Cases from cite.case.law:

MASIS, v. STATE, 245 So. 3d 913 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . rescored under the 1994 sentencing guidelines, the trial court could impose a sentence anywhere from 17.16 . . .

VIZIO, INC. v. KLEE,, 226 F. Supp. 3d 88 (D. Conn. 2016)

. . . According to DEEP, VIZIO’s billable national market share is currently 17.16%. Amend. Compl. ¶ 34. . . .

ODONNELL, On v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS,, 227 F. Supp. 3d 706 (S.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . Judges are state actors in their direct enforcement of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 17.16 . . .

UNITED STATES v. REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT OLD MONTAUK HIGHWAY, MONTAUK, NEW YORK, LLC, In, 298 F.R.D. 43 (E.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . The interest on the CreXus Loan continues to accrue at a rate of 17.16 percent per annum or $6,184.02 . . . $14,598,467.92 that was owing the CreXus Loan as of April 1,2013, interest continues to accrue at a rate of 17.16% . . .

P. ERRICO, v. STRYKER CORPORATION,, 281 F.R.D. 182 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . A, § 17.16(a)); Michigan, where Stryker resides and has filed a state court action seeking declaratory . . .

In E. SMITH,, 463 B.R. 756 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2012)

. . . P. 3129.1 17.16 foreclosure fees 1,925.00 escrow advances 1,395.18 Total $29,800.87 IV. . . . P. 3129.1 17.16 foreclosure fees 1,925.00 escrow advances 1,395.18 Total $30,351.55 Y. . . .

PICKETT, v. SHERIDAN HEALTH CARE CENTER,, 664 F.3d 632 (7th Cir. 2011)

. . . , Abrahamson, Vorachek & Levinson (“Abrahamson”), to prepare the fee petition, Rossiello also spent 17.16 . . .

NORTHROP GRUMMAN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 99 Fed. Cl. 651 (Fed. Cl. 2011)

. . . Kienlen, Government Contract Disputes §§ 17.15-17.16(2010); Steven W. . . .

D. CARLSON, v. CITY OF DELAFIELD, De, 779 F. Supp. 2d 928 (E.D. Wis. 2011)

. . . Delafield Ordinances provides that “[appointed officials may be removed as provided in §§ 17.12(l)(c) and 17.16 . . . Section 17.16(3) states “Removals from office for cause shall be made as provided in this section.” . . . Stat. § 17.16, and include a requirement of written notice of the charges, a speedy hearing, and a full . . .

BENDER, v. NEWELL WINDOW FURNISHINGS,, 725 F. Supp. 2d 642 (W.D. Mich. 2010)

. . . (Id. at ¶ 9; docket no. 229-11, Plaintiffs’ Ex. 17.16.) . . .

HSH NORDBANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, v. SWERDLOW, 259 F.R.D. 64 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . . § 17.16.) . . . A § 17.16), but it also contemplates that Nordbank’s counsel will effectively represent the interests . . .

INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS GROUP, v. AVAYA, INC. K. K. Sr., 564 F.3d 242 (3d Cir. 2009)

. . . On December 20, 2004, Avaya's stock closed at $17.16. . . .

SLUSSER, v. VANTAGE BUILDERS, INC., 576 F. Supp. 2d 1207 (D.N.M. 2008)

. . . Pennebaker $17.16 per hour. Defendant raised Ms. . . . Pennebaker’s final hourly rate was $17.16 per hour. . . .

PERRY, v. METROPOLITAN SUBURBAN BUS AUTHORITY a. k. a. MTA AFL- CIO,, 390 F. Supp. 2d 251 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . 333 50.00% 341 50.44% AfricanAM Female Operators 9.91% 67 9.91% Total Female Operators 114 17.12% 116 17.16% . . .

