Cases from cite.case.law:

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 192 So. 3d 1190 (Fla. 2016)

. . . Boating Under the Influence); 28.15 (Boating Under the Influence Causing Property Damage or Injury); 28.16 . . . adopted in 2009 [6 So.3d 574] and amended in 2012 [87 So.3d 679], and 2014 [146 So.3d 1110], and 2016. 28.16 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES REPORT NO., 146 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 2014)

. . . Boating Under the Influence; 28.15 — Boating Under the Influence Causing' Property Damage or Injury; 28.16 . . . a license tax for operation” from the definition of the word “vessel” in instructions 28.14, 28.15, 28.16 . . . respect to new instruction 29.3, and the proposed amendments to instructions 12.1, 12.2, 28.14, 28.15, 28.16 . . . the Committee declined to modify its proposed amendments to instructions 12.1, 12.2, 28.14, 28.15, 28.16 . . . 11.18, 12.9, 14.10, and 29.3, and amended instructions 7.3, 7.5, 7.6, 7.11, 12.1, 12.2, 28.14, 28.15, 28.16 . . .

DAVIS, v. PERRY, LULAC v., 991 F. Supp. 2d 809 (W.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . Hebert requests an award of $28.16 for gas purchased on May 28, 2013 in Hammonton, New Jersey. . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT, 87 So. 3d 679 (Fla. 2012)

. . . 28.14 Influence Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1 Comment This instruction was adopted in 2009 and amended in 2011. 28.16 . . .

REYES, v. NORTH TEXAS TOLLWAY AUTHORITY,, 830 F. Supp. 2d 194 (N.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . violation invoice from the NTTA listing the same fifteen transactions, amounting to collective tolls of $28.16 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 6 So. 3d 574 (Fla. 2009)

. . . Boating Under the Influence; 28.15 — Boating Under the Influence Causing Property Damage or Injury; 28.16 . . . New instructions 28.14, 28.15, 28.16, and 28.17, relating to boating under the influence, are not traffic . . . the 327.35(1) 28.14 Influence_ Attempt_777.04(1) 5.1 Comment This instruction was adopted in 2009. 28.16 . . .

MENDOZA, J. G. a v. BREWSTER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO., 469 F. Supp. 2d 905 (E.D. Wash. 2006)

. . . Cochran on June 27, $232.16, on June 28th, $92.00, the bar on May 27th for $23.00, and June 27th for $28.16 . . .

ASAD, v. CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC., 314 F. Supp. 2d 726 (N.D. Ohio 2004)

. . . Results from testing at the other three airports indicated an 8-hour TWA of .01 to 28.16 ppm and peak . . .

STATE v. SIEGEL A., 679 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . and April were, respectively, $81.09 and $70.35; the charges for the second trailer were $36.36 and $28.16 . . .

OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION v. POWER AUTHORITY OF STATE OF NEW YORK, GENERAL MILLS, INC. v. POWER AUTHORITY OF STATE OF NEW YORK,, 758 F. Supp. 854 (W.D.N.Y. 1991)

. . . Davis, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TREATISE § 28.16 (1982 Supp.); K. . . .

INTERNATIONAL LABOR RIGHTS EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FUND, v. BUSH,, 752 F. Supp. 495 (D.D.C. 1990)

. . . Chenango Court, Inc., 447 F.2d 296, 303 (2d Cir.1971) (quoting Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 28.16 . . .

ARNOW, v. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 868 F.2d 223 (7th Cir. 1989)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 at 984 (1970 Supp.)) . . .

E. FLAHERTY, v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, FINANCIAL SERVICES DIVISION, C. E. Jr. L. L., 697 F. Supp. 127 (E.D.N.Y. 1988)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16, at 965 (Supp.1970)). . . .

UNITED STATES v. CAMINOS,, 770 F.2d 361 (3d Cir. 1985)

. . . Defendant notes a discrepancy between the package weight as recorded in Brazil — 28.16 pounds — and that . . .

HECKLER, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES v. CHANEY, 470 U.S. 821 (U.S. 1985)

. . . Brennan, 502 F. 2d 79, 87-88 (CA3 1974) (quoting Davis §28.16, p. 984 (1970 Supp.)). . . .

