Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 11.25 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 11.25 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 11.25

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title III
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH; COMMISSIONS
Chapter 11
LEGISLATIVE ORGANIZATION, PROCEDURES, AND STAFFING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 11.25
11.25 Salaries and expenditures not subject to control of executive agencies.
(1) The Legislature hereby declares and determines that the employees of the several offices, committees, and other divisions of the Legislature are and shall continue to be groups of employees employed by the Legislature to perform such services as may be provided by law, by rule of the respective house, or directed by the joint committee, whichever is applicable. Such offices, committees and divisions are not agencies of government within the intent of the Legislature as expressed in chapters 216 and 287.
(2) Agencies of the executive branch shall have no power to determine the number or fix the compensation of legislative employees or exercise any manner of control over them. The selection of such employees, the determination of their qualifications and compensation, and the establishment of policies relating to their work, including hours of work, leave, and other matters, shall be the sole prerogative of the Legislature.
History.s. 9, ch. 25369, 1949; ss. 1-4, ch. 29659, 1955; ss. 2, 3, ch. 67-371; s. 18, ch. 68-35; s. 25, ch. 69-52; ss. 31, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 4, ch. 77-104; s. 5, ch. 92-279; s. 55, ch. 92-326.

F.S. 11.25 on Google Scholar

F.S. 11.25 on Casetext

Amendments to 11.25


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 11.25
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 11.25.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP., 593 B.R. 217 (Bankr. Del. 2018)

. . . On May 13, 2018, UMB Bank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee ("UMB") for the unsecured 11.25%/12.25% Senior . . .

IN RE A. HIRSCH REALTY, LLC,, 583 B.R. 583 (Bankr. Mass. 2018)

. . . Default interest rate: 11.25% Through a series of loan assignments, the Loan Documents were assigned . . .

A. WEIL, D. v. METAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 305 F. Supp. 3d 948 (S.D. Ind. 2018)

. . . Fulk was being paid $11.25 per hour, so her time-and-a-half rate would be $16.88 per hour. . . .

IN RE D. CULLER,, 584 B.R. 516 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2018)

. . . To the extent that WSFS seeks to augment its pre-petition judgment by adding interest at the 11.25% contract . . . should consist of the pre-petition judgment amount ($49,516.62) enhanced by following sums: interest @ 11.25% . . . The rate stated in the Note is 11.25%. . . . Cohen-Harvin. 2. post-judgment interest Paragraph 21 authorizes WSFS to charge post-judgment interest at the 11.25% . . . Objection in part and deny it in part as follows: judgment entered on March 23, 2017 $49,516.62 interest @ 11.25% . . .

DOE, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,, 258 F. Supp. 3d 1089 (C.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . declarations stating that a substantial part of Plaintiffs portfolio is invested in funds that have earned 11.25% . . .

CLOUD FARM ASSOCIATES LP, v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. ZF AG,, 674 F. App'x 1000 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

. . . body toward said axle to a slower rate of movement of said body toward said axle. ’616 patent col.13 11.25 . . .

SHOEMAKER, v. CONAGRA FOODS, INC., 219 F. Supp. 3d 719 (E.D. Tenn. 2016)

. . . documentation for some of the intervening absences, plaintiffs attendance point total was reduced to 11.25 . . .

AT T CORPORATION, v. AVENTURE COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY, LLC LLC,, 207 F. Supp. 3d 962 (S.D. Iowa 2016)

. . . costs (or average schedule settlements) and demand of all pool members and are targeted to achieve an 11.25 . . .

MURRAY, v. BIRMINGHAM BOARD OF EDUCATION,, 172 F. Supp. 3d 1225 (N.D. Ala. 2016)

. . . During the 2013-14 school year, after the filing of this lawsuit, she received overtime many months: 11.25 . . .

IN RE SABEY,, 553 B.R. 883 (Bankr. D. Utah 2016)

. . . Karleen owned 11.25% of the member interests. David owned 22.5% of the member interests. . . .

