The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 17.32

17.32 Annual report of trust funds; duties of Chief Financial Officer.—

(1) On February 1 of each year, the Chief Financial Officer shall present to the Governor and the Legislature a report listing all trust funds as defined in s. 215.32. The report must contain the following data elements for each fund for the preceding fiscal year:

(a) The fund code.

(b) The title.

(d) The statutory authority.

(e) The beginning cash balance.

(f) Direct revenues.

(g) Nonoperating revenues.

(h) Operating disbursements.

(i) Nonoperating disbursements.

(j) The ending cash balance.

(k) The department and budget entity in which the fund is located.

(2) The report shall separately list all funds that received no revenues other than interest earnings or transfers from the General Revenue Fund or from other trust funds during the preceding fiscal year.

(3) The report shall separately list all funds that had unencumbered balances in excess of $2 million in each of the 2 preceding fiscal years.

History.—s. 4, ch. 92-142; s. 43, ch. 2003-261; s. 30, ch. 2010-102.

F.S. 17.32 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.32 on Casetext

Amendments to 17.32

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 17.32

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 17.32.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

FRIENDS OF ANIMALS, v. ZINKE,, 373 F. Supp. 3d 70 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . . § 17.32." 50 C.F.R. § 17.40(e)(6). . . . threatened species permit evaluated through the ESA permit application process found at 50 C.F.R. § 17.32 . . . the general prohibitions and exceptions for threatened wildlife included in 50 C.F.R. §§ 17.31 and 17.32 . . . survival of the species and the trophy is accompanied by a threatened species permit issued under § 17.32 . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. ZINKE,, 369 F. Supp. 3d 164 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . survival of the species and the trophy is accompanied by a threatened species permit issued under § 17.32 . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 17.32 (listing enhancement along with scientific purposes, economic hardship, zoological . . .

IN RE AEROGROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. LLC, v. THL, 601 B.R. 571 (Bankr. Del. 2019)

. . . Property's value as of June 30, 2017 at an OLV of approximately $ 29.49 million and a FLV of approximately $ 17.32 . . .

UNITED STATES v. F. CHARETTE,, 893 F.3d 1169 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 17.32(b). . . . determining whether the government or the defendant bears the burden of proof regarding the exception in § 17.32 . . . who bears the burden of proving that a valid permit was in force, and thus whether the exemption in § 17.32 . . .

DOYLE, v. UNITED STATES,, 129 Fed. Cl. 147 (Fed. Cl. 2016)

. . . . § 17.32. . . . .

IN RE ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION NO. VI L. s, 837 F.3d 231 (3d Cir. 2016)

. . . Hay, Conflict of Laws § 17.32 (1984 ed,)) ("[W]here there is no real conflict ... the forum should apply . . .

UNION NEIGHBORS UNITED, INC. v. JEWELL,, 831 F.3d 564 (D.C. Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 17.22 (endangered species), 17.32(b)(1)(ii) (threatened species). . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE AND CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. JEWELL,, 815 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2016)

. . . . §§ 17.22(d)(2), 17.32(d)(2). . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE AND CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. JEWELL,, 421 U.S. App. D.C. 213 (D.C. Cir. 2016)

. . . . §§ 17.22(d)(2), 17.32(d)(2). . . .

RALEIGH WAKE CITIZENS ASSOCIATION, v. WAKE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, v., 166 F. Supp. 3d 553 (E.D.N.C. 2016)

. . . Margin of Victory Year Vernon Malone 3.66% 2000 Harold Webb 5.24% 2004 Lmdy Brown 6.30% 2006 Harold Webb 17.32% . . .

BEAR VALLEY MUTUAL WATER COMPANY v. JEWELL, M., 790 F.3d 977 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . . §§ 17.32(b)(5)(ii-iii). . . .

KLAMATH- SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER, v. NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE,, 109 F. Supp. 3d 1238 (N.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . (citing 50 C.F.R § 17.32 (“Permits-General”), 50 C.F.R. § 222.301 (“General requirements”)), KS Wild . . .

IN RE FIELDS,, 534 B.R. 126 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 2015)

. . . $363.30 on Line 47b) and l/60th of the amount necessary to cure the pre-petition arrears owed to Carmax ($17.32 . . . amount for transportation ownership/lease expense ($517.00) plus the amount to cure the arrear-age ($17.32 . . .

