The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Melford testified that as a result of the Foreclosure Action she spent $ 35.28 on Federal Express packages . . .
. . . while Cheema's average transaction was $ 134.99, other stores which sold Halal meat averaged $ 50, $ 35.28 . . .
. . . Reg. 64119, ¶ 154 (codified 18 CFR § 35.28(g)(1) (2015) ). . . . Reg. 16658 (Rule) (codified 18 CFR § 35.28(g)(1)(v) ). . . . See 16 U.S.C. §§ 824d(c) -(d) ; 18 CFR §§ 35.28(c)(4), 35.3(a)(1). . . . FERC's own definition of demand response is aimed at energy consumers, not resellers. 18 CFR § 35.28( . . . reduction in "retail electricity sales"-by offering "incentive payments" to those customers. 18 CFR § 35.28 . . .
. . . . § 35.28(b)(4). . . . See 18 C.F.R. § 35.28(b)(4). . . .
. . . . § 35.28(b)(4)) (internal quotation marks and emphasis omitted). . . . .
. . . Using Mercer as an example, he set' the per-share price at $35.28. . . .
. . . . § 35.28(b)(4)-(5). . . . Id. at *13; see also 18 C.F.R. § 35.28(g)(l)(v)(A). . . . permitting demand response resources to participate as a resource in the energy market.” 18 C.F.R. § 35.28 . . . Id. § 35.28(g)(1)(i)(A); see also id. § 35.28(g)(l)(iii). . . . paying a demand response resource is cost-effective under the rule’s net benefits test. 18 C.F.R. § 35.28 . . . . § 35.28(b)(4) (emphasis added); see also Order U5, 2011 WL 890975, at *1 n. 2. . . . See Order U5, 2011 WL 890975, at *1-3 & n. 2 (citing 18 C.F.R. § 35.28(b)(4)). . . . See FERC Br. 5, 34; see also Order 715, 2011 WL 890975, at *1-3 & n. 2 (citing 18 C.F.R. § 35.28(b)(4 . . .
. . . denied her request for a three-bedroom unit as “not reasonable” because it would cost an additional $35.28 . . .
. . . evaluate the reasonableness of the consideration exchanged based on a valuation of Marian's assets at $35.28 . . . The $35.28 million figure appears to be a blending of the VCG appraisal report’s market and income approaches . . .
. . . . § 35.28). . . .
. . . Once Brandt took over as the sole hiring authority, the average age dropped still further to 35.28. . . .
. . . The annual total returns for Thrift Plan investments in IPALCO stock were as follows: +35.28 percent . . .
. . . . § 35.28(c)(1); Promoting Wholesale Competition Through Open Access Non-Discriminatory Transmission . . .
. . . . § 35.28(c)(1), the Commission also recognized that its order was likely not the end of the road in . . .
. . . . § 35.28(c)(1) (requiring public utilities owning, controlling, or operating facilities transmitting . . .
. . . . § 35.28(c)(1). . . . See 18 C.F.R. § 35.28(c)(2). . . . See Order No. 888-A at 30,503-43 (containing the final OATT); 18 C.F.R. § 35.28(c)(1) (requiring all . . . /or unbundled retail load must take transmission service for such loads under its OATT. 18 C.F.S. § 35.28 . . .
. . . supervisory goodwill, but that still left SoCal in a core capital deficit position of approximately $35.28 . . .
. . . . § 35.28 (implementing the nondiscriminatory open access transmission tariff policy). . . .
. . . . § 35.28 (implementing the nondiscriminatory open access transmission tariff policy). . . .
. . . On July 13, 1999, Plaintiff made a $35.28 purchase at Home Depot, using a check which had been erroneously . . . went directly to this store on July 13 and used the first of her new checks from Artistic to make $35.28 . . . Defendant Home Depot provides a copy of the refused check for $35.28 dated July 13, 1999 (Home Depot . . .
. . . . § 35.28). . . .
. . . . § 35.28(e)(2) (allowing nonjuris-dictional utilities to file a request for waiver “for good cause shown . . .
. . . The average percentage dry extract for the 12 bales was 29.27% which is 17.0% lower than the 35.28% obtained . . .
. . . Deposit) 1,575.28 1,542.42 1,576.32 1,037.22 1,002.46 Sales Tax 87.66 95.76 99.72 64.80 63.36 Insurance 35.28 . . .
. . . the 924 students residing in Stafford currently enrolled in FBISD schools is 571 (61.80%) Anglo, 326 (35.28% . . . Mexican-American students currently enrolled in FBISD would nearly double in the new district from 18.67% to 35.28% . . .
. . . In March, 1920, he obtained employment as a railroad hostler, earning $35.28 a week. . . .
. . . (b) Additional improvement of outhouse, $35.28. (c) Initial cost of the land, $562.52. 4. . . .
. . . In a proceeding to fix gas rates, an allowance of 35.28 per cent, for leakage would be excessive. . . . The gas lost and unaccounted for during the year was 216,849,700 cubic feet, which is equivalent to 35.28 . . . On the basis of a reduction in leakage from 35.28 per cent, to 15 per cent, and an increase in the rate . . . The percentage found by the commission, to wit, 35.28 per Icent., was, of course, excessive. . . .
. . . , from putting into operation the determination of the Secretary so as to exact a greater sum than $35.28 . . .
. . . for the construction cost of the project exclusive of the cost of operation and maintenance; that $35.28 . . . irrigation of the lands in the district, and it is alleged that in May, 1904, relying upon the estimate of $35.28 . . .
. . . cents for each dollar not exceeding $100 and for each dollar in excess of $300 two cents, amounting to $35.28 . . .
. . . of longevity increase for the years 1882 and prior thereto, the sum of $216.59; on other accounts, $35.28 . . .