Cases from cite.case.law:

LIGGETT GROUP INCORPORATED USA, R. J. v. A. ENGLE, M. D., 853 So. 2d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . The $17.59 billion dollar award against Brown & Williamson was roughly twenty times its net worth of . . .

UNITED STATES v. VELASCO- HEREDIA,, 319 F.3d 1080 (9th Cir. 2003)

. . . They recovered 17.59 kilograms of marijuana from the pickup. . . . According to the defense, Velasco-Heredia was responsible for only the 17.59 kilograms of marijuana found . . . from the stash house, which would have enclosed approximately 269 kilograms of marijuana, and (2) the 17.59 . . . which the government signed, Velasco-Heredia admitted he had agreed with another person to pick up 17.59 . . . We note that the only evidence in the record of an amount of marijuana supporting the conviction was 17.59 . . .

FRANKLIN FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, O. Jr. B. C. A. S. R. G. v. UNITED STATES,, 55 Fed. Cl. 108 (Fed. Cl. 2003)

. . . Robinette’s stock would therefore have increased in value by $17.59 per share, yielding a total damages . . . figure of $366,452 (20,833 shares times $17.59). . . .

OPE INTERNATIONAL LP, v. CHET MORRISON CONTRACTORS, INCORPORATED,, 258 F.3d 443 (5th Cir. 2001)

. . . . §§ 17.42 & 17.59 (Vernon Supp.1982). . . .

CORADI, v. STATE, 670 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . In addition, restitution in the amount of $17.59 to the Spur Station was ordered, and a $10,000.00 civil . . .

AYERS, Sr. Jr. G. C. v. ALLAIN,, 893 F.2d 732 (5th Cir. 1990)

. . . 74 and 1985— 86: 1973-74 1980-81 1985-86 Historically White Institutions Delta State University 17.1 17.59 . . .

CAIN BULTMAN, INC. a v. MISS SAM, INC. a A. J., 409 So. 2d 114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . practical aspects of agreements for deeds, see The Florida Bar, 1 Florida Real Property Practice, §§ 17.59 . . .

In J. COOPER, Jr. E. CHRYSLER CREDIT CORPORATION, v. J. COOPER, Jr. E., 11 B.R. 391 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1981)

. . . Alternatively, the Debtor argued that the rate of interest should be 17.59% which is the contract rate . . .

YODER BROTHERS, INC. v. CALIFORNIA- FLORIDA PLANT CORPORATION CALIFORNIA- FLORIDA PLANT CORPORATION v. YODER BROTHERS, INC., 537 F.2d 1347 (5th Cir. 1976)

. . . percentage of CFPC’s and CFPCF’s sales which Yoder controlled varieties claimed: 1963, 0.19%; 1969, 17.59% . . . In 1963, 0.19% of their cutting sales were BGA or GRA varieties; by 1969, the number had grown to 17.59% . . .

YBARRA, M. a v. CITY OF TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS, a, 503 F.2d 250 (9th Cir. 1974)

. . . Mexican-Americans form only 2.1% of the town’s population but comprise 17.59%-of the county’s population . . .

L. SCOTT, v. LIBERTY FINANCE CO., 380 F. Supp. 475 (D. Neb. 1974)

. . . Unpaid Contract Balance 1 52.00 18.60 33.40 939.62 1196.00 2 52.00 18.09 33.91 905.71 1144.00 3 52.00 17.59 . . .

UNITED STATES v. STATE OF TEXAS, Dr. J. W., 321 F. Supp. 1043 (E.D. Tex. 1970)

. . . (See § 17.59(a), Texas Education Code (1969)). [.Historical Background] Prior to 1954, the State of Texas . . .

PLATIS, v. UNITED STATES JONES, v. UNITED STATES MARICICH, Jr. v. UNITED STATES N. DAY a N. v. UNITED STATES, 288 F. Supp. 254 (D. Utah 1968)

. . . Multiplication of $8,000 by the 4 per cent factor (17.59) produces a figure of $140,720. . . . .

In SUPREME APPLIANCE HEATING CO., 113 F. Supp. 228 (W.D. Ky. 1953)

. . . Its account in the Citizens Fidelity Bank & Trust Company was exhausted on that date and there was $17.59 . . .

HOLDCROFT TRANSP. CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 153 F.2d 323 (8th Cir. 1946)

. . . Petitioner paid, in addition, $17.59 Clerk’s costs, $15 for an appearance bond, and $276.27 to its counsel . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. CARLISLE LUMBER CO., 99 F.2d 533 (9th Cir. 1938)

. . . Under the order the largest sum fixed as the amount of back pay was $3,080.16, and the smallest was $17.59 . . .

UNITED STATES v. D OLIER ENGINEERING CO., 215 F. 209 (E.D. Pa. 1914)

. . . engineers made computations and found that the boiler had attained an efficiency of 82.59, an excess of 17.59 . . .

THE MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. v. THE UNITED STATES, 47 Ct. Cl. 377 (Ct. Cl. 1912)

. . . 31, 1909, on route No. 145001, $230.56, and on route No.. 155084, $18.99, and on route No. 155091, $17.59 . . .

v., 6 F. 228 (C.C.D.N.J. 1881)

. . . Hugg, city solicitor, $17.59, for taxes and costs for 1872 on tlie real estate described in 3, 4, 5, . . .

L. D., 17 Fla. 630 (Fla. 1880)

. . . said Remington, of about $20 each and costs; James Bennett obtained judgment against Remington for $17.59 . . .

HUSSEY v. BRADLEY, 12 F. Cas. 1059 (C.C.N.D.N.Y. 1864)

. . . October, 1862, when the hearing of the cause was transferred to New York, being for court expenses only, $17.59 . . .

B. D. B., 38 U.S. 519 (U.S. 1839)

. . . Ang. and Ames, 17.59. Head vs. Amory, 2 Cranch, 167. Dartmouth College, 4- Wheat. 636.. .U. S. . . .