The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 28
CLERKS OF THE CIRCUIT COURTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 28.03

28.03 Obligation of sureties.—Each surety upon such bond may bind himself or herself for a specified sum, but the aggregate amount for which the sureties shall bind themselves shall not be less than the penalty of the bond.

History.—s. 9, ch. 3724, 1887; RS 934; GS 1822; RGS 3067; CGL 4848; s. 2, ch. 17754, 1937; s. 1, ch. 20719, 1941; s. 154, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 28.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 28.03 on Casetext

Amendments to 28.03

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 28.03

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 28.03.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

HARDESTY, v. SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT,, 307 F. Supp. 3d 1010 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

. . . 2392:10-13), a total damages calculation for the Schneiders' substantive due process claim would be $28.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BRICENO, B., 681 F. App'x 334 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 28.03 for criminal mischief was an “aggravated felony” under the Sentencing Guidelines, thereby imposing . . . Accordingly, the district court found that the conduct proscribed under § 28.03(a)(1) was a “crime of . . . Penal Code Ann. § 28.03(a)(1) is an aggravated felony under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C). . . . Penal Code Ann. § 28.03(a)(1) (2005). . United States v. . . . Penal Code Ann. § 28.03(a)(1). . . . .

E. MASCIANTONIO, v. SWEPI LP,, 195 F. Supp. 3d 667 (M.D. Pa. 2016)

. . . Ins. 28-1, § 28.03[2] (2013))). .This same authority .cautions that the particular language chosen by . . . See Pierce, supra, at §§ 28.02[2], 28.03[1]. . . . See id. at § 28.03[1]. . . . See Pierce, supra, at §§ 28.02[2], 28.03[1]; Williams & Meyers, Oil and Gas Law § 666. . . . Kaufman, 2012 WL 4442799, at *4; Kuhn, 2012 WL 4442798, at *3-4; see also Pierce, supra, at §§ 28.02[2], 28.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. GONZALEZ- MANCILLA,, 551 F. App'x 128 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . Penal Code § 28.03 (1992). . . .

MORRIS JAMES LLP, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY,, 928 F. Supp. 2d 816 (D. Del. 2013)

. . . (citing Richard Hagedorn & Henry Bailey, Brady on Bank Checks: The Law of Bank Checks ¶ 28.03 (rev. ed . . .

In J. JOHNSON, J. v., 478 B.R. 235 (Bankr. S.D. Miss. 2012)

. . . The Debtor requested $28.03 in lost wages. (Adv. Dkt. 17, ¶ 15). 54. . . . The Court will address each category of damages in turn, a.Lost Wages The Debtor requested $28.03 in . . . lost work, the Court, being constrained by the Pretrial Order, finds that she incurred lost wages of $28.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. MORENO,, 460 F. App'x 317 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 28.03, and the Texas statutory provision for disorderly conduct is Tex. . . .

SPRINGFIELD SCHOOL COMMITTEE, v. DOE,, 623 F. Supp. 2d 150 (D. Mass. 2009)

. . . . § 28.03(3)(c) (2009), as well as the federal regulation which establishes a ten-day maximum for exclusion . . .

In AIRADIGM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v., 519 F.3d 640 (7th Cir. 2008)

. . . left over after superior creditors recover from the proceeds of the sale. 3-28 Debtor-Creditor Law § 28.03 . . .

In AIRADIGM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v., 519 F.3d 640 (7th Cir. 2008)

. . . left over after superior creditors recover from the proceeds of the sale. 3-28 Debtor-Creditor Law § 28.03 . . .

W. BLANTON, TDCJ No. v. QUARTERMAN,, 489 F. Supp. 2d 621 (W.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . . § 28.03(a)(Vernon Supp.2006). . . .

UNITED STATES OF v. BURNS,, 149 F. App'x 171 (4th Cir. 2005)

. . . The marijuana equivalency of the drugs to which Burns did not object was 28.03 kilograms. . . .

UNITED STATES v. REYES- MAYA,, 305 F.3d 362 (5th Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 28.03 (Vernon 1992), and disorderly conduct, Tex. . . . Penal Code Ann. § 28.03(b). . . . Penal Code Ann. § 28.03(a), and is considered a crime of violence. See Boyd v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. LANDEROS- GONZALES,, 262 F.3d 424 (5th Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 28.03(a)(3)(Vernon 1994)(historieal notes). . . . Penal Code Ann. § 28.03(b)(4)(A)(Vernon 1994)(historical notes). . . . Penal Code § 28.03(a)(l)-(3). . . .

L. CARROLL, v. B. SCHRIRO, W., 243 F.3d 1097 (8th Cir. 2001)

. . . Missouri Court of Appeals found it to be waived on direct appeal because Missouri Supreme Court Rule 28.03 . . . The district court concluded that the Missouri court’s application of Rule 28.03 to bar review of Carroll . . . Rollins, 882 S.W.2d 314 (Mo.Ct.App.1994), which he claims demonstrate that Rule 28.03 is not regularly . . . At the time of trial, Rule 28.03 provided: A party may, but is not required to, object specifically or . . .

