Cases from cite.case.law:

STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, v. PETER R. BROWN CONSTRUCTION, INC., 108 So. 3d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . As it did below, Appellant also contends that section 17.29(1) and 17.03(1) together provide sufficient . . . The ALJ rejected Appellant’s argument that she should look to both section 17.29 and section 17.03 to . . . The rule cites section 17.03 as a “law implemented” and not as “specific authority.” . . . By its language, section 17.03(1) merely requires that the CFO examine, audit, and settle all claims . . . We accordingly conclude that section 17.03(1), whether separately considered or in combination with section . . .

In MAY,, 478 B.R. 431 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2012)

. . . See also 5-17 Harnett & Lesnick, The Law of Life and Health Insurance § 17.03 (Matthew Bender, rev. ed . . .

KATZ, v. PERSHING, LLC,, 672 F.3d 64 (1st Cir. 2012)

. . . . §§ 17.03-17.04. . . .

McCLAFFERTY, v. PORTAGE COUNT BOARD OF ELECTIONS,, 661 F. Supp. 2d 826 (N.D. Ohio 2009)

. . . (Id. at § 17.03; Stipulations at ¶ 12.) . . .

NEW MEDIUM LLC, AV LLC, J. IP LLC, v. BARCO N. V., 612 F. Supp. 2d 958 (N.D. Ill. 2009)

. . . Unison Industries, L.P., 899 F.Supp. 1268, 1286 (D.Del.1995); 5 Chisum on Patents § 17.03[1] (2008). . . .

G. TILLMAN, v. PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP, INC., 538 F. Supp. 2d 754 (D. Del. 2008)

. . . extra man (relief driver)” position should receive an hourly rate at some amount between $15.78 and $17.03 . . .

BERRY, v. CITY OF PONTIAC,, 269 F. App'x 545 (6th Cir. 2008)

. . . Responsibility of a Member), 4.01 (Departmental Records), 17.01 (Conduct Unbecoming an Officer) and 17.03 . . .

In BENNETT FUNDING GROUP, INC. C. v. R. T. M. A. P. J. M. A. P. C., 367 B.R. 269 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . to dismiss into a summary judgment motion.” 2-17 Moore’s Manual of Federal Practice and Procedure, § 17.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. LUCIANO- RODRIGUEZ,, 442 F.3d 320 (5th Cir. 2006)

. . . LaFave, supra note 16 § 17.03. . Id. § 17.03(a), at 622. . Id. § 17.03(a), at 623. . . . .

LATTERA v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 437 F.3d 399 (3d Cir. 2006)

. . . Chirelstein, Federal Income Taxation ¶ 17.03, at 369-70 (9th ed.2002). . . . Comm’r, 303 F.2d 687, 690 (9th Cir.1962); see also Chirelstein, supra, ¶ 17.03, at 376-77 (noting that . . . Chirel-stein, supra, ¶ 17.03, at 373. . . .

BBDOVA, LLC d b a v. AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 358 F. Supp. 2d 387 (D. Del. 2005)

. . . Territory” description set forth in Section 1.05 of the Agreement in a manner provided for under Section 17.03 . . .

YOUNG, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 351 F. Supp. 2d 644 (E.D. Mich. 2004)

. . . He worked a total of 17.03 hours on piece rated jobs with an average productivity rate of 33.52%. . . .

GALE, v. HYDE PARK BANK,, 384 F.3d 451 (7th Cir. 2004)

. . . Brandel, The Law of Electronic Fund Transfer Systems: Legal and Strategic Planning ¶ 17.03[3][a] (2004 . . .

GADDIS a a v. UNITED STATES, 381 F.3d 444 (5th Cir. 2004)

. . . P. 17.03 (“The court may in its discretion allow the guardian ad litem a reasonable fee for services, . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. MAGINNIS Y., 356 F.3d 1179 (9th Cir. 2004)

. . . Chirlstein, Federal Income Taxation ¶ 17.03 (7th ed.1994). . . .

BISH, v. AQUARION SERVICES CO., 289 F. Supp. 2d 134 (D. Conn. 2003)

. . . Filter, his pursuant to Section 17.03 of the Local 145 CBA. . . .