PADRON WAREHOUSE CORP. a v. THE REALTY ASSOCIATES FUND III, L. P. III, a J., 377 F. Supp. 2d 1259 (S.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . There is also a separate provision, ¶ 17.16, which Realty relies on. . . . On the other hand, Realty is entitled to attorneys’ fees under ¶ 17.16, but only for this case, and not . . . Second, I agree with PWC that the natural reading of ¶ 17.16 is that it only applies in legal actions . . . Under ¶ 17.16, then, Realty is entitled to its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs in this case from . . . PWC also argues (without any authority) that ¶ 17.16 is completely inapplicable because under ¶ 17.18 . . .

NORMAN, v. UNITED STATES,, 63 Fed. Cl. 231 (Fed. Cl. 2004)

. . . Create 1.32 acres of waters of the United States (located in the North Channel); • Preserve and maintain 17.16 . . .

KELLY, v., 312 B.R. 200 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 2004)

. . . The Debtor received a stipend from the state of $17.16 per day per child for the care of each of the . . .

In MILLER, v., 310 B.R. 185 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2004)

. . . generally the last and definitive commentary on the 1898 Bankruptcy Act, 1A CollieR on BankRuptCY ¶ 17.16 . . . The only hint of such a distinction is found in Collier’s final paragraph of footnote 12 to ¶ 17.16[3 . . .

ESTATE OF G. CADDEN, a k a a k a G. a k a a k a v. H. SCHICKEDANZ, a k a H. a k a, 855 So. 2d 651 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Cadden) negotiated with Gerhard Schickedanz and his wife, Susan LeAnne Schickedanz (appellees) to sell 17.16 . . .

C. O BRIEN, v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD,, 319 F. Supp. 2d 90 (D. Mass. 2003)

. . . See id. at § 17.16(2). B. . . . Code tit. 456, § 17.16 (union cannot invoke contractual sanctions against fee objector who has charges . . . Code tit. 456, §§ 17.00-17.16. . . . .

G. WAGNER K. v. DRYVIT SYSTEMS, INC. a v. v. L., 208 F.R.D. 606 (D. Neb. 2001)

. . . Citing Discovery Proceedings in Federal Court, 3rd Edition, § 17.16 Manner of Production, Dryvit acknowledges . . .

In D. LUTGEN, WEGMANS FOOD MARKETS, INC. v. D. LUTGEN,, 225 B.R. 37 (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. 1998)

. . . See, for example 1A Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 17.16[6], p. 1650.1, 14th Edition (not 15th), wherein the . . .

AMESCO EXPORTS, INC. a v. ASSOCIATED AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING SALES, INC. a, 87 F. Supp. 2d 1013 (C.D. Cal. 1997)

. . . Further, Local Rule 17.16(b), states in pertinent part that a motion for reconsideration may be made . . .

SMITH, v. MILWAUKEE COUNTY,, 954 F. Supp. 1314 (E.D. Wis. 1997)

. . . sheriffs work hours as “straight time” or “overtime” is governed by the following provisions: (a) Section 17.16 . . .

VILLAS OF LAKE JACKSON, LTD. v. LEON COUNTY,, 906 F. Supp. 1509 (N.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . Ordinance 72-100 rezoned to RM-3 two tracts of land, one containing about 17.16 acres, and the other . . . As discussed in the last order, tracts 2, 3, and 5, are located within the 17.16 acre and 31.98 acre . . .

CARLISLE AREA SCHOOL v. SCOTT P. By BESS P. E. P. No. CARLISLE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, No. v. SCOTT P. By BESS P. E. P., 62 F.3d 520 (3d Cir. 1995)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 17.16 (2d ed. 1980)). . . .

In GRAMOLINO, AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. GRAMOLINO,, 183 B.R. 565 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 1995)

. . . Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th Edition, Vol. 1A, page 1635, ¶ 17.16, fn. 16 (1971). . . .

In YOUNG, Jr. YOUNG, v. YOUNG,, 181 B.R. 555 (Bankr. E.D. Okla. 1995)

. . . In re Homer, 45 B.R. 15 (Bankr.W.D.Mo.1984) (citing 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16, pp. 1638-39 (15th . . .

