The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 17.11

17.11 To report disbursements made.—

(1) The Chief Financial Officer shall make in all his or her future annual reports an exhibit stated from the record of disbursements made during the fiscal year, and the several heads of expenditures under which such disbursements were made.

(2) The Chief Financial Officer shall also cause to have reported from the Florida Accounting Information Resource Subsystem no less than quarterly the disbursements which agencies made to small businesses, as defined in the Florida Small and Minority Business Assistance Act; to certified minority business enterprises in the aggregate; and to certified minority business enterprises broken down into categories of minority persons, as well as gender and nationality subgroups. This information shall be made available to the agencies, the Office of Supplier Diversity, the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives. Each agency shall be responsible for the accuracy of information entered into the Florida Accounting Information Resource Subsystem for use in this reporting.

History.—s. 3, ch. 1536, 1866; RS 104; GS 108; RGS 120; CGL 150; s. 5, ch. 83-132; s. 6, ch. 85-104; s. 2, ch. 94-322; s. 1312, ch. 95-147; s. 12, ch. 99-155; s. 7, ch. 2000-286; s. 28, ch. 2003-261; s. 18, ch. 2007-157.

F.S. 17.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 17.11

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 17.11

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 17.11.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

FRIENDS OF ANIMALS, v. ZINKE,, 373 F. Supp. 3d 70 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . . § 17.11(h), it has been the subject of a special species-specific rule for importation. . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. ZINKE,, 369 F. Supp. 3d 164 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . . § 17.11(h), and both are the subject of special species-specific rules for importation. . . .

UNITED STATES v. W. TURTLE, 365 F. Supp. 3d 1242 (M.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . . § 17.11(h) lists the American alligator as threatened due to similarity in appearance with other listed . . .

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, v. ZINKE, U. S., 347 F. Supp. 3d 465 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

. . . . §§ 17.11, 222.101(a), 223.102, 402.01(b). . . .

SIERRA CLUB v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U. S. T. LLC, v. U. S. LLC,, 899 F.3d 260 (4th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 17.11 (listing endangered and threatened wildlife). . . .

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. v. ROSS,, 331 F. Supp. 3d 1338 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2018)

. . . . § 17.11 ). . . .

HUMANE SOCIETY OF UNITED STATES, v. M. KIENZLE, III Sr., 333 F. Supp. 3d 1236 (D.N.M. 2018)

. . . . §§ 17.11, 17.21. . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. LONGFIN CORP. S. a k a, 316 F. Supp. 3d 743 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . Longfin's April 2, 2018 Form 10-K later reported that Stampede Capital Limited, in turn, was 17.11% controlled . . . As noted above, Meenavalli and his wife own 17.11% of Stampede Capital Limited. . . . Meenavalli, the CEO of Longfin, owns 17.11% of Stampede Capital Limited with his wife. . . .

ACT II JEWELRY, LLC, a d b a a v. WOOTEN U, LLC, a U, LLC, a v. II LLC, a a K. III, 301 F. Supp. 3d 905 (N.D. Ill. 2018)

. . . Commentary Rule 17(a) (internal quotations omitted); see also, 4-17 Moore's Federal Practice-Civil, § 17.11 . . .

AQUALLIANCE, v. U. S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION,, 287 F. Supp. 3d 969 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

. . . . §§ 17.11, 222.101(a), 223.102, 402.01(b). . . .

PEOPLE FOR ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC. v. MIAMI SEAQUARIUM, LLC,, 879 F.3d 1142 (11th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 17.11). . . .

TURTLE ISLAND RESTORATION NETWORK v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE L. U. S. U. S., 878 F.3d 725 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 17.11. . . . Of those birds, only the short-tailed albatross is listed under the ESA, 50 C.F.R. § 17.11(h). . . .

SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL v. ZINKE, U. S., 878 F.3d 316 (D.C. Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 17.11. . . . the African Elephant as a Threatened Species, 43 Fed, Reg. 20,499, 20,503 (May 12, 1978); 50 C.F.R. § 17.11 . . .