W. KEISER M. R. E. v. MATAMORAS COMMUNITY CHURCH, 66 F. App'x 358 (3d Cir. 2003)

. . . recognize that its property is subject to the governing rules of the Churches of God, including Article 17.03 . . .

METLIFE CAPITAL CORPORATION, v. WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE CO., 224 F. Supp. 2d 374 (D.P.R. 2002)

. . . Newman, Handbook on Insurance Coverage Disputes § 17.03 (11th ed.2002); But see, Servants of Paraclete . . .

W. KEISER, M. R. E. v. MATAMORAS COMMUNITY CHURCH,, 262 F. Supp. 2d 468 (M.D. Pa. 2002)

. . . Defendant’s continued use of the property in ways not sanctioned by the denomination violates Article 17.03 . . . Article 17.03 provides: . . . .

In VALLEY MEDIA, INC., 279 B.R. 105 (Bankr. D. Del. 2002)

. . . the percentage of the value of consigned inventory to total inventory for Valley was never more than 17.03% . . .

UNITED STATES v. IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY IOM,, 286 F.3d 641 (3d Cir. 2002)

. . . Becoming a custodian of money that is used to place bets offshore would be a violation of section 17.03 . . . However, the indictment did not allege that the appellants violated section 17.03(a)(3) and the jury . . .

BAD ASS COFFEE COMPANY OF HAWAII, a v. BAD ASS COFFEE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a a, 25 F. App'x 738 (10th Cir. 2001)

. . . If we accept BACLP’s argument and interpret Article 17.03 to prohibit an award of attorney’s fees in . . . We can resolve any potential conflict between Article 17.03 and Article 17.06 by construing the phrase . . . This construction is supported by the wording of Article 17.03. . . . Thus, it is reasonable to construe Article 17.03 to likewise apply only to attorney’s fees incurred in . . . Accordingly, we conclude that Article 17.03 of the MDAH does not apply to the attorney’s fees awarded . . .

CARELL v. THE SHUBERT ORGANIZATION, INC. NV, 104 F. Supp. 2d 236 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . Armstrong, supra, 91 F.Supp.2d at 637 (quoting 3 Nimmer, supra., § 17.03); see also 3 Paul Goldstein, . . .

UNITED STATES v. LOVE, v. D., 219 F.3d 721 (8th Cir. 2000)

. . . See 2 Jurywork § 17.03[4] at 17-53. . . . See 2 JuRyworK § 17.03[4] at 17-54. . . . seating jurors whose evaluation of the evidence will be seriously skewed by racial bias.” 2 Jurywork § 17.03 . . . (citing Swain, 380 U.S. at 221, 85 S.Ct. 824); 2 JuRYWORK § 17.03[4] at 17-52 (“The primary goal of in-depth . . . Id. § 17.03[4][a] at 17-57. . . .

A. ARMSTRONG, d b a v. VIRGIN RECORDS, LTD., 91 F. Supp. 2d 628 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . Champion Road Machinery Ltd., 961 F.Supp. 398, 404-05 (N.D.N.Y.1997); 3 Nimmer § 17.03; 3 Paul Goldstein . . . adjudicated in the courts of a sovereign other than the one in which the cause of action arose. 3 Nimmer § 17.03 . . .

OCONOMOWOC RESIDENTIAL PROGRAMS, INC. a v. CITY OF GREENFIELD, a a, 23 F. Supp. 2d 941 (E.D. Wis. 1998)

. . . Burns at Exhibit A, at § 17.03(2)(bd). . . . .

FRINK AMERICA, INC. v. CHAMPION ROAD MACHINERY LIMITED, CHAMPION ROAD MACHINERY LIMITED, v. FRINK AMERICA, INC., 961 F. Supp. 398 (N.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . formalities are barred in all nations that adhere to the Berne Convention,” 3 Nimmer on Copyright, § 17.03 . . .

COMMITTEE FOR IDAHO S HIGH DESERT, INC. v. YOST, s s s COMMITTEE FOR IDAHO S HIGH DESERT, INC. v. YOST, s s s, 92 F.3d 814 (9th Cir. 1996)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 17.03 (3d ed.) . . .