UNION NEIGHBORS UNITED, INC. v. S. M. R. JEWELL,, 83 F. Supp. 3d 280 (D.D.C. 2015)

. . . . § 17.32(b)(l)(iii)(B) (requiring information about the species to be covered, including the number, . . . age, and sex of individuals, if known) with id. § 17.32(b)(l)(iii)(C) (requiring a habitat conservation . . .

R. SCHERTZ, v. K. SHINSEKI,, 26 Vet. App. 362 (Vet. App. 2013)

. . . Notably, 38 C.F.R. § 17.32 requires the health care provider having primary responsibility for a patient . . . treatment that would be disclosed in connection with the informed consent procedures of 38 C.F.R. § 17.32 . . . for the patient would not have foreseen such risks or determined them subject to disclosure under § 17.32 . . . possibility of spinal cord impairment and paralysis as a reasonably foreseeable risk, §§ 3.361(d)(2), 17.32 . . . Pursuant to 38 C.F.R. § 17.32(c) (2013), when obtaining informed consent, a practitioner "must explain . . .

MOORE- STOVALL, M. D. v. SHINSEKI,, 969 F. Supp. 2d 1309 (D. Kan. 2013)

. . . Greenberg’s annualized salary be raised from $161,957 to $190,000, for an increase of 17.32 per cent. . . .

In TITANIUM DIOXIDE ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 959 F. Supp. 2d 799 (D. Md. 2013)

. . . Likewise, Kronos’s margins fell from 15.13 percent to 7.93 percent, and Millennium’s margins fell from 17.32 . . .

CONSERVATION FORCE, v. SALAZAR,, 915 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 17.32(a)(1). . . . acknowledge that “there is an analogous enhancement permit provision for threatened species in 50 C.F.R. § 17.32 . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 17.32(a)(1) (allowing permits for importation of threatened species upon a finding of . . . Compare 50 C.F.R. § 17.32(a)(1), with 50 C.F.R. § 17.22(a)(1). . . .

CONSERVATION FORCE, v. SALAZAR,, 851 F. Supp. 2d 39 (D.D.C. 2012)

. . . . §§ 17.31(a), 17.32(a). . . .

M. McNAIR, v. K. SHINSEKI,, 25 Vet. App. 98 (Vet. App. 2011)

. . . . § 17.32, the regulation governing the provision and documentation of consent to medical procedures . . . and also that minor deviations from the requirements of § 17.32 that are immaterial will not defeat . . . (c) (2011), 3.361(c)(1), (d)(l)(ii) (referring to § 17.32). . . . Additionally, 38 C.F.R. § 17.32(d) provides that “[t]he informed consent process must be appropriately . . . Compare 38 C.F.R. § 17.32(d) (“Documentation of informed consent.”), with 38 C.F.R. § 17.32(c) (“General . . .

In POLAR BEAR ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT LISTING AND D RULE LITIGATION To v. No. v. U. S. t No., 818 F. Supp. 2d 214 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . provisions of the MMPA and CITES, along with, the application of the ESA regulations at 50 CFR 17.31 and 17.32 . . . would otherwise be required under the general ESA threatened species regulations at 50 CFR 17.31 and 17.32 . . . regulations at 50 CFR 17.31, the prohibitions of § 17.31 apply, and permits would be required under 50 CFR 17.32 . . . would otherwise be required under the general ESA threatened species regulations at 50 CFR 17.31 and 17.32 . . . See AR4D 12932 (comparing 50 C.F.R. § 17.32(a) (allowing permits for zoological exhibition and educational . . .

CONSERVATION FORCE, v. SALAZAR,, 811 F. Supp. 2d 18 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . . §§ 17.21(b), 17.32. . . .

BOGGS, Jr. v. K. SHINSEKI,, 404 F. App'x 472 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 17.32. . . . only that the Board made erroneous findings of fact and erroneously applied 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.361 and 17.32 . . .

BOGGS, Jr. v. K. SHINSEKI,, 404 F. App'x 472 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 17.32. . . . only that the Board made erroneous findings of fact and erroneously applied 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.361 and 17.32 . . .

CONSERVATION FORCE, v. SALAZAR,, 753 F. Supp. 2d 29 (D.D.C. 2010)

. . . . §§ 17.21(b), 17.32. . . .

