Cases from cite.case.law:

NAJERA- RODRIGUEZ, v. P. BARR,, 926 F.3d 343 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . The government relies on Pattern Jury Instruction 17.28, which provides alternative instructions on this . . . the identity of the substance is a necessary element-e.g., § 402(a) and § 402(d)-use of Instruction 17.28 . . .

ESTATE OF J. MCKELVEY, G. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 906 F.3d 26 (2nd Cir. 2018)

. . . On the date of the MSI extension, the closing price of Monster stock was $17.28. . . .

IN RE RELATIVITY FASHION, LLC,, 565 B.R. 50 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . $ 669.58 Hotel charges $10,349.31 Late work meals $ 97.64 Late work taxi $ 24.83 Mileage expenses $ 17.28 . . .

TEXAS DIVISION, SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS, INCORPORATED, a J. W. v. T. VANDERGRIFF, In In a Jr. In a In a In a a III, In a In a, 759 F.3d 388 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . Code § 17.28(i)(8)(B) (providing the DMVB with "final approval authority of all specialty license plate . . .

YELTON, K. D. L. Y. L. R. L. Y. v. PHI, INCORPORATED III, v. PHI PHI,, 669 F.3d 577 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . abandoned the lex loci delicti rule by 1973, and a majority had abandoned it by the end of the decade), § 17.28 . . .

SAWANT v. RAMSEY, 742 F. Supp. 2d 219 (D. Conn. 2010)

. . . At the time of the sale Lockhart owned approximately 17.28 percent of Host common stock. Id. ¶ 83. . . .

LOPEZ QUINONES, v. PUERTO RICO NATIONAL GUARD,, 715 F. Supp. 2d 233 (D.P.R. 2010)

. . . hour; (12) $20,481.30 for 227.57 hours drafting motions at a rate of $90 per hour; (13) $1,036.80 for 17.28 . . .

PELLA CORPORATION v. E. SALTZMAN,, 606 F.3d 391 (7th Cir. 2010)

. . . Newberg, Newberg on Class Actions § 17.28, pp. 413-14 (4th ed.2002). . . .

UNITED STATES v. ROWE,, 332 F. App'x 995 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . presen-tence report reveals that he was held accountable “for conspiracy to possess and distribute 17.28 . . .

MAWALLA, v. HOFFMAN,, 569 F. Supp. 2d 253 (D.D.C. 2008)

. . . Mallen & Smith, Legal Malpractice, § 17.28, at 1085-86. . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. BURGESS,, 172 F. App'x 125 (8th Cir. 2006)

. . . The labels on the boxes of pseudoephedrine indicated they contained 17.28 grams, and a visual comparison . . .

ALCANTARA R. v. ALLIED PROPERTIES, LLC II Co. II Co. T. U. C. Co., 334 F. Supp. 2d 336 (E.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . The workers were paid between $17.28 and $19.10 hourly. . . .

In B. L. OF MIAMI, INC. a, 294 B.R. 325 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2003)

. . . of Debtor’s only business, and there is a Florida choice-of-law provision in the lease (Page 66, ¶ 17.28 . . . Section 17.28 of the lease at issue states that any litigation will take place in Dade County, Florida . . .

MARTINEZ, v. M. HODGSON, H. II,, 265 F. Supp. 2d 135 (D. Mass. 2003)

. . . Ultimately, therefore, Lipede is entitled to compensation for 17.28 hours. . . .

CAVALIER CLOTHES, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 51 Fed. Cl. 399 (Fed. Cl. 2001)

. . . These rates were negotiated between Cavalier and its employees’ union and were $17.28 per Marine Corps . . .

UNITED STATES v. GALVEZ, 108 F. Supp. 2d 1369 (S.D. Fla. 2000)

. . . be willing to buy a case of cashew nuts (containing 144 small packages) at its wholesale price of $17.28 . . . purchasing a single package would pay i.e. a total of $36 for the case instead of its wholesale price of $17.28 . . . Rather, it is important that all who steal something worth $17.28 receive the same punishment. . . .

CASTILLO, v. CASE FARMS OF OHIO, INC., 96 F. Supp. 2d 578 (W.D. Tex. 1999)

. . . Because Case Farms, for Galvan, made deductions of $37.00, $5.00, and $17.28, in the three weeks she . . .