In C. BENTON,, 237 B.R. 353 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1999)

. . . Upon termination of membership, §§ 28.02 and 28.03 provide for the refund of accumulated employee contributions . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. SALAMEH,, 152 F.3d 88 (2d Cir. 1998)

. . . Devitt et al., Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 28.03 (4th ed.1990) (setting forth essential . . .

CRESWELL TRADING CO. INC. SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY D L Co. Co. P. RSI Co. R. B. Co. P. P. UMA Co. v. UNITED STATES, Co. Co. Co. U. S. Co., 964 F. Supp. 409 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1997)

. . . Ltd. 36.40% 28.03% Govind Steel 78.86% 45.11% Kejriwal Iron & Steel Works 27.37% 11.42% R.B. . . .

Co. D L Co. Co. P. RSI Co. R. B. Co. P. P. Co. v. Co. Co. Co. U. S. Co., 21 Ct. Int'l Trade 487 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1997)

. . . Ltd. 36.40% 28.03% Govind Steel 78, 45.11% Kejriwal Iron & Steel Works. 27.37% 11.42% R.B. . . .

CONNTECH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, v. UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT EDUCATION PROPERTIES, INC., 102 F.3d 677 (2d Cir. 1996)

. . . Section 28.03 of the MDA provides that ConnTech’s remedies in an action against UCEPI are limited to . . . Section 28.03 of the MDA limits ConnTech's ability to satisfy any judgment to recovery out of UCEPX’s . . .

In EXTRADITION OF LAHORIA, 932 F. Supp. 802 (N.D. Tex. 1996)

. . . IPC 365 1201 20.02, 20.03, 20.04 Mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees IPC 427 844(f) 28.03 . . .

M. McKAY, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 933 F. Supp. 635 (S.D. Tex. 1995)

. . . Section 28.03 of the Texas Penal Code Ann. . . .

UNITED STATES v. K. CARROLL,, 813 F. Supp. 698 (E.D. Mo. 1993)

. . . Circuit, § 5.06A (1992); 2 Devitt, Blackmar, and O’Malley, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, § 28.03 . . .

WISE, v. ARMONTROUT,, 952 F.2d 221 (8th Cir. 1991)

. . . Missouri Supreme Court Rule 28.03 required Wise to file a notice of appeal no later than ten days after . . .

OF AMERICA BANK, MID- MICHIGAN, N. A. a E. W. v. UNITED STATES, 752 F. Supp. 764 (E.D. Mich. 1990)

. . . 35.67 1994 45.87 34.12 1995 48.32 32.70 1996 50.90 31.39 1997 53.62 30.18 1998 56.48 29.07 1999 59.49 28.03 . . .

In KACZMARCZYK, 107 B.R. 200 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1989)

. . . See Bankruptcy Act §§ 1006(2), 1046(1); 10 Colliers on Bankruptcy, ¶ 22.02, 28.03 (14th ed. 1978). . . .

GOLDEN v. CIRCLE T. V. AND APPLIANCE, INC., 14 Fla. Supp. 2d 157 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1985)

. . . written estimate for labor and parts and the charges therefor in violation of Sections 2-28.02(5) and 2-28.03 . . . The testimony of Chaffee Hallmark establishes violations of Sections 2-28.03(6) and 2-28.05, Florida . . .

In ANSCHUETZ CO., 754 F.2d 602 (5th Cir. 1985)

. . . See 4 Moore’s Federal Practice HH 28.03-04, .06. . . .

BLACK GOLD, LTD. a v. ROCKWOOL INDUSTRIES, INC. a, 729 F.2d 676 (10th Cir. 1984)

. . . Co., 269 F.2d 950, 954 (10th Cir.1959); 4 J. von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation § 28.03 . . .

LOZANO, v. SMITH,, 718 F.2d 756 (5th Cir. 1983)

. . . Section 28.03(b)(3). . . . .

BUTLER, FITZGERALD POTTER, A v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION,, 571 F. Supp. 1258 (S.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . Article 28.03 of the Main Lease provides: (c) If in any lease year the Operating Rate for any of the . . . foregoing items of operating expense [Electricity, Art. 28.03(a)(iii) ] shall be higher or lower than . . . Article 28.03(a)(iii) of the Main Lease explicitly includes electricity as one of several items of “operating . . .

PUERTO RICO MARITIME SHIPPING AUTHORITY, v. FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION GOVERNMENT OF VIRGIN ISLANDS v. FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION, 678 F.2d 327 (D.C. Cir. 1982)

. . . sheet shows the relevant PRMSA fuel prices in dollars per barrel for 1980 to be 19.26, 20.60, 21.39 and 28.03 . . .