L. HERBST, M. D. v. E. RYAN, R. M. D. O s s, 90 F.3d 1300 (7th Cir. 1996)

. . . generally, Grendel’s Den, 749 F.2d at 959-60; Mary Frances Durfer et al., Court Awarded Attorney Fees para. 17.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. HEALY, F. G. Jr. D. HEALY, v. COUNTRY HILL BANK n k a, 923 F. Supp. 1424 (D. Kan. 1996)

. . . amount of $97,570.19 as of January 26, 1996, plus interest accrued after January 26,1996, at a rate of $17.03 . . .

McKAY, v. MAD MURPHY S, INC., 899 F. Supp. 872 (D. Conn. 1995)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, § 17.03[3] (3rd ed. 1995); Saratoga Vichy . . .

UNITED STATES v. YARBOUGH,, 55 F.3d 280 (7th Cir. 1995)

. . . Black-mar, § 17.03 (3d ed. 1977) [as modified by Yarbough], The district court refused the instruction . . .

QUALITEX CO. v. JACOBSON PRODUCTS CO. INC., 514 U.S. 159 (U.S. 1995)

. . . Altman, Callmann on Unfair Competition, Trademarks and Monopolies § 17.03 (4th ed. 1983); Landes & Posner . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. PEREZ,, 43 F.3d 1131 (7th Cir. 1994)

. . . Devitt et ah, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 17.03, at 620 ff (4th ed. 1992). . . . .

SULTENFUSS, v. SNOW, Jr. T. H. O. J., 35 F.3d 1494 (11th Cir. 1994)

. . . Parole Decision Guidelines System ¶ 8-17.03. . Id. at ¶ 8-17.02 through ¶ 8-25.02. . . . .

JORDAN, JORDAN, v. D. JACKSON, L., 15 F.3d 333 (4th Cir. 1994)

. . . . § 17.03 (West 1993) (hearing on first working day); Wyo.Stat. § 14-6-209 (Supp.1992) ("prompt” petition . . .

SULTENFUSS, v. SNOW, Jr. T. H. O. J., 7 F.3d 1543 (11th Cir. 1993)

. . . Id. at ¶ 8-17.03 through ¶ 8-25.02. . Id. at ¶ 8-17.02 and ¶ 8-26.01 (emphasis added). . . . .

T. S. v., 100 T.C. 180 (T.C. 1993)

. . . See generally Saltzman, IRS Practice and Procedure, pars. 17.01[4], 17.03, 17.04 (2d ed. 1991). . . .

FOGIE v. RENT- A- CENTER, INC. a TEUSA a EMI USA a EMI a, 867 F. Supp. 1398 (D. Minn. 1993)

. . . Under the contract, Fogie was required to pay $17.03 per week for 87 weeks or $73.79 per month for 20 . . .

In MORSE TOOL, INC. J. FERRARI, v. BARCLAYS BUSINESS CREDIT, INC. f k a, 148 B.R. 97 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1992)

. . . In Article 17, entitled “Retirement,” the agreement states: 17.03 — BENEFITS: Any employee who, having . . . It simply states (in II 17.03) that upon retirement, employees “shall ... be entitled to receive” the . . . See ¶¶ 17.03 and 17.032. . . . Barclays interprets ¶ 17.04 as limiting the irrevocability of any retiree benefits conferred in ¶ 17.03 . . . durational limits in Article 16 permits the Court to infer from the absence of durational limits in ¶ 17.03 . . .

In RB FURNITURE, INC. a, 141 B.R. 706 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1992)

. . . Paragraph 17.03 of the Lease provides: If legal action be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction . . .

ITSI T. V. PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. CALIFORNIA AUTHORITY OF RACING FAIRS,, 785 F. Supp. 854 (E.D. Cal. 1992)

. . . United States courts even though the only alleged infringement occurred in another country”); 3 Nimmer § 17.03 . . . administrative formalities which must be satisfied in order to create or to perfect a copyright.” 3 Nimmer, at § 17.03 . . .

In MANLEY BRYAN, v. MANLEY,, 135 B.R. 137 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1992)

. . . 267 U.S. 467, 45 S.Ct. 357, 69 L.Ed. 739 (1925), 1A Collier on Bankruptcy (14th ed. 1978) ¶¶ 17.02, 17.03 . . .

