The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 17.29

17.29 Authority to prescribe rules.—The Chief Financial Officer may adopt rules pursuant to ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 to implement this chapter and the duties assigned by statute or the State Constitution. Such rules may include, but are not limited to, the following:

(1) Procedures or policies relating to the processing of payments from salaries, other personal services, or any other applicable appropriation.

(2) Procedures for processing interagency and intraagency payments that do not require the issuance of a state warrant.

(3) Procedures or policies requiring that payments made by the state for goods, services, or anything of value be made by electronic means, including, but not limited to, debit cards, credit cards, or electronic funds transfers.

(4) A method that reasonably accommodates persons who, because of technological, financial, or other hardship, may not be able to receive payments by electronic means. The Chief Financial Officer may make payments by state warrant if deemed administratively necessary.

History.—s. 7, ch. 83-132; s. 65, ch. 95-147; s. 7, ch. 98-200; s. 41, ch. 2003-261; s. 3, ch. 2010-151.

F.S. 17.29 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.29 on Casetext

Amendments to 17.29

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 17.29

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 17.29.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

ODONNELL, On v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS,, 251 F. Supp. 3d 1052 (S.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . Pro. art. 17.29-292. . . . Pro. art. 17.29. . The Roberson order is available at Def. Ex. 95. . . . .

MERCADO, v. DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS,, 229 F. Supp. 3d 501 (N.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . Art. 17.29, which guarantees immediate release on bond. 2 In Mercado I the court sua sponte dismissed . . . Art. 17.29(a) provides: "[w]hen the accused has given the required bond, either to the magistrate or . . .

ODONNELL, On v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS,, 227 F. Supp. 3d 706 (S.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . taldng the bail to regulate the amount of bail), art. 17.20 (empowering sheriffs to take bail), art. 17.29 . . .

G. OSTERWEIL, v. R. BARTLETT, III,, 92 F. Supp. 3d 14 (N.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . Schmutter for 17.29 hours, Ms. Luzzi for 5.36 hours, Mr. Brown for 3.69 hours, Mr. . . .

In NEXIUM ESOMEPRAZOLE ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 297 F.R.D. 168 (D. Mass. 2013)

. . . WL 5498182, at *2 n. 5 (D.Mass.2013), in the Middle District of Florida it has actually increased by 17.29% . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, v. PETER R. BROWN CONSTRUCTION, INC., 108 So. 3d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . , Florida Statutes, which provides: 17.29. . . . With respect to each of the subsections in section 17.29, the ALJ stated that section 17.29(1) specifically . . . Section 17.29(2) only relates to procedures for processing interagency and interagency [sic] payments . . . We agree with the ALJ’s interpretation of section 17.29 and her conclusion on this point. . . . The ALJ rejected Appellant’s argument that she should look to both section 17.29 and section 17.03 to . . .

In RADLAX GATEWAY HOTEL, LLC,, 447 B.R. 570 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2011)

. . . Torts § 17.29; 59 Cal. Jur.3d Trespass to Realty § 5. . . .

In YOUNG BROADCASTING INC., 430 B.R. 99 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . projected to increase by 38.2% while comparable companies’ BCF margins are projected to increase by 17.29% . . .

In MOTOROLA SECURITIES LITIGATION, 505 F. Supp. 2d 501 (N.D. Ill. 2007)

. . . Motorola shares actually fell $1.04 per share (approximately 6%) on February 23, 2001, from a close of $17.29 . . .

In LYMECARE, INC. R. v., 301 B.R. 662 (Bankr. D.N.J. 2003)

. . . N.J.S.A. 52:14— 17.29(B). . . . . N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(B). Murray v. . . .

In V. BELBA, M. RODOLAKIS, v. P. PEDONE,, 226 B.R. 738 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1998)

. . . James Cas-ner ed., 1952) § 17.29. . . .

HORIZON COAL CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES, 876 F. Supp. 1512 (N.D. Ohio 1993)

. . . 172,838 tons of coal (16.33% of the total), 603,000 tons of shale (56.97%), 183,000 tons of limestone (17.29% . . .

In ALLEGHENY INTERNATIONAL, INC., 136 B.R. 396 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 1991)

. . . Supplemental Rent X 36 Months $ 105,750.00 15% of Remaining Lease Term: 115.25 Months Remaining in Lease X 15% 17.29 . . . Additional Rent X 36 Months $ 651,219.48 15% of Remaining Lease Term: 115.25 Months Remaining in Lease X 15% 17.29 . . . Parking Rent X 36 Months $ 135,000.00 15% of Remaining Lease Term: 115.25 Months Remaining in Lease X 15% 17.29 . . . OF 506(b)(6) TO ADDITIONAL RENT: 15% of Remaining Lease Term: 115.25 Months Remaining in Lease X 15% 17.29 . . .

In MILL CONCEPTS CORP., 123 B.R. 938 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1991)

. . . See American Law of Property (1952) § 17.29. . . .

COBB, v. ANHEUSER BUSCH, INC., 793 F. Supp. 1457 (E.D. Mo. 1990)

. . . Every bottler is paid an hourly wage of $17.29, receives 15 paid holidays, 6 paid sick days and between . . .

In BERRY,, 85 B.R. 367 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 1988)

. . . See also 1A COLLIERS ON BANKRUPTCY TMÍ 17.27 and 17.29 (14th ed. 1978). . . .

