Cases from cite.case.law:

MALOY, v. SEMINOLE COUNTY,, 264 So. 3d 370 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . See § 28.33, Fla. Stat. (2017). . . . Then, in 1973, the Legislature enacted section 28.33, Florida Statutes (1973), which also gave the clerk . . . Powers, 351 So.2d 32 (Fla. 1977), the court held that pursuant to section 28.33, the clerk of circuit . . . Section 28.33, Florida Statutes (2017), provides that "[t]he clerk of the circuit court in each county . . . the Florida Constitution, and continues to "invest" those funds as provided in sections 218.415 and 28.33 . . .

A. LIVINGSTON, v. FRANK,, 150 So. 3d 239 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . barred by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540; that the Clerk’s actions were authorized by sections 28.33 . . .

JOHNSON, F. J. a F. J. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, A, 962 F. Supp. 2d 263 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . (Accotink), provides similar hours as Ballou — 30.5 hours of school per week and 28.33 hours of actual . . .

W. KWONG, S. v. BLOOMBERG, T., 723 F.3d 160 (2d Cir. 2013)

. . . amendment to § 10-131(a)(2) increased the cost for residential license holders of owning a handgun by $28.33 . . .

In LINCOLNSHIRE CAMPUS, LLC,, 441 B.R. 524 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2010)

. . . 84 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST 16.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 05 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 56 SECONDS EAST 28.33 . . .

McCARTHY v. CITY OF CLEVELAND,, 626 F.3d 280 (6th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 28.33 (1977). . . .

In L. FORD,, 415 B.R. 51 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . . - 15% (location) $28.33/sq. ft. - 10% (size) + 10% (other bldg.) . . .

E. BROCK, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, COLLIER COUNTY, a, 9 So. 3d 635 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Section 28.33, Florida Statutes (2007), states: The clerk of the circuit court in each county shall invest . . . The plain language of section 28.33 provides that the interest earned on money-invested by the Clerk . . . Section 28.33 does not impose any restrictions on how the Clerk may use this income, and again, the County . . . In fact, the County at least implicitly acknowledges that section 28.33 means what it says because its . . . Section 28.33 is such a clear and unambiguous statute. . . .

ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 559 F. Supp. 2d 1347 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2008)

. . . However, purified calcium sulphate isolated from these residues, is excluded (heading 28.33). . . .

v., 32 Ct. Int'l Trade 343 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2008)

. . . However, purified calcium sulphate isolated from these residues, is excluded (heading 28.33). . . .

Co. v., 27 Ct. Int'l Trade 1709 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2003)

. . . methodology, the Cooperative Respondents’ calculated antidumping duty margin increased from 14.88% to 28.33% . . .

BROWN v. LEGAL FOUNDATION OF WASHINGTON, 538 U.S. 216 (U.S. 2003)

. . . . §28.33 (1977)). . . . Section 28.33’s authorization for the clerk of court to invest the interpleader funds, like the Washington . . . As the Florida Supreme Court observed, “[interest accrues only because of section 28.33. . . . creditors in Webb’s sued to recover the entire interest that had been earned on the fund pursuant to § 28.33 . . .

Co. Et Al. v. Et Al., 27 Ct. Int'l Trade 477 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2003)

. . . recalculation the Cooperative Respondents’ antidumping duty margin increased from 14.88 percent to 28.33 . . . [Plaintiffs have] not demonstrated that the 28.33 percent rate selected by Commerce is not “reasonably . . .

C. III N. v., 118 T.C. 1 (T.C. 2002)

. . . Allen H 28.33 Warren L. Allen, Jr. 00 16.67 John R. . . .

In MEZVINSKY, G. v. v., 265 B.R. 681 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2001)

. . . 1999; or (3) $120,000 at any time between November 1-30, 1999, plus interest at a daily per diem of $28.33 . . .

In GEORGETOWN BUILDING ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, v. PWA,, 240 B.R. 124 (Bankr. D.D.C. 1999)

. . . Dreyfuss and Sehuble each had a 28.33-1/3% interest in the partnership; Aronoff held a 27.33-1/3% interest . . .

