The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title III
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH; COMMISSIONS

Chapter 11
LEGISLATIVE ORGANIZATION, PROCEDURES, AND STAFFING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 11.47

11.47 Penalties; failure to make a proper audit or examination; making a false report; failure to produce documents or information.—

(1) All officers whose respective offices the Auditor General or the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability is authorized to audit or examine shall enter into their public records sufficient information for proper audit or examination, and shall make the same available to the Auditor General or the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability on demand.

(2) The willful failure or refusal of the Auditor General, director of the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability, or any staff employed by the Auditor General or the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability to make a proper audit or examination in line with his or her duty, the willful making of a false report as to any audit or examination, or the willful failure or refusal to report a shortage or misappropriation of funds or property shall be cause for removal from such office or employment, and the Auditor General, the director of the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability, or a staff member shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

(3) Any person who willfully fails or refuses to provide access to an employee, officer, or agent of an entity subject to an audit or to furnish or produce any book, record, paper, document, data, or sufficient information necessary to a proper audit or examination which the Auditor General or the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability is by law authorized to perform commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

(4) Any officer who willfully fails or refuses to furnish or produce any book, record, paper, document, data, or sufficient information necessary to a proper audit or examination which the Auditor General or the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability is by law authorized to perform, shall be subject to removal from office.

History.—s. 7, ch. 69-82; s. 9, ch. 71-136; s. 22, ch. 95-147; s. 27, ch. 96-318; s. 16, ch. 2001-266; s. 3, ch. 2019-15.

F.S. 11.47 on Google Scholar

F.S. 11.47 on Casetext

Amendments to 11.47

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 11.47

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S11.47 2 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FAIL REFUSE TO MAKE PROPER AUDIT - M: F

S11.47 3 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FAIL TO FURNISH INFO TO AUD GENERAL OR OPPAGA - M: F

S11.47 3 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FAIL PROV ACCESS AGNT EMP OFC ENT SUB TO AUDIT - M: F

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

DANESHVAR, v. KIPKE, 266 F. Supp. 3d 1031 (E.D. Mich. 2017)

. . . ECF 135-1,- col.6 11.47-49. . . .

CHAI, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 851 F.3d 190 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . On his 2003 tax return, Chai reported an overall loss of $11.47 million and income tax of $0. . . .

In MATTER OF COMPLAINT OF INGRAM BARGE COMPANY M V A. In LLC, M V, 219 F. Supp. 3d 749 (N.D. Ill. 2016)

. . . April 17 Morris hydrograph—as depicted below—indicated “that the river was going to rise on up from 11.47 . . .

IN RE BODY SCIENCE LLC PATENT LITIGATION, 167 F. Supp. 3d 152 (D. Mass. 2016)

. . . hospitals, or in the examination of patients.” (’238 Patent, coll.l 11.15-17; see also, e.g., id. at coll.6 11.47 . . .

HITACHI MAXELL, LTD. v. TOP VICTORY ELECTRONICS TAIWAN CO. LTD. TPV l USA Co. TPV Co. TPV TPV Co., 143 F. Supp. 3d 485 (E.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . Id. at col.6 11.20-21, col.16 11.47-48, col.20 11.40 — 41, col.22 11.64-65. . . . convert the digital video signal to an analog video signal for display. ‘197 Patent col.3 11.20-30, col.3 11.47 . . .

SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE ELECTROMEDICINA Y CALIDAD, S. A. v. BLUE RIDGE X- RAY COMPANY, INC. USA,, 621 F. App'x 644 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

. . . Id. at col.4 11.47-49. . . .

HOWLINK GLOBAL LLC, v. NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP., 561 F. App'x 898 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

. . . announcement for request to accept the collect call is outputted to the called terminal.” '744 Patent col.8 11.47 . . .

INTEX RECREATION CORPORATION, v. TEAM WORLDWIDE CORPORATION,, 42 F. Supp. 3d 80 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . Wang uses the term “housing” as synonymous with "chamber”. '469 Patent col.6 1.66 - col.6 11.47-65. . . . .

