Cases from cite.case.law:

LLOYD S SYNDICATE v. AMERICAN GLOBAL MARITIME INC., 346 F. Supp. 3d 908 (S.D. Tex. 2018)

. . . . § 17.041 -045; see also Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Liebreich , 339 F.3d 369, 373 (5th Cir. 2003). . . .

DILLARD, v. FEDERAL CORPORATION,, 321 F. Supp. 3d 752 (W.D. Tex. 2018)

. . . CODE §§ 17.041 -045. . . .

BAR GROUP, LLC, v. BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE ADVISORS, INC., 215 F. Supp. 3d 524 (S.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . not authorized to do business in the State of Texas and is a “nonresident” as that term is defined in 17.041 . . .

EDUCATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, v. J. TRACEY,, 102 F. Supp. 3d 906 (W.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . . & Rem.Code § 17.041). . . .

JAFFER, v. STANDARD CHARTERED BANK,, 301 F.R.D. 256 (N.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . . & Rem.Code § 17.041 et seq. (Texas long-arm statute). . . .

BREATHWIT MARINE CONTRACTORS, LTD. v. DELOACH MARINE SERVICES, LLC,, 994 F. Supp. 2d 845 (S.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . . §§ 17.041-.045 (West 2013). . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. BASS PRO OUTDOOR WORLD, LLC,, 884 F. Supp. 2d 499 (S.D. Tex. 2012)

. . . . §§ 17.041-17.045, is coterminous with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United . . . Code Ann. §§ 17.041-17.045, is coterminous with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to . . .

AKERBLOM, v. EZRA HOLDINGS LTD., 848 F. Supp. 2d 673 (S.D. Tex. 2012)

. . . . §§ 17.041-17.045, is coterminous "with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United . . .

POWELL, v. PROFILE DESIGN LLC,, 838 F. Supp. 2d 535 (S.D. Tex. 2012)

. . . . §§ 17.041-17.045, is coterminous with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United . . .

POWELL, v. PROFILE DESIGN LLC,, 825 F. Supp. 2d 842 (S.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . . §§ 17.041-17.045, is coterminous with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United . . .

VALERO MARKETING AND SUPPLY COMPANY, v. GENERAL ENERGY CORPORATION,, 702 F. Supp. 2d 706 (S.D. Tex. 2010)

. . . The Texas long-arm statute, Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code § 17.041 et seq., confers jurisdiction . . .

RIMKUS CONSULTING GROUP, INC. v. BALENTINE,, 693 F. Supp. 2d 681 (S.D. Tex. 2010)

. . . Code §§ 17.041-17.045. . . .

LANSING TRADE GROUP, LLC, v. BIOFUELS CO. KG,, 612 F. Supp. 2d 813 (S.D. Tex. 2009)

. . . . § 17.041-.045; see also Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Liebreich, 339 F.3d 369, 373 (5th Cir.2003). . . .

CLEMENS, v. McNAMEE,, 608 F. Supp. 2d 811 (S.D. Tex. 2009)

. . . . §§ 17.041-17.045, is coterminous with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United . . .

STROMAN REALTY, INC. v. WERCINSKI,, 513 F.3d 476 (5th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 17.041. . . .

SEITZ v. ENVIROTECH SYSTEMS WORLDWIDE INC., 513 F. Supp. 2d 855 (S.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . . § 17.041-.045. . . .

GARTIN, v. PAR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, INC. a a k a d b a IV, IV,, 561 F. Supp. 2d 670 (E.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . . §§ 17.041-17.045 (Vernon 1986). . . .

P. SEGHERS, v. M. EL BIZRI,, 513 F. Supp. 2d 694 (N.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . . § 17.041 et seq. (Vernon 1997) (Texas long-arm statute). 3. . . .

SARMIENTO, v. PRODUCER S GIN OF WATERPROOF, INC., 439 F. Supp. 2d 725 (S.D. Tex. 2006)

. . . . & Rem.Code §§ 17.041-17.045 (Vernon Supp.2006); Moreno, 182 F.Supp.2d at 593(internal citations omitted . . .

GOODMAN CO. L. P. Co. L. P. v. A H SUPPLY, INC., 396 F. Supp. 2d 766 (S.D. Tex. 2005)

. . . . § 17.041 et seq., confers jurisdiction to the limit permitted by due process. . . .

UNITED VAN LINES, LLC, v. MARKS, 366 F. Supp. 2d 468 (S.D. Tex. 2005)

. . . . & Rem.Code § 17.041 et. seq. (Vernon 2004). . . .

HANSON PIPE PRODUCTS, INC. v. BRIDGE TECHNOLOGIES LLC,, 351 F. Supp. 2d 603 (E.D. Tex. 2004)

. . . . § 17.041 (Vernon 2001) et seq.; Gessmann v. Stephens, 51 S.W.3d 329, 335 (Tex.App. . . .

RELIGIOUS TECHNOLOGY CENTER, v. LIEBREICH, J. G. v. v., 339 F.3d 369 (5th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 17.041 (Vernon 2001) et seq.; Gessmann v. . . .

CARROT BUNCH CO. INC. d b a v. COMPUTER FRIENDS, INC. d b a d b a, 218 F. Supp. 2d 820 (N.D. Tex. 2002)

. . . . §§ 17.041-.045 (Vernon 2000). . . .