IN RE FRESH- G RESTAURANT INTERMEDIATE HOLDING, LLC, 580 B.R. 103 (Bankr. D. Del. 2017)

. . . A, 1(2.2, 17.11, Beverly Connection Restaurant Lease Fundamental Lease Provisions (emphasis added). . . . .

HILL v. COGGINS, d b a d b a v. d b a d b a, 867 F.3d 499 (4th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 17.11(h). . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, E. I. De, 861 F.3d 174 (D.C. Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 17.11. . . . . . §§ 17.11, 402.01(b). . . . NMFS experts if the agency action "may affect” a marine species. 16 U.S.C. § 1532(15); 50 C.F.R. §§ 17.11 . . .

NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND FISH, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Dr. Co. LLC, 854 F.3d 1236 (10th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 17.11(h) (2016). . . . Reg. 9607-01, 9612 (Mar. 9, 1978) (to be codified at 50 C.F.R pt. 17); see also 50 C.F.R. § 17.11(h) . . .

PEOPLE FOR ETHICAL TREATMENT OF PROPERTY OWNERS, v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE M. s S. M. M. D. C., 852 F.3d 990 (10th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 17.11), the species was reclassified as threatened in 1984; at that time, the FWS issued a special . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 17.11 (listing endangered and threatened wildlife). . . .

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, v. A. NORTON, U. S., 236 F. Supp. 3d 1198 (E.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . . §§ 17.11, 222.101(a), 223.102, 402.01(b). . . .

SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL v. JEWELL, In, 842 F.3d 1280 (D.C. Cir. 2016)

. . . . §§ 17.11, 17.22. . . .

DOYLE, v. UNITED STATES,, 129 Fed. Cl. 147 (Fed. Cl. 2016)

. . . . §§ 17.11(h), 17.42(e); Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Threatened Status . . .

WILD FISH CONSERVANCY, v. IRVING, M., 221 F. Supp. 3d 1224 (E.D. Wash. 2016)

. . . . §§ 17.2, 17.11, 223.102, 224.101. . . .

SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, v. M. R. JEWELL, U. S., 213 F. Supp. 3d 48 (D.D.C. 2016)

. . . . § 17.11(h); 50 C.F.R. § 17.40(e) (“Special Rule”). . . .

UNITED STATES v. HESS,, 829 F.3d 700 (8th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 17.11(h). . . .

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY, v. HOPPER, U. S., 827 F.3d 1077 (D.C. Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 17.11(h) (“List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife”). . . .

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY, v. HOPPER, U. S., 424 U.S. App. D.C. 11 (D.C. Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 17.11(h) (“List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife”). . . .

PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC. v. MIAMI SEAQUARIUM LLC, d b a, 189 F. Supp. 3d 1327 (S.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . . §§ 17.11, 222101(a))). ‘ The ESA protects listed species in several ways. . . .

K. KUEHL, K. A. A. T. a v. SELLNER, a, 161 F. Supp. 3d 678 (N.D. Iowa 2016)

. . . See 50 C.F.R. § 17.11(h). Plaintiffs argue the protection extends to “hybrid” wolves. . . . . § 17.11(h) “contains the names of all species of wildlife which have been determined by the Services . . . to be Endangered or Threatened.” § 17.11(a). . . . However, “the listing of a particular taxon includes all lower taxonomic units.” § 17.11(g). . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 17.11(g). . . .

MOBLEY, v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY,, 806 F.3d 568 (D.C. Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 17.11(a). . . .

MOBLEY, v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY,, 420 U.S. App. D.C. 108 (D.C. Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 17.11(a). . . .

SAN DIEGO CATTLEMEN S COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION, v. VILSACK, U. S. v., 318 F.R.D. 646 (D.N.M. 2015)

. . . . § 17.11) (listing the New Mexico meadow jumping mouse); (Doc. 12-2 at 1 (addressing occupied habitat . . .