ESG CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP, a v. STRATOS, LLP, 828 F.3d 1023 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . With this final transfer, ESG Capital’s payments to Stratos totaled $11.25 million. . . . In addition, ESG Capital pled that it wired $11.25 million to Soumaya Securities in direct reliance on . . .

CHAGANTI, v. K. LEE,, 187 F. Supp. 3d 682 (E.D. Va. 2016)

. . . . § 11.25(d)(2). . . .

IN RE AUTTERSON,, 547 B.R. 372 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2016)

. . . Guaranty Agreement pursuant to which the Debtor guaranteed (in an amount not to exceed $3 million) an $11.25 . . . The Debtor guaranteed (in an amount not to exceed $3 million) an $11.25 million loan to Communicom Corporation . . .

BOKF, N. A. v. CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, UMB N. A. s s s s v., 162 F. Supp. 3d 243 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . certain indentures, dated as of June 10, 2009, governing Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc.’s 11.25% . . .

HITACHI MAXELL, LTD. v. TOP VICTORY ELECTRONICS TAIWAN CO. LTD. TPV l USA Co. TPV Co. TPV TPV Co., 143 F. Supp. 3d 485 (E.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . that is outputted from another element), col.9 11.21-27 (“an input signal to the delay unit”), col.10 11.25 . . .

IN RE ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP., 540 B.R. 96 (Bankr. D. Del. 2015)

. . . (“UMB” or “Indenture Trustee”), as indenture trustee for the unsecured 11.25%/12.25% Senior Toggle Notes . . .

IN RE ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP., 540 B.R. 109 (Bankr. D. Del. 2015)

. . . (“UMB”) is the Indenture Trustee for the unsecured 11.25%/12.25% Senior Toggle Notes Due 2018 (the “PIK . . .

BOKF, N. A. v. CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, UMB N. A. s s s s v., 144 F. Supp. 3d 459 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . certain indentures, dated as of June 10, 2009, governing Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc.’s 11.25% . . .

UNITED STATES v. FORD,, 625 F. App'x 4 (1st Cir. 2015)

. . . Record evidence shows that James F. told agents two important things: first that he grew 11.25-13.5 pounds . . .

B. B. CRAIG, v. J. LEW, U. S., 109 F. Supp. 3d 268 (D.D.C. 2015)

. . . PL’s SGI ¶ 11.25. In addition to Mr. . . .

IN RE ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP. LLC EFIH v. UMB N. A., 531 B.R. 499 (Bankr. D. Del. 2015)

. . . The defendant herein is UMB Bank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee (the "Trustee") for the unsecured 11.25% . . .

AVENTURE COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY, LLC, v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L. P., 224 F. Supp. 3d 706 (S.D. Iowa 2015)

. . . costs (or average schedule settlements) and demand of all pool members and are targeted to achieve an 11.25 . . .

ETHELBERTH, v. CHOICE SECURITY COMPANY, Co., 91 F. Supp. 3d 339 (E.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . 1/2007 through 6/30/2008, $11.35 per hour from 7/1/2008 through 6/30/2009, and then varied between $11.25 . . . Ex. 37 (ranging from $11.25 for 0-6 months of experience to $13.25 for more than 24 months of experience . . .

CONTENDER FARMS, L. L. P. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,, 779 F.3d 258 (5th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 11.25(c). . . . Id. at § 11.25(e). . . . Id. at § 11.25(e). . . . Id. at § 11.25(e). . . . Id. at § 11.25(f). . . .

QWEST COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, v. AVENTURE COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY, LLC LLC, LLC LLC, 86 F. Supp. 3d 933 (S.D. Iowa 2015)

. . . costs (or average schedule settlements) and demand of all pool members and are targeted to achieve an 11.25 . . .

IN RE FLORES, v., 524 B.R. 420 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2015)

. . . Id. at ¶¶ 11.25-26. . Id. at ¶¶ 11.27-28. . Id. at ¶¶ 11.27-30. . Id. al ¶ II.31. . . . .

