Cases from cite.case.law:

RUBENSTEIN, v. INTERNATIONAL VALUE ADVISERS, LLC, IVA f k a, 363 F. Supp. 3d 379 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . 22,053 $28.02 November 17, 2016 84,499 $28.35 November 18, 2016 7,709 $28.27 November 21, 2016 48,164 $28.01 . . .

MARTINEZ, v. B. SESSIONS, III,, 893 F.3d 1067 (8th Cir. 2018)

. . . R. 28.01 ; State v. Isa , 850 S.W.2d 876, 902 (Mo. 1993). . . .

UNITED STATES v. P. NAYLOR, II,, 887 F.3d 397 (8th Cir. 2018)

. . . R. 28.01 ; State v. Nolan, 872 S.W.2d 99, 103 (Mo. banc 1994). . . .

BYRD, LLC, v. TENNESSEE WINE AND SPIRITS RETAILERS ASSOCIATION,, 883 F.3d 608 (6th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 28.01. . . .

RUTHERFORD, v. UNITED STATES, 295 F. Supp. 3d 1258 (N.D. Ala. 2017)

. . . See also , e.g. , 2 Alabama Pattern Jury Instructions-Civil § 28.01 (3d ed. 2016) ("Negligence is the . . .

MADISON VIGIL FOR LIFE, INC. Fr. v. CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN,, 1 F. Supp. 3d 892 (W.D. Wis. 2014)

. . . On February 25, 2014, the City of Madison Common Council passed Madison General Ordinance 28.01, “Prohibition . . .

UNITED STATES v. RODRIGUEZ,, 924 F. Supp. 2d 1108 (C.D. Cal. 2013)

. . . Hispanic % Citizens Year (18 + )_Hispanic —Hispanic (18 +)_Citizens —Hispanic 2005 2,144,727 602,199 28.01% . . .

GLENN DEFENSE MARINE ASIA PTE LTD. v. UNITED STATES,, 97 Fed. Cl. 568 (Fed. Cl. 2011)

. . . See AR Tab 28.01, at 11339-477. . . . See AR Tab 28.01, at 11339-477. . . . See AR Tab 28.01, at 11339-447. . . . See AR Tab 28.01, at 11339-447. . . . See AR Tab 28.01, at 11400. . . .

SUDBURY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, v. MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION,, 762 F. Supp. 2d 254 (D. Mass. 2010)

. . . Laws ch. 71B; 603 Mass.Code Regs. 28.01 et seq. . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. HINSON,, 585 F.3d 1328 (10th Cir. 2009)

. . . jury found that Hinson had sold 40.96 grams of a mixture containing methamphetamine, which amounted to 28.01 . . .

GULF POWER COMPANY, v. COALSALES II, L. L. C. f k a, 661 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (N.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . Gulf Power states that Section 28.01 of the CSA requires any amendments to the contract to be evidenced . . .

A. SHAW, v. HYATT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,, 461 F.3d 899 (7th Cir. 2006)

. . . , whereas the official exchange rate set by the Central Bank of Russia on the date of check-out was 28.01 . . .

In GLOBO COMUNICACOES E PARTICIPACOES S. A. GMAM I, WRH v. e S. A., 317 B.R. 235 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . (Appellant Br. at 8-9 (quoting Section 28.01(a) of the Trust Deeds for the Bond Debt containing the jurisdictional . . .

LAS VEGAS SANDS, INC, a v. CULINARY WORKERS UNION LOCAL a v. a v., 82 F. App'x 580 (9th Cir. 2003)

. . . Perhaps most significant is § 28.01 of the CBA, which is read together with an appended Side Letter Agreement . . . Section 28.01 broadly defines the term “Employer” to include subsidiaries and other entities under LVSI . . . campaign at any operation (at which the Union does not have representation rights) covered by Section 28.01 . . . Taken by itself, § 28.01 might suggest that the parties intended the “Employer” (and thus the “Employer . . . Similarly, § 28.01 requires the Employer to give advance notice and to honor its payment obligations . . .