CORTLANDT STREET RECOVERY CORP. v. HELLAS TELECOMMUNICATIONS, S. R. L. I, S. r. l, Co- TCW HT- Co- I L. P. TCW HT- Co- II L. P., 790 F.3d 411 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . Co., 187 F.2d 567, 571 (10th Cir.1951); see also 4 Moore’s Federal Practice § 17.11 [l][e]. . . .

SWANSON GROUP MFG. LLC, v. JEWELL, J., 790 F.3d 235 (D.C. Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 17.11(h). . . .

ANCHOR SAVINGS BANK, FSB, v. UNITED STATES, 121 Fed. Cl. 296 (Fed. Cl. 2015)

. . . would have had a stronger earnings history and would have been able to sell those stocks at a price of $17.11 . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, E. I. LLC,, 106 F. Supp. 3d 95 (D.D.C. 2015)

. . . . §§ 17.11, 402.01(b). . . . .

KLAMATH- SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER, v. NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION,, 99 F. Supp. 3d 1033 (N.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . Defenders of Wildlife, 551 U.S. 644, 651, 127 S.Ct. 2518, 168 L.Ed.2d 467 (2007) (citing 50 CFR §§ 17.11 . . .

ETHELBERTH, v. CHOICE SECURITY COMPANY, Co., 91 F. Supp. 3d 339 (E.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . work at Schools of $12 to $15.61, while the prevailing wage rate for Plaintiffs experience level was $17.11 . . .

IN RE CARRIER IQ, INC., 78 F. Supp. 3d 1051 (N.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . Code § 17.11 To state a claim under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”), plaintiffs must . . .

SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, v. M. R. JEWELL, U. S., 76 F. Supp. 3d 198 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . . § 17.11(h). . . .

ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE U. S. U. S. U. S. Of U. S. U. S., 772 F.3d 592 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 17.11 (2014). . . .

HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, v. PRITZKER,, 75 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . WW 17.11, 402.01(b); Lujan v. . . .

NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY, INC. v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE M. U. S. U. S. P. U. S. E. U. S., 55 F. Supp. 3d 316 (E.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . . § 17.11 and 17.12, respectively, see 50 C.F.R. § 402.01, including the piping plover. . . . . § 17.11(h). . . . determined to be endangered or threatened under section 4 of the [ESA] * * * [and] are found in 50 CFR 17.11 . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 65 F. Supp. 3d 742 (N.D. Cal. 2014)

. . . . §§ 17.11, 402.01(b). The NMFS and FWS are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Service.” . . .

BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ALLIANCE, f k a v. J. JIRON, v., 762 F.3d 1036 (10th Cir. 2014)

. . . . §§ 17.11-17.12 (listing species). . . . .

HYMAS d b a v. UNITED STATES,, 117 Fed. Cl. 466 (Fed. Cl. 2014)

. . . See 5 RM § 17.11(A)(1)(c) (1986). . . . AR 91-92 (citing 5 RM 17.11(A)(c)(1)). In addition, Mr. . . . MJAR 17 (citing AR 26-28; 5 RM 17.11(A)(1)(c) (1986)). . . . Gov’t Mot. 40 (quoting 5 RM § 17.11(A)(1)(c) (1986)). . . . Gov’t Mot. 41 (citing 5 RM § 17.11(A)(1)(c) (1986)). . . .

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL v. JEWELL, U. S. J. U. S. LP F. D. Co. D. Te, 749 F.3d 776 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . §§ 17.11, 222.101(a), 223.102, 402.01(b). . . .