In POSITIVE HEALTH MANAGEMENT, W. v., 769 F.3d 899 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . nature of Recile’s enterprise meant that it lacked the resources to pay anything close to the land’s $11.25 . . .

In POSITIVE HEALTH MANAGEMENT, W. v., 769 F.3d 899 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . nature of Recile’s enterprise meant that it lacked the resources to pay anything close to the land’s $11.25 . . .

OGBUEHI, v. COMCAST OF CALIFORNIA COLORADO FLORIDA OREGON, INC., 303 F.R.D. 337 (E.D. Cal. 2014)

. . . Jan. 10, 2011) (citing New-berg, supra, § 11.25). . . .

BECKWORTH, Co. Co. Co. v. O. BIZIER Co., 48 F. Supp. 3d 186 (D. Conn. 2014)

. . . Shareholder Agreement, executed on the same date, Marcel Bizier owns 75% of DTC, Glenn Beckworth owns 11.25% . . . , Willis Beckworth owns 11.25%, and Vicky Juneau owns 2.5%; additionally, Glenn Beckworth owns 20% of . . .

K. K. a L. K. T. G. v. PITTSBURGH PUBLIC SCHOOLS K. K., 590 F. App'x 148 (3d Cir. 2014)

. . . pursuant to which "the student may be counted for attendance purposes as if in school.” 22 Pa.Code § 11.25 . . . Id. § 11.25(a), (c). . . . .

SORENSON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, 765 F.3d 37 (D.C. Cir. 2014)

. . . included, for example, directly attributable overhead, labor costs, executive compensation, and an 11.25% . . . Sorenson advances two specific reasons for deeming the 11.25% rate of return unreasonable: (1) when spread . . . In contrast, if Sorenson is correct that the 11.25% rate of return is too low to attract the capital . . . or any other provider actually has had trouble raising the necessary capital under the long-standing 11.25% . . . Therefore, we defer to the Commission’s judgment that its longstanding 11.25% rate of return provides . . .

CITIZENS OF STATE v. FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,, 146 So. 3d 1143 (Fla. 2014)

. . . in Unfair and Unreasonable Rates Citizens argues that FPL’s original request for a ROE midpoint of 11.25% . . . Also notable is that FPL requested a midpoint ROE of 11.25%, negotiated a 10.7% midpoint, and ultimately . . . had authorized ROEs higher than 10.7%, including a Florida investor-owned utility earning a ROE of 11.25% . . .

NEN THIO, v. GENJI, LLC,, 14 F. Supp. 3d 1324 (N.D. Cal. 2014)

. . . During his tenure as a Sushi Chef, Thio was paid an hourly wage ranging between $11.25 and $12.75 per . . .

IN RE ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP. CSC v. LLC EFIH, 513 B.R. 651 (Bankr. D. Del. 2014)

. . . PIK Noteholders” is a term often used within this bankruptcy case, which refers to the holders of the 11.25% . . .

H- W TECHNOLOGY, L. C. v. OVERSTOCK. COM, INC., 758 F.3d 1329 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

. . . The claims, for example, reference “said user’s contact and payment information.” '955 patent col.28 11.25 . . .

LIZONDRO- GARCIA, v. KEFI LLC,, 300 F.R.D. 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . Newberg & Alba Conte, Newberg on Class Actions § 11.25 (4th ed. 2002) (internal quotation omitted); accord . . . Newberg & Alba Conte, Newberg on Class Actions (‘‘Newberg ”) § 11.25 (4th ed. 2002)). . . . Ass’n, 627 F.2d 631, 634 (2d Cir.1980); see Newberg § 11.25 (“If the preliminary evaluation of the proposed . . .

HAGGART, a v. UNITED STATES,, 116 Fed. Cl. 131 (Fed. Cl. 2014)

. . . between milepost 5.0 at Kennydale and milepost 10.6 at Wilburton; and the third runs from milepost 11.25 . . .

