Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES v. HERNANDEZ, v. v., 919 F.3d 1102 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . The Task Force made a controlled purchase of 28.09 grams of methamphetamine from Moreno Lopez on September . . .

CHESEMORE, v. ALLIANCE HOLDINGS, INC. A. H. I. B. A. LLC, 886 F. Supp. 2d 1007 (W.D. Wis. 2012)

. . . SRR”), the paper value of Trachte’s common equity increased steadily, from $25.4 million in 2003, to $28.09 . . .

MANCHESTER- ESSEX REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL COMMITTEE, v. BUREAU OF SPECIAL EDUCATION APPEALS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, D. T., 490 F. Supp. 2d 49 (D. Mass. 2007)

. . . education school programs are able to receive approval from the state Department of Education. 603 C.M.R. 28.09 . . .

ABBOTT LABORATORIES v. SANDOZ, INC. USA,, 486 F. Supp. 2d 767 (N.D. Ill. 2007)

. . . for cefdinir monohydrate, and listed them as follows: 14.84, 17.83, 21.33, 21.98, 23.53, 24.58, and 28.09 . . .

UNITED STATES v. E. WINSTON,, 456 F.3d 861 (8th Cir. 2006)

. . . toilet tank in the bathroom of the master bedroom, officers recovered (1) a plastic baggie containing 28.09 . . .

E. OGUEZUONU, v. GENESIS HEALTH VENTURES, INC., 415 F. Supp. 2d 577 (D. Md. 2005)

. . . From January through March of 2003, Sarbeng was earning $28.09 per hour. (Def.’s Mem. Supp. Mot. . . .

UNITED STATES v. JONES,, 260 B.R. 415 (E.D. Mich. 2000)

. . . Trustee’s professional fees appear to be $1,378 plus $28.09 in expenses. . . .

In L. MILLS,, 246 B.R. 395 (Bankr. S.D. Cal. 2000)

. . . repayment expense and the $302 plan contribution expense (the latter less state and federal taxes of $28.09 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SLAUGHTER, UNITED STATES v. E. LEONARD,, 128 F.3d 623 (8th Cir. 1997)

. . . (8th Cir.1997); see also 2 Devitt, Blackmar and O’Malley, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 28.09 . . .

In FPI AGRETECH SECURITIES LITIGATION. W. HAYES, v. HAUSHALTER LIEFF, CABRASER HEIMANN, v. CHUCK, 105 F.3d 469 (9th Cir. 1997)

. . . as follows: Lodestar Percent Pro Rata Allocation LCH $1,897,728 44.56% $1,293,987 Chuck $1,196,324 28.09% . . .

UNITED STATES v. DUFF, P. III, J., 76 F.3d 122 (7th Cir. 1996)

. . . the same vein, all taken from Devitt, Blackmar & O’Malley, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 28.09 . . .

In MARTIN, MARTIN, v. AVCO FINANCIAL SERVICES,, 157 B.R. 268 (Bankr. W.D. Va. 1993)

. . . On September 20, 1990, AVCO loaned Debtor the sum of $1,931.76, to be repaid over 36 months at 28.09% . . .

YOUNG v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, YOUNG v. CHEMICAL BANK, N. A., 882 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1989)

. . . Currier, Moore’s Federal Practice II 28.09[2] (2d ed. 1989) [hereinafter Moore’s j. . . .

L. BESTA, v. BENEFICIAL LOAN CO. OF IOWA BENEFICIAL LOAN COMPANY OF IOWA, v. L. BESTA,, 855 F.2d 532 (8th Cir. 1988)

. . . 184.00 Loan Principal $1478.35 $2598.23 Length of Loan 36 months 72 months Annual Percentage Rate 24% 28.09% . . . Recording Fees 15.00 $ 184.00 $ Amount Financed $1478.35 $2598.23 $ 1705.00 Annual Percentage Rate 24% 28.09% . . . 28.09% Number of Payments 36 72 36 Amount Per Payment $ 58/mo. $ 75/mo. $ 70.61/mo. . . .

L. v., 90 T.C. 1154 (T.C. 1988)

. . . had wells and the United States as a whole: 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 Colorado $35.69 $31.56 $28.92 $28.09 . . .

CITY NATIONAL BANK, S. v. AMERICAN COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION, D. ICH, 657 F. Supp. 817 (W.D.N.C. 1987)

. . . Marshal Service fee. 28.09 10/25/84 Instant copies for Class mailing. 50.16 10/20/84 Postage charges . . .

In RUTHERFORD,, 54 B.R. 784 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1985)

. . . SUBTOTALS 28.09 29.75 LD Call 4.39 01/23/85 Call to Joplin, Mo. * JRM .25 02/12/85 Call to Client. . . .

WHITTENBERG, Mr. P. NAACP, Dr. T. H. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 607 F. Supp. 289 (D.S.C. 1985)

. . . 18.58 34.32 28.20 18.74 28.19 19.56 14.77 42.03 42.27 28.93 34.02 25.64 17.31 16.48 34.06 26.94 20.69 28.09 . . .