PROCON, INCORPORATED, v. WUKASCH, AFL- CIO P. L. W. A. R. E. M. AFL- CIO s AFL- CIO s AFL- CIO AFL- CIO AFL- CIO AFL- CIO AFL- CIO AFL- CIO AFL- CIO AFL- CIO AFL- CIO, 526 F. Supp. 597 (E.D. Tex. 1981)

. . . See Section 31.01, Section 31.03, Section 32.32, Section 28.01, Section 28.03 and Section 15.01 of the . . .

De PAIN, De v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. FRANTZEN, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. CHRISTOPHERSEN, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. KAHN, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. SIBTHORPE, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP., 637 F.2d 775 (D.C. Cir. 1980)

. . . See 4 Moore’s Federal Practice (2d ed.1979) V •' 28.03-04, .06. . . .

In COVINGTON BLOOMFIELD SAVINGS BANK, v. COVINGTON, Jr. E., 2 B.R. 120 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1979)

. . . .) ¶¶ 22.02, 28.03. . . .

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL NO. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,, 587 F.2d 1176 (D.C. Cir. 1978)

. . . Kheel, 6 Labor Law § 28.03[2a] (1974); C. J., Morris, supra note 20 at 739. . Vaca v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. HAMMERMILL PAPER COMPANY,, 429 F. Supp. 1271 (W.D. Pa. 1977)

. . . In 1960, the highest market share was 8.54%, the highest 4 had a cumulative share of 28.03%, the highest . . .

THOMPSON, v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES,, 492 F.2d 1082 (5th Cir. 1974)

. . . Gardner, 1967, 387 U.S. 136, 141, 87 S.Ct. 1507, 18 L.Ed.2d 681, 687; Davis, Administrative Law, § 28.03 . . .

J. C. TERRY, v. COLONIAL STORES EMPLOYEE S CREDIT UNION OF ATLANTA,, 411 F.2d 553 (5th Cir. 1969)

. . . D.Kan.1962, 216 F.Supp. 329; In re O’Dell, D.Kan. 1961, 198 F.Supp. 389; 10 Collier on Bankruptcy §§ 28.03 . . .

K. ZASSENHAUS S. v. EVENING STAR NEWSPAPER CO., 404 F.2d 1361 (D.C. Cir. 1968)

. . . See 4 Moore, Federal Practice ¶¶ 28.03 at 1922, 28.06 at 1935-37, 1940 (2d ed. 1967). . 1963 Advisory . . .

In J. CHEETHAM,, 272 F. Supp. 501 (D. Me. 1967)

. . . See 10 Collier, supra, para. 28.03; The printed form furnished to the debtor and completed by him at . . .

OKLAHOMA TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, 272 F. Supp. 729 (W.D. Okla. 1966)

. . . .-1954) 218 F.2d 164; 5 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, Section 28.03, c. 6.28, p. 27. . . .

S. PRICE K. v. UNITED STATES PRICE TRUST NO. S. K. v. UNITED STATES PRICE TRUST NO. S. K. v. UNITED STATES PRICE TRUST NO. S. K. v. UNITED STATES PRICE TRUST NO. S. K. v. UNITED STATES, 260 F. Supp. 18 (W.D. Okla. 1966)

. . . United States (9th Cir. 1954), 218 F.2d 164; 5 Mertens, Chap. 28, Pg. 7, Sec. 28.03. 5. . . .

W. E. STIVERS T. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, H. L. STIVERS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 360 F.2d 35 (6th Cir. 1966)

. . . grace, the burden of proof rule has been applied with inexorable force to loss claims.” 5 Mertens at § 28.03 . . .

Co. H. A. v., 40 Cust. Ct. 69 (Cust. Ct. 1958)

. . . Ca 28.03%, CaO 39.22%, 0 22.38%, Cl 49.59%. White, dry powder; chlorine odor. Powerful oxidizer. . . .

THE EDMUND FANNING. ISBRANDTSEN CO., 89 F. Supp. 282 (S.D.N.Y. 1950)

. . . Prac., 1st Ed., Vol. 2 at page 2553, § 28.03. . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. SEYMOUR WOOLEN MILLS,, 101 F.2d 1015 (7th Cir. 1939)

. . . $143.50; Harry Stradley, $124:82; Nannie Mellenkamp, $31.50; Eunice Hunt, $44.97; Farrell McAdams, $28.03 . . .

LOUISVILLE N. R. CO. v. COULTER,, 131 F. 282 (C.C.E.D. Ky. 1903)

. . . complainant’s stock bore to the total stock and one-half of the latter is included, the percentage is 28.03 . . .

J. J., 44 Fla. 719 (Fla. 1902)

. . . Carlton for the sum of $49.88 principal, $1.08 interest, and $28.03 costs and attorneys’ fees, making . . .

HARTRANFT v. WIEGMANN, 121 U.S. 609 (U.S. 1887)

. . . them as manufactures of shells amounted to $25.98, which, with interest to October 5, 1883, amounts $28.03 . . .