BROWN, v. W. COLVIN,, 16 F. Supp. 3d 1051 (D. Neb. 2014)

. . . .) ($6,481.59 awarded based on 31.1 hours of attorney time, 24.92 hours of paralegal time, and 11.25 . . . The 24.92 hours of paralegal time (at $25 and $15 per hour) and 11.25 hours of law clerk time (at $20 . . .

ELCOMMERCE. COM, INC. v. SAP AG SAP, 745 F.3d 490 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

. . . managers (CMs), vendors, distributors and an original equipment manufacturer (OEM).” '903 patent, col.3, 11.25 . . .

WONDERLAND NURSERYGOODS CO. LTD. v. THORLEY INDUSTRIES, LLC, d b a, 988 F. Supp. 2d 479 (W.D. Pa. 2013)

. . . See Nordella col. 3 11.25-31, (Docket No. 111-2 at 8). . . .

BRYANT L. Jr. v. SOUTHLAND TUBE,, 294 F.R.D. 633 (N.D. Ala. 2013)

. . . an annual raise to $10.71 per hour on May 22, 2006, and another annual raise the following year to $11.25 . . . to $16.00 per hour; (3) Packaging Line Operator, $12.80 to $17.50 per hour; (4) Change Over Person, $11.25 . . .

INTEX RECREATION CORPORATION, v. TEAM WORLDWIDE CORPORATION,, 42 F. Supp. 3d 80 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . However, it is understood that the fan and motor can be housed together to operate. ’469 Patent col.6 11.25 . . . History at TWW00020910 (reciting former claims); ’469 Patent col.6 11.25-49 (describing eighth embodiment . . .

A. RIZZO, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA,, 969 F. Supp. 2d 1180 (C.D. Cal. 2013)

. . . (Id. 11.25.) . . .

UNITED STATES v. COLE, v., 721 F.3d 1016 (8th Cir. 2013)

. . . calculated Cole’s advisory Guideline range to be 135 to 168 months imprisonment — in other words, between 11.25 . . .

TARAZI v. TRUEHOPE INC. LLC,, 958 F. Supp. 2d 428 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . Reg. 124/2010, § 11.25 (allowing service of commencing document outside of Canada only if “a real and . . .

UNITED STATES v. BERNAL, a. k. a., 518 F. App'x 800 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . Finally, Bernal’s 135-month sentence (equivalent to 11.25 years) was substantially below the statutory . . .

CLEMENT, v. UNITED HOMES, LLC, LLC, LLC, LLC,, 914 F. Supp. 2d 362 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . The mortgage was for $491,200 with an adjustable interest rate up to 11.25%. . . .

HAGGART, As a v. UNITED STATES,, 108 Fed. Cl. 70 (Fed. Cl. 2012)

. . . between milepost 5.0 at Ken-nydale and milepost 10.6 at Wilburton; and the third runs from milepost 11.25 . . . Transportation Board (“STB”) a petition for exemption to abandon the portion of the line extending from milepost 11.25 . . .

TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING, INC. v. MAERSK DRILLING USA, INC., 699 F.3d 1340 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . Id. col.9 11.25-30. . . .

VOUGHT, E. a v. BANK OF AMERICA, N. A. BAC LP,, 901 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (C.D. Ill. 2012)

. . . credit class member’s uncredited payments is between $5,625 million (75% chance at $7.5 million) and $11.25 . . .

REALTIME DATA, LLC d b a IXO, v. STANLEY, LLC d b a IXO, v. CME LLC d b a IXO, v., 897 F. Supp. 2d 146 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . (See '568 Patent col.5 11.25-32) The claims of the '568 Patent relate generally to methods for compressing . . .

SANTARUS, INC. v. PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., 694 F.3d 1344 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . prophylaxis, [citing references],” was known to have occasional adverse effects. '737 patent, col.3 11.14-15, 11.25 . . .

In APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., 692 F.3d 1289 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . 855 Patent col.l 11.10-14; '847 Patent col.l 11.22-26; '115 Patent col.l 11.23-27; '455 Patent col.l 11.25 . . .