FERRO UNION, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 74 F. Supp. 2d 1289 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1999)

. . . Rather, Wheatland proposes a margin of 17.28 percent, the highest calculated margin applied to Saha Thai . . .

v. Co., 23 Ct. Int'l Trade 713 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1999)

. . . Rather, Wheatland proposes a margin of 17.28 percent, the highest calculated margin applied to Saha Thai . . .

In BANDY, R. E. v. In R. R. E. v. R., 237 B.R. 661 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1999)

. . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.28 at 1725-1729 (14th ed.1988). . . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.28 & ¶ 17.28A[6] (14th ed.1988). . . . King, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.28 (14th ed.1988). . . .

v. Co., 23 Ct. Int'l Trade 178 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1999)

. . . Previously, the highest rate calculated for Saha Thai in a less than fair value investigation was 17.28 . . . Prior margins assessed against Saha Thai in other administrative reviews range from 0.49 percent to 17.28 . . .

FERRO UNION, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 44 F. Supp. 2d 1310 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1999)

ASSISTED LIVING ASSOCIATES OF MOORESTOWN, L. L. C. v. MOORESTOWN TOWNSHIP, Of v. STOW, J. V. Of L. L. C., 31 F. Supp. 2d 389 (D.N.J. 1998)

. . . See Garden of Memories, 109 N.J.Super. at 534-35, 264 A.2d 82 (citing 4 American Laic of Property, § 17.28 . . .

SAARSTAHL AG, v. UNITED STATES, Co., 967 F. Supp. 1311 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1997)

. . . This finding lowered the countervailing duty from 17.28 percent to 16.85 percent. . . .

AG, v. Co., 21 Ct. Int'l Trade 511 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1997)

. . . This finding lowered the countervailing duty from 17.28 percent to 16.85 percent. . . .

AETNA SURETY AND CASUALTY CO. v. SACCHETTI, Ad A. P B Co., 956 F. Supp. 1163 (D.N.J. 1996)

. . . . § 17.28-1.1(e)). (Df. Br. at 30). . . .

SAARSTAHL AG, UNITED STATES, v. INLAND STEEL BAR COMPANY,, 78 F.3d 1539 (Fed. Cir. 1996)

. . . On January 27,1993, Commerce had imposed a countervailing duty of 17.28%. . . .

AG, v. Co., 18 Ct. Int'l Trade 525 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1994)

. . . In the original final determination Commerce found CVD margins of 17.28%, and in the subsequent remand . . .

SAARSTAHL, AG, v. UNITED STATES, Co., 858 F. Supp. 187 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1994)

. . . In the original final determination Commerce found CVD margins of 17.28%, and in the subsequent remand . . .

In WANG LABORATORIES, INC. STEEL HECTOR DAVIS v. WANG LABORATORIES, INC., 155 B.R. 289 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1993)

. . . Agreement, § 17.28. Turning to the Agreement, we find § 9.8.1. . . . See Agreement, §§ 17.17, 17.28. . . .

R. GROGAN, v. J. GARNER, Jr., 111 S.Ct. 654 (U.S. 1991)

. . . Felsen, 442 U.S., at 129, 99 S.Ct., at 2208; 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.28, pp. 1726-1727 (14th ed . . .

GROGAN v. GARNER, 498 U.S. 279 (U.S. 1991)

. . . S., at 129; 1A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.28, pp. 1726-1727 (14th ed. 1978). . . .

IRBY, v. H. FITZ- HUGH,, 693 F. Supp. 424 (E.D. Va. 1988)

. . . Blacks comprise 17.28% of the population in jurisdictions which appoint school board members through . . .

D. FLYNN, H. J. On v. BASS BROTHERS ENTERPRISES, INC. H. T. P. R. M. R. W. R. E., 744 F.2d 978 (3d Cir. 1984)

. . . also did not refer to a second report prepared by Prochemco which gave two additional valuations: $17.28 . . .

UNITED STATES v. HARRIS, 729 F.2d 441 (7th Cir. 1984)

. . . A box full of new tiles is worth $17.28, so if all of the boxes were full their total value was $103.68 . . .

In ELIN, ELIN, v. G. BUSCHE,, 20 B.R. 1012 (D.N.J. 1982)

. . . actual notice but does place on inquiry one who is affected by the record. 4 American Law of Property, § 17.28 . . .

