The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 28
CLERKS OF THE CIRCUIT COURTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 28.06

28.06 Power of clerk to appoint deputies.—The clerk of the circuit court may appoint a deputy or deputies, for whose acts the clerk shall be liable, and the said deputies shall have and exercise each and every power of whatsoever nature and kind as the clerk may exercise, excepting the power to appoint a deputy or deputies.

History.—s. 1, Feb. 12, 1834; s. 1, ch. 254, 1849; RS 1384; GS 1825; RGS 3070; CGL 4851; s. 1, ch. 21956, 1943; s. 156, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 28.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 28.06 on Casetext

Amendments to 28.06

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 28.06

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 28.06.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

WHITT, Jr. Sr. v. KALEIDA HEALTH,, 298 F. Supp. 3d 558 (W.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . At that time, Whitt's rate of pay increased to $28.06, although he was on an extended leave of absence . . . At that time, Whitt was on an extended leave of absence, and his rate of pay remained stagnant at $28.06 . . . Whitt's hourly was $29.18 even though its own Exhibit M shows that his hourly rate was only $28.06." . . .

TRUSTEES OF MOSAIC AND TERRAZZO WELFARE, PENSION, ANNUITY AND VACATION FUNDS, v. HIGH PERFORMANCE FLOORS, INC. a a HPF, L. L. C, LLC,, 233 F. Supp. 3d 329 (E.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . provides that, at least from 2009-2010, employers who are signatories were required to contribute $28.06 . . .

JERRY S ENTERPRISES, INC. v. U. S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 845 F.3d 883 (8th Cir. 2017)

. . . At that time, Cheryl Sullivan owned 28.06% of all outstanding company shares, while Kelly and Monica . . .

JERRY S ENTERPRISES, INC. v. U. S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 132 F. Supp. 3d 1128 (D. Minn. 2015)

. . . Shares_Voting Shares Monica Sullivan_1,141 (1.2%)_=_ Kelly Sullivan_2,317 (2.4%)_- Cheryl Sullivan_26,554 (28.06% . . .

DRACUT SCHOOL COMMITTEE, v. BUREAU OF SPECIAL EDUCATION APPEALS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, P. A. C. A., 737 F. Supp. 2d 35 (D. Mass. 2010)

. . . ; and developing skills necessary for seeking, obtaining, and maintaining jobs. 603 Mass.Code Regs. 28.06 . . .

REED v. ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE,, 268 F.R.D. 573 (N.D. Ill. 2009)

. . . effective competitive wage” would be $31.23 per hour, while the “actual average effective wage paid” was $28.06 . . .

In A. SMITH,, 388 B.R. 603 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2008)

. . . . § 1046(5) (repealed 1978); 10 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 28.06 (14th ed.1977). . . .

ROTHE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE U. S., 499 F. Supp. 2d 775 (W.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . Minority Business Enterprises represent 28.06 percent of the available vertical construction firms and . . .

In WILLIAMS SECURITIES LITIGATION, 496 F. Supp. 2d 1195 (N.D. Okla. 2007)

. . . Shares of WCG closed on October 1, 1999, the first day of trading, at $28.06 per share. . . .

In QLT INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 312 F. Supp. 2d 526 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . price of QLT shares fell from approximately $40.44 per share at the close of December 13 to a low of $28.06 . . . December 13, 2000, QLT shares had closed at approximately $40.44 on the NASDAQ, they reached a low of $28.06 . . . Paragraph 4 states that it reached a low of $28.06 while paragraph 67 marks it as $24. . . . Because both paragraphs describe the drop as 31% from a high of $44.44, this Court assumes the $28.06 . . . In either event, the difference between $28.06 and $24 does not alter this Court's legal conclusions. . . .

SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL AFL- CIO, v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RELATIONS COMMISSION,, 752 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 2000)

. . . See § 28.06, Fla.Stat. (1997). . See § 193.024, Fla.Stat. (1997). . . . .

