Cases from cite.case.law:

A. FROST, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY,, 914 F.3d 1189 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 24.104(f)(1) ). Coppinger-Martin v. . . .

SMITH, v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR E. LLC d b a DZ, 674 F. App'x 309 (4th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 24.104(f)(2). . . . . § 24.104(f)(4). . . .

DESILVA, v. n CASTRO, U. S., 314 F.R.D. 17 (D.D.C. 2016)

. . . property] but no review appraisal was found in the file to verify these values as required by 49 CFR 24.104 . . . Id. at 4 (citing 49 C.F.R. § 24.104). . . . See also 49 C.F.R. § 24.104. . . .

L. TAMOSAITIS, PH. D. v. URS INC. a URS U. S. URS, 781 F.3d 468 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 24.104(a); that “the respondent may submit to the Assistant Secretary a written statement and any . . . affidavits or documents substantiating its position,” 29 C.F.R. § 24.104(b); and that the agency “will . . . provide to the complainant ... a copy of all of respondent’s submissions to the agency,” 29 C.F.R. § 24.104 . . . inference that the protected activity was a contributing factor in the adverse action.” 29 C.F.R. § 24.104 . . . his “protected activity was a contributing factor in the adverse [employment] action.” 29 C.F.R. § 24.104 . . .

L. TAMOSAITIS, Ph. D. v. URS INC. a URS U. S. URS, 771 F.3d 539 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 24.104(a); that “the respondent may submit to the Assistant Secretary a written statement and any . . . affidavits or documents substantiating its position,” 29 C.F.R. § 24.104(b); and that the agency “will . . . provide to the complainant ... a copy of all of respondent’s submissions to the agency,” 29 C.F.R. § 24.104 . . . inference that the protected activity was a contributing factor in the adverse action.” 29 C.F.R. § 24.104 . . . his “protected activity was a contributing factor in the adverse [employment] action.” 29 C.F.R. § 24.104 . . .

S. KOCH, v. L. SCHAPIRO,, 777 F. Supp. 2d 86 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . . § 24.104; see also 48 C.F.R. §§ 52.224-1 & 52.224-2. Mr. . . . See Opp. at 10; see also 48 C.F.R. § 24.104 (citing 48 C.F.R. §§ 52.224-1 & 52.224-2). . . .

BURCH, v. PIONEER CREDIT RECOVERY, INC., 551 F.3d 122 (2d Cir. 2008)

. . . . §§ 24.104 and 52.224-2, Pioneer is subject to civil liability for violations of the Privacy Act because . . . See 48 C.F.R. § 24.104 (requiring the inclusion of the provisions specified in 48 C.F.R. § 52.224-2 in . . .

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS v. SINKS, L. L. C. d b a, 565 F. Supp. 2d 1216 (D. Kan. 2008)

. . . Chrysler Corp., 968 F.Supp. 568, 578 (D.Colo.1997); McCarthy, supra note 31, § 24.104. . . . .

STANO, v. L. DUGGER,, 889 F.2d 962 (11th Cir. 1989)

. . . circumstances such as “complete denial of counsel,” are not present in this case. 466 U.S. at 658-59 & n. 24.104 . . .

GOODMAN, v. LUKENS STEEL COMPANY,, 580 F. Supp. 1114 (E.D. Pa. 1984)

. . . discriminating against any employee, probationary or permanent, on racial grounds {see, e.g., N.T. 24.97-99, 24.104 . . .