RITA M. FLEMING v. CNA INSURANCE COMPANY, 52 F. Supp. 2d 499 (E.D. Pa. 1999)

. . . defendants had never paid; (2) that plaintiff would expect defendants to pay interest at the daily rate of $28.33 . . .

SCHNEIDER v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 151 F.3d 1194 (9th Cir. 1998)

. . . . § 28.33, provided, in pertinent part, that “[a]ll interest accruing from moneys deposited shall be . . . Notwithstanding § 28.33, however, which seemed quite explicitly to vest the county with ownership of . . . As for the express command of § 28.33, the Court declared: [A] State, by ipse dixit, may .not transform . . .

PHILLIPS v. WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION, 524 U.S. 156 (U.S. 1998)

. . . . §28.33 (1977)) (emphasis deleted). . . .

UNITED STATES JOSLIN v. COMMUNITY HOME HEALTH OF MARYLAND, INC., 984 F. Supp. 374 (D. Md. 1997)

. . . liabilities—-that is, liabilities not incurred before the statute’s repeal. 1A Sutherland, supra, § 28.33 . . .

NEWSWEEK, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, H. F., 689 So. 2d 361 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Moreover, while section 28.33, Florida Statutes (1995) states, in pertinent part, that “[m]oneys deposited . . .

v., 102 T.C. 149 (T.C. 1994)

. . . sales June 30, 1983 17.6% 21.39% June 30, 1984 18.4 22.57 June 30, 1985 16.6 19.86 June 30, 1986 22.0 28.33 . . .

RIVKIN v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY,, 838 F. Supp. 1009 (E.D. Pa. 1993)

. . . . §.28.33 (1977), quoted at 449 U.S. at 156 n. 1, 101 S.Ct. at 448 n. 1. . . .

FLORIDA ELKS CHILDREN S HOSPITAL, v. G. STANLEY,, 610 So. 2d 538 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Lockwood involved the constitutionality of section 28.33, Florida Statutes (1977) which authorized the . . .

GORDON, v. STATE, 608 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 1992)

. . . deposited shall be deemed income of the office of the clerk of the circuit court investing such moneys_” § 28.33 . . .

WILLIAMS v. CITY OF DALLAS,, 734 F. Supp. 1317 (N.D. Tex. 1990)

. . . In District 1, another black candidate (Giddings) ran against two white opponents, and received 28.33% . . .

GRECO, Jo Jo v. TAMPA WHOLESALE COMPANY, 522 So. 2d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . seeking return of certain funds retained by the clerk of the court pursuant to sections 28.24(13) and 28.33 . . . Section 28.33 states in pertinent part: The clerk may invest monies deposited in the registry of the . . . The Greco family members contend that sections 28.24(13) and 28.33 are unconstitutional. . . . The Greco family members concede that normally the assessments required by sections 28.24(13) and 28.33 . . . The 1977 version of section 28.33 provided that “All interest accruing from moneys deposited shall be . . .

CAMDEN I. CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC. L. A. I. v. B. DUNKLE,, 805 F.2d 1532 (11th Cir. 1986)

. . . StatAnn. sec. 28.33 (West 1974), all interest earned on funds deposited in court registries was deemed . . . According to Fla.Stat.Ann. sec. 28.33 (West 1974), the interest was public income. . . . In 1981, the United States Supreme Court held that Fla.Stat.Ann. sec. 28.33 was an unconstitutional taking . . . In 1972, one year before the effective date of section 28.33, another state supreme court struck down . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. sec. 28.33 (West 1974). .Section 28.33 was amended to read, "Except for interest earned . . .

INTERNATIONAL STUDIO APARTMENT ASSOCIATION, INC. v. E. LOCKWOOD,, 421 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Another statute, Section 28.33, Florida Statutes (1977), authorized the clerk of the circuit court to . . . In the instant case, the litigants, particularly appellees, relied upon section 28.33 without question . . . More specifically, the clerk of the circuit court in this case, pursuant to section 28.33, invested the . . . funds deposited by litigants into the court registry and, in reliance on section 28.33, retained the . . . First, appellants apparently never questioned the constitutionality of section 28.33 either at the time . . .