STYRON, Jr. v. L. JOHNSON,, 262 F.3d 438 (5th Cir. 2001)

. . . Issue 7: His absence, in violation of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 28.01, from the pretrial . . .

CROSS, v. L. JOHNSON,, 169 F. Supp. 2d 603 (N.D. Tex. 2001)

. . . PROC. art. 28.01 and therefore any objection had been waived. Cross v. . . .

In TELECTRONICS PACING SYSTEMS, INC. J, 137 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (S.D. Ohio 2001)

. . . excellent work done on behalf of the Class as a whole, which comes to exactly twenty-eight percent (28.01% . . . amount proposed on February 15th of $17,480,000.00 ($17.4 million) represents only twenty-eight percent (28.01% . . . worked times a rate of $230.00 for a lodestar total of $17,480,000.00 ($17.4 million), which comes to 28.01% . . . The lodestar amount using these figures amounts to $17,480,000, equating to 28.01% of the Total Fund. . . . The Court also notes that the requested amount represents 28.01% of the total amount of the Total Fund . . .

R. PRICKETT, v. UNITED STATES, 111 F. Supp. 2d 1191 (M.D. Ala. 2000)

. . . Alabama Pattern Jury Instructions, Civil 28.01 (1993). . . .

BAILEY, D. C. D. C. D. C. v. MORALES,, 190 F.3d 320 (5th Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 28.01(12)). .A person commits an offense if, with intent to obtain an economic benefit the person . . .

WASTE MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS, INC. v. S. GILMORE, III,, 64 F. Supp. 2d 537 (E.D. Va. 1999)

. . . promote the general health and welfare by providing for adequate [waste] disposal services,” Code § 15.01-28.01 . . . Id. 455 S.E.2d at 718 (citing Va.Code §§ 15.01-28.01 and 15.0128.02 (now §§ 15.2-931 and 15.2-932) and . . .

ELVIS PRESLEY ENTERPRISES, INC. v. CAPECE a a, 950 F. Supp. 783 (S.D. Tex. 1996)

. . . McCarthy, supra, § 28.01[2][a]; see also J. McCarthy, Melville B. . . . McCarthy, supra, § 28.01[4]. . . . recognizing that without identification, the right of publicity is worthless); see also McCarthy, supra, § 28.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SPRING, 80 F.3d 1450 (10th Cir. 1996)

. . . Texas Penal Code § 28.01. . . .

UNITED STATES, v. L. ANZALONE, U. S., 43 M.J. 322 (C.A.A.F. 1995)

. . . Dressier, Understanding Criminal Law § 28.01 at 368 (Matthew-Bender 1994 Reprint) (“Solicitation is an . . .

UNITED STATES v. GUADARDO,, 40 F.3d 102 (5th Cir. 1994)

. . . The same definitions are also contained in section 28.01(1) and (2). . . .

JIM HENSON PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. JOHN T. BRADY ASSOCIATES, INC., 867 F. Supp. 175 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . See 2 McCarthy § 28.01[3] (discussing the distinction between privacy-based and publicity-based misappropriation . . .

McNABB, v. W. RILEY,, 29 F.3d 1303 (8th Cir. 1994)

. . . See 2 Alba Conte, Attorney Fee Awards § 28.01 (1993). . . .

C A CARBONE, INC. v. TOWN OF CLARKSTOWN, NEW YORK, 511 U.S. 383 (U.S. 1994)

. . . . §15.1-28.01 (Supp. 1993). . . .

FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, INC. v. DIXON, St., 603 So. 2d 562 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Support for the finding of a specific duty on the clerk’s part may further be found in sections 28.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CHAMBERS,, 922 F.2d 228 (5th Cir. 1991)

. . . The same general thrust is also apparent from Texas Code of Criminal Procedure articles 1.14 and 28.01 . . . raise it before and at trial and on direct appeal — is to in effect read articles 1.14, 19.27, and 28.01 . . . an objection to an indictment or information be made at an earlier time in compliance with Article 28.01 . . . Article 28.01 authorizes pretrial conferences at which challenges to "the form or substance of the indictment . . .