CLASSEN IMMUNOTHERAPIES, INC. v. BIOGEN IDEC,, 968 F. Supp. 2d 660 (D. Md. 2013)

. . . The findings are highly statistically significant.” '139 patent, col. 42, 11.47-50 (emphasis added). . . .

In OIL SPILL OIL RIG DEEPWATER HORIZON To No. v. BP, 295 F.R.D. 112 (E.D. La. 2013)

. . . Barry, 752 F.Supp. 1087, 1092-93 (D.D.C.1990) (citing 2 Newberg on Class Actions § 11.47 (2d ed.), at . . .

In Re OIL SPILL BY THE OIL RIG DEEPWATER HORIZON IN GULF OF MEXICO, ON APRIL, 910 F. Supp. 2d 891 (E.D. La. 2012)

. . . Newberg, Newberg on Class Actions § 11.47, at 463 (2d ed.)); Cotton, 559 F.2d at 1331 (“In assessing . . .

In BORGMAN, a k a E. a k a a k a E. a k a R. E. B. v. In a k a a k a W. a k a V. a k a a k a V. W. a k a a k a Ra a k a R. a k a E. Ra a k a E. R. B. v., 698 F.3d 1255 (10th Cir. 2012)

. . . See id. 11.47-54. These credits are subtracted from the tax, but can only reduce the tax to zero. . . .

In BORGMAN, a k a E. a k a a k a E. a k a R. E. B. v. In a k a a k a W. a k a V. a k a a k a V. W. a k a a k a Ra a k a R. a k a E. Ra a k a E. R. B. v., 698 F.3d 1255 (10th Cir. 2012)

. . . See id. 11.47-54. These credits are subtracted from the tax, but can only reduce the tax to zero. . . .

In ABBOTT DIABETES CARE INC., 696 F.3d 1142 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . in a sample via electrochemical oxidation and reduction reactions on the sensor.” '752 patent col.5 11.47 . . .

CLS BANK INTERNATIONAL, CLS v. ALICE CORPORATION PTY. LTD., 685 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . Id. col.5 11.47-50. . . .

WALKER DIGITAL, LLC, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 484 F. App'x 496 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . by pressing a toolbar icon, selecting a menu item, or entering keyboard commands. '295 patent col.4 11.47 . . . simultaneously returning control of the application program to the user. '295 patent col.7 11.37-40; id. col.8 11.47 . . .

CHICAGO BOARD OPTIONS EXCHANGE, INC. v. INTERNATIONAL SECURITIES EXCHANGE, LLC,, 677 F.3d 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . Id. eol.4 11.47-51. . . .

NOAH SYSTEMS, INC. v. INTUIT INC., 675 F.3d 1302 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . entering, deleting, reviewing, adjusting and processing data inputs in the master ledger____” Id. at col.4 11.47 . . . authorized users of the first entity, such as the controller or bookkeeper of a business. '435 patent col.6 11.47 . . . process data inputs within the master ledger unless the passcode is verified. '435 patent Fig. 1, col.4 11.47 . . . of the specification only describe how passcodes are issued to authorized agents, '435 patent col.4 11.47 . . .

YOON JA KIM, v. EARTHGRAINS COMPANY, 451 F. App'x 922 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . juice, fruit juice concentrate, vinegar, wine, and mixtures thereof, and (c) flour. '355 patent, col.8 11.47 . . .

In NTP, INC., 654 F.3d 1279 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . See, e.g., '611 patent col.47 11.47-48 (claiming “[a] system for transmitting originated information” . . .

FOX GROUP, INC. v. CREE, INC., 819 F. Supp. 2d 490 (E.D. Va. 2011)

. . . the “axial growth zone” is the space in the crucible where the SiC material is grown, see id. col.5 11.47 . . . approximately 10 millimeters thick with diameters ranging between 20 and 75 millimeters.” '130 patent col.7 11.47 . . . Id. 11.47-49 (emphasis added). . . .

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION v. JOHNSON JOHNSON, 647 F.3d 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . Id. eol.5 11.47-51. . . .

SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC. v. SAINT- GOBAIN CERAMICS PLASTICS, INC., 647 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . See '420 patent, col. 7 11.39GÍ3, col. 7 11.47-col. 8 11.2. . . .