In E. MAYER v. SPANEL INTERNATIONAL LTD. N. A., 51 F.3d 670 (7th Cir. 1995)

. . . See generally 1A Collier on Bankruptcy §§ 17.01, 17.16[3] (14th ed. 1978) (tracing this history). . . .

In E. MAYER v. SPANEL INTERNATIONAL LTD. N. A., 51 F.3d 670 (7th Cir. 1995)

. . . See generally 1A Collier on Bankruptcy §§ 17.01, 17.16[3] (14th ed. 1978) (tracing this history). . . .

LIEBERMAN, v. E. SHALALA,, 878 F. Supp. 678 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . entire psychic spectrum of perceptions, thoughts, and behavior.” 3 Lawyers’ Medical Encyclopedia § 17.16 . . .

A. LANDRY v. A- ABLE BONDING INC., 870 F. Supp. 715 (E.D. Tex. 1994)

. . . ProC.Ann. art. 17.16 (Vernon 1977 & Supp. 1994). . . .

PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. v. KITTY HAWK AIRWAYS, INC., 964 F.2d 478 (5th Cir. 1992)

. . . Rhodes, The Law of Liability Insurance § 17.16, at 17-59, 17-65 (1988). . . . . Rhodes, The Law of Liability Insurance § 17.16, at 17-67 (1988); A. . . .

In CULP, P. NEWSOME, Jr. v. CULP,, 140 B.R. 1005 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1992)

. . . many—for a partial listing, see 1A Collier on Bankruptcy (14th ed. 1978) ¶ 14.34 pp. 1378-1379 n. 14, § 17.16 . . . Collier on Bankruptcy (15th ed. 1992) ¶ 523.08[4], [5]; 1A Collier on Bankruptcy (14th ed. 1978) ¶ 17.16 . . . Collier on Bankruptcy (14th ed. 1978) ¶¶ 14.34, 14.35, 14.36, 14.39 pp. 1395-1396 n. 9, 17.01[3.1], 17.16 . . .

In MANLEY BRYAN, v. MANLEY,, 135 B.R. 137 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1992)

. . . this dissent was endorsed by a leading treatise on the Act, 1A Collier on Bankruptcy (14th ed. 1978) ¶ 17.16 . . .

In HART, N. LESLIE, v. HART,, 130 B.R. 817 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 1991)

. . . Oglebay, Collier on Bankruptcy, para. 17.16[6], p. 1650.1 n. 50 (14th ed. 1978) (1970 Act), with id., . . . para. 17.16[4], p. 1643 (prior state law). . . .

ILAPAK RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT S. A. a a v. RECORD SpA., 762 F. Supp. 1318 (N.D. Ill. 1991)

. . . Callman, Unfair Competition, Trademarks and Monopolies, § 17.16 (4th Ed., 1981); see also Wrist-Rocket . . .

In WINGO DOMINION BANK, v. WINGO, 112 B.R. 141 (W.D. Va. 1990)

. . . ‘perfunctory device to be used to contest discharge, ...’”, id. citing 1A Colliers on Bankruptcy, § 17.16 . . .

J. ATKINS HOLDINGS LIMITED, v. ENGLISH DISCOUNTS, INC. s, 729 F. Supp. 945 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)

. . . See Callman, Unfair Competition, Trademarks and Monopolies, § 17.16 (4th Ed.1981). . . .

In DIAZ, DIAZ, v. DIAZ,, 120 B.R. 967 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 1989)

. . . Oglebay, Collier on Bankruptcy, para. 17.16[6], p. 1650.1 n. 50 (14th ed. 1978) (1970 Act), with id., . . . para. 17.16[4], p. 1643 (prior state law). . . .

In HARASYMIW, v. SELFRELIANCE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,, 97 B.R. 924 (N.D. Ill. 1989)

. . . Matter of Garman, 643 F.2d at 1257, quoting 1A Collier’s on Bankruptcy, ¶ 17.16 at 1636 n. 17 (14th ed . . .

