Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 17.68 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 17.68 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 17.68

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 17.68
17.68 Financial Literacy Program for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities.
(1) The Legislature finds that the state has a compelling interest in promoting the economic independence and successful employment of individuals with developmental disabilities as defined in s. 393.063. In comparison with the general population, individuals with developmental disabilities experience lower rates of educational achievement, employment, and annual earnings and are more likely to live in poverty. Additionally, such individuals must navigate a complex network of federal and state programs in order to be eligible for financial and health benefits. Thus, it is essential that these individuals have sufficient financial management knowledge and skills to effectively participate in benefit eligibility determination processes and make informed decisions regarding financial services and products provided by financial institutions. Enhancing the financial literacy of such individuals will provide a pathway for economic independence and successful employment.
(2) The Financial Literacy Program for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities is established within the Department of Financial Services. The department, in consultation with public and private stakeholders, shall develop and implement the program, which must be designed to promote the economic independence and successful employment of individuals with developmental disabilities. Banks, credit unions, savings associations, and savings banks will be key participants in the development and promotion of the program, which must provide information, resources, outreach, and education in the following areas:
(a) For individuals with developmental disabilities:
1. Financial education, including instruction on money management skills and the effective use of financial services and products, to promote income preservation and asset development.
2. Identification of available financial and health benefit programs and services.
3. Job training programs and employment opportunities, including work incentives and state and local workforce development programs.
4. The impact of earnings and assets on eligibility for federal and state financial and health benefit programs, and options to manage such impact.
(b) For employers in this state, strategies to make program information and educational materials available to their employees with developmental disabilities.
(3) Effective October 1, 2016, the department shall:
(a) Establish on its website a clearinghouse for information regarding the program and other resources available for individuals with developmental disabilities and their employers.
(b) Publish a brochure describing the program, which is also accessible on its website.
(4) Within 90 days after the department establishes the website clearinghouse and publishes the brochure, each bank, savings association, and savings bank that is a qualified public depository as defined in s. 280.02 shall:
(a) Make copies of the department’s brochures available, upon the request of the consumer, at its principal place of business and each branch office located in this state which has in-person teller services by having copies of the brochure available or having the capability to print a copy of the brochure from the department’s website. Upon request, the department shall provide copies of the brochure to a bank, savings association, or savings bank.
(b) Provide on its website a hyperlink to the department’s website clearinghouse. If the department changes the website address for the clearinghouse, the bank, savings association, or savings bank must update the hyperlink within 90 days after notification by the department of such change.
(5) A participating qualified public depository is not subject to civil liability arising from the distribution or nondistribution of the brochure or program website information. The contents of the brochure or the program website information may not be attributed to a participating qualified public depository by virtue of its distribution, and do not constitute financial or investment advice by, nor create a fiduciary duty on, the participating qualified public depository to the recipient.
History.s. 1, ch. 2016-3.

F.S. 17.68 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.68 on Casetext

Amendments to 17.68


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 17.68
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 17.68.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

TK SERVICES, INC. v. RWD CONSULTING, LLC,, 263 F. Supp. 3d 64 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . loss of the revenue from the contract with RWD will diminish its projected total annual revenue by 17.68% . . .

MOORE- STOVALL, M. D. v. SHINSEKI,, 969 F. Supp. 2d 1309 (D. Kan. 2013)

. . . Director Malone approved a final annual salary of $200,000 — a 17.68 per cent increase. . . . points to evidence that the VA gave her a 5.43 per cent pay raise, while it gave raises of 13.18 to 17.68 . . .

JANUS CAPITAL GROUP, INC. v. FIRST DERIVATIVE TRADERS, 564 U.S. 135 (U.S. 2011)

. . . JCG’s stock price fell nearly 25 percent, from $17.68 on September 2 to $18.50 on September 26. . . .

JANUS CAPITAL GROUP, INC. v. FIRST DERIVATIVE TRADERS, 180 L. Ed. 2d 166 (U.S. 2011)

. . . JCG’s stock price fell nearly 25 percent, from $17.68 on September 2 to $13.50 on September 26. . . .

HOLTER, v. WELLS FARGO AND COMPANY,, 281 F.R.D. 340 (D. Minn. 2011)

. . . Plaintiff earned $17.68 per hour. . . .

In MUTUAL FUNDS INVESTMENT LITIGATION. v. f k a B. M. A., 566 F.3d 111 (4th Cir. 2009)

. . . the Attorney General’s complaint, the share price of JCG’s common stock dropped by 12.7 percent from $17.68 . . .

UNITED STATES v. LOT BLOCK LAKEWOOD OAK ESTATES SEC. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, v., 260 F. App'x 699 (5th Cir. 2007)

. . . property and the allocation between tainted and non-tainted funds, the district court determined that 17.68% . . .