WELCH, L. v. UNITED STATES, 737 F. Supp. 2d 18 (D. Me. 2010)

. . . . § 17.32(a) as establishing the informed consent standard for medical malpractice claims against the . . . Feb. 3, 2006), the District Court rejected an analogous proposition based in part on 38 C.F.R. § 17.32 . . . requires the physician to inform the patient about "reasonable and available alternatives.” 38 C.F.R. § 17.32 . . .

CONSERVATION FORCE, v. SALAZAR,, 715 F. Supp. 2d 99 (D.D.C. 2010)

. . . . §§ 17.21(b), 17.32. . . .

A. HALCOMB, v. K. SHINSEKI,, 23 Vet. App. 234 (Vet. App. 2009)

. . . found that “the medical evidence reflects informed consent on the veteran’s behalf under 38 C.F.R § 17.32 . . . endo-phthalmitis and retinal tears were reasonably foreseeable events means that under 38 C.F.R. § 17.32 . . . He further points out that the Board discussed the adequacy of informed consent under 38 C.F.R. § 17.32 . . . In addition, signature consent is required for all [surgical procedures]. 38 C.F.R. § 17.32(c), (d) ( . . . See 38 C.F.R. § 17.32(c) (2009). . . .

In CAMPTON, s s v. s, 405 B.R. 887 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2009)

. . . The Debtor’s wife is employed, working 40 hours per week at an hourly rate of $17.32. . . .

WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE,, 622 F. Supp. 2d 1155 (D. Utah 2009)

. . . . § 17.32(b)(l)(ii)-(iii) (2009). . 16U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2) (2009). .50 C.F.R. § 402.14(g)(4) (2009). . . . . Id. § 17.32(b)(5)(iii)(C)(8). . 16 U.S.C. § 1539(a)(2)(C). . 65 FR 35243, Response 1 (June 1, 2000) ( . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, v. TUGGLE, v., 607 F. Supp. 2d 1095 (D. Ariz. 2009)

. . . Service-approved management plan, special management measure, or a valid permit issued by the Service under § 17.32 . . . management plan, special management measure, or a valid permit issued by the Service under section 17.32 . . .

SPIRIT OF SAGE COUNCIL, v. KEMPTHORNE,, 511 F. Supp. 2d 31 (D.D.C. 2007)

. . . . §§ 17.22, 17.32). . . . Reg. 32,706, 32,712-14 (Jun. 17, 1999), codified at 50 C.F.R. §§ 17.22(b), 17.32(b)). 16 U.S.C. § 1539 . . . See 50 C.F.R. §§ 17.22(b), 17.32(b). . . .

KLEIN J. v. DEPUY, INC., 476 F. Supp. 2d 1007 (N.D. Ind. 2007)

. . . Hay, Conflict of Laws § 17.32 (1984 ed.)). . . .

COLINDRES, v. QUIETFLEX MANUFACTURING,, 235 F.R.D. 347 (S.D. Tex. 2006)

. . . highest-paid machine operators in Department 911 earned, during the same week, per hour, $18.10, $17.93, $17.32 . . . , $17.32, and $17.08. . . .

SPIRIT OF THE SAGE COUNCIL, v. A. NORTON, U. S., 411 F.3d 225 (D.C. Cir. 2005)

. . . . §§ 17.22(b)(8) & 17.32(b)(8). . . .

L. COOK, Jr. v. J. PRINCIPI,, 353 F.3d 937 (Fed. Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 17.32(c) (1997). According to Mr. . . .

L. COOK, Jr. v. J. PRINCIPI,, 353 F.3d 937 (Fed. Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 17.32(c) (1997). According to Mr. . . .

SPIRIT OF THE SAGE COUNCIL, v. NORTON, U. S., 294 F. Supp. 2d 67 (D.D.C. 2003)

. . . . §§ 17.22, 17.32, 222.2) and the “Permit Revocation Rule” (“PRR”), 64 Fed.Reg. 32,712, 32,714 (Jun. . . . 17, 1999), (codified at 50 C.F.R. §§ 17.22(b), 17.32(b)). . . . recovery of the threatened or endangered species covered by the plan. 50 C.F.R. §§ 17.22(b)(l)(iii)(B), 17.32 . . . given species covered by a permit.” 63 Fed.Reg. 8859 (Feb. 23, 1998), codified at 50 C.F.R. §§ 17.22, 17.32 . . . the Services] in a timely fashion.” 64 Fed.Reg. 32,712, 32,714, codified at 50 C.F.R. §§ 17.22(b), 17.32 . . .