N. SEDERQUIST, T. J. W. W. v. COURT, I. A. C., 861 F.2d 554 (9th Cir. 1988)

. . . Newberg, Attorney Fee Awards, § 28.01 (1986) (listing statutes), the award of attorneys’ fees is a task . . .

In JORDAN, Jr., 79 B.R. 49 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 1987)

. . . . § 28.01, at 2 (1981, rev. 7/85). . 3 Norton, Bankr.L. & Prac. § 76.09, at 23 (1981, rev. 1/87). . 28 . . .

In GURST,, 70 B.R. 467 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1987)

. . . NORTON, BANKRUPTCY LAW & PRACTICE, § 28.01, at Part 28—Page 2 to Page 3 (1982), is consistent with that . . .

S. A. DISCOUNT LIQUOR, INC. v. TEXAS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION,, 709 F.2d 291 (5th Cir. 1983)

. . . . §§ 28.01, 32.01 (Vernon 1978). . . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY,, 688 F.2d 345 (5th Cir. 1982)

. . . Article 28 RESPONSIBLE UNION-COMPANY RELATIONSHIP 28.01 The Company and the Union recognize that it is . . . It is clear to us that articles 21.05A and 28.01 fall well short of imposing specific duties on union . . . Article 28.01’s statement that the Union and its representatives will “apply” the terms of the contract . . .

SHAYER, v. C. KIRKPATRICK, St. C. Jr. St. M. O H. OVERSCHMIDT, v. C. KIRKPATRICK, MISSOURI STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, INC. St. NAACP, St. NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, St. NAACP, v. BOND, C. MISSOURI STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, INC. NAACP, St. NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, Dr. Mr. L. v. BOND, C., 541 F. Supp. 922 (W.D. Mo. 1982)

. . . 2.113 Census Tract 24 1,399 Census Tract 25 1,777 Census Tract 26 28 Census Tract 27 10 Census Tract 28.01 . . .

PROCON, INCORPORATED, v. WUKASCH, AFL- CIO P. L. W. A. R. E. M. AFL- CIO s AFL- CIO s AFL- CIO AFL- CIO AFL- CIO AFL- CIO AFL- CIO AFL- CIO AFL- CIO AFL- CIO AFL- CIO, 526 F. Supp. 597 (E.D. Tex. 1981)

. . . See Section 31.01, Section 31.03, Section 32.32, Section 28.01, Section 28.03 and Section 15.01 of the . . .

PALMER NEWS, INC. v. ARA SERVICES, INC., 476 F. Supp. 1176 (D. Kan. 1979)

. . . Von Kalinowski, Business Organizations: Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation § 28.01, p. 28-5 (1976): . . .

CAMEL MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 215 Ct. Cl. 460 (Ct. Cl. 1978)

. . . 1.064.000. 00 ' 389,000.00 % Profit (of total sales) 15.04% 11.01% 4.02% % Profit (of Renegot. sales) 28.01% . . . of GFP is the reduction of percentage profits (from renegotiable business) from 20.50%, 24.68%, and 28.01% . . .

CAMEL MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES, 572 F.2d 280 (Ct. Cl. 1978)

. . . 1.064.000. 00 389,000.00 % Profit (of total sales) 15.04% 11.01% 4.02% % Profit (of Renegot. sales) 28.01% . . . of GFP is the reduction of percentage profits (from renegotiable business) from 20.50%, 24.68%, and 28.01% . . . action ** 6.9%-15.4% FY 1968 Plaintiff Others No. of Others Sales range Actual profit $3.8 million 28.01% . . . FY 1968 Plaintiff Others No. of Others Sales range $3.8 million $l.l-$5.4 million (11) Actual profit 28.01% . . . FY 1968 Plaintiff Others No. of Others Sales range $3.8 million $l.l-$5.4 million (11) Actual profit 28.01% . . .

