The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 15
SECRETARY OF STATE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 15.01

15.01 Duties.—

(1) The Secretary of State shall serve as the state protocol officer. In consultation with the Governor and other governmental officials, the Secretary of State shall develop, maintain, publish, and distribute the state protocol manual.

(2) The Department of State shall have the custody of the constitution and Great Seal of this state, and of the original statutes thereof, and of the resolutions of the Legislature, and of all the official correspondence of the Governor. The department shall keep in its office a register and an index of all official letters, orders, communications, messages, documents, and other official acts issued or received by the Governor or the Secretary of State, and record these in a book numbered in chronological order. The Governor, before issuing any order or transmission of any official letter, communication, or document from the executive office or promulgation of any official act or proceeding, except military orders, shall deliver the same or a copy thereof to the Department of State to be recorded.

History.—s. 1, ch. 1, 1845; ch. 1845, 1871; RS 73; GS 74; RGS 88; CG; s. 1, ch. 28086, 1953; ss. 10, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 41, ch. 95-147; s. 2, ch. 2000-258; s. 1, ch. 2020-93.

F.S. 15.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 15.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 15.01

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 15.01

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 15.01.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

WACHTER, INC. v. CABLING INNOVATIONS, LLC,, 387 F. Supp. 3d 830 (M.D. Tenn. 2019)

. . . LR 15.01(a)(1); see also PR Diamonds , 364 F.3d at 699 ("Failure to file a motion to amend [that complies . . .

IN RE SKYMARK PROPERTIES II, LLC,, 597 B.R. 363 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2019)

. . . or before August 20, 2018" and to "diligently complete the required [Lobby B]uildout under Section 15.01 . . .

H. HARRIS D. v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INS. CO. W. N. A. V. A., 367 F. Supp. 3d 768 (M.D. Tenn. 2019)

. . . Failure to file a full amended pleading directly violates Local Rule 15.01(b), which states: "Amended . . .

ELLIOTT v. TULSA CEMENT, LLC, 357 F. Supp. 3d 1141 (N.D. Okla. 2019)

. . . See [Doc. 20-1, p. 23, § 15.01 ("The parties will agree to discuss any problem concerning this collective . . . agreement that may arise at work in the following manner[.] ) (emphasis added) and § 15.01 - Step Four . . .

L. ROBERTS, II, v. GORDY,, 359 F. Supp. 3d 1231 (S.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . ineffective and void, and therefore legal ownership of Hustlin' remained with Roberts, because: (1) Section 15.01 . . . per the agreement was effective, and stripped Roberts of his legal ownership, because: (1) Section 15.01 . . . Section 15.01 of the Sony/ATV Agreement-which Roberts relies on to argue that he was "substituted" into . . . That never happened here, and therefore Roberts was never substituted into the agreement under Section 15.01 . . . And even if such substitution had occurred under Section 15.01, that provision only applies to the agreement . . .

PUEBLO OF JEMEZ, a v. UNITED STATES, 350 F. Supp. 3d 1052 (D.N.M. 2018)

. . . Cohen 's Handbook § 15.01, at 995. . . .

PEG BANDWIDTH TX, LLC v. TEXHOMA FIBER, LLC, 299 F. Supp. 3d 836 (E.D. Tex. 2018)

. . . Code §§ 15.01, et seq. , and the Texas Covenants Not to Compete Act, Tex. Bus. & Com. . . .

B. DOLIN, v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC,, 269 F. Supp. 3d 851 (N.D. Ill. 2017)

. . . IPI 15.01. . . .

GOODWIN, v. UNITED STATES, 869 F.3d 636 (8th Cir. 2017)

. . . See also § 15.01 (criminal attempt). . . .

HIAM v. HOMEAWAY. COM, INC., 267 F. Supp. 3d 338 (D. Mass. 2017)

. . . Code Regs. 15.01(1), count VII is analyzed in tandem with count II. . . .

SETTLEMENT FUNDING, L. L. C. L. L. C. E. v. RAPID SETTLEMENTS, LIMITED, A. RSL L. L. C. v. J. G. S. S. C. L. P. JGWPT L. L. C. JLL JG L. L. C., 851 F.3d 530 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . Code § 15.01 et seq., or both. . . .