FUND FOR ANIMALS, v. NORTON,, 295 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2003)

. . . . § 17.32. 1. . . . Id. § 17.32. . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 17.32. . . . Id. § 17.32(a). . . . Id. § 17.32. . . . .

In THIARA, v. a, 285 B.R. 420 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2002)

. . . Real Estate § 17.32 (3d ed.2000). . . .

SIERRA CLUB v. A. NORTON,, 207 F. Supp. 2d 1310 (S.D. Ala. 2002)

. . . . § 17.22(b)(1) and 17.32(b)(1).' . . .

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION CENTER, a v. THE SIMPSON TIMBER COMPANY, 255 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2001)

. . . of necessity, provided that any such amendment of a permit issued under § 17.22(b) through (d) or § 17.32 . . . this subchapter shall be consistent with the requirements of § 17.22(b)(5), (c)(5) and (d)(5) or § 17.32 . . . Simpson’s permit was issued under § 17.32(b). . . . Consequently, the permit would be protected from amendment under the assurances provided in § 17.32(b . . . . § 17.32(d)(5) (2000), limits the power to amend permits issued after March 25, 1998. . . .

LOGGERHEAD TURTLE v. COUNTY COUNCIL OF VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, a, 120 F. Supp. 2d 1005 (M.D. Fla. 2000)

. . . . §§ 17.22(b)(1) and 17.32(b)(1). This contention is without merit. . . .

SANDERS, v. JACKSON a, 209 F.3d 998 (7th Cir. 2000)

. . . No. 17, ¶ 17.32. . . .

JAN R. SMITH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a v. DEKALB COUNTY, a, 18 F. Supp. 2d 1365 (N.D. Ga. 1998)

. . . $133.19 for “Courier (x2)”; $122.34 for “Westlaw Research”; $520.23 for “Postage/Photocopies”; and $17.32 . . .

LOGGERHEAD TURTLE v. COUNTY COUNCIL OF VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, a, 148 F.3d 1231 (11th Cir. 1998)

. . . . § 17.32(b)(l)(iii)(A)-(B) (threatened wildlife). . . . of the notice, of written data, views, or arguments with respect to the application.”); 50 C.F.R. § 17.32 . . . 16 U.S.C. § 1539(a)(2)(B); 50 C.F.R. § 17.22(b)(2); 50 C.F.R. § 17.32(b)(2). . . . . § 17.32. . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 13.21(b)-(c) (incorporated by reference into 50 C.F.R. §§ 17.22(b)(2), 17.32(b)(2)). . . .

McKNIGHT, v. KIMBERLY CLARK CORPORATION, a a, 149 F.3d 1125 (10th Cir. 1998)

. . . UNPAID WAGES AND OVERTIME At the time of McKnight’s discharge he was earning $17.32 per hour. . . .

In BANGERT, p d b a V. WOMACK, v. HOUK, 226 B.R. 892 (Bankr. D. Mont. 1998)

. . . Pursuant to the Writ, the Sheriff seized $17.32. (Exhibit E). 11. . . .

UNITED STATES v. S. JIM, Jr., 888 F. Supp. 1058 (D. Or. 1995)

. . . . §§ 17.41, 17.32, 17.21. . . .

SWEET HOME CHAPTER OF COMMUNITIES FOR A GREAT OREGON, v. BABBITT,, 303 U.S. App. D.C. 42 (D.C. Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 17.32. . . .

SWEET HOME CHAPTER OF COMMUNITIES FOR A GREAT OREGON, v. BABBITT,, 1 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 17.32. . . .

v., 16 Ct. Int'l Trade 155 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1992)

. . . of the TSUS, dependent upon the Brix value of the imported product: Orange juice having a Brix value 17.32 . . . classifiable as “not concentrated,” dutiable under item 165.30; orange juice having a Brix value of more than 17.32 . . . dilution processes designed to accomplish two objectives: (1) duty reduction by conformance with the 17.32 . . .

