Cases from cite.case.law:

M. KNIGHT, v. CHIEF JUDGE OF FLORIDA S TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT E., 235 So. 3d 996 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See also § 34.07, Fla. Stat. (2016) (sheriff also executive officer of county court). . . .

UNITED STATES v. FREEMAN,, 435 F. App'x 99 (3d Cir. 2011)

. . . The table featured a hydraulically operated trap concealing 34.07 kilograms of cocaine. . . .

FITZGERALD LIVING TRUST, v. UNITED STATES N. III, 460 F.3d 1259 (9th Cir. 2006)

. . . Powell, Powell on Real Property § 34.07 at 34-76 (rev. ed.1997), and Rights-of-Way Across Nat’l Forests . . . Powell, Powell on Real Property § 34.07 (2006). . . . Powell, supra, at § 34.07[1], [3]. . . .

UNITED STATES v. JENKS,, 129 F.3d 1348 (10th Cir. 1997)

. . . Powell, Powell on Real Property § 34.07 (rev.ed., 1997). As we stated in Kinscherff v. . . . to exist, however, Defendant might successfully claim easements by necessity See 4 Powell, supra, § 34.07 . . .

DOE v. RAINS COUNTY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 66 F.3d 1402 (5th Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 34.07, the Family Code imposes on all teachers a criminally enforceable obligation to report child . . .

v., 104 T.C. 256 (T.C. 1995)

. . . 36.75 4th 36.55 36.65-36.80 H 1982 35.05 1st 34.64 35.10-35.30 N 32.50 2d 32.40 32.40-32.60 (M 34.15 3d 34.07 . . . 35.05 34.64 .41 36.38 (1.33) 33.35 1.70 Qtr. 2 32.50 32.40 .10 33.00 (.50) 33.36 (.86) Qtr. 3 34.15 34.07 . . .

DOE v. RAINS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 865 F. Supp. 375 (E.D. Tex. 1994)

. . . . § 34.07 (Vernon 1986). . . .

J. F. FEESER, INC. v. SERV- A- PORTION, INC., 909 F.2d 1524 (3d Cir. 1990)

. . . 66.67 Feeser Paid Lower Price than Weis (3 14.84 15.92 29.88 23.15 Feeser and Weis Paid Same Price (3 34.07 . . .

BROWN, By v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOPEKA, SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS,, 892 F.2d 851 (10th Cir. 1989)

. . . 36.51 1974-75 84 143 227 37.00 1975-76 77 120 197 39.09 1976-77 78 126 204 38.24 1977-78 62 120 182 34.07 . . .

SPANN, SPANN, a v. TYLER INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 876 F.2d 437 (5th Cir. 1989)

. . . . §§ 34.01, .02 and 34.07. . . . .

DeSPAIN, v. JOHNSTON,, 731 F.2d 1171 (5th Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 1983, declaratory relief, that §§ 34.05, 34.06, and 34.07 of the Texas Family Code are unconstitutional . . .

v., 82 T.C. 105 (T.C. 1984)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice, par. 34.07, at 34-36 (2d ed. 1948). . . .

OHIO TEAMSTERS EDUCATIONAL AND SAFETY TRAINING TRUST FUND, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 692 F.2d 432 (6th Cir. 1982)

. . . See also 6 Mertens, The Law of Federal Income Taxation § 34.07 at 24 (1968): The basic problem is to . . .

In HUNTER OUTDOOR PRODUCTS, INC. PARLOW, v. BANK OF NEW YORK,, 21 B.R. 188 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1982)

. . . See generally, 4A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 34.07 (2nd Ed. 1981). . . .

v., 74 T.C. 240 (T.C. 1980)

. . . Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, sec. 34.07, p. 31 (1975 rev.) . . .

BELCHER, T. W. H. R. M. P. W. R. J. E. F. M. v. BASSETT FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC. Co. Co. J. D. Co. Co., 588 F.2d 904 (4th Cir. 1978)

. . . See, generally, 4A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 34.07, at 34-50 to 34-56 (2d ed. 1978). . . . .

TAXATION WITH REPRESENTATION, v. UNITED STATES, 585 F.2d 1219 (4th Cir. 1978)

. . . Mertens, The Law of Federal Income Taxation § 34.07, at 27 (1975). . . .

LITVAK PACKING COMPANY, a v. AMALGAMATED BUTCHER WORKMEN, LOCAL NO. AFL- CIO, J., 455 F. Supp. 1180 (D. Colo. 1978)

. . . no power “to add to, subtract from nor modify any of the terms of this Agreement,” (art. 34, para. 34.07 . . .

MITSUI CO. U. S. A. INC. v. PUERTO RICO WATER RESOURCES AUTHORITY,, 79 F.R.D. 72 (D.P.R. 1978)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice, Sec. 34.07, at p. 34-57. . . .