SAN LUIS DELTA- MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY LLC a v. JEWELL, U. S. U. S. M. U. S. U. S. U. S. L. U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S. N. Sr. U. S. P. LLC a v. U. S. M. U. S. U. S. U. S. Of L. U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S. N. Sr. U. S. P. U. S. LLC a v. U. S. U. S. M. U. S. U. S. U. S. L. U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S. N. Sr. U. S. P. LLC a v. U. S. U. S. M. U. S. U. S. U. S. L. U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S. In U. S. N. Sr. U. S. P. LLC a v. U. S. U. S. M. U. S. U. S. U. S. L. U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S. U. S. N. Sr. U. S. P. v. M. U. S. U. S. v. U. S. M. U. S. J., 747 F.3d 581 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 17.11; BiOp at 140. . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF NAVY,, 733 F.3d 1106 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . §§ 17.11, 402.01(b). The ESA protects listed species in several ways. . . .

INTERTRIBAL SINKYONE WILDERNESS COUNCIL, v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE,, 970 F. Supp. 2d 988 (N.D. Cal. 2013)

. . . . §§ 17.11, 402.01(b). . . .

CONSERVATION FORCE, INC. v. JEWELL,, 733 F.3d 1200 (D.C. Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 17.11(h); see Endangered Status for 159 Taxa of Animals, 41 Fed.Reg. 24,062, 24,-067 (June 14, 1976 . . .

SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, v. JEWELL, v., 960 F. Supp. 2d 17 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . . § 17.11(h) (“List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife”). . . . Populations in Zimbabwe from Endangered to Threatened, 53 Fed.Reg. 38,451 (Sept. 30, 1988); 50 C.F.R. § 17.11 . . . (emphasis added) (citing 50 C.F.R. § 17.11(h) {see, e.g., African elephant, Asian elephant, panda, Grevy . . .

UNITED STATES v. AGUILAR,, 527 F. App'x 808 (10th Cir. 2013)

. . . the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife, 72 Fed.Reg. 37,346, 37,372 (July 9, 2007); 50 C.F.R. 17.11 . . .

STRAHAN, v. ROUGHEAD,, 910 F. Supp. 2d 358 (D. Mass. 2012)

. . . . §§ 17.11(h) & 224.101(b) (listing protected species). . . . See 50 C.F.R. §§ 17.11(h) & 224.101(b). . . .

In MAMMOLA, P. v., 474 B.R. 23 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2012)

. . . Tiffany’s Real Property § 1285 (inquiry notice as a form of actual notice); 4 American Law of Property § 17.11 . . .

ILLINOIS COMMERCIAL FISHING ASSOCIATION, v. SALAZAR, U. S., 867 F. Supp. 2d 108 (D.D.C. 2012)

. . . .] § 17.11” with an indication of whether it is to be treated as threatened or endangered. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ONE ETCHED IVORY TUSK OF AFRICAN ELEPHANT, 871 F. Supp. 2d 128 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . . § 17.11. . . .

CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, v. U. S. FISH WILDLIFE SERVICE, U. S., 677 F.3d 1073 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 17.11). . . .

SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, v. SALAZAR, U. S. v. v., 852 F. Supp. 2d 102 (D.D.C. 2012)

. . . . § 17.11(h)). The FWS was also “recently petitioned to list all chimpanzees as endangered....” Id. . . .

NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES, a v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, a a a a, 855 F. Supp. 2d 1199 (D. Or. 2012)

. . . . § 17.11(h). . . .

DOUGLAS TIMBER OPERATORS, INC. v. SALAZAR,, 831 F. Supp. 2d 285 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . . § 17.11(h). The owl resides, among other places, on the lands at issue in this case. . . .

ARANSAS PROJECT, v. SHAW,, 835 F. Supp. 2d 251 (S.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . . § 17.11(h), and no more is required for Section 9 liability. . . . .

COALITION FOR A SUSTAINABLE DELTA v. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, 812 F. Supp. 2d 1089 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . . §§ 17.11, 402.01(b). . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE v., 797 F. Supp. 2d 949 (D. Ariz. 2011)

. . . . § 17.11. . . . . The lynx is designated "threatened.” 50 C.F.R. § 17.11. . . .