GONSALEZ MORENO, v. MILK TRAIN, INC. AG-, 182 F. Supp. 2d 590 (W.D. Tex. 2002)

. . . . §§ 17.041-17.045 (Vernon 1997 & Supp.2002)); see also Kelly v. Syria Shell Petroleum Dev. . . .

MANAGEMENT INSIGHTS, INC. v. CIC ENTERPRISES, INC., 194 F. Supp. 2d 520 (N.D. Tex. 2001)

. . . . § 17.041-.042 (Vernon 1997). . . .

BELLORIN, v. BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE, INC. a k a, 236 F. Supp. 2d 670 (W.D. Tex. 2001)

. . . . §§ 17.041-17.069 (Vernon 1997), has been interpreted as extending to the limits of federal due process . . .

J. M. HUBER CORPORATION INC. v. PAN AMERICAN EXPRESS, INC. v. S. R. L. C. V., 118 F. Supp. 2d 764 (S.D. Tex. 2000)

. . . Court has interpreted the language of its long-arm statute, Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code §§ 17.041 . . .

COLE, v. TOBACCO INSTITUTE,, 47 F. Supp. 2d 812 (E.D. Tex. 1999)

. . . . §§ 17.041-045 (1986). . . .

B. LATSHAW Co. v. H. E. JOHNSTON, 167 F.3d 208 (5th Cir. 1999)

. . . . & Rem.Code §§ 17.041-045 (Vernon 1986). . Schlobohm v. . . .

SUMMIT MACHINE TOOL MANUFACTURING CORP. v. WARREN TRANSPORT, INC. a, 920 F. Supp. 722 (S.D. Tex. 1996)

. . . . §§ 17.041-.043 (Vernon 1986), is coextensive with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment . . .

KREIMERMAN, v. CASA VEERKAMP, S. A. C. V., 22 F.3d 634 (5th Cir. 1994)

. . . . & Rem.Code § 17.041, et seq. . . . .

BILL REA INSURANCE ASSOCIATES, INC. F. v. NATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP., 860 F. Supp. 1181 (W.D. Tex. 1994)

. . . . §§ 17.041-.045 (Vernon 1986). . Ms. . . .

RUSTON GAS TURBINES, INC. v. DONALDSON COMPANY, INC. v. CORCHRAN, INC., 9 F.3d 415 (5th Cir. 1993)

. . . . & Rem.Code §§ 17.041-045 (Vernon 1986). . E.g., Schlobohm v. . . .

HAM d b a v. LA CIENEGA MUSIC COMPANY,, 4 F.3d 413 (5th Cir. 1993)

. . . Code §§ 17.041-045. . E.g., Schlobohm v. . . .

POLYTHANE SYSTEMS, INC. v. MARINA VENTURES INTERNATIONAL, LTD. LF, 993 F.2d 1201 (5th Cir. 1993)

. . . . §§ 17.041-.045 (Vernon 1986). . See also Standard Fittings Co. v. . . .

JOHN HAVLIR ASSOCIATES, INC. v. TACOA, INC., 810 F. Supp. 752 (N.D. Tex. 1993)

. . . . §§ 17.041-045 (West 1986 & Supp. 1993). . . .

COMMAND- AIRE CORP. v. ONTARIO MECHANICAL SALES AND SERVICE INCORPORATED,, 963 F.2d 90 (5th Cir. 1992)

. . . . §§ 17.041-17.045. . . .

TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPELINE CORPORATION, v. DAKOTA GASIFICATION CO., 782 F. Supp. 336 (S.D. Tex. 1991)

. . . . §§ 17.041-17.045 (Vernon 1986). . . .

CROWDER, v. SINYARD, CROWDER, v. SINYARD, v. P. CROWDER,, 884 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1989)

. . . . & Rem.Code §§ 17.041-17.045, insofar as they could be characterized as tort-feasors whose offending . . .

KERVIN v. RED RIVER SKI AREA, INC., 711 F. Supp. 1383 (E.D. Tex. 1989)

. . . . §§ 17.041-045 (Vernon 1986). . . .

SOUTHMARK CORPORATION, v. LIFE INVESTORS, INC. USLICO, 851 F.2d 763 (5th Cir. 1988)

. . . . §§ 17.041-045), the principal question here is whether the assertion of jurisdiction over USLICO by . . .

ENTEK CORPORATION E. v. SOUTHWEST PIPE SUPPLY CO. d b a USA W. C. PTE J. B., 683 F. Supp. 1092 (N.D. Tex. 1988)

. . . . §§ 17.041-17.093 (Vernon 1986) and the principles of due process, because Defendants have done business . . . Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code § 17.041-17.093. The Court therefore rejects Defendants’ argument. . . . .

BLUDWORTH BOND SHIPYARD, INC. v. M V CARIBBEAN WIND, In, 841 F.2d 646 (5th Cir. 1988)

. . . . & Rem.Code §§ 17.041-.045 (Vernon 1986). . . .

BEARRY, v. BEECH AIRCRAFT CORPORATION,, 818 F.2d 370 (5th Cir. 1987)

. . . . §§ 17.041-.043 (Vernon 1986). . . .

MICROMEDIA, v. AUTOMATED BROADCAST CONTROLS,, 799 F.2d 230 (5th Cir. 1986)

. . . . §§ 17.041-17.045. . . . .