H. BECKWITH, Jr. v. WEBB S FABULOUS PHARMACIES, INC., 394 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 1981)

. . . 1979, reversing the Order of Circuit Court in and for Seminole County, Florida, and holding section 28.33 . . . The portion of section 28.33, Florida Statutes, which the Supreme Court finds constitutionally objectionable . . . This portion, however, cannot be validly severed from the portion of section 28.33 which provides: “Moneys . . . Consequently, we hold that this portion of section 28.33 is also unconstitutional. . . . We note that without the above-quoted portion of section 28.33, Florida Statutes (1977), and in the absence . . .

STODDARD, J. J. v. LING- TEMCO- VOUGHT, INC. a, 513 F. Supp. 339 (C.D. Cal. 1981)

. . . Theriault until his projected death, and, at the time of the November, 1980 trial, 28.33 years. . . . Theriault (28.33/32.25 x $634,300) ......$557,200.58 Andre J. Theriault ......... Richard E. . . .

WEBB S FABULOUS PHARMACIES, INC. v. BECKWITH, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SEMINOLE COUNTY,, 449 U.S. 155 (U.S. 1980)

. . . . §28.33 (1977). . . . The Supreme Court, in a per curiam opinion with one justice dissenting in part, ruled that § 28.33 was . . . This toll would be exacted because of § 28.33’s provision that the interest “shall be deemed income of . . . An initial reading of § 28.33 might prompt one to conclude that, so far as it concerns entitlement to . . . Section 28.33, enacted as 1973 Fla. . . .

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, v. G. WILLIS, H. Jr. J. R., 497 F. Supp. 272 (S.D. Ga. 1980)

. . . Veenstra Guarantor 28.33% liability Robert H. Still Guarantor 28.33% liability Roger R. . . .

R. POMPONIO, v. CLARIDGE OF POMPANO CONDOMINIUM, INC., 378 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 1979)

. . . This Court’s recent construction of section 28.33, Florida Statutes (1977), in Beckwith v. . . . Because of our construction of section 28.33, I must agree that section 718.401(4), which mandates the . . . circuit court receives a fee for his services apart from the interest earned on deposited funds. § 28.33 . . .

UNITED STATES v. STATE OF MONTANA, B. C. H. W. R., 604 F.2d 1162 (9th Cir. 1979)

. . . Government Owned 1,400.50 .07% Yellowtail Dam 6,695.64 29% State Lands 44,804.82 1.96% Fee Lands 646,679.12 28.33% . . .

H. BECKWITH, Jr. v. WEBB S FABULOUS PHARMACIES, INC., 374 So. 2d 951 (Fla. 1979)

. . . The constitutionality of section 28.33, Florida Statutes (1977), which provides that interest accruing . . . In an order granting the receiver’s motion, the trial court held section 28.33, Florida Statutes (1977 . . . Section 28.33 does two things: (1) it authorizes the clerk to invest money in the registry of the court . . . Interest accrues only because of section 28.33. . . . OVERTON, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion. . § 28.33, Fla.Stat. (1977), reads . . . Section 28.33, Florida Statutes (1977), concerns the investment of all county funds held by the clerk . . .

UNITED STATES v. STATE OF MONTANA, B. C. J. W. R. STATE OF MONTANA, B. C. J. W. R. v. UNITED STATES, 457 F. Supp. 599 (D. Mont. 1978)

. . . Government Owned 1,400.50 .07% Yellowtail Dam 6,695.64 .29% State Lands 44,804.82 1.96% Fee Lands 646,679.12 28.33% . . .

ALACHUA COUNTY, a v. A. POWERS,, 351 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 1977)

. . . In regard to investment of county funds the court below held that Section 28.33, Florida Statutes (1975 . . . designate the investment of surplus funds, these funds are to be invested by the clerk pursuant to Section 28.33 . . .

ROBERT L. MERWIN CO. INC. MARITIME CONTRACTORS, v. DONALD S. STRONG CARGO SERVICES, INC., 7 V.I. 567 (3d Cir. 1970)

. . . The trial court awarded the lessee $28.33 per day from the date of unlawful eviction until the lessee . . . the time of eviction, provided for rental of $525.00 per month, or $17.50 per day, rather than the $28.33 . . . that the trial court made some estimate of value from which the reserved rent was deducted to yield $28.33 . . . Both the complaint and the counterclaim contain allegations of damages in the amount of $28.33 per day . . . some indications of the value of the warehouse in the record, but they do not support the amount of $28.33 . . .