WHITTENBERG, Mr. P. NAACP, Dr. T. H. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 607 F. Supp. 289 (D.S.C. 1985)

. . . 9.45 76.98 20.16 20.60 27.71 26.17 13.61 48.93 6.23 13.21 31.91 33.14 31.33 36.27 5.68 21.82 23.40 28.16 . . . 27.71 25.31 20.36 26.32 11.20 55.32 28.95 26.97 29.07 33.12 20.64 38.50 16.32 5.28 33.63 21.10 32.73 28.16 . . .

B. T. v., 82 T.C. 989 (T.C. 1984)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, secs. 28.07, 28.16 (1958 ed. Supp. 1982). . . .

STORY, a W. C. a E. Jr. a a No. No. v. O. MARSH, Jr. K. U. S. E. U. S. F. Jr. U. S. UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN MISSISSIPPI COUNTY, STATE OF MISSOURI, H. No. UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN MISSISSIPPI COUNTY, STATE OF MISSOURI, St. No. UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN MISSISSIPPI COUNTY, STATE OF MISSOURI, St. No. UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN MISSISSIPPI AND NEW MADRID COUNTIES, No. UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN MISSISSIPPI AND NEW MADRID COUNTIES, No. No., 732 F.2d 1375 (8th Cir. 1984)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, 1982 Supplement § 28.16 (1982). . . .

F. DUGAN, v. RAMSAY,, 727 F.2d 192 (1st Cir. 1984)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 28.16 (1958) and Administrative Law of the Seventies, § 28.16 ( . . .

HONDROS, v. UNITED STATES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION E. B. J. B. R. D. W. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, 720 F.2d 278 (3d Cir. 1983)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16, at 80 (1958). . . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 (1958); Saf-erstein, Nonreviewability: A Functional Analysis . . .

AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE, v. H. WEBSTER,, 720 F.2d 29 (D.C. Cir. 1983)

. . . Davis, supra n. 9, § 28.16, at 499 (criticizing the test and pointing out that “[d]iscretion which is . . .

NEW YORK RACING ASSOCIATION INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, 708 F.2d 46 (2d Cir. 1983)

. . . Che-nango Court, supra, 447 F.2d at 303 (quoting Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, 1970 Supplement, § 28.16 . . .

BOROUGHS OF ELLWOOD CITY, GROVE CITY, NEW WILMINGTON, WAMPUM AND ZELIENOPLE, PENNSYLVANIA, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 701 F.2d 266 (3d Cir. 1983)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 (Supp.1970) at 966. . . . .

FRAKES, v. R. PIERCE, Jr., 700 F.2d 501 (9th Cir. 1983)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treaties § 28.16 (1958 & Supp. 1982); Saferstein, Nonreviewability: A Functional . . .

UTAH INTERNATIONAL, INC. a a v. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR OF THE UNITED STATES G. J. R. A. A. STATE OF UTAH, By DIVISION OF STATE LANDS AND FORESTRY DIVISION OF OIL, GAS AND MINING, v. G. WATT, SIERRA CLUB, a a v. G. WATT, V. a a, 553 F. Supp. 872 (D. Utah 1982)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 (Supp. 1982). . . .

OAK TREE FARM DAIRY, INC. v. R. BLOCK,, 544 F. Supp. 1351 (E.D.N.Y. 1982)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, 1970 Supplement § 28.16 at 965. . . .

LOCAL AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, v. J. DONOVAN, LOCAL AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, v. J. DONOVAN, AFL- CIO,, 683 F.2d 511 (D.C. Cir. 1982)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 (1982 Supp.). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BOXES OF BONED BEEF WEIGHING APPROXIMATELY POUNDS,, 516 F. Supp. 321 (D. Kan. 1981)

. . . This analysis dovetails nicely with Davis’ rationale [Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 28.16 (Supp . . .