In K. SMITH, L. LOVE L. v. K. SMITH,, 98 B.R. 423 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. 1989)

. . . See: In re Paolino, 75 B.R. 641, 648 (Bankr.E.D.Penn.1987) citing 1A Collier, para. 17.16 (14th ed.), . . .

In L. DANIELS, CHANG, v. L. DANIELS,, 91 B.R. 981 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1988)

. . . Oglebay, Collier on Bankruptcy, Section 17.16[6], p. 1650. (14th Ed. 1978); Countrymen, The New Dischargeability . . .

In W. WAGNER, C. MOLLDREM F. v. W. WAGNER, BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD UNITED OF WISCONSIN, v. W. WAGNER,, 79 B.R. 1016 (Bank. W.D. Wis. 1987)

. . . Oglebay, Collier on Bankruptcy § 17.16[6], p. 1650.2 (14th ed. 1978); Countryman, The New Dischargeability . . .

In WICAT SECURITIES LITIGATION, 671 F. Supp. 726 (D. Utah 1987)

. . . reductions from each attorney’s time: Barrack Firm: Barrack .30 Gold 19.10 Goodkind Firm: Sternberg 17.16 . . .

In LARSON LARSON v. NORRIS,, 79 B.R. 462 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1987)

. . . intention, ... may constitute a false representation within the exception.” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .

In G. PAOLINO M. F. FLUEHR, Jr. J. M. v. G. PAOLINO M., 75 B.R. 641 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1987)

. . . See 1A Collier 1Í 17.16, at 1641 nn. 25-26 (14th ed.) (collection of cases). . . . See 1A Collier ¶ 17.16 (14th ed.). . . .

SUSAN R. M. CHARLES L. M. v. NORTHEAST INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, a, 818 F.2d 455 (5th Cir. 1987)

. . . Lucas, Moore’s Federal Practice §§ 17.16, 17.26, at 17-189 to 17-191, 17-272 (2d ed. 1986); Tex.Prob.Code . . .

In TOMSIC, GELLENBECK, s v. TOMSIC,, 104 B.R. 22 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 1987)

. . . Oglebay, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16[6], p. 1650.1 n. 50 (14th ed. 1978) (1970 Act), with id., 1117.16 . . .

In RUDD ESTATE OF SCHUBERT, v. RUDD, 104 B.R. 8 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 1987)

. . . Ogle-bay, Collier on Bankruptcy 1117.16[6], p. 1650.1 n. 50 (14th ed. 1978) (1970 Act), with id,., ¶ 17.16 . . .

In SEARS A. KOWALEWYCZ, v. SEARS, 68 B.R. 34 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1986)

. . . Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16, pp. 1638, 1639 (14th ed. 1976) (Emphasis added.) . . . .

In GREIS, DOUVITSAS, v. GREIS,, 73 B.R. 197 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1986)

. . . intention, however, may constitute a false representation within exception." 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .

PREMIER DENTAL PRODUCTS COMPANY v. DARBY DENTAL SUPPLY COMPANY, INC. DARBY DENTAL SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., 794 F.2d 850 (3d Cir. 1986)

. . . Callmann, Unfair Competition, Trademarks and Monopolies § 17.16 (4th ed., 1981); See Wrist-Rocket Manufacturing . . . is such that the article acquires a value by his testimony to its genuineness,” Callmann, supra, at 17.16 . . . National Silver Co., 61 F.Supp. 232, 236 (S.D.N.Y.1945); Callmann, § 17.16-17; Derenberg, Territorial . . .

O. STARRETT, Jr. v. SPECIAL COUNSEL,, 792 F.2d 1246 (4th Cir. 1986)

. . . Davis Administrative Law Treatise, § 17.16 (2d ed. 1980). . . .

A. PARKER, v. R. BOWEN, R. HAND, v. R. BOWEN,, 788 F.2d 1512 (11th Cir. 1986)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 17.16 (2d ed. 1980). . . . Davis, supra, § 17.16, at 327-30. . . .