SEGOVIA- RIVAS, v. LYNCH, U. S., 643 F. App'x 367 (5th Cir. 2016)

. . . conviction for “Attempted Deadly Conduct — Discharge of a Firearm” in violation of Texas Penal Code §§ 15.01 . . . Section 15.01 provides that an attempt offense is committed "if with specific intent to commit an offense . . . Penal Code § 15.01. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MAYER,, 162 F. Supp. 3d 1080 (D. Or. 2016)

. . . J.I. 15.07, 15.01(11); Haw. Rev. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CARRANZA- MALDONADO, R., 627 F. App'x 390 (5th Cir. 2015)

. . . Penal Code § 15.01(d). . . .

IN RE KING, v., 541 B.R. 404 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . violated the agreement or committed fraud, theft, or gross negligence against the LLC or other members), 15.01 . . .

LINCOLN RD SB, LLC, v. DAXAN FL LLC,, 180 So. 3d 134 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . The right of first refusal is found in Article XV of the recorded Declaration, “Sale or Transfer”: 15.01 . . . The right of first refusal on sale or transfer is clearly stated in section 15.01 of the Declaration. . . .

EDNACOT, v. MESA MEDICAL GROUP, PLLC,, 790 F.3d 636 (6th Cir. 2015)

. . . P. 15.01). . . .

PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES,, 120 Fed. Cl. 41 (Fed. Cl. 2015)

. . . . & Shareholders, ¶ 15.01 (2015) (hereinafter “Eustice”). . . .

JTEKT CORPORATION U. S. A. v. UNITED STATES,, 37 F. Supp. 3d 1326 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2014)

. . . assigned the following anti-dumping duty margins to plaintiffs: Aisin, 6.15%; Asahi, 1.28%; JTEKT, 15.01% . . .

J. HANCOCK, P. I. No. I. B. T. J. P. I. J. No. I. B. T. v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL SWEEPING LLC,, 73 F. Supp. 3d 932 (N.D. Ill. 2014)

. . . Trust Agreement § 5.04(B)); see also Doc. 62 at ¶ 19; Doc. 58-1 at 94 (Pension Fund Trust Agreement § 15.01 . . . filing of a lawsuit by the Trustees against the Employer”); id. at 142 (Welfare Fund Trust Agreement § 15.01 . . . Doc. 58-1 at 94 (Pension Fund Trust Agreement § 15.01(A)(5)) (emphasis added); id. at 142 (Welfare Fund . . . Trust Agreement § 15.01(A)(5)) (same). . . .

JOHNSON, v. UNITED STATES M. D., 65 F. Supp. 3d 595 (N.D. Ill. 2014)

. . . Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions, Civil, No. 15.01 (2009) (second set of brackets in original). . . .

In HENSLEY C. v. C., 578 F. App'x 530 (6th Cir. 2014)

. . . P. 15.01, which states that leave to amend shall be freely given, and is ‘mandatory when justice so requires . . . Dec. 10, 2010) (“Kentucky courts have interpreted CR 15.01 to mean that, where justice so requires, it . . . 129, 131 (W.D.Ky.1971) (noting that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 and Kentucky’s parallel Rule 15.01 . . .

In HENSLEY C. v. C., 578 F. App'x 530 (6th Cir. 2014)

. . . P. 15.01, which states that leave to amend shall be freely given, and is ‘mandatory’ when justice so . . . Dec. 10, 2010) (“Kentucky courts have interpreted CR 15.01 to mean that, where justice so requires, it . . . 129, 131 (W.D.Ky.1971) (noting that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 and Kentucky’s parallel Rule 15.01 . . .

GILBERT, v. R. DONAHOE,, 751 F.3d 303 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . Section 15.01 provides: A. . . .

P. HILLMANN, v. CITY OF CHICAGO,, 14 F. Supp. 3d 1152 (N.D. Ill. 2014)

. . . -Civ. 15.01. . . .

TYLER, v. DH CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC., 736 F.3d 455 (6th Cir. 2013)

. . . P. 15.01. . . .

TYLER, v. DH CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC., 736 F.3d 455 (6th Cir. 2013)

. . . P. 15.01. . . .

UNITED STATES v. LIU,, 731 F.3d 982 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . infringement case lies in the other prerequisite to criminal liability: willfulness.” 4 Nimmer, supra, § 15.01 . . .

CITIBANK N. A. v. CITY OF BURLINGTON P. C., 971 F. Supp. 2d 414 (D. Vt. 2013)

. . . Ann. tit. 11 A, § 15.01 et seq. (2013), “[a] foreign corporation transacting business in this state without . . .

FORD- SHOLEBO, v. UNITED STATES, 980 F. Supp. 2d 917 (N.D. Ill. 2013)

. . . Civ. 15.01. . . .