UNITED STATES BARKSDALE, v. BLACKBURN,, 639 F.2d 1115 (5th Cir. 1981)

. . . eligible black population to be the most appropriate: Seventh Sixth Percentage of Blacks in Eligible 28.16% . . . Undetermined Grand Jury Black 50% Black Participation Percentage of Eligible Blacks in the Eligible Population 28.16% . . . 28.16% 28.16% Percentage of Blacks on Jury or Jury Venire 19.43% 16.64% 16.67% Disparity 8.73% 11.52% . . . Seventh-Grade Sixth-Grade _Education_Education Percentage of Eligible Blacks in the Eligible Population 26.31% 28.16% . . .

SGA FINANCIAL CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, N. s, 509 F. Supp. 392 (D.N.J. 1981)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16-1 (Supp.1970). . 5 U.S.C. § 301 (1976) provides in pertinent . . .

COPAKE LAKE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT,, 490 F. Supp. 386 (E.D.N.Y. 1980)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Sec. 28.16 at 965 (Supp. 1970), or “ ‘the subject matter is for some reason . . .

LOCAL AFGE AFL- CIO P. E. J. N. J. J. J. v. UNITED STATES Jr. E. U. S. H. U. S. J. U. S., 602 F.2d 574 (3d Cir. 1979)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law of the Seventies § 28.16 (1976); K. C. . . . Davis, Administrative Law Treaties § 28.16 (1958 & Supp.1970); Saferstein, Nonreviewability: A Functional . . .

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTMASTERS OF UNITED STATES v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTMASTERS OF UNITED STATES v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 602 F.2d 420 (D.C. Cir. 1979)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law § 28.16 at 82 (1958). That deference is appropriate here. . . .

v. v., 71 T.C. 692 (T.C. 1979)

. . . Stockholders Shares owned Percentage of outstanding stock Jack Paparo . 97,737 6.90 Irving Paparo . 399,136 28.16 . . . Under see. 318(a) Jack constructively owned 28.16 percent from his son, Irving; 3.04 percent from the . . .

F. MALONEY, Jr. v. SHEEHAN,, 453 F. Supp. 1131 (D. Conn. 1978)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 (1958 & Supps. 1970 & 1976). . . .

HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK STATE, INC. v. L. TOIA, P. L. U. S., 438 F. Supp. 866 (S.D.N.Y. 1977)

. . . Davis Administrative Law § 28.16 at 965 (Supp.1970) or 3) “ ‘the subject matter [of the agency’s action . . .

SUWANNEE STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. UNITED STATES, 435 F. Supp. 389 (Cust. Ct. 1977)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law of the Seventies §§ 28.16—28.16-1 at pp. 638—41 (1976) and Saferstein, Nonreviewability . . .

v., 79 Cust. Ct. 19 (Cust. Ct. 1977)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law of the Seventies §§ 28.16-28.16-1 at pp. 638-41 (1976) and Saferstein, Non-reviewability . . .

CITY OF WESTFIELD v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,, 551 F.2d 468 (D.D.C. 1977)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 (Supp.1970) at 966, cited in Mun. . . .

F. CLARK, Jr. v. RICHARDSON,, 431 F. Supp. 105 (D.N.J. 1977)

. . . Davis, supra, § 28.16-1, at 641. . . .

P. ORNATO, v. HOFFMAN,, 546 F.2d 10 (2d Cir. 1976)

. . . See 4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 28.16, especially pp. 81-82 (1958 & 1970 Supp.). . . .

CERTIFIED COLOR MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, v. F. MATHEWS, HEW,, 543 F.2d 284 (D.C. Cir. 1976)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 (1958); See generally Saferstein, Nonreviewability: A Functional . . .

A. TRAMMELL, v. H. CALLAWAY, 415 F. Supp. 212 (N.D. Miss. 1976)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16, at 82 (1958). 415 F.2d at 1276. . . .

Re COOMES v. A. ADKINSON,, 414 F. Supp. 975 (D.S.D. 1976)

. . . See Da vis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 28.16 at 964-65 (1970 Supp.). . . .

CHAVEZ, v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION CO. A. DURGIN v. UNITED STATES L. PERKINS v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. BELCHE v. UNITED STATES B. JAMES v. UNITED STATES F. ODLE v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. B. WILLIAMS v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. AYALA v. UNITED STATES NATIONAL AMERICAN INSUR. CO. OF OMAHA v. UNITED STATES, 413 F. Supp. 1203 (E.D. Cal. 1976)

. . . (See also 2 Harper and James, Torts, §§ 28.15-28.16, pp. 1569-1574; Prosser, Strict Liability to the . . .