UNITED STATES v. PERRY,, 638 F.2d 862 (5th Cir. 1981)

. . . be willing to buy a case of cashew nuts (containing 144 small packages) at its wholesale price of $17.28 . . . a single package would pay — i. e., a total of $36 for the case instead of its wholesale price of $17.28 . . .

UNIROYAL, INC. v. HOFF AND THAMES, INC. d b a E. A. L., 511 F. Supp. 1060 (S.D. Miss. 1981)

. . . The thrust of his study is that the total savings attributable to sales to Otasco was no less than 17.28% . . .

D. FLYNN, H. J. v. BASS BROTHERS ENTERPRISES, INC. H. T. P. R. M. R. W. R. E., 456 F. Supp. 484 (E.D. Pa. 1978)

. . . As presented in the chart, the former value was $17.28 per share, and the latter was $7.60 per share. . . .

In a k a M. D. GLASS v. MILLER KEARNEY, a, 577 F.2d 537 (9th Cir. 1978)

. . . non-bankruptcy courts in actions by creditors seeking to enforce their claims. 1A Collier on Bankruptcy K 17.28 . . .

CORPORATION v. ELI LILLY COMPANY, 427 F. Supp. 1089 (E.D. Pa. 1976)

. . . 12.60 8.16 3.74 1969 10.56 4.08 12.60 8.16 3.74 1970 10.56 4.08 21.00 12.60 8.16 3.94 1971 11.64 4.37 17.28 . . . 12.60 8.16 3.94 1972 11.64 4.80 17.28 14.50 8.96 3.94 1973 12.68 4.80 13.77 14.50 11.12 4.18 1974 13.68 . . .

UNITED STATES v. McQUATTERS,, 370 F. Supp. 1286 (W.D. Tex. 1973)

. . . proper forum to determine whether a discharge releases a particular debt. 1A Collier on Bankruptcy, Sec. 17.28 . . .

In BROWNE, v. SAN LUIS OBISPO NATIONAL BANK, In BROWNE, v. SAN LUIS OBISPO NATIONAL BANK,, 462 F.2d 129 (9th Cir. 1972)

. . . Compare 1A Collier’s f 17.28 with 17.28A. . Cf. Coast Bank v. . . .

In I. MARTIN, v. HENLEY,, 452 F.2d 295 (9th Cir. 1971)

. . . Donnelly, 153 F.2d 588 (8th Cir. 1946); Collier on Bankruptcy, if 17.28, at 1730, n. 22. . . . Jaggli, 366 F.2d 793 (9th Cir. 1966); 1A Collier on Bankruptcy, 17.28 (14th Ed.). . . . the rule of discretion, which was designed to protect the bankrupt (see 1A Collier on Bankruptcy, |f 17.28 . . .

COPPERSTATE SUPPLY CO. a B. v. J. FISHER, 449 F.2d 760 (9th Cir. 1971)

. . . Jaggli (9 Cir. 1966) 366 F.2d 793, 794; Vol. la Collier on Bankruptcy § 17.28 at 1726 (14th ed.). . . .

ROBERTSON, v. INTERSTATE SECURITIES COMPANY, a, 435 F.2d 784 (8th Cir. 1971)

. . . Co., 98 F.2d 199 (8 Cir. 1938); 1 Collier, Bankruptcy ¶ 17.28 at 1726-31 (14th ed. 1970); IB Moore, Federal . . .

In URQUHART, FRED GORGES LINCOLN- MERCURY, INC. a v. URQUHART,, 427 F.2d 492 (8th Cir. 1970)

. . . See 1 Collier on Bankruptcy, j[ 17.28 (14th ed. 1969). . . .

UNITED STATES v. AYERS,, 426 F.2d 524 (2d Cir. 1970)

. . . .-48; Kearney, $17.28 and Ayers, $120.61, which the jury might have found of some significance. . . .

KAISER INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, Ag. v. McLOUTH STEEL CORPORATION,, 50 F.R.D. 5 (E.D. Mich. 1970)

. . . Marshal’s fees — $17.28; 3. Docket fees, authorized by 28 U. . . .

In S. FALLICK, v. KEHR,, 369 F.2d 899 (2d Cir. 1966)

. . . See generally 1 Collier, Bankruptcy ¶¶ 2.62[5], 17.27, 17.28 (14th ed. 1966). . . .

HILTON CREDIT CORPORATION, v. JAGGLI,, 366 F.2d 793 (9th Cir. 1966)

. . . See I Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th ed., § 17.28, p. 1698; White v. . . . Collier, supra, § 17.28 at pp. 1702-1704. . . .