LEXION MEDICAL, LLC, v. NORTHGATE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 641 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . Id. at col.9 11.47-55. . . .

REMBRANDT DATA TECHNOLOGIES, LP, v. AOL, LLC, LLC, DIRECTV, U. S. A., 641 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . separating the bits of each frame into a first group and a second group of bits.” '236 patent, col.5 11.47 . . . Id. at col.5 11.47-50. In Figure 1, buffer 16 performs the combining operation. . . .

INNOVENTION TOYS, LLC, v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC. R Us,, 637 F.3d 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

. . . Patent 3,516,671 lacks “the unique elements and rules of the ['242 patent’s] invention,” id. col.l 11.47 . . . Swift col.2 11.47-51. . . .

LUCKY LITTER LLC, s v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,, 403 F. App'x 490 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . litter can be made responsive to entry and exit of the cat from the litter box.” '847 patent col.l 11.47 . . .

COMPUTER CACHE COHERENCY CORPORATION, v. INTEL CORPORATION, v. USA, 395 F. App'x 696 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . Id. col.9 11.47-57. . . .

LARYNGEAL MASK COMPANY LTD. LMA v. AMBU A S,, 618 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . Id. col.l 11.47-54. . . . leading end of the LMA-device during the course of the procedure for its insertion.” '100 patent col.l 11.47 . . . Rather, it describes a reinforcement incorporated into the distal end of the cuff. '100 patent col.l 11.47 . . .

PRINCO CORPORATION v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, U. S., 616 F.3d 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . See, e.g., Lagadec patent col.6 11.47-52, col.7 11.54-58 (discussing band-limitation to eliminate disturbance . . .

A. HECHT, L. P. v. MALVERN PREPARATORY SCHOOL,, 716 F. Supp. 2d 395 (E.D. Pa. 2010)

. . . No. 1 11.47.) . . .

ANASCAPE, LTD. v. NINTENDO OF AMERICA, INC., 601 F.3d 1333 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . Id. col.7 11.47-49 (“A 6DOF trackball-type embodiment is illustrated in FIGS. 1-10, and 6DOF joystick . . . Id. col.7 11.47-49. . . .

PREGIS CORPORATION, v. J. DOLL,, 698 F. Supp. 2d 584 (E.D. Va. 2010)

. . . Perkins '397 Patent col. 12 11.47-51 (emphasis added). . . .

COMAPER CORPORATION, v. ANTEC, INC. Co., 596 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . See '955 patent col.5 11.47-54. . . . See '955 patent col.5 11.47-51. . . .

MARTEK BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION, v. NUTRINOVA, INC. GMBH,, 579 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . and industrial products.” '594 Patent col.l 11.25-30; '281 Patent col.l 11.38-43; '567 Patent col.l 11.47 . . .

CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY, v. ACUSHNET COMPANY,, 576 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . Proudfit col.6 11.19-27; id. col.12 11.47-52. . . .

BOSS INDUSTRIES, INC. v. YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U. S. A. INC., 333 F. App'x 531 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . which is placed on top of the base section. '317 patent col.2 11.27-30; see, e.g., '630 patent col.3 11.47 . . . ; '317 patent col.4 11.5-7; col.7 11.1-3, and “provide[s] strength and rigidity,” '630 patent col.3 11.47 . . .

LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, v., 566 F.3d 1049 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . Id. col.2 11.47-49. . . .

PRINCO CORPORATION v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, U. S., 563 F.3d 1301 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . E.g. '565 Patent col.6 11.47-52; id. col.7 11.54-58 (discussing band-limitation to eliminate disturbance . . .

KINETIC CONCEPTS, INC. KCI KCI USA, v. BLUE SKY MEDICAL GROUP, INC. S. AG, 554 F.3d 1010 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . hese examples are provided for illustrative purposes only and are not to be taken as limiting,” col.5 11.47 . . . specification of the '643 patent provides several examples of selected stages of healing. '643 patent col.12 11.47 . . .

In W. COMISKEY, 554 F.3d 967 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . . can support the arbitration process by providing an arbiter for each dispute.” '207 patent col.30 11.47 . . .