In BROWNSBERGER, CENTRAL COOPERATIVES, INC. v. BROWNSBERGER,, 61 B.R. 22 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1986)

. . . however, may constitute a false representation within the exception.” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy para. 17.16 . . . impossible is an unduly restricted interpretation of the purposes of the Act.” 1 A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .

In SCHWANINGER, HERETH, v. SCHWANINGER,, 57 B.R. 553 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1986)

. . . non-dischargeable, even though there is no excuse for the subsequent breach.” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .

E. JACKSON, v. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION,, 768 F.2d 1325 (Fed. Cir. 1985)

. . . See generally 3 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 17.16 (2d ed. 1980). . . .

In WALKER, CITIZENS STATE BANK OF MARYVILLE, v. WALKER,, 53 B.R. 174 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1985)

. . . bound by the fraud of an agent acting within the scope of his authority.' 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .

In A. CURL J. COWAN, v. A. CURL J., 49 B.R. 302 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1985)

. . . however, may constitute a false representation within the exception.” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy para. 17.16 . . .

WHITTENBERG, Mr. P. NAACP, Dr. T. H. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 607 F. Supp. 289 (D.S.C. 1985)

. . . 26.05 16.37 20.93 17.95 29.82 25.62 26.84 5.11 5.76 34.25 9.29 20.00 18.37 3.63 15.28 25.95 21.64 23.75 17.16 . . .

In COLIN d b a COMMERCE BANK OF KANSAS CITY, N. A. v. COLIN, 44 B.R. 704 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1984)

. . . See, e.g., IA Collier on Bankruptcy para. 17.16, pp. 1638-1640.1 (1976), to the following effect: “A . . .

In BUTLER d b a ST. JOSEPH WHOLESALE LIQUOR CO. v. BUTLER, 45 B.R. 46 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1984)

. . . See, e.g., 1A Collier on Bankruptcy para. 17.16, pp. 1638-1640.1 (1976), to the following effect: “A . . .

In H. BEHR WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, a v. H. BEHR, 42 B.R. 922 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1984)

. . . strengthening the discharge in bankruptcy would be greatly dissipated.” 1 A Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 17.16 . . .

In L. HOMER, M. E. JENKINS, d b a v. L. HOMER, M., 45 B.R. 15 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1984)

. . . however, may constitute a false representation within the exception.” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy para. 17.16 . . .

In D. COMBS, RICHARDSON, v. COMBS,, 40 B.R. 148 (Bankr. W.D. Va. 1984)

. . . The court stated, at p. 371, quoting 1A Collier on Bankruptcy, § 17.16, as follows: “The judgment in . . .

BELL, p k a E. v. STREETWISE RECORDS, LTD. BOSTON INTERNATIONAL RECORDS, INC. v. BELL,, 616 F. Supp. 4 (D. Mass. 1984)

. . . article is symbolized by it.” 3 Callmann, The Law of Unfair Competition Trademarks and Monopolies § 17.16 . . .

CITIZENS OF STATE v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,, 448 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 1984)

. . . legislative mandate, the Commission adopted the Oil-Backout Rule, Florida Administrative Code Rule 25-17.16 . . . Commission approval before the construction of a proposed project, under section (3)(c) of Rule 25-17.16 . . . With regard to the first issue, Citizens contend that Rule 25-17.16, and particularly section (3)(c) . . . essential requirements of the law when it allegedly retroactively applied the amended version of Rule 25 — 17.16 . . .

LOCAL ONE, AMALGAMATED LITHOGRAPHERS OF AMERICA, AFL- CIO, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,, 729 F.2d 172 (2d Cir. 1984)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 17.16 (2d ed. 1980). . . .

In SINGLETON, SECURITY BANK OF NEVADA, v. SINGLETON,, 37 B.R. 787 (Bankr. D. Nev. 1984)

. . . obtaining of money or property by ‘false pretenses or false representations.’ ” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .

O. BROCKERT, Jr. v. SKORNICKA, a, 711 F.2d 1376 (7th Cir. 1983)

. . . . § 17.16, which sets forth the procedure for removals. . . . Section 17.16(3) allows removal for cause “only upon written verified charges,” which implies a limit . . .