MORSE, v. MOXLEY, Jr., 691 So. 2d 504 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Article V, section 16 of the Florida Constitution and possesses statutory authority, pursuant to section 28.06 . . .

JIM HENSON PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. JOHN T. BRADY ASSOCIATES, INC., 867 F. Supp. 175 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . According the McCarthy, at § 28.06[4], “the overwhelming majority rule under either statute or common . . .

JECHURA, a k a v. UNITED STATES, 9 Cl. Ct. 753 (Cl. Ct. 1986)

. . . station wagon was made by the law enforcement officers, and the reported inventory included approximately 28.06 . . .

J. BOHANNON v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 118 F.R.D. 151 (S.D. Ga. 1986)

. . . Georgia Insurance Regulations § 120-2-28.06(3)(b). . . .

GOLDEN v. CIRCLE T. V. AND APPLIANCE, INC., 14 Fla. Supp. 2d 157 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1985)

. . . The testimony of Phyllis Fowler establishes violations of Sections 2-28.07(1) and 2-28.06(1), Florida . . . The testimony of Jim Trent establishes violations of Sections 2-28.02(2) and (3); 2-28.06(1); 2-28.06 . . . The testimony of Cass Phillips establishes violations of Sections 2-28.02(4) and (5); 2-28.06(1) and . . . The testimony of Dennis Moxley establishes violations of Sections 2-28.02(1); 2-28.06(2); 2-28.07(6) . . . The testimony of Raymond Soto establishes violations of Sections 2-28.06(2); 2-28.07(2) and (7) and 2 . . .

WHITTENBERG, Mr. P. NAACP, Dr. T. H. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 607 F. Supp. 289 (D.S.C. 1985)

. . . 21.31 19.88 25.91 22.07 30.88 15.44 5.76 32.69 7.56 29.22 21.99 6.08 24.27 21.23 28.07 16.70 15.48 28.06 . . .

In KONTARATOS,, 35 B.R. 135 (Bankr. D. Me. 1983)

. . . the validity of the claim by a preponderance of the evidence. 1 Norton, Bankruptcy Law and Practice § 28.06 . . .

In COLEMAN AMERICAN COMPANIES, INC. A A An A UNITED STATES v. COLEMAN AMERICAN COMPANIES, INC. A A An A, 26 B.R. 825 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1983)

. . . the validity of the claim by a preponderance of the evidence. 1 Norton, Bankruptcy Law & Practice § 28.06 . . .

WILLIAMS, v. BENNETT,, 689 F.2d 1370 (11th Cir. 1982)

. . . .-04, 28.05, 28.06 (1973). . . .

K- D v., 78 T.C. 742 (T.C. 1982)

. . . $334,985 X %) Depreciable basis (purchase price less attributable going-concern value) Buildings $572,800 28.06 . . .

STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY v. SWEAT,, 547 F. Supp. 233 (N.D. Ga. 1982)

. . . Ga.Code of Rules and Regulations § 120-2-28.06(1). . . . . Ga.Code of Rules and Regulations § 120-2-28.06(4). . . . .

D. POUNCY, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,, 499 F. Supp. 427 (S.D. Tex. 1980)

. . . employees receiving promotions Percentage of black employees receiving promotions 1973 2-6 38.56 39.84 7-12 28.06 . . .

LARRY P. P. v. RILES,, 495 F. Supp. 926 (N.D. Cal. 1979)

. . . 1974 Bakersfield Elem. 15.76 15.62 41.4 (36/87) 16.1 Berkeley Unified 43 0 100 (4/4) 43.9 Vallejo City 28.06 . . .

KLEINMAN, v. ETHERIDGE,, 49 Fla. Supp. 163 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1979)

. . . . §28.06. The clerk of the circuit court is also the clerk of the county court, Fla. . . .

ALACHUA COUNTY, a v. A. POWERS,, 351 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 1977)

. . . Section 28.06, Florida Statutes (1975). . . .