STOLLINGS, v. RYOBI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 725 F.3d 753 (7th Cir. 2013)

. . . See IPI 15.01. . . . Illinois Pattern Instruction 15.01 provided an adequate statement of the law that was unlikely to confuse . . .

UNITED STATES v. HERNANDEZ, A. T- A. A. A. H. H,, 537 F. App'x 470 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 28.02(d) and § 15.01(d). . . .

M. WHATLEY, v. COFFIN,, 496 F. App'x 414 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 15.01(d). . . .

WEINBERG v. GRAND CIRCLE TRAVEL, LCC d b a, 891 F. Supp. 2d 228 (D. Mass. 2012)

. . . Id. 15.01(1). . . .

CONTOUR DESIGN, INC. v. CHANCE MOLD STEEL COMPANY, LTD. a k a, 693 F.3d 102 (1st Cir. 2012)

. . . Second, Third, Fourth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, and Federal Circuits); 4 Milgrim on Trade Secrets § 15.01 . . .

MATCH- E- BE- NASH- SHE- WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS, v. PATCHAK L. v., 132 S.Ct. 2199 (U.S. 2012)

. . . Cohen § 15.01, at 965. . . .

MATCH- E- BE- NASH- SHE- WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS v. PATCHAK, 567 U.S. 209 (U.S. 2012)

. . . Cohen § 15.01, at 965. . . .

In LOWER BUCKS HOSPITAL,, 471 B.R. 419 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2012)

. . . . §§ 9.01, 15.01); • obliged LBH to repay the Bond indebtedness directly to the Indenture Trustee, (id . . . (Indenture § 15.01). . . . (Indenture § 15.01). . . . .

BC TECHNICAL, INC. v. ENSIL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a, 464 F. App'x 689 (10th Cir. 2012)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 15.01 (2011) ("[Tjhe better view construes the 'willfulness . . .

ASHANTI, v. CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY,, 666 F.3d 1148 (8th Cir. 2012)

. . . Rule 15.01 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to amend a pleading once as a matter . . .

UNITED STATES v. SANCHEZ,, 667 F.3d 555 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . attempted sexual assault of a child, in violation of Texas Penal Code sections 22.011(a)(2) and (c)(1), and 15.01 . . . Penal Code Ann. § 15.01(a); see also Santellan v. . . . Penal Code Ann. § 15.01(a) (West 1994). . Laster, 275 S.W.3d at 515-16. . Id. at 516. . Id. . . . .

In WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC., 461 B.R. 200 (Bankr. D. Del. 2011)

. . . (WMI NG 1 at § 15.3; WMI NG 2 at § 15.3; WMI NG 3 at § 3(a) & (b); WMI NG 4 at § 15.01; WMI NG 5 at § . . .

ISYSTEMS, v. SPARK NETWORKS, LIMITED, 428 F. App'x 368 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 1951, and theft and attempted theft in violation Texas Penal Code §§ 15.01 & 31.03. . . .

HARRELL S, LLC, a LLC, a v. AGRIUM ADVANCED U. S. TECHNOLOGIES, INC. a, 795 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . of the Operating Agreement, entitled “Termination and Dissolution,” provides the following: Section 15.01 . . . controversy constitutes an Impasse in order to work to resolve such controversy- (Doc. # 10-4 at 21, § 15.01 . . . as a threshold matter, that the use of the word “mediation,” rather than “arbitration,” in Sections 15.01 . . . (Doc. # 10-4 at 21, § 15.01). . . .

JTEKT CORPORATION U. S. A. v. UNITED STATES,, 768 F. Supp. 2d 1333 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2011)

. . . Results, Commerce assigned plaintiffs the following dumping margins: Aisin, 6.15%; Asahi, 1.28%, JTEKT, 15.01% . . .

UNITED STATES v. ERIKSEN, v., 639 F.3d 1138 (9th Cir. 2011)

. . . increased to $103,606; from 1999 to 2003, the Receivables ballooned from 1.47% of the Plan’s assets to 15.01% . . .

CENTRAL TELEPHONE CO. OF VIRGINIA, v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO. OF VIRGINIA, INC., 759 F. Supp. 2d 789 (E.D. Va. 2011)

. . . credibility jury instruction. 1A O'Malley, Grenig & Lee, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, § 15.01 . . .