ST. LOUIS UNIVERSITY, v. BLUE CROSS HOSPITAL SERVICE,, 537 F.2d 283 (8th Cir. 1976)

. . . See Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 at 80-81, and 1970 Supplement § 28.16 at 964-65. . . . .

ZANNINO, v. ARNOLD, E. U. S. H. U. S. UNITED STATES, 531 F.2d 687 (3d Cir. 1976)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 28.16 (Supp.1970). . See Wolff v. . . .

R. GRASSETTI, Ph. D. v. W. WEINBERGER,, 408 F. Supp. 142 (N.D. Cal. 1976)

. . . See 4 Davis, Admin.Law, § 28.16. . . .

NESS INVESTMENT CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOREST SERVICE,, 512 F.2d 706 (9th Cir. 1975)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 (1958, Supp. 1965); Saferstein, Nonreviewability: A Functional . . .

BACHOWSKI, v. BRENNAN,, 502 F.2d 79 (3d Cir. 1974)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 28.16 at 984 (1970 Supp.). . . .

CITIES SERVICE GAS COMPANY, a v. UNITED STATES, 500 F.2d 448 (Ct. Cl. 1974)

. . . .) ; Interruptible, 28.16 cents per Mcf.” . . .

CITIES SERVICE GAS COMPANY, a v. THE UNITED STATES, 205 Ct. Cl. 16 (Ct. Cl. 1974)

. . . .) ; Interruptible, 28.16 cents per Mcf.” Source: 36 Fed. . . .

RAITPORT v. NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS, 378 F. Supp. 380 (E.D. Pa. 1974)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 28.16 [3]. . . .

ACTION ON SAFETY AND HEALTH, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,, 498 F.2d 757 (D.C. Cir. 1974)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 at 64-65 (1970 Supp.). . . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 at 965 (Supp.1970) (emphasis added). . . .

REDDY, INC. B. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,, 492 F.2d 538 (5th Cir. 1974)

. . . Udall, 336 F.2d 706, 711-712 (CA9, 1964); Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 28.16 (Supp. 1970). . . .

DAVIS ASSOCIATES, INC. v. SECRETARY, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, 373 F. Supp. 1256 (D.N.H. 1974)

. . . Administrative Law Treatise, 1970 Supplement § 28.16 at 965, cited in Langevin v. . . .

J. POIRRIER, Jr. v. ST. JAMES PARISH POLICE JURY, 372 F. Supp. 1021 (E.D. La. 1974)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16. . . .

D. PETTIT v. UNITED STATES, 488 F.2d 1026 (Ct. Cl. 1973)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16, at 82 (1958).] In Ogletree v. . . .

GEORGE D. PETTIT v. THE UNITED STATES, 203 Ct. Cl. 207 (Ct. Cl. 1973)

. . . Davis, AdmiNistrative Law Tkeatise § 28.16, at 82 (1958).] In Ogletree v. . . .

CAMPAIGN CLEAN WATER, INC. v. E. TRAIN,, 489 F.2d 492 (4th Cir. 1973)

. . . Cf., Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, 1970 Supp., § 28.16, p. 964. . . .

LAW, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE LAW, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 366 F. Supp. 1233 (N.D. Ga. 1973)

. . . discretionary power is not so far ‘committed.’ ” Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, 1970 Supp., § 28.16 . . .

CURTISS- WRIGHT CORPORATION, v. L. McLUCAS,, 364 F. Supp. 750 (D.N.J. 1973)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise H 28.16 at 86 (1958). . . .

INMATES OF ATTICA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY v. A. ROCKEFELLER, 477 F.2d 375 (2d Cir. 1973)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16(4) at 982-990 (1970 Supp.), he has also recognized, as have . . .

RAWLEIGH, MOSES CO. INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 201 Ct. Cl. 295 (Ct. Cl. 1973)

. . . a unit price of $17.30 each (f.o.b. destination), and ¡56,070 pairs of trousers at a unit price of $28.16 . . .