A. GRAVES v. MEYSTRIK,, 425 F. Supp. 40 (E.D. Mo. 1977)

. . . Of this total, an average of 19.93 percent were reversed, and, on the average, 28.06 percent of the appeals . . .

VAN BRONKHORST v. SAFECO CORPORATION,, 529 F.2d 943 (9th Cir. 1976)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise ch. 28, especially § 28.06 (1958, Supp.1970). . . . .

THOMPSON v. SHEPPARD, Jr., 502 F.2d 1389 (5th Cir. 1974)

. . . Under-Column (3) Representation Blacks 30.23% :12.48% 19.15% 11.08% 36.66% Women 52.68% 24% 37.90% 14.78% 28.06% . . .

CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA v. SECRETARY OF LABOR, P. A. L. M. D. Co. D. C. D. Co., 442 F.2d 159 (3d Cir. 1971)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law § 28.06 (1958). . 310 U.S. at 127, 60 S.Ct. at 876. . . . .

K. ZASSENHAUS S. v. EVENING STAR NEWSPAPER CO., 404 F.2d 1361 (D.C. Cir. 1968)

. . . See 4 Moore, Federal Practice ¶¶ 28.03 at 1922, 28.06 at 1935-37, 1940 (2d ed. 1967). . 1963 Advisory . . .

ESTATE MILLER, T. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. ESTATE MILLER,, 400 F.2d 407 (3d Cir. 1968)

. . . special legislation.” 4 Rabkin and Johnson, ibid; 4 Mertens, Law of Federal Gift and Estate Taxation, § 28.06 . . .

FOXWORTH, v. L. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 167 So. 2d 868 (Fla. 1964)

. . . Section 28.06, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. . . .

TALLEY v. CALIFORNIA, 362 U.S. 60 (U.S. 1960)

. . . The ordinance, § 28.06 of the Municipal Code of the City of Los Angeles, provides: “No person shall distribute . . .

C. CONWAY, v. UNITED STATES W., 168 F. Supp. 656 (D. Mass. 1958)

. . . net income and tax liability as follows: Year Net Income Tax Due 1939 11,205.45 $ 5.73 1940 1,716.22 28.06 . . .

SARKES TARZIAN, INC. a v. AUDIO DEVICES, INC. a, 166 F. Supp. 250 (S.D. Cal. 1958)

. . . The atomic weight of silicon is 28.06 and its atomic number is 14. . . . The atomic weight of silicon is 28.06 and its atomic number is 14. . . .

BRANYAN v. KONINKLIJKE LUCHTVAART MAATSCHAPPIJ BARROWS v. KONINKLIJKE LUCHTVAART MAATSCHAPPIJ GRATKE v. KONINKLIJKE LUCHTVAART MAATSCHAPPIJ WERKLEY v. KONINKLIJKE LUCHTVAART MAATSCHAPPIJ, 13 F.R.D. 425 (S.D.N.Y. 1953)

. . . Moore’s Federal Practice, 2nd Edition, Volume 4, § 28.06. . See Ali Akber Kiacbif v. . . .

BRANYAN v. KONINKLIJKE LUCHTVAART MAATSCHAPPIJ N. V. ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES HOLLAND BARROWS v. KONINKLIJKE LUCHTVAART MAATSCHAPPIJ N. V. ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES HOLLAND GRATKE v. KONINKLIJKE LUCHTVAART MAATSCHAPPIJ N. V. ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES HOLLAND WERKLEY v. KONINKLIJKE LUCHTVAART MAATSCHAPPIJ N. V. ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES HOLLAND, 13 F.R.D. 334 (S.D.N.Y. 1952)

. . . Department and the proper procedure is described and discussed in Moore, op. cit. supra, §§ 28.05, 28.06 . . .

NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES, 331 U.S. 284 (U.S. 1947)

. . . For manufactures and miscellaneous tonnage the percentages were 28.06 per cent and 60.66 per cent, respectively . . .

v., 12 F. 789 (C.C.N.D. Ill. 1882)

. . . That sum is found to be $28.06. . . .