Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 17.66 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 17.66 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 17.66

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 17.66
17.66 Securities in book-entry form.Any security that:
(1)(a) Is eligible to be held in book-entry form on the books of the Federal Reserve Book-Entry System; or
(b) Is eligible for deposit in a depository trust clearing system established to hold and transfer securities by computerized book-entry systems; and which
(2)(a) Is held in the name of the Chief Financial Officer, in the name of the State Treasurer, or in the name of the State Insurance Commissioner; or
(b) Is pledged to the Chief Financial Officer, to the State Treasurer, or to the State Insurance Commissioner;

under any state law for any purpose whatsoever, may be held in book-entry form on the books of the Federal Reserve Book-Entry System or on deposit in a depository trust clearing system.

History.s. 3, ch. 87-331; s. 66, ch. 2003-261.
Note.Former s. 18.24.

F.S. 17.66 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.66 on Casetext

Amendments to 17.66


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 17.66
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 17.66.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

FASTSHIP, LLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 131 Fed. Cl. 592 (Fed. Cl. 2017)

. . . LCS-1 is 118.8 meters (389.76 feet) long, with a 17.66 meter (67.90 foot) beam and a full-load displacement . . .

G. LUBBERS, s v. FLAGSTAR BANCORP. INC. P. D., 162 F. Supp. 3d 571 (E.D. Mich. 2016)

. . . On August 27, 2014, Flagstar’s stock fell $0.83 per share and closed at $17.66. Id. ¶ 122. . . .

BIO- MEDICAL APPLICATIONS OF AQUADILLA, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 119 Fed. Cl. 546 (Fed. Cl. 2014)

. . . limit the amount the VA could authorize with VA Form 10-7079’s which specify payment under section 17.66 . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS,, 964 F. Supp. 2d 686 (S.D. Tex. 2013)

. . . +4.90% Anglos_312,717 36.92% 248,481 28.0% -64,236 -20.54% Blacks_66,237 7.82% 77,933 8.8% +11,696 +17.66% . . .

SKF USA SKF S. A. SKF S. A. S. SKF SKF S. p. A. v., 34 Ct. Int'l Trade 859 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2010)

. . . . § 1677e (2006), applied a rate of 17.66% to the sales of subject merchandise that SKF GmbH purchased . . .

SKF USA INC. SKF S. A. SKF S. A. S. SKF SKF S. p. A. v. UNITED STATES,, 675 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2009)

. . . . § 1677e (2006), applied a rate of 17.66% to the sales of subject merchandise that SKF GmbH purchased . . . cooperate as required by 19 U.S.C. § 1677e(b), Commerce applied, as an adverse inference, a rate of 17.66% . . . The 17.66% rate Commerce chose was adverse to SKF GmbH, as Commerce acknowledged. . . . Yet, Commerce openly acknowledged that it chose the 17.66% rate because that rate was adverse to SKF . . .

SKF USA SKF S. A. SKF S. A. S. SKF SKF S. p. A. v., 33 Ct. Int'l Trade 1866 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2009)

. . . . § 1677e (2006), applied a rate of 17.66% to the sales of subject merchandise that SKF GmbH purchased . . . cooperate as required by 19 U.S.C. § 1677e(b), Commerce applied, as an adverse inference, a rate of 17.66% . . . The 17.66% rate Commerce chose was adverse to SKF GmbH, as Commerce acknowledged. . . . Yet, Commerce openly acknowledged that it chose the 17.66% rate because that rate was adverse to SKF . . .

In INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING SECURITIES LITIGATION, 260 F.R.D. 81 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . pre-open period, retail investors had placed purchase orders with a weighted average limit price of $17.66 . . .

H. Jr. D. L. v., 130 T.C. 170 (T.C. 2008)

. . . Ingham — 10.0% (15,198) (17.66) Mr. . . .

In INSPIRE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 515 F. Supp. 2d 631 (M.D.N.C. 2007)

. . . consistently reach their highest sales prices during the class period, but in late 2003, when they averaged $17.66 . . .

FRANCIS v. V. SMITH, 165 F. App'x 199 (3d Cir. 2006)

. . . On August 30, 1999, Francis pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute 17.66 grams of cocaine . . .

BERLYN, INC. v. THE GAZETTE NEWSPAPERS, INC., 157 F. Supp. 2d 609 (D. Md. 2001)

. . . the Sentinel papers by the Press Network fell from 65.72% of the Sentinel’s advertising in 1997 to 17.66% . . .

OUTDOOR GRAPHICS, INC. v. CITY OF BURLINGTON, IOWA,, 103 F.3d 690 (8th Cir. 1996)

. . . In 1988, the City enacted Chapter 17.66 of the Burlington Municipal Code. . . . Although Chapter 17.66 was later amended, those amendments are not relevant to this case. . . . .

BOTTON v. MARPLE TOWNSHIP,, 689 F. Supp. 477 (E.D. Pa. 1988)

. . . BACKGROUND Plaintiff, Claude de Botton is the present owner of approximately 17.66 acres of land (tract . . .

v., 72 T.C. 521 (T.C. 1979)

. . . Middleton, 1/67 $100,000 Lake View Manor 120 9.08 833 $11,100 (2) Huy Q & M Ct., Middleton 3/68 350,000 350 17.66 . . . The nearest parcel in size to the ones here involved was 17.66 acres sold in March 1968 at a price of . . .

REED, III, v. A. RHODES, 422 F. Supp. 708 (N.D. Ohio 1976)

. . . herewith: proportion black enrollment/ capacity closed classrooms Boulevard 7.34% 395/700 4 Dunham 17.66% . . .

SUNKIST GROWERS, INC. v. WINCKLER SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO., 370 U.S. 19 (U.S. 1962)

. . . Exchange Orange and purchase the juice at a stated price less its processing cost alleged to have netted $17.66 . . .

SUNKIST GROWERS, INC. a a v. WINCKLER SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO. a, 284 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1960)

. . . Thus, the total amount EOP received for the byproduct oranges processed under the Silzle contract was $17.66 . . .

ERNST HENRY SCHULTZ, JR. AND JAMES VERNOR DUNBAR, CO- PARTNERS D B A GENERAL CANVAS COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 142 Ct. Cl. 551 (Ct. Cl. 1958)

. . . .0879 pounds, and (3) for the cover tie lines, eave lines, corner lines and guy lines (609.256 ft.) at 17.66 . . . The defendant computed and allowed 17.66 pounds of sisal rope for 555.42 tents with 29.5-inch materials . . .

ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 58 Ct. Cl. 593 (Ct. Cl. 1923)

. . . C. 2600), plus $17.66 individual fare thence to destination (Jos. Eichardson, I. C. C. No. . . .

K. IMADA, THE STEAMSHIP STANLEY DOLLAR., 2 D. Haw. 337 (D. Haw. 1905)

. . . .-................ 17.66 leaving a balance of.............................$50.38 which I find is the . . .