RALPHO, v. J. BELL,, 569 F.2d 607 (D.C. Cir. 1977)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law § 28.01 at 2-3 (1958). . Caulfield v. . . .

SEALASKA CORPORATION, v. M. ROBERTS,, 428 F. Supp. 1254 (D. Alaska 1977)

. . . See Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, 28.01 et seq.; Schilling v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. GREEN a k a M. S. a k a H. TESFA, 544 F.2d 138 (3d Cir. 1976)

. . . 2 Moore’s Federal Practice, Pt. 3.40 (2d ed. 1975); 8 Moore’s Federal Practice — Criminal Rules If 28.01 . . .

CIELICZKA, v. E. JOHNSON,, 363 F. Supp. 453 (E.D. Mich. 1973)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §§ 28.01-21 (1958, 1970). . . . .

In L. DELLAVERSON, USMCR, v. LAIRD,, 351 F. Supp. 134 (S.D. Cal. 1972)

. . . See 4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, §§ 28.01, 28.16. . . .

BAXTER, v. MISSOURI- KANSAS- TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY,, 454 F.2d 25 (8th Cir. 1972)

. . . Compare Missoux-i Approved Jury In-tructions, § 28.01. . . . .

CORDAY S DEPARTMENT STORE, INC. v. NEW YORK FIRE AND MARINE UNDERWRITERS, INC. s No. CENTRAL NATIONAL BANK No. No. v. STATE FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY,, 442 F.2d 100 (7th Cir. 1971)

. . . surplus line insurance on the Illinois risk, and the complementary Illinois Insurance Department Rule 28.01 . . .

SCHATTEN, v. UNITED STATES, 419 F.2d 187 (6th Cir. 1969)

. . . See 4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, §§ 28.01, 28.16. . . .

CURRAN, AFL- CIO, v. R. LAIRD, 420 F.2d 122 (D.C. Cir. 1969)

. . . Davis, supra note 14, § 28.01-28.21, at 1-113; Saferstein, Non-reviewability: A Functional Analysis of . . .

W. SMITH, v. R. SWENSON,, 274 F. Supp. 515 (W.D. Mo. 1967)

. . . Rules 27.20, 28.01 and 28.02. . . .

W. E. STIVERS T. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, H. L. STIVERS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 360 F.2d 35 (6th Cir. 1966)

. . . realization of the loss within the particular taxable year.” 5 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, § 28.01 . . .

BLOCKER, a Mr. W. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF MANHASSET, NEW YORK, Dr. L. S. Dr. W. F. X. Jr. W. N., 226 F. Supp. 208 (E.D.N.Y. 1964)

. . . significant: Munsey Park Piándome Road Valley Professional 26.89% 32.07%' .71% Owner-executive 42.24% 28.01% . . .

B. MAURER E. v. UNITED STATES, 284 F.2d 122 (10th Cir. 1960)

. . . Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, Chap. 28, § 28.01 et seq. . . . .

N. TAPPY, v. STATE W. S. BYINGTON,, 82 So. 2d 161 (Fla. 1955)

. . . Section 28.01, Florida Statutes. 1953, F.S.A., relating t.o bonds to be given by clerks of the circuit . . . Section 28.01, supra. . . .

W. ROUSE, v. UNITED STATES, 215 F.2d 872 (D.C. Cir. 1954)

. . . Associated Contractors, Inc., her promissory note for $1,008.37, payable in monthly installments of $28.01 . . .

SCHNEIDER v. STATE TOWN OF IRVINGTON, 308 U.S. 147 (U.S. 1939)

. . . “Sec. 28.01. . . . The appellant was charged in the Municipal Court with a violation of § 28.01. . . .

SOUTHERN PAC. CO. v. CALIFORNIA ADJUSTMENT CO., 237 F. 954 (9th Cir. 1916)

. . . reverse a judgment of the court below, rendereci in favor of the defendant in error for the sum of $3,9-28.01 . . .

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)