M. MARCUM, v. SALAZAR,, 751 F. Supp. 2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 17.11(h). . . .

BENDER, v. NEWELL WINDOW FURNISHINGS,, 725 F. Supp. 2d 642 (W.D. Mich. 2010)

. . . guaranteed under the previous collective bargaining agreements, (docket no. 229-6, Plaintiffs’ Master Ex. 17.11 . . .

ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE, v. D. MARTIN,, 668 F. Supp. 2d 254 (D. Me. 2009)

. . . . § 17.11). . . .

LeTOURNEAU TECHNOLOGIES DRILLING SYSTEMS, INC. v. NOMAC DRILLING, LLC,, 676 F. Supp. 2d 534 (S.D. Tex. 2009)

. . . Top Drive EPA, Exhibit A to Plaintiff's Motion, Docket Entry No. 28, p. 17, § 17.11; Rig EPA, Exhibit . . . C to Plaintiff’s Motion, Docket Entry No. 28, p. 16, § 17.11. . . . .

QUARTERMAN v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, 716 F. Supp. 2d 67 (D. Mass. 2009)

. . . Bishop, Massachusetts Practice Series § 17.11 (2009). . . .

In L. HOUSEY, W. v. As, 409 B.R. 611 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2009)

. . . Tiffany’s Real Property § 1285 (inquiry notice as a form of actual notice); 4 American Law of Property § 17.11 . . .

In BILL HEARD ENTERPRISES, INC. s, 400 B.R. 813 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 2009)

. . . Section 17.11 of each dealer franchise agreement provides that the agreement is the sole agreement of . . .

RZS HOLDINGS AVV, v. PDVSA PETROLEOS S. A., 598 F. Supp. 2d 762 (E.D. Va. 2009)

. . . (Id.) . “17.11 RZS's conduct has lengthened and embittered the proceedings from the outset. . . .

STRAHAN, v. HOLMES,, 595 F. Supp. 2d 161 (D. Mass. 2009)

. . . . § 17.11. 2. . . .

ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE, v. D. MARTIN,, 588 F. Supp. 2d 70 (D. Me. 2008)

. . . . § 17.11). . . . lynx was listed as a threatened species, 65 Fed.Reg. 16052 (March 24, 2000) (codified at 50 C.F.R. § 17.11 . . .

ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE v. KEMPTHORNE, A v. v., 548 F.3d 815 (9th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 17.11(h). . . .

UNITED STATES LULAC- GI v. TEXAS,, 572 F. Supp. 2d 726 (E.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . denial; Crosby ISD reported 74 denials, a 31.76% rate of denial; Clint ISD reported 699 denials, a 17.11% . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, v. GUTIERREZ,, 532 F.3d 913 (D.C. Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 17.11 (listing the North Atlantic right whale as endangered under the ESA); see also 35 Fed.Reg. . . .

MECKLENBURG FARM, v. ANHEUSER- BUSCH, INC., 250 F.R.D. 414 (E.D. Mo. 2008)

. . . the assignee must sue in its own name and need not join the assignor.” 4 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 17.11 . . . parties in this action because they do not retain any interest therein, see 4 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 17.11 . . .

UNITED STATES v. FRIDAY,, 525 F.3d 938 (10th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 17.11(h)). . . .

WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, v. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT U. S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 1113 (D. Nev. 2008)

. . . . § 17.11(h). . . .

FLORIDA KEY DEER v. R. PAULISON, P., 522 F.3d 1133 (11th Cir. 2008)

. . . . §§ 17.11, 222.101(a), 223.102, 402.01(b). . . .

PACIFIC SHORES SUBDIVISION CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT, v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,, 538 F. Supp. 2d 242 (D.D.C. 2008)

. . . . §§ 17.11, 222.101(a), 223.102, 402.01(b). . . .

ANCHOR SAVINGS BANK, FSB, v. UNITED STATES, 81 Fed. Cl. 1 (Fed. Cl. 2008)

. . . calculation yielded a $4.11 increase in the “but for” Anchor’s share price, for a total offering price of $17.11 . . .

