Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 17.51 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 17.51 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 17.51

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 17.51
17.51 Oath and certificate of Chief Financial Officer.The Chief Financial Officer shall, within 10 days before he or she enters upon the duties of office, take and subscribe an oath or affirmation faithfully to discharge the duties of office, which oath or affirmation must be deposited with the Department of State. The Chief Financial Officer shall also file with the Department of State a certificate attesting that the retiring Treasurer or Chief Financial Officer has filed receipts from his or her successor for balance of cash, and for all bonds and other securities held by the Treasurer or Chief Financial Officer as such, and a certificate from each board of which he or she is made by law ex officio treasurer, that he or she has satisfactorily accounted to such board as its treasurer.
History.s. 3, ch. 9, 1845; s. 2, ch. 3684, 1887; RS 118; GS 123; RGS 134; CGL 164; ss. 10, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 71-19; s. 67, ch. 95-147; s. 1, ch. 98-34; s. 47, ch. 2003-261.
Note.Former s. 18.01.

F.S. 17.51 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.51 on Casetext

Amendments to 17.51


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 17.51
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 17.51.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES v. BARRET, D B A A K A A K A A K A A K A A K A A K A A K A A K A, 848 F.3d 524 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . The postal inspector obtained search warrants, opened the packages and ultimately seized 17.51 kilograms . . . The total weight received during the relevant period was calculated as the amount tendered'less 17.51 . . .

BLITZ TELECOM CONSULTING, LLC, v. PEERLESS NETWORK, INC., 212 F. Supp. 3d 1232 (M.D. Fla. 2016)

. . . , $35,419.69 0.0136986% 17.51 $6,069,85 09/2012 li/05/7.012 ‘ 11/05/2012 1 $.102,531.72 « 0.0136986% . . .

UNITED STATES v. DISH NETWORK, L. L. C., 75 F. Supp. 3d 942 (C.D. Ill. 2014)

. . . , however, also states that the documents cited by the Plaintiffs shows that Dish paid Dish TV Now $17.51 . . .

BROWN, v. KENTUCKY LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH COMMISSION, v. OF, 966 F. Supp. 2d 709 (E.D. Ky. 2013)

. . . Breathitt, Floyd, Knott, and Letcher counties, contains a population of only 94,194, which deviates 17.51% . . .

HEDGEMAN, v. AUSTAL, U. S. A. L. L. C., 866 F. Supp. 2d 1351 (S.D. Ala. 2011)

. . . Deserves a raise[ ]”); and on June 80, 2008 (from $17/hour to $17.51/hour, “cost of living adjustment . . .

TMJ IMPLANTS, INC. ROBERT W. CHRISTENSEN, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH HUMAN SERVICES,, 584 F.3d 1290 (10th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 17.51. . . .

J. W. DEWIT FARMS, INC. d b a v. MINNESOTA CULTIVATED WILD RICE, 393 F. Supp. 2d 847 (D. Minn. 2005)

. . . . §§ 17.51-.69 (2002), are unconstitutional. . . .

RYAN, v. GENERAL MACHINE PRODUCTS,, 277 F. Supp. 2d 585 (E.D. Pa. 2003)

. . . per hour in November 1998; $15.78 per hour in November 1999; $17.00 per hour in November 2000; and $17.51 . . . per hour in November 1998; $15.78 per hour in November 1999; $17.00 per hour in November 2000; and $17.51 . . .

ESTATE OF M. BRATTON, M. v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO., 24 F. Supp. 2d 667 (N.D. Miss. 1998)

. . . schedule, the sum certain for insurance premiums from the October 31, 1976 pay check was at least $17.51 . . .

BAYRAMOGLU, v. W. ESTELLE,, 806 F.2d 880 (9th Cir. 1986)

. . . when an alternate has been substituted is essentially identical to California form instruction CALJIC 17.51 . . .

WHITTENBERG, Mr. P. NAACP, Dr. T. H. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 607 F. Supp. 289 (D.S.C. 1985)

. . . 20.02 38.62 17.68 18.62 23.37 21.91 24.40 15.90 13.74 28.51 12.42 31.14 23.59 21.88 24.08 18.39 20.39 17.51 . . .

In R. TINNIN, L., 37 B.R. 912 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 1984)

. . . disclosure statement, signed by the Debtors, the first year of interest was calculated at a rate of 17.51% . . . At no time since December 15, 1980, has the rate risen to 17.51% or even 17%. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATED IN MORGAN COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY D., 660 F.2d 208 (6th Cir. 1981)

. . . Straton estimated production costs of $17.51 per ton for the combined stripping and augering operation . . .

CITY OF PORT ARTHUR, TEXAS, v. UNITED STATES, 517 F. Supp. 987 (D.D.C. 1981)

. . . Arthur has enveloped within its borders 5,675 additional whites and 111 additional blacks who comprise 17.51% . . .