In JOINT EASTERN AND SOUTHERN DISTRICT ASBESTOS LITIGATION. In JOHNS- MANVILLE CORPORATION, K. FINDLEY, C. Jr. v. M. BLINKEN, H. Jr. E. Jr. C., 129 B.R. 710 (E.D.N.Y. 1991)

. . . Newberg, Newberg on Class Actions § 17.03, at 367 (2d ed. 1985). . . .

ARTHUR S. LANGENDERFER, INC. Co. M B Co. G. M. v. S. E. JOHNSON CO. Co. Co. OAMCO C. P. Co. Co. Co. J. T., 917 F.2d 1413 (6th Cir. 1990)

. . . For the last two years in question, 1986 and 1987, plaintiffs discounted their claimed damages by 17.03 . . .

ASSOCIATION OF RELATIVES AND FRIENDS OF AIDS PATIENTS A. F. A. P. S. v. REGULATIONS AND PERMITS ADMINISTRATION OR ADMINISTRACION REGLAMENTOS y PERMISOS A. R. P. E., 740 F. Supp. 95 (D.P.R. 1990)

. . . A.R.P.E. also had the authority to grant plaintiffs a public hearing (see Topic 4, Section 17.03) so . . .

CABLE HOME COMMUNICATION CORPORATION, M A- v. NETWORK PRODUCTIONS, INC. Jr., 902 F.2d 829 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . Wolf, Court Awarded Attorney Fees ¶ 17.03[2][a] n. 5.1 (1988) ("[Wjhere time spent on claims against . . .

UNITED STATES v. K. BEVANS, 728 F. Supp. 340 (E.D. Pa. 1990)

. . . Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 17.03, at 527-28 (1977 & Supp. 1989)). . . .

DREXELBROOK CONTROLS, INC. v. MAGNETROL INTERNATIONAL, INC., 720 F. Supp. 397 (D. Del. 1989)

. . . See 4 Chisum § 17.03[2], at 17-38.1-40. . . .

CARLOCK, Co. T. I. C. E. v. PILLSBURY COMPANY, Co. HDF HDI WSC DWYER, Co. v. PILLSBURY COMPANY, Co. HDF HDI WSC, 719 F. Supp. 791 (D. Minn. 1989)

. . . Warehouse, Handling, and Delivery Charges 1985 1986 From Woodbridge From Tulare San Francisco 17.78 17.03 . . .

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY CABINET FOR HUMAN RESOURCES, v. UNITED STATES, 16 Cl. Ct. 755 (Cl. Ct. 1989)

. . . Kentucky Rules of Civil Procedure 4.04(3) and 17.03. . . .

SMITH, v. KELSO,, 863 F.2d 1564 (11th Cir. 1989)

. . . See, e.g., Minn.R.Crim.P. 17.03, discussed in Dawson, at 1453 n. 318. Georgia is not such a state. . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. MANGANELLIS,, 864 F.2d 528 (7th Cir. 1988)

. . . Blackmar, § 17.03. . . .

WRIGHT v. B. J. REYNOLDS,, 703 F. Supp. 583 (N.D. Tex. 1988)

. . . Code of Crim.Pro., Art. 17.03 & 17.031. . . . .

NASH, v. CHANDLER,, 848 F.2d 567 (5th Cir. 1988)

. . . Wolf, Court Awarded Attorney Fees § 17.03[2] (1984). . . .

HODOROWSKI v. RAY,, 844 F.2d 1210 (5th Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 17.03(b). . . . Fam.Code.Ann. § 17.03(a)(4). . . . Code Ann. § 17.03, to justify the taking of the children. . . .

S. A. S. A. S. A. C. V. S. A. C. V. S. A. C. V. S. A. C. V. v. Co., 12 Ct. Int'l Trade 401 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1988)

. . . Customs and International Trade Guide § 17.03 at pp. 17-15 to 17-16 (1987)0'The annual review * * * replicates . . .

CEMENTOS ANAHUAC DEL GOLFO, S. A. S. A. S. A. C. V. S. A. C. V. S. A. C. V. S. A. C. V. v. UNITED STATES,, 687 F. Supp. 1558 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1988)

. . . Customs and International Trade Guide § 17.03 at pp. 17-15 to 17-16 (1987) (“The annual review ... replicates . . .

