Cases from cite.case.law:

KALE, Ph. D. v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,, 175 So. 3d 815 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . In turn, Florida Administrative Code Rule 64B19-17.002 contains the Board’s disciplinary guidelines and . . . Code R. 64B19-17.002(l)(q). . . . Code R. 64B19-17.002(l)(gg). . . . Code R. 64B19-17.002(2). In Mann v. . . .

CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR,, 379 F.3d 901 (10th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 101-17.002(c)(1) (2000). . . . should be located in an area of the central city other than the [central business area], 41 C.F.R. § 101~17.002 . . . “reaehpng] a final decision on a proposed relocation into a central business area.” 41 C.F.R. § 101—17.002 . . .

GRABAU, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGY,, 816 So. 2d 701 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Rule 64B19-17.002(1), Florida Administrative Code, authorizes an administrative fine of $1,000.00 for . . .

M. HALTERMANN, L. P. L. P. v. W. JOHNSON, A., 988 F. Supp. 1477 (S.D. Ga. 1996)

. . . . § 101 — 17.002(b). . . . Id. § 101-17.002(e). . . .

H F ENTERPRISES, LTD, v. UNITED STATES, 973 F. Supp. 170 (D.D.C. 1996)

. . . . § 101 — 17.002(c)(1) (1987). . . .

BUFFALO CENTRAL TERMINAL, v. UNITED STATES, 886 F. Supp. 1031 (W.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . . § 101-17.002(e)(1) (1987). . . .

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL- CIO, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY,, 840 F.2d 947 (D.C. Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 101-17.002 et seq. . . .

FAIRPLAIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, v. R. G. FREEMAN, III,, 512 F. Supp. 201 (N.D. Ill. 1981)

. . . . § 101-17.002 (1980). . . .

HORWITZ, v. GROVPAC, INC. a, 286 So. 2d 576 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . The plaintiff then contacted defendant’s surveyor and obtained a recomputation of the acreage at 17.002 . . .

In WATSON, 29 F. Cas. 423 (E.D. Pa. 1874)

. . . In re Greenfield [Cases Nos. 5,774 and 5,775]; In re Pierson [Case No. 11,154]; In re Vorbeck [Id. 17.002 . . .

In VON BECK, 28 F. Cas. 1269 (C.C.E.D. Pa. 1862)

. . . [See Case No. 17.002.] . . .