EAST OAKLAND- FRUITVALE PLANNING COUNCIL, a v. RUMSFELD,, 471 F.2d 524 (9th Cir. 1972)

. . . .) § 28.16 pp. 977-78. . . .

In L. DELLAVERSON, USMCR, v. LAIRD,, 351 F. Supp. 134 (S.D. Cal. 1972)

. . . See 4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, §§ 28.01, 28.16. . . .

CALIFORNIA WELFARE RIGHTS ORGANIZATION v. RICHARDSON,, 348 F. Supp. 491 (N.D. Cal. 1972)

. . . See generally; Davis, Administrative Law, § 28.16 (1970 Supp.) and the cases there cited; the authorities . . .

CONSTRUCTORES CIVILES CENTROAMERICA, S. A. CONCICA v. HANNAH, 459 F.2d 1183 (D.C. Cir. 1972)

. . . Davis, 4 Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 (1958). . . .

L. KUHL v. E. HAMPTON, 451 F.2d 340 (8th Cir. 1971)

. . . Davis Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 at 82 (1958).” We agree. Judgment of dismissal affirmed. . . .

MUNICIPAL LIGHT BOARDS OF READING AND WAKEFIELD MASSACHUSETTS, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,, 450 F.2d 1341 (D.C. Cir. 1971)

. . . Davis Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 (Supp. 1970) at 966: “One important area of administi'a-tive . . .

ROCKBRIDGE On v. LINCOLN,, 449 F.2d 567 (9th Cir. 1971)

. . . See 4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16; Jaffe, Judicial Control of Administrative Action 374 . . .

H. JAEGER, v. W. A. STEPHENS,, 346 F. Supp. 1217 (D. Colo. 1971)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 (1958). . . .

M. LANGEVIN v. CHENANGO COURT, INC. J., 447 F.2d 296 (2d Cir. 1971)

. . . Administrative Law Treatise, 1970 Supplement, § 28.16 at 965. . . .

M. LITTELL, v. C. B. MORTON,, 445 F.2d 1207 (4th Cir. 1971)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 28.16 at 80 (1958). . . .

S. ANTONUK, v. UNITED STATES, 445 F.2d 592 (6th Cir. 1971)

. . . .-01, 28.16. . . .

SHAW- HENDERSON, INC. v. R. J. SCHNEIDER,, 335 F. Supp. 1203 (W.D. Mich. 1971)

. . . merely ‘involves’ discretion which is nevertheless reviewable. 4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 . . .

HI- RIDGE LUMBER COMPANY, a v. UNITED STATES, 443 F.2d 452 (9th Cir. 1971)

. . . merely ‘involves’ discretion which is nevertheless reviewable. 4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 . . .

RAMAPO BANK N. J. a N. J. Co. a N. J. J. Jr. N. J. v. B. CAMP, a No. J. Jr. N. J. No., 425 F.2d 333 (3d Cir. 1970)

. . . Administrative Law § 28.16 (1958, Supp. 1965). . . .

SCHATTEN, v. UNITED STATES, 419 F.2d 187 (6th Cir. 1969)

. . . See 4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, §§ 28.01, 28.16. . . .

CURRAN, AFL- CIO, v. R. LAIRD, 420 F.2d 122 (D.C. Cir. 1969)

. . . Davis, supra, § 28.16; L. Jaffe, supra, 363-369. . . .

SHANNON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT P. II, J., 305 F. Supp. 205 (E.D. Pa. 1969)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §§ 28.08, 28.16 (1958, Supp.1965). . “[BY THE COURT] Q. . . .

J. GNOTTA, v. UNITED STATES W. G. M. F. D. H. M. M. O. E. F. M. H. B., 415 F.2d 1271 (8th Cir. 1969)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16, at 82 (1958). , The integrity of these authorities and the . . . Cir. 1969) (both opinions) ; 4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise ch. 28 (1958) and, in particular, § 28.16 . . .

H. D. MOLLOHAN M. S. Ed v. J. GRAY, L., 413 F.2d 349 (9th Cir. 1969)

. . . Walker, 409 F.2d 477 (9 Cir. 3/27/69); see also, Davis, Administrative Law, § 28.16 (Supp.1965). . . .