IZAAK WALTON LEAGUE OF AMERICA, INC. v. KIMBELL,, 516 F. Supp. 2d 982 (D. Minn. 2007)

. . . . § 17.11. . . .

AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS, v. RINGLING BROTHERS AND BARNUM BAILEY CIRCUS,, 502 F. Supp. 2d 103 (D.D.C. 2007)

. . . . § 17.11. . . .

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS v. DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, 551 U.S. 644 (U.S. 2007)

. . . See 50 CFR §§17.11, 222.101(a), 223.102, 402.01(b) (2006). . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. ZAK, Jr., 486 F. Supp. 2d 208 (D. Mass. 2007)

. . . . § 17.11; but see S. Res. 146, 110th Cong. . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, v. GUTIERREZ,, 484 F. Supp. 2d 44 (D.D.C. 2007)

. . . See 50 C.F.R. 17.11; see also Am. Compl. 41. . . .

FOREST GUARDIANS, a a a a a a v. FORSGREN, U. S. a M. a a a H., 478 F.3d 1149 (10th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 17.11(h) adds Wyoming to the list of areas where Canada lynx are threatened. . . .

OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL v. B. ALLEN, s U. S., 476 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 17.11(h). . . .

REINHART OIL GAS, INC. v. EXCEL DIRECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,, 463 F. Supp. 2d 1240 (D. Colo. 2006)

. . . Moore, supra, § 17.11[l][a] (“Because it has assigned the entire claim, the assignor retains no interest . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, v. MARTIN, v., 454 F. Supp. 2d 1085 (E.D. Wash. 2006)

. . . . § 17.11. . . .

NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION v. J. HARVEY, U. S., 440 F. Supp. 2d 940 (E.D. Ark. 2006)

. . . . § 17.11 (amended by 71 F.R. 19244-01 and 71 FR 19452-01). . 16 U.S.C. § 1536 (Although there is no . . .

HUBBARD AUTO CENTER, INC. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, 422 F. Supp. 2d 999 (N.D. Ind. 2006)

. . . B, “Standard Provisions,” § 17.11 Ex. 1 Hubbard’s unjust enrichment claim fails as a matter of law and . . .

CELTA AGENCIES, INC. v. DENIZCILIKSANAYI VE TICAARET, A. S., 396 F. Supp. 2d 106 (D.P.R. 2005)

. . . “The validity of an assignment is determined by substantive law.” 4 Moore’s § 17.11[l][a]. . . . assigned the entire claim the assignor retains no interest on which to base an action.” 4 Moore’s § 17.11 . . .

KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT, v. UNITED STATES, s, 67 Fed. Cl. 504 (Fed. Cl. 2005)

. . . . §§ 17.11, 402.01(b). . . .

UNITED STATES v. R. KAPP,, 419 F.3d 666 (7th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 17.11. . . . At all times relevant to Kapp’s case, the USFWS enforced a policy, consistent with 50 C.F.R. § 17.11( . . . tiger and leopard subspecies are similarly protected, as set forth in the regulations. 50 C.F.R. § 17.11 . . . of tiger) are endangered and protected because tigers are listed at the species level. 50 C.F.R. § 17.11 . . . E.g., 50 C.F.R. § 17.11(h). . . .

APCC SERVICES, INC. v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO., 418 F.3d 1238 (D.C. Cir. 2005)

. . . Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 17.11[1][c] (3d ed. 1997) (“The assignee is real party in interest . . .

ORFF v. UNITED STATES, 545 U.S. 596 (U.S. 2005)

. . . Reg. 12854-12855; 50 CFR § 17.11. . . .

COLD MOUNTAIN v. P. GARBER, U. S. A., 375 F.3d 884 (9th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 17.11. . . .

SCARBOROUGH v. PRINCIPI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 541 U.S. 401 (U.S. 2004)

. . . or agencies in the proceeding that the applicant alleges was not substantially justified”); 40 CFR § 17.11 . . .