ROBERT L. MERWIN CO. v. S. STRONG, 429 F.2d 50 (3d Cir. 1970)

. . . The trial court awarded the lessee $28.33 per day from the date of unlawful eviction until the lessee . . . the time of eviction, provided for rental of $525.00 per month, or $17.50 per day, rather than the $28.33 . . . that the trial court made some estimate of value from which the reserved rent was deducted to yield $28.33 . . . Both the complaint and the counterclaim contain allegations of damages in the amount of $28.33 per day . . . some indications of the value of the warehouse in the record, but they do not support the amount of $28.33 . . .

MARATHON FOUNDRY MACHINE COMPANY, DYNER, v. SCHWARTZ J., 239 F.2d 122 (7th Cir. 1956)

. . . and that the highest, and best bid was that of Intelectron in the total amount of $910,129.58, or $28.33 . . .

In MARATHON FOUNDRY AND MACHINE COMPANY, a MARATHON FOUNDRY AND MACHINE COMPANY, v. SCHWARTZ J. a, 228 F.2d 594 (7th Cir. 1955)

. . . bids were made at said hearing, the highest and best bid being that made by Intelec-tron, Inc., for $28.33 . . . . be sold upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth to Intelectron, Inc., for the sum of $28.33 . . .

M. IRAVANI MOTTAGHI, v. BARKEY IMPORTING CO., 134 F. Supp. 719 (S.D.N.Y. 1955)

. . . reads.as follows: “265 báles Iranian Carpet Wool Total gross weight: 64,047 lbs. “ nett “ 62,439 “ (28.33 . . .

In ANN ARBOR BREWING CO., 110 F. Supp. 111 (E.D. Mich. 1951)

. . . Supplemental withholding tax for the 4th quarter 1948 in the amount of $28.33, which became a lien on . . .

HARVEY v. EARLY, 189 F.2d 169 (4th Cir. 1951)

. . . When all of these errors are corrected, there is a net increase in income tax for the year 1941 of $28.33 . . .

PHILLIPS v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 153 F.2d 27 (2d Cir. 1946)

. . . Electric’s common stock by capitalizing its estimated earnings at either 6% per annum, yielding values of $28.33 . . .

SANTA MONICA MOUNTAIN PARK CO. v. UNITED STATES, 99 F.2d 450 (9th Cir. 1938)

. . . See eases cited in Paul & Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation (1934), Vol. 3, § 28.33, p. 424, notes . . .

MADDEN v. UNITED STATES, 18 F. Supp. 534 (S.D.N.Y. 1936)

. . . now remaining unpaid should be dealt with in this manner: A sum representing monthly installments of $28.33% . . .

AUTOMATIC WASHER CO. v. UNITED STATES, 15 F. Supp. 70 (Ct. Cl. 1936)

. . . plaintiff is entitled to1 a judgment as follows: $1,490.76 tax paid, to which was added $74.54 penalty and $28.33 . . .

AUTOMATIC WASHER COMPANY, A CORPORATION, v. THE UNITED STATES, 83 Ct. Cl. 593 (Ct. Cl. 1936)

. . . plaintiff is entitled to a judgment as follows: $1,490.76 tax paid, to which was added $74.54 penalty and $28.33 . . .

RALSTON S. HOLMES v. THE UNITED STATES, 49 Ct. Cl. 70 (Ct. Cl. 1913)

. . . were not included in the naval-pay act of May 13,1908, 35 Stats., 128, and consequently the amount of $28.33 . . . from May 13 to July 3, 1908, and the amount of his pay for that portion of the time, amounting to $28.33 . . .

In ARKANSAS RATE CASES. ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RY. CO. v. ALLEN R. R. ST. LOUIS, I. M. S. RY. CO. v. SAME, 187 F. 290 (C.C.E.D. Ark. 1911)

. . . Engine miles...........................79,053 199,981 279,034 Percentage of each....................... 28.33 . . .

LUFKIN LAND LUMBER CO. v. BEAUMONT TIMBER CO., 151 F. 740 (5th Cir. 1907)

. . . that the plaintiff has shown title to 289.9696 acres of said land and the defendant has shown title to 28.33% . . .