PENSACOLA JUNIOR COLLEGE FACULTY ASSOCIATION, v. PENSACOLA JUNIOR COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES,, 50 So. 3d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 15.01 C of the CBA provides that “[t]o the extent possible within the budget model, faculty hired . . .

LEMIEUX, O R. Jr. v. CITY OF HOLYOKE, 740 F. Supp. 2d 246 (D. Mass. 2010)

. . . (CBA ¶ 15.01.) . . .

DUPRE v. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICES OF LOUISIANA, INC. LLC,, 394 F. App'x 115 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . Article XV, Section 15.01, Discretionary Authority of the Plan. [Doc. 24-3, R. 175]. . . . .

ENG, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,, 737 F. Supp. 2d 1078 (C.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . CSR 15.01 states that assignment of "an employee from one position to another” within the same class . . .

UNITED STATES v. WHITTEN, R,, 610 F.3d 168 (2d Cir. 2010)

. . . Gov’t Ex. 15.01. . . .

PFIZER INC. LLC, v. APOTEX INC., 731 F. Supp. 2d 741 (N.D. Ill. 2010)

. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 15.01 (2010). . . .

UNITED STATES v. FARLEY,, 607 F.3d 1294 (11th Cir. 2010)

. . . Penal Code §§ 12.33, 22.011, 15.01. . . .

BDT PRODUCTS, INC. GMBH KG, v. LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., 602 F.3d 742 (6th Cir. 2010)

. . . See 4-15 Milgrim On Trade Secrets § 15.01[1] (2009) (“Plaintiff, by the preponderance of the evidence . . . Plaintiff is the owner of a trade secret.”); § 15.01[l][d][iv] (2009) (“[I]f plaintiff has engaged in . . .

PADILLA v. KENTUCKY, 559 U.S. 356 (U.S. 2010)

. . . Proc. 15.01 (2009); Mont. Code Ann. §46-12-210 (West 2009); N. M. Rule Crim. Form 9-406 (2009); N. . . .

JOSE PADILLA, v. KENTUCKY, 176 L. Ed. 2d 284 (U.S. 2010)

. . . Proc. 15.01 (2009); Mont. Code Ann. §46-12-210 (West 2009); N. M. Rule Crim. Form 9-406 (2009); N. . . .

GULF POWER COMPANY, v. COALSALES II, L. L. C. f k a, 661 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (N.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . 5.03, 5.08, 6.02, 6.04, 6.05, 7.01, 7.02, 8.01, 8.02, 9.01, 9.04, 9.06, 9.07, 11.01, 14.02, 14.06, 15.01 . . . Finally, Coalsales refers to Sections 2.22, 2.23, 2.30, 6.02, 7.01, 7.02, 9.07 and 15.01, which either . . . Sections 9.04(4) ("Buyer shall have the right, but not the obligation, to terminate this CSA____”) and 15.01 . . .

SOUTH TEXAS ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, v. DRESSER- RAND COMPANY, INC., 575 F.3d 504 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . Under paragraph 15.01, the parties agreed that after referring the dispute to the contract engineer, . . .

BAYNES v. UNITED STATES, 302 F. App'x 334 (6th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 15.01 (“If the trip to and from work is made in a truck, bus, van, car, or other vehicle under the . . .

SASONOV, v. UNITES STATES, 575 F. Supp. 2d 626 (D.N.J. 2008)

. . . P. 15.01(10)(d) (2008); N.C. Gen.Stat. § 15A-1022(a)(7) (2007); R.I. Gen. . . .

MASTEC NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. MSE POWER SYSTEMS, INC., 581 F. Supp. 2d 321 (N.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . CSA to parties subcontractor agreements, ¶ 15.01(C)) [dkt. # 5]. . . .

ROTHGERY v. GILLESPIE COUNTY, TEXAS, 554 U.S. 191 (U.S. 2008)

. . . Dawson, Texas Practice Series: Criminal Practice and Procedure § 15.01 (2d ed. 2001), which is sometimes . . .

ZAYAS v. BACARDI CORPORATION,, 524 F.3d 65 (1st Cir. 2008)

. . . See 1 Tim Bornstein et ah, Labor & Employment Arbitration § 15.01 (2d ed.1997); Ray J. . . .

UNITED STATES v. R. CABRERA- FRATTINI, E- U. S., 65 M.J. 950 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 2008)

. . . Moore’s Federal Practice P 15.01[3] at 15-8 (1976)). . . .