In A. M. KYRIAZES, DE BARTOLO, v. A. KYRIAZES,, 38 B.R. 353 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1983)

. . . .2d 1370 (9th Cir.1975); In re Wright, 515 F.2d 260 (9th Cir.1975); 1A, Collier on Bankruptcy, Par. 17.16 . . .

In B. FRITTS, HARDWICK BANK TRUST COMPANY, v. B. FRITTS,, 26 B.R. 43 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1982)

. . . Syros, 254 F.Supp. 195 (E.D.Mo.1966); 1A Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 17.16[3] (14th Ed.1973). . . .

In ADAMS SPURGEON L. v. ADAMS,, 24 B.R. 252 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1982)

. . . intention, however, may constitute a false representation within the exception.” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .

In TOM WOODS USED CARS, INC. d b a McCLOUD, Jr. W. v. WOODS, d b a P. Jr., 23 B.R. 563 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1982)

. . . obtained the money for himself in order for the debt to be nondischargeable. 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .

In LA BRANT, VESSEL, HTH v. LA BRANT, 23 B.R. 367 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1982)

. . . .2d 1370 (9th Cir. 1975); In re Wright, 515 F.2d 260 (9th Cir. 1975); 1A, Collier on Bankruptcy, Sec. 17.16 . . .

In D. H. OVERMYER TELECASTING CO. INC. HADAR LEASING INTERNATIONAL CO. INC. v. D. H. OVERMYER TELECASTING CO. INC., 23 B.R. 823 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1982)

. . . (Raible, 9 Tr. 795-96) 17.16. No Recourse for Defective Equipment. . . .

MOORE v. ROSS, A. a R. a a G. a, 687 F.2d 604 (2d Cir. 1982)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 17.16, at 327 (2d ed. 1980), nor must an agency give them as much . . .

In RIPPEY, III, NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SYSTEM, INC. v. RIPPEY, III,, 21 B.R. 954 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1982)

. . . See 1A Colliers on Bankruptcy, ¶ 17.16(4), p. 1643 (14th ed.). . . .

In N. CAROTHERS, NORTH CENTRAL WOOL MARKETING CORPORATION, v. N. CAROTHERS,, 22 B.R. 114 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1982)

. . . Oglebay, Collier on Bankruptcy § 17.16[6], p. 1650.2 (14th ed. 1978); Countryman, The New Dischargeability . . .

G. SCHLECHTA v. POOLE TRUCK LINES, INC., 678 F.2d 59 (8th Cir. 1982)

. . . Instruction No. 3 is a modification of Missouri Approved Jury Instructions — Civil (MAI) 17.16 (1973 . . . According to appellants, the rear-end doctrine instruction, MAI 17.16, should be used only when no dispute . . . MAI 17.16 appears as follows: Your verdict must be for plaintiff if you believe: First, defendant’s automobile . . .

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, v. NORTON,, 18 B.R. 380 (D. Md. 1982)

. . . See 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16. . . . Id. ¶ 17.16[6]. The Government simply did not do so. . . .

In J. STEWART, UNITED SECURITY BANK, v. J. STEWART,, 19 B.R. 165 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1982)

. . . Vol. 1A, Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 17.16[3] (14th Ed.). . . .

In J. SWARTZ, Jr. J. PIONEER NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. J. SWARTZ, Jr. J., 18 B.R. 64 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1982)

. . . that such representations were knowingly and fraudulently made . . . . ” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 17.16 . . .

In TRIANGLE INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES B- d b a J. L. In TRIANGLE INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES B- d b a J. L. In TRIANGLE INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES B- d b a J. L. MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. TRIANGLE INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES B- d b a J. L. B- d b a J. L. B- d b a J. L., 17 B.R. 296 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1982)

. . . IA Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 at 1635-36. . . .

In HUNTER, KRAFT, v. HUNTER,, 17 B.R. 523 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1982)

. . . is an unduly restricted interpretation of the purposes of the Act.” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy para. 17.16 . . .