ACTIVEVIDEO NETWORKS, INC. v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 694 F.3d 1312 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . J.A. 215 (emphasis added); '578 patent col.5 11.28-34; '678 patent col.5 11.25-31; '883 patent col.5 . . .

CHAMPIONSWORLD, LLC, v. UNITED STATES SOCCER FEDERATION, INC. LLC, 890 F. Supp. 2d 912 (N.D. Ill. 2012)

. . . foreign club team; • 9% of the gross gate receipts for matches involving two foreign club teams; • 11.25% . . .

KINETIC CONCEPTS, INC. KCI KCI USA, KCI KCI v. SMITH NEPHEW, INC., 688 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . Id. at col.l 11.25-28. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CLARKE,, 491 F. App'x 725 (6th Cir. 2012)

. . . and Total Offense Level, the Sentencing Guidelines recommend a range of 108 to 135 months (9 years to 11.25 . . .

TOSHIBA CORPORATION, v. IMATION CORP. CMC, 681 F.3d 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . identifier 2 represents whether the disc is a double-sided disc or a single-sided disc.” '966 patent col.6 11.25 . . . side identifier indicates which side of a double-sided disc is being reproduced. '966 patent col.6 11.25 . . .

R. DICKSON, v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION,, 480 F. App'x 263 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 11.25(a) (2007). . . .

DAVIS, v. DUNN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., 872 F. Supp. 2d 1291 (N.D. Ala. 2012)

. . . Defendant’s records demonstrate that in 2008, Plaintiffs pay rate of $11.00 per hour was increased to $11.25 . . . from his position with Defendant, and on the next day, began working for Wiregrass Construction at $11.25 . . .

NOAH SYSTEMS, INC. v. INTUIT INC., 675 F.3d 1302 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . Id. at col.12 11.25-41 (emphasis added). . . .

FOX, v. COMMONWEALTH WORLDWIDE CHAUFFEURED TRANSPORTATION OF NY, LLC, D S LLC,, 865 F. Supp. 2d 257 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . His hourly rate increased to $11.25 when he worked overtime. (2nd Rutter Aff. ¶ 13; Fox Aff. ¶ 12.) . . . infra) would receive $22,50 ($7.50 x 3) plus the service charge for a three hour trip, and $33.75 ($11.25 . . .

ERGO LICENSING, LLC v. CAREFUSION INC., 673 F.3d 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . At col.3 11.25-28 the specification further elaborates the operation of the control: When the manual . . . states that “[a] multichannel metering system of this type” was known in the prior art, and at col.l 11.25 . . . predetermined group of fluid flow sources is possible by means of the selector switches.” '412 patent, col.2 11.25 . . .

JONES, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO., 845 F. Supp. 2d 1016 (N.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . Defendants also contend that a number of other specific entries, totaling 11.25 hours, should be stricken . . .

POWELL v. BANK OF AMERICA, N. A. d b a f k a A. BAC LP N. A., 842 F. Supp. 2d 966 (S.D.W. Va. 2012)

. . . modification capitalized a claimed past due amount of $10,419.06, and reduced the interest rate from 12.25% to 11.25% . . .

BURDEN, v. SELECTQUOTE INSURANCE SERVICES, a, 848 F. Supp. 2d 1075 (N.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . Burden concedes that his compensation under the 2005 Plan was effectively $10.13 per hour for 2006 and $11.25 . . .

FOX, v. L. RYAN Of, 462 F. App'x 730 (9th Cir. 2011)

. . . post-conviction court vacated Fox’s sentence of 15.75 years for trafficking in stolen property and 11.25 . . . second” guilty plea and resentenced Fox on the original convictions so that the 15.75 year term and the 11.25 . . .

WARREN, v. COUNTY COMMISSION OF LAWRENCE COUNTY, ALABAMA,, 826 F. Supp. 2d 1299 (N.D. Ala. 2011)

. . . Warren’s current position, earning $11.25 per hour, is the most “[s]he could expect to earn from h[er . . . Warren's computation for lost wages properly offsets her current earnings of $11.25 per hour, as well . . .