In FOLDING CARTON ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 76 F.R.D. 420 (N.D. Ill. 1977)

. . . Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 34.07 at 34-56 & n. 18. . . .

F. LAUFMAN v. OAKLEY BUILDING AND LOAN COMPANY, 72 F.R.D. 116 (S.D. Ohio 1976)

. . . a reasonable man would know what documents or things are called for. 4A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 34.07 . . .

FOX v. FRATELLO,, 308 So. 2d 581 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . Section 34.07(6) thereof provides for the public hearing aforesaid. . . . The next following subsection, § 34.07(7), relating to the eventuality of protests, provides : “In case . . . Finally, the next succeeding subsection of § 34.07, i. e., subsection (8), provides: “All proposed changes . . . No matter what happened at that stage, and notwithstanding that subparagraph (d) of § 34.07(6) of the . . . We now hold that the three-fourths vote required under § 34.07(7), supra, to make the annexation and . . .

S. v., 62 T.C. 256 (T.C. 1974)

. . . Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, sec. 2211, p. 628; 4A Moore, Federal Practice, par. 34.07 . . .

MALLINCKRODT CHEMICAL WORKS, v. GOLDMAN, SACHS CO. CATHEDRAL ESTATES, INC. v. L. LEVY, 58 F.R.D. 348 (S.D.N.Y. 1973)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice, ¶34.07, at 34-57 & n. 18. . . .

M. v., 55 T.C. 1125 (T.C. 1971)

. . . hold that she may deduct 48/365 of the $259.06 in taxes on the Auburn Street property for 1966, or $34.07 . . .

ELISIAN GUILD, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 412 F.2d 121 (1st Cir. 1969)

. . . Mertens, The Law of Federal Income Taxation § 34.07 at 24 (1968) : “The issue of ‘organized’ as used . . .

YOUNG RUBICAM, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 187 Ct. Cl. 635 (Ct. Cl. 1969)

. . . Payments.... 5,129.40 168.39 2,192.08 443.48 1,891.20 1,927.88 540.00 68.66 1,106.50 3,463.55 13.29 34.07 . . . Richard. 358.87 Wilkerson, James P__,. 275.64 $91.58 1,669.49 933.00 1,891.20 3,463.55 $8. 61 13.29 34.07 . . .

L. LARSON A s v. TONY S INVESTMENTS, INC. a L. J. E. M. R. A. H., 46 F.R.D. 612 (M.D. Ala. 1969)

. . . or constructively, a requested document should say so under oath. 4 Moore’s Federal Practice, para. 34.07 . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. AMERICAN BERYLLIUM OIL CORPORATION, 47 F.R.D. 66 (S.D.N.Y. 1968)

. . . Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., supra; 4 Moore, Federal Practice ¶34.07, p. 2465 (2d ed. 1968). . . . Rules 26(b) and 34, Fed.R.Civ.P.; James, Civil Procedure § 34.07 (1965). . . .

SPEEDRACK INC. v. L. BAYBARZ, F. L., 45 F.R.D. 254 (E.D. Cal. 1968)

. . . view has been given the implied approval of the Advisory Committee. 4 Moore’s Federal Practice, para. 34.07 . . .

GEORGIA POWER COMPANY v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, 295 F. Supp. 950 (N.D. Ga. 1968)

. . . such practice is contrary to existing federal discovery procedures. 4 Moore, Federal Practice, ¡Jf 34.07 . . .

D. NOONAN, v. CUNARD STEAMSHIP CO., 375 F.2d 69 (2d Cir. 1967)

. . . N.Y.1965); 4 Moore, supra, ¶34.07 at 2442; 1A Barron and Holtzoff, Federal Procedure and Practice, § . . .

ST. LOUIS UNION TRUST COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, 374 F.2d 427 (8th Cir. 1967)

. . . Thayer, 24 T.C. 384, 391 (1955); 6 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, § 34.07 (1957) and 1966 supplement . . .

JONES, a v. URIS SALES CORPORATION, 373 F.2d 644 (2d Cir. 1967)

. . . . § 7(b) (1), see 4 Moore, supra, ¶ 34.07 at 2442; 1A Barron and Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure . . .

In NATTA In U. S. No. HOGAN v. ZLETZ v. BAXTER v. NATTA, 264 F. Supp. 734 (D. Del. 1967)

. . . be sufficiently identified by categories, as was done in this motion. 4 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 34.07 . . .

R. FLICKINGER, D. R. L. P. F. F. D. D. v. AETNA CASUALTY SURETY COMPANY, a a, 37 F.R.D. 533 (W.D. Pa. 1965)

. . . See: 2A Barron and Holtzoff, supra, § 799, p. 455; 4 Moore, supra, ¶ 34.07, pp. 2443-2444. . . . .