In S. PIRNIE, A. HARRIS C. v. S. PIRNIE,, 16 B.R. 65 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1981)

. . . and fraudulently made, and that they were relied upon by the other party.’ 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .

In Of E. SUPPLE, Jr. MA M INCORPORATED, v. E. SUPPLE, Jr., 14 B.R. 898 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1981)

. . . Ogle-bay, Collier on Bankruptcy § 17.16[6], p. 1650.2 (14th ed. 1978); Countryman, The New Dischargeability . . .

LOWENSTEIN DYES COSMETICS, INC. v. AETNA LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, 524 F. Supp. 574 (E.D.N.Y. 1981)

. . . Long, Law of Liability Insurance, § 17.16 at 17-21 (1980): “The doctrines of waiver and estoppel cannot . . .

In V. PAPPAS, MERCHANTS NATIONAL BANK TRUST COMPANY OF INDIANAPOLIS, v. V. PAPPAS,, 661 F.2d 82 (7th Cir. 1981)

. . . See, 1A Collier on Bankruptcy H 17.16[6], at 1649 (14th ed. 1978). . . . See, 1A Collier on Bankruptcy H 17.16[3] at 1638 (14th ed. 1978) . . . .

In V. PAPPAS, MERCHANTS NATIONAL BANK TRUST COMPANY OF INDIANAPOLIS, v. V. PAPPAS,, 661 F.2d 82 (7th Cir. 1981)

. . . See, 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16[6], at 1649 (14th ed. 1978). . . . See, 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16[3] at 1638 (14th ed. 1978). . . .

In GROSS, L. O. MILLER, v. GROSS,, 654 F.2d 602 (9th Cir. 1981)

. . . Oglebay, Collier on Bankruptcy H 17.16, p. 1650.1 (14th ed. 1978). . . .

In GROSS, L. O. MILLER, v. GROSS,, 654 F.2d 602 (9th Cir. 1981)

. . . Oglebay, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16, p. 1650.1 (14th ed. 1978). . . .

In T. IANNELLI, Jr. MANNING, v. T. IANNELLI, Jr., 12 B.R. 561 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1981)

. . . Iannelli received the money. .Collier supports this latter interpretation. 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . . See 1A, Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 17.16 (14th ed. 1978); Countryman, The New Dischargeability Law, 45 . . . TA Collier on Bankruptcy, § 17.16 (14th ed. 1978). . . .

In BARKER, WITT BUILDING MATERIAL COMPANY, INC. v. BARKER,, 14 B.R. 852 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1981)

. . . nondischargeable, even though there is no excuse for the subsequent breach.” 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .

In R. HALLMAN, Jr. SAYERS INVESTMENT CORPORATION, a v. R. HALLMAN, Jr., 12 B.R. 502 (Bankr. W.D. Va. 1981)

. . . In 1A Collier on Bankruptcy § 17.16 commencing at Page 1634 the authority states: “The frauds included . . .

In D. COLASANTE, M. D. S. COLASANTE, D. D. S. CEMENT NATIONAL BANK, v. D. COLASANTE S., 12 B.R. 635 (E.D. Pa. 1981)

. . . Bank, 165 F. 607 (3d Cir. 1908); 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 14.40, at 1396, ¶ 17.16, at 1634-35 (14th . . .

In C. PRITCHARD, BANK OF MISSISSIPPI, v. C. PRITCHARD, In PRITCHARD, BANK OF MISSISSIPPI, v. PRITCHARD,, 11 B.R. 614 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 1981)

. . . Collier on Bankruptcy (14th Edition) par. 17.16 at p. 1640; and see, for example, In re Black (E.D.Wis . . .

In R. CARROLL, W. SNYDER C. v. R. CARROLL, In HERITAGE BUILDING, INC. W. SNYDER C. v. HERITAGE BUILDING, INC., 11 B.R. 812 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1981)

. . . must have been reliance on the allegedly false representations of fraud. 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.16 . . .