RICOH COMPANY, LTD. v. QUANTA COMPUTER INC. USA, NU, 550 F.3d 1325 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . Id. at col.l 11.47-52. . . .

WELKER BEARING COMPANY, v. PHD, INCORPORATED,, 550 F.3d 1090 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . .”); id. at col.6 11.47-50 (“Referring to FIG. 2B, a pair of cams 90 and corresponding cam followers . . .

PAPYRUS TECHNOLOGY CORP. v. NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC., 581 F. Supp. 2d 502 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . For example, Papyrus argues that “data packet” refers to (a) an execution report, '002 Patent col. 17 11.47 . . .

In J. SWANSON E., 540 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . Id. col.8 11.47-54. . . . Tom col.3 11.1-5, 11.47-49. . . .

LEGGETT PLATT, INCORPORATED L P v. VUTEk, INC., 537 F.3d 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . Id. at col.5 11.47-57. . . . ink would be exposed to more energy than is even required to fully cure the ink. '823 patent col.5 11.47 . . . See '823 patent col.5 11.47-57. . . .

REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, v. DAKOCYTOMATION CALIFORNIA, INC. v. A S,, 517 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . Id. col.4 11.47-52. . . . Id. col.4 11.47-48. . . .

H. SITRICK, v. DREAMWORKS, LLC, HM, 516 F.3d 993 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . Id. at col.22 11.47-54 (emphasis added). . . .

In OPENWAVE SYSTEMS SECURITIES LITIGATION., 528 F. Supp. 2d 236 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . the SEC was investigating Openwave’s stock option grant practices, and that the drop in price from $11.47 . . .

SPARTON TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. UTIL- LINK, LLC,, 248 F. App'x 684 (6th Cir. 2007)

. . . 24 S.W.3d 267, 272 (Tenn.2000)); see also 21 Tennessee Practice Series Contract Law and Practice § 11.47 . . .

In W. COMISKEY, 499 F.3d 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

. . . . can support the arbitration process by providing an arbiter for each dispute.” '207 patent col.30 11.47 . . .

FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. H. a s, v. IVAX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 501 F.3d 1263 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

. . . Id. at col.5 11.47-48. . . . Id. at col.5 11.47-59. . . .

In TRANS TEXAS HOLDINGS CORP., 498 F.3d 1290 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

. . . Id. col.28 11.47-59. . . .

AUTOMED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. MICROFIL, LLC, 244 F. App'x 354 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

. . . '927 patent col.8 11.1-2 (drive unit vibration); id. col.10, 11.58-62 (vial transport); id. col.ll, 11.47 . . .

PODS, INC. v. PORTA STOR, INC. E., 484 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

. . . Id. col.10 11.47-48. . . .

BROOKS, L. L. L. L. v. AIG SUNAMERICA LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY,, 480 F.3d 579 (1st Cir. 2007)

. . . 2001, however, the policy capped the monthly COI rate that Mutual could deduct at $9.42, $10.42, and $11.47 . . . for 1999, 2000, and 2001 were $6.52, $7.12, and $7.95, well below the policy caps $9.47, $10.42, and $11.47 . . . Section II.B thus pertains to how SunAmerica arrived at the cap COI rates of $9.47, $10.42, and $11.47 . . . Appellants do not allege that Sun-America miscalculated the maximum COI rates of $9.47, $10.42, and $11.47 . . .

PALMTOP PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. LO- Q PLC,, 450 F. Supp. 2d 1344 (N.D. Ga. 2006)

. . . interface and to the request generation module, for storing information describing the patron____” (eol.25, 11.47 . . . (col.2, 11.47-49.) . . .

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. HONEYWELL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, INC. v. ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. ITT AUTOMOTIVE, INC. TG TG USA A., 452 F.3d 1312 (Fed. Cir. 2006)

. . . Id., col.3 11.47-51. . . .

BEST, v. BELLEVUE HOSPITAL NEW YORK, NY F. St. s,, 115 F. App'x 459 (2d Cir. 2004)

. . . Vincent’s held him for longer than five days, as authorized by New York City Health Code § 11.47, the . . .