N. CHARLTON, Jr. v. UNITED STATES W. Jr. J. E., 412 F.2d 390 (3d Cir. 1969)

. . . Arbitrariness and Judicial Review, 65 Col.L.Rev. 55 (1965); 4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 . . .

WARREN BANK, a v. B. CAMP, U. S. a, 396 F.2d 52 (6th Cir. 1968)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law § 28.16 (1958, Supp. 1965). . . .

TRANSCONTINENTAL BUS SYSTEM, INC. D. C. S. P. v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, TRANSCONTINENTAL BUS SYSTEM, INC. v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD,, 383 F.2d 466 (5th Cir. 1967)

. . . Judicial Review, 65 Colum.L.Rev. 55 (1965) ; responded to in 4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 . . .

A. v. R. HOFFMASTER,, 253 F. Supp. 633 (D. Md. 1966)

. . . Weakley, 4 Cir., 356 F.2d 242 (1966); 4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 28.16 (1958 ed. and 1965 . . .

WONG WING HANG, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,, 360 F.2d 715 (2d Cir. 1966)

. . . Celebrezze, 356 F.2d 1, 5 (2 Cir. 1966); 4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §§ 28.08, 28.16 (1958) . . .

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SMITHFIELD, NORTH CAROLINA, v. J. SAXON, FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SMITHFIELD, NORTH CAROLINA, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA,, 352 F.2d 267 (4th Cir. 1965)

. . . of the character expressly made reviewable by § 1009(e) (1). 4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, §.28.16 . . .

VUCINIC, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE J. STANISIC, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE J., 243 F. Supp. 113 (D. Or. 1965)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Text § 28.16 (1958). . . .

DAGLEY, W. v. ARMSTRONG RUBBER COMPANY Co. ZIFFRIN TRUCK LINES, INC. v. ARMSTRONG RUBBER COMPANY Co., 344 F.2d 245 (7th Cir. 1965)

. . . buyer against the person who sold the dangerous article to him.” 2 Harper & James, The Law of Torts § 28.16 . . .

D. PUTMAN, v. ERIE CITY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, 338 F.2d 911 (5th Cir. 1964)

. . . Treatises: 2 Harper & James, Law of Torts § 28.16, p. 1570-1574 (1956); Prosser on Torts § 97, p. 676 . . .

V. FERRY, v. L. UDALL, FREEMAN, v. L. UDALL,, 336 F.2d 706 (9th Cir. 1964)

. . . merely “involves” discretion which is nevertheless reviewable. 4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 28.16 . . .

WILLIAMS, v. CONNOLLY, a a a, 227 F. Supp. 539 (D. Minn. 1964)

. . . the unfit commodity for a purpose ordinarily to be expected.” 2 Harper and James, The Law of Torts § 28.16 . . .

J. HAMEL, v. D. NELSON, E., 226 F. Supp. 96 (N.D. Cal. 1963)

. . . See Davis, Administrative Law, § 28.16 (1958). . . . See 4 Davis, Administrative Law, §§ 28.16 and 30.02. Cf. Switchmen’s Union v. . . . See generally Davis, Administrative Law, § 28.16 (1958). See also Switchman’s Union v. . . .

ITALIA SOCIETA PER AZIONI NAVIGAZIONE, v. OREGON STEVEDORING COMPANY,, 310 F.2d 481 (9th Cir. 1962)

. . . See Harper & James, Torts § 28.16 (1956) and Prosser, Torts § 84 (2d ed. 1955). . . .

CHAPMAN, H. v. E. BROWN L. D. d b a a, 198 F. Supp. 78 (D. Haw. 1961)

. . . In 2 Harper & James, Law of Torts, 1570, § 28.16, in discussing the refusal of many courts, which have . . .

UNITED STATES v. WILEY S COVE RANCH, a, 181 F. Supp. 371 (W.D. Ark. 1960)

. . . In Volume 4, Sec. 28.16, he states: “All of section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act, dealing with . . .

LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, 179 F. Supp. 605 (D. Del. 1959)

. . . . § 1001(g). . 4 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 28.16 (1958). . Heikkila v. . . .