FLORIDA EXPORT TOBACCO CO. INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, 510 So. 2d 936 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . this dispute, the Comptroller’s authority regarding claims against the state was set forth in section 17.03 . . .

FANTASY, INC. v. C. FOGERTY, Co. WEA C. FOGERTY, v. FANTASY, INC., 664 F. Supp. 1345 (N.D. Cal. 1987)

. . . Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright (“Nimmer”) §§ 14.05 & 17.03 (1986); see also, Robert Stigwood Group Ltd. . . .

MYERS, A. C. G. J. v. HOISTING AND PORTABLE LOCAL AFL- CIO, AFL- CIO AFL- CIO F. AFL- CIO AFL- CIO C. AFL- CIO AFL- CIO AFL- CIO AFL- CIO,, 653 F. Supp. 500 (E.D. Mo. 1987)

. . . Section 17.03: Special Meetings, general or as specified in Section 17.02, may be called by the Executive . . .

UNITED STATES v. R. RIDINGER,, 805 F.2d 818 (8th Cir. 1986)

. . . Blackmar, supra note 4, § 17.03. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BOWMAN a k a a k a a k a J. D. S. a k a a k a, 798 F.2d 333 (8th Cir. 1986)

. . . See Devitt & Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instruction, Instructions No. 17.02, 17.03, 17.-04, . . .

LOWE S OF VIRGINIA, INC. N. A. B. v. W. THOMAS A., 60 B.R. 418 (W.D. Va. 1986)

. . . Murphy, Creditors’ Rights In Bankruptcy § 17.03 (1980) (footnotes omitted). . . .

THIRTEEN MILE ROAD, INC. v. CITY OF WARREN, A CHRISTY SALES AND SERVICE, INC. v. CITY OF WARREN, A EAST EIGHT MILE ROAD, INC. a v. CITY OF WARREN, a THIRTEEN MILE ROAD, INC. v. CITY OF WARREN, DETROIT NOVELTY AND TOY, INC. A v. CITY OF WARREN S. Jr., 626 F. Supp. 803 (E.D. Mich. 1985)

. . . See Warren Zoning Ordinance, Sections 14.01, 15.01, 17.02F and 17.03. . 22.14 PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL . . .

UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL- CIO, LOCAL v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, SPENCER FOODS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, AFL- CIO,, 768 F.2d 1463 (D.C. Cir. 1985)

. . . Kheel, Labor Law § 17.03[1][a] (1982). . . .

TOSCO CORPORATION v. P. HODEL, B. UMPLEBY, Co. v. P. HODEL, T. NAPIER, A. L. B. St. H. Jr. R. W. S. v. P. HODEL, BROWN, a v. P. HODEL,, 611 F. Supp. 1130 (D. Colo. 1985)

. . . V.A., 692 F.2d 35, 37-38 (6th Cir.1982); see generally, Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, §§ 17.01, 17.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. GTE CORPORATION,, 603 F. Supp. 730 (D.D.C. 1984)

. . . See generally 3 Von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulations at § 17.03[3], . . . .

GRENDEL S DEN, INC. v. P. LARKIN, GRENDEL S DEN, INC. v. P. LARKIN,, 749 F.2d 945 (1st Cir. 1984)

. . . Wolf, Court Awarded Attorney Fees § 17.03[2] (1984). . . .

R. PIERCE, Jr. v. APPLE VALLEY, INC., 597 F. Supp. 1480 (N.D. Ohio 1984)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.6 (2d ed. 1983), and 1982 Supplement, §§ 17.03 and 17.04. . . .

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, v. H. HARRISON G., 735 F.2d 408 (11th Cir. 1984)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 17.03 at 252 (Supp.1982). . . .

GRENDEL S DEN, INC. v. P. LARKIN,, 582 F. Supp. 1220 (D. Mass. 1984)

. . . See 2 Derfner and Wolf, Court Awarded Attorney Fees, § 17.03(2) at 17-10 (1983). . . .

v., 6 Ct. Int'l Trade 293 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1983)

. . . “B” and “C” shall be made available in full. (2) Subparts 17.01 and the questionnaire component of 17.03 . . . The “10-K” Report component of subpart 17.03 shall be made available in full. (3) Subpart “A” (a) worksheets . . .