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. v. HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION, 370 F.3d 1131 (Fed. Cir. 2004)

. . . parameter” that represents airflow out of the compressor as determined by a sensor. '893 patent, col. 2, 11.47 . . .

UNITED STATES v. FRANCIS, v. v. v., 367 F.3d 805 (8th Cir. 2004)

. . . During the consensual search of Hargrove’s vehicle, an officer discovered 11.47 kilograms of cocaine . . .

WINN INCORPORATED, a v. EATON CORPORATION,, 272 F. Supp. 2d 968 (C.D. Cal. 2003)

. . . (Id. at Col. 5, 11.47-49). . . .

In AMERICAN HOMEPATIENT, INC., 298 B.R. 152 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 2003)

. . . 8.25 1.25 8.75 3.75 3.75 8.25 1.25 8.75 3.75 1.58 2001 1.02 1.69 4.75 6.25 8.52 3.67 2.7 1.22 2.87 11.47 . . .

STROUGO, THE BRAZILIAN EQUITY FUND, INC. v. BASSINI, Dr. R. J. A. W. M. BEA v. BEA, 258 F. Supp. 2d 254 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . Newberg, Newberg on Class Actions § 11.47, at 463 (2d ed.1985)). . . .

F. MINTON, v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC., 197 F. Supp. 2d 699 (E.D. Tex. 2001)

. . . individuals can buy and sell directly from each other, with only minimum involvement from a broker” (e. 2, 11.47 . . .

CONTROL RESOURCES, INC. v. DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. LSI, 133 F. Supp. 2d 121 (D. Mass. 2001)

. . . difference in temperature from the surrounding air to the semiconductor junction.” '669 patent, col.4, 11.47 . . .

MAYTAG CORPORATION, v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION,, 95 F. Supp. 2d 888 (N.D. Ill. 2000)

. . . as will next be shown, it is likewise at war with the portion of Whirlpool's specification (col.5, 11.47 . . .

PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES, INC. a v. TERRI WELLES, INC. a PIPPI, a, 78 F. Supp. 2d 1066 (S.D. Cal. 1999)

. . . See id. at § 11.47, at 85-86. . . .

LaSALLE TALMAN BANK, F. S. B. v. UNITED STATES,, 45 Fed. Cl. 64 (Fed. Cl. 1999)

. . . These warrants, which could be exercised at a price of $11.47, effectively placed a ceiling on Talman . . .

DUHAIME W. M. A. On v. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 177 F.R.D. 54 (D. Mass. 1997)

. . . Newberg, Newberg on Class Actions § 11.47 at 463 (2d ed.1985). . . .

In RECONVERSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. In RECONVERSION TECHNOLOGIES,, 216 B.R. 46 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1997)

. . . amount of $81.45, which may be broken down as follows: The Copy Shop (Hand Placement of Originals) $11.47 . . .

AUSTIN, v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 876 F. Supp. 1437 (E.D. Pa. 1995)

. . . See Newberg § 11.47. . . .

GIUSTI- BRAVO, v. UNITED STATES VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, 853 F. Supp. 34 (D.P.R. 1993)

. . . Newberg, New-berg on Class Actions § 11.47. . . .

AMERICAN CYANAMID CO. v. UNITED STATES SURGICAL CORP., 833 F. Supp. 92 (D. Conn. 1992)

. . . 23; Wiles Tr. 1428, 1502-03, 1507-10; Chisum Tr. 1869-72, 1875-77, 1934-35, 1937-38; PX 67, col. 3, 11.47 . . .

K. HAMMON, v. S. BARRY, Jr. BYRNE, v. R. COLEMAN,, 752 F. Supp. 1087 (D.D.C. 1990)

. . . Newberg, Newberg on Class Actions § 11.47, at 463 (2d ed. 1985) (citing Laskey v. . . .

Co. v., 94 T.C. 360 (T.C. 1990)

. . . Tract Acreage Purchase price 107-110 23.71 $118,500 107-111 .82 2,000 107-114 15.00 57,500 107-116 11.47 . . .