LITWIN, v. OCEANFREIGHT, INC., 865 F. Supp. 2d 385 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . DryShips would acquire Kandylidis’s approximately 50.5% stake at a price per OceanFreight share equal to $11.25 . . .

SORENSON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION T- USA,, 659 F.3d 1035 (10th Cir. 2011)

. . . example, labor costs, directly attributable overhead, startup expenses, executive compensation, and an 11.25% . . .

IGT, v. BALLY GAMING INTERNATIONAL, INC., 659 F.3d 1109 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . Id. col.7 11.25-31. The floor controllers interface with file servers 32-36. . . .

In J K FARMS, INC. d b a MS LLC, v. J K d b a MS, 458 B.R. 636 (Bankr. D.D.C. 2011)

. . . Disallowed 3/10/10 $585.00 6/24/10 32,50 3/11/10 236.25 6/30/10 2.32 3/15/10 33.75 7/14/10 32.50 3/23/10 11.25 . . . 146.25 7/5/10 101.25 3/12/10 $ 97.50 7/6/10 78.75 3/17/10 32.50 7/14/10 $ 90.00 3/31/10 $13.76* 7/19/10 11.25 . . . 22,50 5/7/10 22.50 10/11/10 32.50 5/10/10 101.25 10/31/10 6.75* 5/12/10 22.50 11/19/10 65.00 5/13/10 11.25 . . . 11/22/10 11.25 5/14/10 11.25 11/22/10 32.50 5/6/10 227.50 11/30/10 7.62* 5/19/10 33.75 12/9/10 22.50 . . . 5/14/10 32.50 12/13/10 32.50 5/27/10 11.53* 12/31/10 10.32* 6/4/10 56.25 1/13/10 23.50 6/7/10 11.25 . . .

MARINE POLYMER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. HEMCON, INC., 659 F.3d 1084 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . See id. col.43 11.54-60, col.44 11.25-56, & col.45 11.41-43. . . .

MARKEM- IMAJE CORPORATION, v. ZIPHER LTD., 657 F.3d 1279 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . Col.20 11.25-28. . . .

HARARI, D. v. LEE D. v., 656 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . Mihnea patent col.8 11.25-50. . . .

GENETICS INSTITUTE, LLC, v. NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS, INC., 655 F.3d 1291 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . ability to bind vWF, e.g., 447 patent col.2 11.29-31, col.8 11.19-22; '620 patent col.2 11.30-32, col.8 11.25 . . .

In NTP, INC., 654 F.3d 1279 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . address of the at least one RF receiver to receive the originated information”); '670 patent col.53 11.25 . . . system for transmitting information from one of a plurality of originating processors.”); id. col.20 11.25 . . .

In NTP, INC., 654 F.3d 1268 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . Id. col.17 11.25-32. . . . transmits electronic mail from an originating processor to a destination processor. '592 patent, col.17 11.25 . . .

STAMPS. COM INC. v. ENDICIA, INC. PSI, 437 F. App'x 897 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . by said first system from said second system to said refreshable memory device. '991 patent, col.34 11.25 . . . See id. col.34 11.25-31. . . .

FOX GROUP, INC. v. CREE, INC., 819 F. Supp. 2d 490 (E.D. Va. 2011)

. . . See id. 11.25-26 (describing “said axial region [as] having a second density of defects”); id. 11.28- . . .

TESSERA, INC. v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, USA U. S. A., 646 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . times, even uses the term “solder mask” interchangeably with “protective barrier.” '106 patent at eol.2 11.25 . . .

WELLMAN, INC. v. EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY,, 642 F.3d 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . crystallization relative to conventional PET resins. '317 patent col.3 11.15-25; '863 patent col.3 11.25 . . . which use the metallic element antimony as a catalyst. '317 patent col.3 11.16-20; '863 patent col.3 11.25 . . .