In COX, d b a UNITED STATES v. COX, d b a, 33 B.R. 657 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1983)

. . . in bankruptcy even though it may be provable and share in distribution.” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.03 . . . See 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.03 (14th ed. 1978) (under the Act, a debt may be nondis-chargeable . . .

SEVEN ELVES, INCORPORATED, v. S. ESKENAZI,, 704 F.2d 241 (5th Cir. 1983)

. . . Home Indemnity Co., 546 F.2d 1149, 1150 (5th Cir.1977); 1 Collier, Bankruptcy ¶ 17.03 (1978). . . .

SEVEN ELVES, INCORPORATED, v. S. ESKENAZI,, 704 F.2d 241 (5th Cir. 1983)

. . . Home Indemnity Co., 546 F.2d 1149, 1150 (5th Cir.1977); 1 Collier, Bankruptcy ¶ 17.03 (1978). . . .

COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, INC. a E. v. A. CALIFANO, Jr. a COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, INC. a v. HARRIS, a, 698 F.2d 615 (3d Cir. 1983)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §§ 17.01, 17.03-17.04 (2d Ed. 1 Supp. 1982); Note, Equitable Estoppel . . .

MARTIN, v. STRASBURG,, 689 F.2d 365 (2d Cir. 1982)

. . . White-bread, Criminal Procedure §§ 17.01-17.03 (1980). . . .

In ASKEW, BRAWNER, v. ASKEW,, 22 B.R. 641 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1982)

. . . without just cause or excuse, may constitute a willful and malicious injury. 1 Collier, Bankruptcy ¶ 17.03 . . .

PORTMANN, v. UNITED STATES, 674 F.2d 1155 (7th Cir. 1982)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Text § 17.03 at 348 (1972) (“The government is estopped every hour by agreements . . .

In ST. CROIX HOTEL CORPORATION,, 18 B.R. 375 (Bankr. D.V.I. 1982)

. . . See 4 Kheel, Labor Law § 17.03[l][e] (1981). . . . See discussion in Kheel, supra, at § 17.03[2][b]. . . . .

In GROSS, L. O. MILLER, v. GROSS,, 654 F.2d 602 (9th Cir. 1981)

. . . Oglebay, Collier on Bankruptcy 1 17.03, p. 1583 (14th ed. 1978) (any debts which are not provable are . . .

In GROSS, L. O. MILLER, v. GROSS,, 654 F.2d 602 (9th Cir. 1981)

. . . Oglebay, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.03, p. 1583 (14th ed. 1978) (any debts which are not provable are . . .

CITY OF PORT ARTHUR, TEXAS, v. UNITED STATES, 517 F. Supp. 987 (D.D.C. 1981)

. . . Hispanics, blacks and others from the total population; in that event, we conclude that 4,991 whites or 17.03% . . .

TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER v. A. LEWIS, 399 So. 2d 106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . The comptroller has specific authority to hold' such hearings under Sections 17.03 and 17.05, Florida . . . Section 17.03, titled To Audit Claims Against the State, provides: (1) The Comptroller of this state, . . .

UNITED STATES v. BERNARD, UNITED STATES v. COMSTOCK, Jr., 625 F.2d 854 (9th Cir. 1980)

. . . Devitt and Blackmar, § 17.03. . . .

In DARDAR J. PETTY, Sr. v. DARDAR J., 620 F.2d 39 (5th Cir. 1980)

. . . without just cause or excuse, may constitute a willful and malicious injury. 1 Collier, Bankruptcy ¶ 17.03 . . .

Z. COTY v. HARRIS,, 495 F. Supp. 452 (W.D. Va. 1980)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law of the Seventies, §§ 17.03 and 17.04 (Supp.1978). . . .

HANSEN, v. HARRIS,, 619 F.2d 942 (2d Cir. 1980)

. . . Davis, supra, §§ 17.03 and 17.04 (Supp.1978). . . .

BROAD v. ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, 614 F.2d 418 (5th Cir. 1980)

. . . contained such further covenants and agreements thereafter to be observed, and (subject to Section 17.03 . . .