POTTER, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, FLORIDA, POTTER, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,, 653 F. Supp. 121 (N.D. Fla. 1986)

. . . with the following demographics: District Population Variance from Norm %Black 1 2898 -2.5% 2 3313 + 11.47% . . . plan (A) contains one district (district 2) in which the population deviates from the norm by ( + )11.47% . . .

TREHO v. UNITED STATES, 464 F. Supp. 113 (D. Nev. 1978)

. . . The search pertained to a codified offense under the Code of Indian Tribal Offenses, 25 C.F.R. 11.47, . . .

C. CAUBLE v. W. WHITE, 360 F. Supp. 1021 (E.D. La. 1973)

. . . . § 11.47 With respect to the control of the corporation and plans for the bank following the tender . . . F.R. § 11.5(1), 12 C.F.R. § 11.5 (m), 12 C.F.R. § 11.47, and 12 C.F.R. § 11.53. . 15 U.S.C. § 78n(d)( . . .

H. HARGRAVE v. R. KIRK, Jr., 313 F. Supp. 944 (M.D. Fla. 1970)

. . . 10.40 4.40 5,343,076 Pasco 11.425 10.00 1.425 263,289 Pinellas 17.00 10.65 6.35 9,481,993 Putnam 14.271 11.47 . . .

GETTY OIL COMPANY SUCCESSOR ON MERGER TO TIDEWATER OIL COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 185 Ct. Cl. 244 (Ct. Cl. 1968)

. . . Pleas Dawson_ Blackwell- 5 11.47 7.62 H. W. Donnell. C. O. . . .

NATIONAL DAIRY PRODUCTS CORPORATION, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,, 395 F.2d 517 (7th Cir. 1968)

. . . One Kroger store took only 7,864 points a month and was cost justified up to an 11.47% bracket. . . .

PHOENIX MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. J. McLEAN, 263 F. Supp. 246 (E.D. Pa. 1967)

. . . Webb 11/9/61 — $ 11.47 12/8/61 - 11.47 12/28/61 - 6.62 1/12/62 - 11.45 1/25/62 - 545.46 586.47 James . . .

In DONLEY d b a, 242 F. Supp. 403 (E.D. Mo. 1965)

. . . $2,740.29; that for the year 1959, there had been an overassessment of $2,791.93, with interest of $11.47 . . .

MASCUILLI, v. UNITED STATES, 241 F. Supp. 354 (E.D. Pa. 1965)

. . . 1,250.00 $ 5,269.25 (Present worth value of $1.00 per year payable at end of 30 years at 6% = 11.470.) 11.47 . . .

DEVINE, v. UNITED STATES, 278 F.2d 552 (9th Cir. 1960)

. . . testified that Hays Company had not received Exhibit 19, a check dated February 19, 1959 in the sum of $11.47 . . .

M. BOSTICK, I. B. R. J. R. v. SMOOT SAND AND GRAVEL CORPORATION, 154 F. Supp. 744 (D. Md. 1957)

. . . airplane, Virginia side 68-82 11.35 general, dredge predominant 62 11.40 airplane, Maryland side 64r-72 11.47 . . .

Co. C. S. Co. v., 33 Cust. Ct. 205 (Cust. Ct. 1954)

. . . reasoning, since 1 box of the imported connectors, containing 100 pieces, would measure approximately 11.47 . . .

v., 40 C.C.P.A. 19 (C.C.P.A. 1952)

. . . suitably adjusted to coincide with the definition of clear content as defined in article 763 (b) {Sec. 11.47 . . .

THE LONDON, 241 F. 863 (3d Cir. 1917)

. . . On arriving there, Nellemenn demanded that one-half of said $22.95, to. wit, $11.47, be paid him. . . .

THE LONDON, 238 F. 645 (E.D. Pa. 1917)

. . . His claim is that he demanded as his right $11.47, the one-half of $22.95, the balance of what he had . . .

THE BUCKINGHAM. STEAMSHIP BUCKINGHAM CO. v. PACIFIC TRANSPORT CO., 129 F. 975 (E.D. Pa. 1904)

. . . One is the sum of $11.47, excess of exchange upon London over the true rate, charged upon cash advanced . . . that the rate charged for exchange was one penny too high, and this amounts to the disputed sum of $11.47 . . .