In GADANSKY,, 249 F. Supp. 114 (E.D.N.Y. 1965)

. . . Public Loan Corp., supra; see, 1 Collier on Bankruptcy (14th Edition) ¶¶ 2.62[5], 17.28; cf., In re Alvino . . .

H. GRAHL v. UNITED STATES, 336 F.2d 199 (Ct. Cl. 1964)

. . . Under this system, plaintiff received credit for 17.28 years of service under Title HI at the time of . . . have observed in footnote 6, supra, under Title III retirement, plaintiff would be credited with only 17.28 . . .

CHARLES H. GRAHL v. THE UNTED STATES, 167 Ct. Cl. 80 (Ct. Cl. 1964)

. . . each year of service with which he has been credited, under this system, plaintiff received credit for 17.28 . . . have observed in footnote 6, supra, under Title III retirement, plaintiff would be credited with only 17.28 . . .

v., 51 Cust. Ct. 407 (Cust. Ct. 1963)

. . . School at Oaseoraweg, Curacao, at a price of $186 (fl.706.10) per square meter which is equivalent to $17.28 . . .

In BELL,, 212 F. Supp. 300 (E.D. Va. 1962)

. . . See Collier, supra, § 17.28. . . .

CRESCENT TOWING SALVAGE COMPANY, v. DIXILYN DRILLING CORPORATION,, 303 F.2d 237 (5th Cir. 1962)

. . . The surface of the river at the bridge is 17.28 feet above mean sea level at zero on the Natchez gauge . . .

BRAUN a v. HASSENSTEIN STEEL COMPANY, a, 23 F.R.D. 163 (D.S.D. 1959)

. . . The two items each for 86.40 and another two items each for $17.28, the $134.40, the $117.60, the $93.60 . . .

F. WHITE, v. PUBLIC LOAN CORPORATION,, 247 F.2d 601 (8th Cir. 1957)

. . . See Collier, supra, § 17.28, and Cum.Supp. addition to text thereof, entitled “Recapitulation as to What . . .

In PURRIER, 73 F. Supp. 418 (W.D. Wash. 1947)

. . . determine whether a discharge releases a particular debt.” 1 Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th Ed., sec. 17.28 . . .

In GROVER, 63 F. Supp. 644 (D. Minn. 1945)

. . . indicated herein are in conformity with those expressed in Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th Ed., Vol. 1, Sec. 17.28 . . .

In BISCOE, 45 F. Supp. 422 (D. Mass. 1942)

. . . See Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th Ed., vol. 1, § 17.28 note 2. . . .

In ANTHONY. In MONROE, 42 F. Supp. 312 (E.D. Ill. 1941)

. . . Vol. 1, paragraph 17.28: “The question often arises as to what court determines whether or not a particular . . .

LIGGETT MYERS TOBACCO CO. v. UNITED STATES, 299 U.S. 383 (U.S. 1937)

. . . , seek to establish the right of some petitioner to recover the value of Internal Revenue stamps — $17.28 . . . complied by shipping from its bonded warehouse four packages to which Revenue stamps amounting to $17.28 . . .

O DONNELL v. HARTT, 75 F.2d 195 (C.C.P.A. 1935)

. . . At the right of the February date is the date “Apr. 17.28,” and above the figure “17” is the word “in . . .

O v., 22 C.C.P.A. 958 (C.C.P.A. 1935)

. . . At the right of the February date is the date “Apr. 17.28 ” and above the figure “ 17 ” is the word “ . . .

s v., 21 C.C.P.A. 573 (C.C.P.A. 1934)

. . . described as follows: 1 pearl weighing 17.68 grains. 1 pearl weighing 17.36 grains. 1 pearl weighing 17.28 . . . The pearl in question weighing 17.28 grains was part of a pendant (exported June 26, 1930, under notice . . .

SAUNDERS v. UNITED STATES, 73 F. 782 (C.C.D. Me. 1896)

. . . These are proper charge's, for travel, in going only, to make the service, and should be paid, §17.28 . . .

ELIAS E. BARNES ET AL. v. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SAMUEL J. RITCHIE v. THE SAME, 22 Ct. Cl. 366 (Ct. Cl. 1887)

. . . ........................... 91.52 15. 48 lin. ft. 6" sewer pipe, at 36............................. 17.28 . . .

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)