H. STEELMAN A. v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, 35 F.R.D. 120 (W.D. Mo. 1964)

. . . and Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure § 796, pp. 426-28, n. 70; 4 Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 34.07 . . .

Z. GOOSMAN, a v. A. DUIE PYLE, INC. a, 320 F.2d 45 (4th Cir. 1963)

. . . KING: I’ll do the same.” . 4 Moore, Federal Practice, para. 34.07, at 2442-43, n. 6 (2d ed. 1950, Supp . . .

TAYLOR, v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, a, 33 F.R.D. 283 (W.D. Mo. 1962)

. . . Barron and Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure § 796, pp. 426-28, n. 70; 4 Moore, Federal Practice ¶34.07 . . .

METZ, v. C. SMITH,, 141 So. 2d 617 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)

. . . Venetian Blind Co., E.D.N.Y.1939, 30 F.Supp. 903, 905 ; 4 Moore, Federal Practice (2d ed. 1950) par. 34.07 . . .

DYNATRON CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES RUBBER COMPANY,, 27 F.R.D. 480 (D. Conn. 1961)

. . . view with respect to the extent of designation required under Rule 34 (4 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 34.07 . . . Moore, referring to the form of a proper motion under Rule 34, states (4 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 34.07 . . .

UNITED STATES v. NATIONAL STEEL CORPORATION, B. R., 26 F.R.D. 607 (S.D. Tex. 1960)

. . . Professor Moore discerns two lines of authority. 4 Moore's Federal Practice, Sec. 34.07 (2d Ed. 1950) . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. LOS ANGELES TRUST DEED MORTGAGE EXCHANGE, J. A. Jr. C., 24 F.R.D. 460 (S.D. Cal. 1959)

. . . (sec. 34.07) comments thus on Rule 34: “The greatest area of disagreement with respect to the form of . . .

HOUDRY PROCESS CORPORATION, v. COMMONWEALTH OIL REFINING COMPANY,, 24 F.R.D. 58 (S.D.N.Y. 1959)

. . . Practice, section 34.07, at page 2448. . . . Practice, section 34.07, at page 2449. ' Finally, defendant contends that the motion should be denied . . .

ERONE CORPORATION, Co. v. SKOURAS THEATRES CORPORATION, P. S. C. Jr., 22 F.R.D. 494 (S.D.N.Y. 1958)

. . . See 4 Moore supra at par. 34.07. . . .

W. TIEDMAN v. AMERICAN PIGMENT CORPORATION,, 253 F.2d 803 (4th Cir. 1958)

. . . See: 4 Moore, Federal Practice (1950), Sec. 34.07, p. 2442 et seq., Consolidated Rendering Co. v. . . .

PORTSMOUTH BASEBALL CORPORATION, a v. C. FRICK,, 19 F.R.D. 195 (S.D.N.Y. 1956)

. . . . ¶ 34.07. . . .

CHIN NEE DEU, Ai Ai v. DULLES,, 18 F.R.D. 350 (S.D.N.Y. 1955)

. . . 35.04. . 4 Moore’s Fed.Prac., 2d Ed., para. 26.09 [1], footnote 1. . 4 Moore’s Fed.Prac., 2d Ed., para. 34.07 . . .

S. SHANKMAN, P. v. NORTHWEST AIR LINES,, 18 F.R.D. 436 (S.D.N.Y. 1955)

. . . Cf. 4 Moore’s Fed.Prac., 2d Ed., pars. 26.10, 26.20. . 4 Moore’s Fed.Prac., pars. 26.10, 26.20, 34.07 . . .

C. MILLER, v. PACIFIC MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 17 F.R.D. 121 (W.D. Mich. 1954)

. . . Miller Transport Co., D.C., 109 F.Supp. 502, 504; 10 Cyclopedia of Federal Procedure, 3d Ed., § 34.07 . . .

HEFTER v. NATIONAL AIRLINES,, 14 F.R.D. 78 (S.D.N.Y. 1952)

. . . Moore’s Fed.Prae., 2d Ed., Vol. 4, § 34.07, p. 2442, et seq. . . . .

LEVEN v. BIRRELL, 13 F.R.D. 341 (S.D.N.Y. 1952)

. . . long as the category itself is sufficiently defined, see Moore’s Federal Practice, 2nd ed., vol. 4, § 34.07 . . .

STATE THEATRE CO. v. TRI- STATES THEATRE CORP., 11 F.R.D. 381 (D. Neb. 1951)

. . . Regent Theatre Co., supra; 4 Moore’s Federal Practice, Sec. 34.07, pp. 2446, 2447. . . .