TROPICANA PRODUCTS, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 789 F. Supp. 1154 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1992)

U. S. DURUM MILLING, INC. v. FRESCALA FOODS, INC., 785 F. Supp. 1369 (E.D. Mo. 1992)

. . . market value of Durum-Patent flour of the same type and quality as stated in the 1438 contract was $17.32 . . .

SPERLING, v. HOFFMAN- LA ROCHE INC. a, 862 F.2d 439 (3d Cir. 1988)

. . . Eglit, 2 Age Discrimination § 17.32 n. 5 (1982). . . .

A. BRAZZELL, v. UNITED STATES, 633 F. Supp. 62 (N.D. Iowa 1985)

. . . The plaintiff was 65 years old at the time of trial and her life expectancy was 17.32 years. . . .

WHITTENBERG, Mr. P. NAACP, Dr. T. H. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 607 F. Supp. 289 (D.S.C. 1985)

. . . 13.66 23.00 18.46 49.04 17.25 20.26 28.47 23.63 25.50 15.20 13.18 32.24 12.08 34.62 21.61 22.51 27.03 17.32 . . .

MAN HING IVORY AND IMPORTS, INC. a v. DEUKMEJIAN,, 702 F.2d 760 (9th Cir. 1983)

. . . the United States. (3) A special purpose permit may be issued in accordance with the provisions of § 17.32 . . .

LAMPHERE v. BROWN UNIVERSITY In Re, 491 F. Supp. 232 (D.R.I. 1980)

. . . 6.32 7.07 7.77 0.38 0.68 0.98 2.67 3.16 3.64 6.70 7.68 8.63 2.20 2.59 2.92 3.4 4.2 4.6 13.93 15.80 17.32 . . .

CAYMAN TURTLE FARM, LTD. v. D. ANDRUS, M., 478 F. Supp. 125 (D.D.C. 1979)

. . . . § 17.32(e)(ii)(D), 40 Fed.Reg. 21,976 (May 20, 1975). . . . .

In SOUTHWEST AREA RATE CASE OSWA I SHELL OIL COMPANY v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,, 484 F.2d 469 (5th Cir. 1973)

. . . Texas Gulf Coast 148 19.39 12.05-22.13 38 18.39 10.50-24.38 75 22.19 11.00-30.11 Hugoton-Anadarko 6 17.32 . . . 12 18.69 14.00-21.53 52 25.21 4.40-28.92 Rocky Mountain 0.7 11.57 9.75-12.00 8 18.05 6.83-19.01 20 17.32 . . .

CONTINENTAL BAKING COMPANY, a v. UTAH PIE COMPANY, a CARNATION COMPANY, a v. UTAH PIE COMPANY, a PET MILK COMPANY, a v. UTAH PIE COMPANY, a, 396 F.2d 161 (10th Cir. 1968)

. . . total 1961 - % of total Carnation 10.87% 14.74% 24.51% 14.67% Continental 1.40% 4.87% 3.67% 13.75% Pet 17.32% . . . , 1960, and 1961, as follows: Year Carnation Continental Pet Utah Pie 1958 (Base Year) 10.87% 1.40% 17.32% . . .

v., 38 T.C. 535 (T.C. 1962)

. . . . $346,246.52 ($156,326.97) $189,919.55 Percentage of profits to sales- 17.32% Loss 6.4% The major long-term . . .

SCOTT PAPER COMPANY, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 301 F.2d 579 (3d Cir. 1962)

. . . Tissue 24,033 38,901 13.52 19.65 All Paper Napkins 0 17,509 0 10.02 Resale Paper Napkins 0 17,509 0 17.32 . . .

AMERICAN CAN CO. v. RUSSELLVILLE CANNING CO., 191 F.2d 38 (8th Cir. 1951)

. . . shipments of cans to the Ozark region were as follows: 1941 (about 6 months) 1942 1943 1944 1945 15 79% 17.32% . . .

AMERICAN TOBACCO CO. v. THE UNITED STATES, 76 Ct. Cl. 201 (Ct. Cl. 1932)

. . . One claim for $17.32 was not finally liquidated until March 13, 1925, and paid the same day; another . . .

v., 93 U.S. 514 (U.S. 1876)

. . . The deed closes with these words : and thence S. 41° 37' E. . 17.32 chains to the place of beginning. . . .