B. LEVY, M. D. v. MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 517 F.3d 519 (7th Cir. 2008)

. . . Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions—Civil, No. 15.01 (2006 ed.). . . .

KELLEY v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION,, 251 F.R.D. 544 (W.D. Wash. 2008)

. . . misrepresentation proximately caused plaintiffs injury: We hold that the proximate cause standard embodied in WPI 15.01 . . . Washington Jury Pattern Instruction ("WPI”) 15.01 states: The term "proximate cause” means a cause which . . .

FICHMAN, v. MEDIA CENTER,, 512 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . Telecommunications Regulation: Cable, Broadcasting, Satellite, and the Internet (Matthew Bender 2004) ¶ 15.01 . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. DOROZHKO,, 606 F. Supp. 2d 321 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . At 2:15.01 p.m., the hacker from IP Address 83.98.156.219 again probed the Thomson Financial network, . . .

UNITED STATES v. Vu LE,, 512 F.3d 128 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . Penal Code § 15.01(a). . . . Id. § 15.01(b). . . . Penal Code §§ 12.34(a), 15.01(a), 22.02(a)(2). . . .

HUNT CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC. v. ALLIANZ GLOBAL RISKS U. S. INSURANCE COMPANY,, 503 F.3d 632 (7th Cir. 2007)

. . . example, insurance against fire damage is the major component of homeowners’ insurance, Stempel, supra, § 15.01 . . .

T. NORRIS, O. v. HEARST TRUST, L. P., 500 F.3d 454 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . . & Comm.Code § 15.01, § 15.05(a), (b)).” As stated in Scott v. . . .

HARRINGTON, v. CACV OF COLORADO, LLC, J. A. PC,, 508 F. Supp. 2d 128 (D. Mass. 2007)

. . . Laws ch. 156D, § 15.01 et seq. . . .

UNITED STATES v. GARCIA- ORTIZ,, 241 F. App'x 222 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . Section 15.01 of the Texas Penal Code defines the preparatory offense of criminal attempt, and section . . . Penal Code § 15.01(b). . . . Id. § 15.01(a). . . . .

GARCIA- MALDONADO, v. R. GONZALES, U. S., 491 F.3d 284 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . Pen.Code §§ 15.01, 22.041(b) & (d)(1)). . . .

In BROKERS, INC. v., 363 B.R. 458 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2007)

. . . Robinson II, Robinson on North Carolina Corporation Law § 15.01(4) (2005). . . .

APACHE BOHAI CORPORATION LDC LDC, v. TEXACO CHINA BV,, 480 F.3d 397 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . [the "Exculpatory Clause”] § 15.01- — This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance . . .

BARROWS, v. WILEY, 478 F.3d 776 (7th Cir. 2007)

. . . Code UWS § 15.01(1). . . .

NATIONAL POSTAL PROFESSIONAL NURSES, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,, 461 F. Supp. 2d 24 (D.D.C. 2006)

. . . Article 15, Section 15.01, Agreement between the United States Postal Service and National Postal Professional . . .

KLACZAK v. CONSOLIDATED MEDICAL TRANSPORT,, 458 F. Supp. 2d 622 (N.D. Ill. 2006)

. . . BERNARD_Type 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Part B — Contract Rate ALS N/A $5.71 $15.01 N/A N/A Percentage . . .

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, v. AMERICAN RE- INSURANCE CO., 441 F. Supp. 2d 646 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . Coverage Disputes § 15.01[a] (12th ed.2004) (citing Colonial Am. Life Ins. Co. v. . . .

In SUNSHINE JR. STORES, INC. d. b. a. d. b. a. Jr. v. Jr., 456 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . Section 15.01 of the Trust Indenture Agreement provided that "[t]he Notes may be prepaid before their . . .

In SUNSHINE JR. STORES, INC. d. b. a. d. b. a. Jr. v. Jr., 456 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . Section 15.01 of the Trust Indenture Agreement provided that "[t]he Notes may be prepaid before their . . .

ALPHAMED PHARMACEUTICALS CORP. v. ARRIVA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. SPINELLI CORPORATION,, 432 F. Supp. 2d 1319 (S.D. Fla. 2006)

. . . Lykes-Youngstown Corp., 504 F.2d 518, 545 (5th Cir.1974)); Milgrim on Trade Secrets § 15.01 (“It is fundamental . . .

ARRINGTON, v. HELMS,, 438 F.3d 1336 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . Code r. 660-3-15.01 (2005). . . . Code r. 660-3-15.01(3), they can obtain the requisite information directly from DHR without having to . . .