TRANS OCEAN VAN SERVICE v. THE UNITED STATES, 200 Ct. Cl. 122 (Ct. Cl. 1972)

. . . based on a diversion of 804 miles, i.e., additional compensation for this diversion in the amount of $17.51 . . .

v. v., 59 T.C. 338 (T.C. 1972)

. . . its reply brief, petitioner DFC claimed that the figures should read 17.91 percent, 17.52 percent, 17.51 . . .

F. ZIMMER, v. J. McKEITHEN, 467 F.2d 1381 (5th Cir. 1972)

. . . . § 17.51. . . .

FREEPORT COUNTRY CLUB, v. UNITED STATES, 430 F.2d 986 (7th Cir. 1970)

. . . $20 spent by a member each month constituted taxable dues, but that the stipulated monthly charge of $17.51 . . . The court found the $17.51 payments not equated to the use of the club facilities; rather they were payments . . . The court found the taxable figure to be $17.51 rather than $20 because a member could spend one cent . . . So plaintiff says, the Court of Claims, by choosing $17.51 as the taxable amount, was necessarily taxing . . . the full $10 amount might be spent by each member each month, thereby avoiding any assessment, the $17.51 . . .

C. HORN, M S HEINZ HORN, v. CIA NAVEGACION FRUCO, S. A. J. R. d b a CIA NAVEGACION FRUCO, S. A. J. R. d b a v. C. HORN, M S, 404 F.2d 422 (5th Cir. 1968)

. . . HORN under this charter party produced the following percentages of ripe and turning bananas: No. 2 17.51% . . .

W. WIRTZ, v. AIRE FRIO, S. A. a, 304 F. Supp. 693 (D.C.Z. 1968)

. . . Padilla Hernandez 28.79 Gregorio Perez 34.82 Jose Quintana 7.62 Cristobal Rodriguez 11.82 Jose Rosales 17.51 . . .

LOCAL INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN S WAREHOUSEMEN S UNION, v. PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION, s s, 278 F. Supp. 755 (C.D. Cal. 1967)

. . . participate in selecting the area arbitrator prior to 1960, this authority was withdrawn by Section 17.51 . . . Section 17.51 provides, “[T]he powers of arbitrators shall be limited strictly to the application and . . .

COHEN, L. v. UNITED STATES, 381 F.2d 383 (Ct. Cl. 1967)

. . . that the very least amount of money that a member could spend and keep his membership in force was $17.51 . . . Accordingly, it was agreed between the parties that $17.51 was the minimum monthly payment which was . . . The defendant contends that the $17.51 minimum monthly charge is includable within the broad statutory . . . The minimum monthly payment of $17.51 is a payment required as a condition of continued membership, “ . . . This does not change the controlling fact that a payment of the minimum sum of $17.51 was obligatory, . . .

ETHEL COHEN, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF HARRY L. COHEN, DECEASED v. THE UNITED STATES, 180 Ct. Cl. 647 (Ct. Cl. 1967)

. . . that the very least amount of money that a member could spend and keep his membership in force was $17.51 . . . Accordingly, it was agreed between the parties that $17.51 was the minimum monthly payment which ivas . . . The defendant contends that the $17.51 minimum monthly charge is includable within the broad statutory . . . The minimum monthly payment of $17.51 is a payment required as a condition of continued membership, “ . . . This does not change the controlling fact that a payment of the minimum sum of $17.51 was obligatory, . . .

TENNEY ROSS v. THE UNITED STATES, 146 Ct. Cl. 223 (Ct. Cl. 1959)

. . . that— * * * The Riggs National Bank would contribute 82.49% and The Washington Loan and Trust Company 17.51% . . . of the shareholders of the Trust Company to such assets would have been 15.91 per cent rather than 17.51 . . .

STAFFORD ORDNANCE CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 108 F. Supp. 378 (Ct. Cl. 1952)

. . . . $82.21 8,204 pounds Steel Scrap from ' ’ ’ Philadelphia @ $17.51 G. . . .

STAFFORD ORDNANCE CORPORATION, A CORPORATION v. THE UNITED STATES, 123 Ct. Cl. 787 (Ct. Cl. 1952)

. . . ._ $82.21 8,204 pounds Steel Scrap from Philadelphia @ $17.51 G. . . .

AMERICAN GAS ELECTRIC CO. v. SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 134 F.2d 633 (D.D.C. 1943)

. . . Bond and Share owns 846,985 shares of common stock, which constitute 17.51 per cent of the outstanding . . . They rose to 17.51 per cent in 1929 and 1930. Management. . . . In 1929 and 1930 Bond and Share’s holdings increased to 17.51 per cent. . . . In brief recapitulation of the: evidence, we find on one side Bond anji Share’s ownership of 17.51 per . . . Of the outstanding voting securities of American Gas 17.51% are owned by Bond and Share; the remaining . . . The scattered character of American Gas stock ownership outside the 17.51% owned by Bond and Share might . . . the facts in this case — where the company alleged to be exercising controlling influence owns but 17.51% . . .