In F. BUTCHER, a k a F. JFB, 74 B.R. 211 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1987)

. . . ) 06-27-83 1,112.89 282.30 WH/FICA 1981 (3Q) 08-22-83 1,097.64 150.10 WH/FICA 1982 (4Q) 06-27-83 -0-17.29 . . . 06-27-83 1,112.89 282.30 WH/FICA 1982 (3Q) 08-22-83 1,097.64 150.10 WH/FICA 1982 (4Q) 06-27-83 0.00 17.29 . . .

In A. VITULLO, 60 B.R. 822 (D.N.J. 1986)

. . . effect of a discharge is only to ¡relieve the bankrupt of personal liability. 1A Collier on Bankruptcy § 17.29 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY OF CHICAGO,, 621 F. Supp. 1296 (N.D. Ill. 1985)

. . . . $17.29 million of the fiscal year 1984 moneys appropriated to the Discretionary Fund neither appeared . . . Moreover, these documents, see, e.g., Document “B5” confirm that the Secretary considered $17.29 million . . .

WHITTENBERG, Mr. P. NAACP, Dr. T. H. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 607 F. Supp. 289 (D.S.C. 1985)

. . . 12.71 17.99 25.76 15.69 19.53 27.60 25.11 28.51 22.37 15.32 21.14 24.25 13.51 29.26 33.02 26.84 25.90 17.29 . . .

In GREAT PLAINS WESTERN RANCH COMPANY, INC. C. R. LOUP, M. S. M. L N v. GREAT PLAINS WESTERN RANCH COMPANY, INC. In GREAT PLAINS WESTERN CORPORATION, a WILSON COUNTY LAND COMPANY a L. HILL, a v. GREAT PLAINS WESTERN CORPORATION, a GREAT PLAINS WESTERN CORPORATION, a v. WILSON COUNTY LAND COMPANY a a L. s s DOES, 38 B.R. 899 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1984)

. . . See, e.g., 10 AMERICAN LAW OF PROPERTY § 17.29 (1952). . . .

J. SILTZER A. v. NORTH FIRST BANK, a, 445 So. 2d 649 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Star Cory., 110 N.J.L. 570, 166 A. 223 (1933); 1A Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 17.29 at p. 1742.74 (14th . . .

In W. MORSE, MAINE NATIONAL BANK, v. W. MORSE,, 30 B.R. 52 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 1983)

. . . See also IV American Law of Property, § 17.9 at 555 and § 17.29 at 611 (1952). . . .

BARNETT BANK OF JACKSONVILLE, a v. G. HARRIS, a k a, 421 So. 2d 822 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . judgment, the lien itself was not discharged, but survived the bankruptcy. 1A Collier on Bankruptcy, § 17.29 . . .

In K. PAPE,, 7 B.R. 443 (Bankr. N.D. Fla. 1980)

. . . .) § 17.29; 4B Collier (14th Ed.) § 70.70. . . .

D. ALBRITTON, v. GENERAL PORTLAND CEMENT CO., 344 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 1977)

. . . Landry, 15 So.2d 158 (La.App.1943); Collier, note 3, at § 17.29. . See Straton v. . . .

In BISHOP, ROANOKE INDUSTRIAL LOAN AND THRIFT CORPORATION, v. BISHOP,, 482 F.2d 381 (4th Cir. 1973)

. . . discharge, the judgment lien would not be released by her subsequent discharge. 1A Collier, Bankruptcy § 17.29 . . .

ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, v. WILLIAMS,, 397 F.2d 147 (5th Cir. 1968)

. . . Co.17-29 the “17.29 1955. 76 S.Ct. 131, 350 U.S. 77, 100 L.Ed. 60. . . .

EASTMAN, v. W. GARDNER,, 373 F.2d 481 (6th Cir. 1967)

. . . income tax returns of George showed net earnings from the parking lot of only $2685.94 during 1959 and $17.29 . . .

SIMONSON, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY, v. GRANQUIST, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 369 U.S. 38 (U.S. 1962)

. . . Co., 98 F. 2d 199; see 1 Collier, Bankruptcy ¶ 17.29 (14th ed. 1961). . . .

UNITED STATES NOLAND COMPANY, INCORPORATED, v. ALLIED CONTRACTORS, INCORPORATED, a, 171 F. Supp. 569 (D. Md. 1959)

. . . Date of Delivery $ 26.72 8270 12-22-54 74.42 1748 1- 10-55 17.29 3431 2- 10-55 19.03 1283 2- 25-55 3.32 . . .

OSIN, v. H. JOHNSON, 243 F.2d 653 (D.C. Cir. 1957)

. . . See also 4 American Law of Property § 17.29 (Casner ed. 1952); 1919, 4 A.L.R. 434. . . . For a summary of the applicable state statutes, see 4 American Raw of Property § 17.29 n. 1 (Casner ed . . .

INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS CO. v. LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, 33 F. Supp. 50 (E.D. La. 1940)

. . . Industries, Inc.......... 72,890 7.65 Columbian Carbon Company....... 164,807 17.29 American Republics . . .

LEHIGH VALLEY R. CO. OF NEW JERSEY v. MARTIN, r CENTRAL R. CO. OF NEW JERSEY v. SAME, 19 F. Supp. 63 (D.N.J. 1936)

. . . The result of such a calculation ($11,674,490 x 17.29 per cent.) is $2,018,519, which represents the . . .