BILLUPS- ROTHENBERG, INC. v. ASSOCIATED REGIONAL AND UNIVERSITY PATHOLOGISTS, INC. ARUP, 642 F.3d 1031 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . disclosure with the observation that the mutation “may only be a polymorphic variant.” '130 patent eol.19 11.25 . . .

AMERICAN PILEDRIVING EQUIPMENT, INC. v. GEOQUIP, INC. v., 637 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . See '964 Patent Abstract; col.5 11.25-27. . . .

HOLOGIC, INC. L. P. v. SENORX, INC., 639 F.3d 1329 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . .”); id. col.6 11.25-29 (“[T]his device specifically alters the isodose profile for applications where . . .

A. LINTON A. v. UNITED STATES, 630 F.3d 1211 (9th Cir. 2011)

. . . William or Stacy to each trust): signed by William or Stacy as assignor and by James as trustee, gifting 11.25 . . . the gift documents stating that each taxpayer “hereby gifts to the [relevant] Trust ... a total of 11.25 . . .

In BEAR STEARNS COMPANIES, INC. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE, AND ERISA LITIGATION. To, 763 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . . ¶ 416), though it rebounded over the following weeks to $11.25 and was ultimately acquired by JPMorgan . . .

CHAVEZ, U. S. C. A. a C. v. CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE,, 630 F.3d 1300 (10th Cir. 2011)

. . . the total hours worked ($55.00/44 = $1.25) and add that to the straight time rate ($1.25 + $10.00 = $11.25 . . . dividing the sum by hours worked. ($10.00X40) = $400.00, $400.00 + $55.00 = $455.00. $455.00/44 = $11.25 . . .

AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC., 629 F.3d 1311 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . string contains the object’s original URL. '645 patent col.8 11.24-25; id. eol.8 11.56-57; id. col.9 11.25 . . . establish an alternative domain name system (DNS)”); '413 patent col.18 11.22-23, eol.19 11.44-45, col.20 11.25 . . .

ALDRIDGE, Jr. O v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, 404 F. App'x 29 (6th Cir. 2010)

. . . Of all the Department’s employees over age 40, 11.25% were impacted by the decision to abolish the rank . . .

RESEARCH CORPORATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION,, 627 F.3d 859 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . The principal frequency, fE, varies from one gray level g to another: Id. col.6 11.25-38. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CEPERO,, 406 F. App'x 504 (2d Cir. 2010)

. . . judge would surely be aware that the sentencing minimum applicable to § 841(b)(1)(A) is 10 years, not 11.25 . . .

LUCKY LITTER LLC, s v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,, 403 F. App'x 490 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . Id. col.3 11.25— 27. The motor is connected to the shaft through a gear train. Id. col.3 11.31-35. . . .

AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. v. BIOLITEC, INC., 618 F.3d 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . .”); id. col. 15 11.25-55 (comparing the 1064 nm wavelength used in the prior art to the 532 nm wavelength . . .

TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING, INC. v. MAERSK CONTRACTORS USA, INC., 617 F.3d 1296 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . See id. col.9 11.25-30. . . .

RING PLUS, INC. v. CINGULAR WIRELESS CORP. II LLC, LLC, AT T, 614 F.3d 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . Sleevi both propose hardware based systems, but no software to operate those systems.” '608 patent col.3 11.25 . . .

PARADOX SECURITY SYSTEMS, LTD. v. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC., 388 F. App'x 976 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . to substantially saturate said gated line switch and seize said telephone line. '406 patent, col. 4, 11.25 . . .

MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a v. UNITED STATES, 722 F. Supp. 2d 1293 (S.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . -12 structures, which must be maintained to prevent catastrophic failure and loss of human life, is 11.25 . . . Moreover, the Corps now disagrees that 11.25 feet is an appropriate engineering cap because it fails . . . This structural analysis, completed in 2001, chronologically superseded the 11.25 engineering cap in . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR, v. SHANKMAN,, 41 So. 3d 166 (Fla. 2010)

. . . Under this agreement, Shankman’s share of the fees increased to approximately 11.25 percent of the client . . .