ROTHGERY, v. GILLESPIE COUNTY, TEXAS,, 413 F. Supp. 2d 806 (W.D. Tex. 2006)

. . . Arts. 15.01-15.27 (West 2005 & West Supp. 2005). . . .

G. CORDLE, v. MERCK CO. INC., 405 F. Supp. 2d 800 (E.D. Ky. 2005)

. . . P. 15.01 (following Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a) and directing that leave to amend "be freely given when justice . . .

AGWAY, INC. EMPLOYEES K THRIFT INVESTMENT PLAN, Co. v. G. MAGNUSON,, 409 F. Supp. 2d 136 (N.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . A, § 15.01, and former members of Agway's Employee Benefit Plans Investment Committee, a body responsible . . . A §§ 14.01, 15.01-15.02. . . . .

UNITED STATES v. SHAW,, 154 F. App'x 416 (5th Cir. 2005)

. . . enhanced based on his prior Texas conviction for attempted sexual assault under sections 22.011 and 15.01 . . .

RODRIGUEZ- CASTRO, v. R. GONZALES,, 427 F.3d 316 (5th Cir. 2005)

. . . Penal Code § 15.01 (Vernon 2005). . . . Id. § 15.01. . . . Penal Code §§ 15.01, 22.041(b),(d)(1). . . .

CARSON, v. McNEAL,, 375 F. Supp. 2d 509 (S.D. Miss. 2005)

. . . First, whereas Mississippi Code Annotated § 7£M-15.01(a), provides that “[a] foreign corporation may . . .

W. H. NOE, d b a d b a d b a v. HENDERSON, In, 373 F. Supp. 2d 939 (E.D. Ark. 2005)

. . . They allege that Codes 15.01, 15.05, 15.11(B), 15.12, and 15.13(D) of the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission . . . ’s regulations are preempted by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and 50 C.F.R. § 21.13.Code 15.01 prohibits . . . The issue then remains as to whether the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission’s Codes 15.01, 15.05, 15.11 . . .

BARTHOLOMEW, v. TOWN OF COLLIERVILLE,, 409 F.3d 684 (6th Cir. 2005)

. . . 78, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938), and is addressed by the following language contained in Rule 15.01 . . . Although neither party disputes that Collierville has cited a number of Tennessee cases construing Rule 15.01 . . .

C. REAVES, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 355 F. Supp. 2d 510 (D.D.C. 2005)

. . . cite ás authority Rules 10(c) and 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules 10.03 and 15.01 . . . Although the Court recognizes the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, there are no Rules 10.03 or 15.01 . . .

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, v. AMERICAN RE- INSURANCE CO., 351 F. Supp. 2d 201 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . Coverage Disputes § 15.01[a] (12th ed.2004) (citing Colonial Am. Life Ins. Co. v. . . . Id. § 15.01[b] (quoting Christiania Gen. Ins. Corp. v. Great Am. Ins. . . .

UNITED STATES v. DODD, 349 F. Supp. 2d 1039 (W.D. Tex. 2004)

. . . . §§ 15.01, 21.11 (West 2003) (criminal attempt, indecency with a child). . . .

CITIGROUP, INC. v. INDUSTRIAL RISK INSURERS, L. P., 336 F. Supp. 2d 282 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . Lease § 15.01 (emphasis added). . . . Lease § 15.01. . . . by or on behalf of Tenant constituting a part of the Demised Premises within the meaning of Sections 15.01 . . . supports reading the phrase “constituting a part of the Demised Premises within the meaning of Sections 15.01 . . .

DOW v. JONES,, 311 F. Supp. 2d 461 (D. Md. 2004)

. . . Kleinberger, Limited Liability Companies: Tax & Business Law §§ 15.01(1), 15.02(3)(b),(e) (2004). . . .

In THE EXTRADITION OF CARLOS NAVA GONZALEZ, 305 F. Supp. 2d 682 (S.D. Tex. 2004)

. . . Pursuant to Texas Penal Code §§ 12.33, 15.01, 19.02, attempted murder is punishable in this jurisdiction . . . immediate influence of sudden passion arising from an adequate cause, then Texas Penal Code §§ 12.34, 15.01 . . .

ICELAND SEAFOOD CORPORATION, v. NATIONAL CONSUMER COOPERATIVE BANK d b a, 285 F. Supp. 2d 719 (E.D. Va. 2003)

. . . Act §§ 15.01(b)(7), (8). . . .