D. OWENS, v. HOWE,, 365 F. Supp. 2d 942 (N.D. Ind. 2005)

. . . the reimbursement of some non-service related postage totaling $48.85 ($4.75+ $4.75+ $5.92+ $15.75+ $17.68 . . .

T. W. v., 118 T.C. 379 (T.C. 2002)

. . . Hahn’s “best case” scenario indicates that the value of the intangible assets represents 17.68 percent . . .

UNITED STATES GOODSTEIN v. MCLAREN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, L. L. C. M. D. M. D. M. D. M. D. M. D., 202 F. Supp. 2d 671 (E.D. Mich. 2002)

. . . the lease in question: Date_Market Rent McLaren Rent July 1, 1994 $13.00 $17.00 July 1, 1995 $14.00 $17.68 . . .

R. MILLSAP, v. MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, a, 162 F. Supp. 2d 1262 (N.D. Okla. 2001)

. . . Facility Age Service Age Service (1) (2) (3) (4) Tulsa 50.95 19.68 49.27 18.71 Torrence 50.02 22.65 46.88 17.68 . . .

In GRANATI, v., 270 B.R. 575 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2001)

. . . Percentage Rate as defined under Regulation Z implementing the Federal Truth in Lending Act would be 17.68% . . .

WASTE MANAGEMENT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, INC. v. EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT,, 135 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (N.D. Cal. 2001)

. . . The average rainfall figure used by OSC was 17.68 inches (based on rainfall at the nearby Oakland International . . .

UNITED STATES v. AGUAYO- DELGADO,, 220 F.3d 926 (8th Cir. 2000)

. . . The report specifically found that Aguayo-Delgado was responsible for 17.68 kilograms of methamphetamine . . .

PATTERSON L. v. P. H. P. HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, 90 F.3d 927 (5th Cir. 1996)

. . . that she was a salaried employee of PHP Healthcare and received $36,650 per year or approximately $17.68 . . .

MORTKOWITZ v. TEXACO INC. a, 842 F. Supp. 1232 (N.D. Cal. 1994)

. . . underground tanks, the Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance, San Jose Municipal Code, Title 17, chapter 17.68 . . .

P. WILFONG, v. UNITED STATES, 991 F.2d 359 (7th Cir. 1993)

. . . The IRS auditor computed the business use at just 17.68 percent. . . .

L. MENDELL, VIACOM, INC. v. R. GOLLUST, R. Jr. K. WJB, 793 F. Supp. 474 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)

. . . At the time of the Viacom International transactions, the GTO defendants were entitled to between 17.68% . . .

WESCH, v. HUNT,, 785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

. . . Block 101C 10 100.00% 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Block 102 198 100.00% 160 80.81% 35 17.68% . . .

M. MOKOVER v. NECO ENTERPRISES, INC. MONDSCHEIN v. NECO ENTERPRISES, INC. M. MOKOVER, v. NECO ENTERPRISES, INC., 785 F. Supp. 1083 (D.R.I. 1992)

. . . Isaac A 22.1 150 3,315.00 125.00 17.68 2,210.00 Neil L. . . .

WHITTENBERG, Mr. P. NAACP, Dr. T. H. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 607 F. Supp. 289 (D.S.C. 1985)

. . . 18.14 19.02 26.74 22.44 24.58 14.79 13.09 31.80 11.33 33.75 20.67 21.85 26.08 18.12 21.09 20.02 38.62 17.68 . . .

In ROLLING GREEN COUNTRY CLUB, a, 26 B.R. 729 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1982)

. . . difference in investment value to the bank is $164,651.64 using a discount rate based on opportunity cost of 17.68% . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. DIGGS, Jr., 613 F.2d 988 (D.C. Cir. 1979)

. . . , payable to North Carolina Mutual (for an insurance policy on Congressman Diggs) in the amount of $17.68 . . .

ASHLAND OIL, INC. v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY,, 463 F. Supp. 619 (N.D. Okla. 1978)

. . . 1966 (Kansas Refined Helium) sold its product for an average price of $16.37 per Mcf and in 1967 for $17.68 . . .

s v., 21 C.C.P.A. 573 (C.C.P.A. 1934)

. . . , by registered mail, covered by customs entry #794,323, and described as follows: 1 pearl weighing 17.68 . . . pearls), said pendants being more specifically described as follows: The pearl in question weighing 17.68 . . . exported June 21, 1930, under notice of intent 145297) containing four pearls as follows: 1 pearl weighing 17.68 . . .

BATES v. DRESSER, 229 F. 772 (D. Mass. 1915)

. . . the amount shown on the cashier’s ledger as due depositors, have found it. not to correspond within $17.68 . . .