The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . records of its bauxite purchases from late 1999 until mid-2012 show that plaintiff never paid less than $92.25 . . .
. . . . § 92.25-15 (a regulation for cargo and miscellaneous vessels, analogous to 46 C.F.R. § 32.02-15) by . . .
. . . = 635 applicants, 95.25 affected; 2007 = 656 applicants, 98.4 affected; and 2008 = 615 applicants, 92.25 . . .
. . . . § 92.25-15 was violated by Martucci’s failure to promptly replace or reinstall the protective guard . . . Carney’s injuries were within the type of injury against which § 92.25-15 was designed to protect, and . . . Given that the injury stemmed from a violation of 46 C.F.R. § 92.25-15, contributory negligence is not . . . Only four cases have addressed the issue of whether a violation of 46 C.F.R. § 92.25-15 in particular . . . , 2007 WL 3085436, *2 (finding that § 92.25-15 does not apply to ballast tanks); Falconer, 397 F.Supp . . .
. . . . § 92.25-5 requires all vessels subject to subchapter I of the Coast Guard regulations, which pertains . . . The Baranof Trader, as a cargo vessel, is clearly subject to § 92.25-5. . . . Nor is the Coast Guard’s interpretation of § 92.25-5 in its Marine Safety Manual, wherein it exempts . . . Section 92.25-5 is unambiguous in its requirement that “[a]ll vessels” have three-course railings at . . . Not only is § 92.25-5 unambiguous, but the Coast Guard’s interpretation in the Marine Safety Manual is . . . . § 92.25-5. . . . The majority contends that this exception only serves to excuse the height requirement of section 92.25 . . . Under the text of the regulation, the only way for a vessel to simultaneously comply with section 92.25 . . . consistent with the Marine Safety Manual, which provides “[t]he rail and deck guard requirements of 46 CFR 92.25 . . .
. . . . § 92.25-15 and 33 C.F.R. § 96.230. . . . I consider them in turn. 1. 46 C.F.R. § 92.25-15 46 C.F.R. § 92.25-15, captioned “Guards in dangerous . . . Standing alone, 46 C.F.R. § 92.25-15 is not a model of clarity. . . . that regulation keeps. § 92.25-15 is one of three mandatory regulations in Subpart 92.25, each of which . . . There are two other provisions in Subpart 92.25: §§ 92.25-1 and 92.25-90. . . .
. . . Curriculum prescribes a total of 320 hours of training, including 116 hours of on-street training and 92.25 . . .
. . . on the basis of negligence per se arising from the defendant’s violation of 29 CFR 1915.73, 46 CFR 92.25 . . . policy judgment, has spoken unequivocally, and it is this Court's duty to enforce the statute. . 46 CFR 92.25 . . .
. . . sentencing guidelines, attaching a proposed scoresheet which showed a sentencing range of 55.35 to 92.25 . . .
. . . 29/97-2/4/98 150.75 $ 75.00 11.306.25 Feder 6/2/97-6/17/97 9 $ 75.00 $ 675.00 Bubble 5/27/98-8/10/98 92.25 . . .
. . . as a prison releasee reoffender, on count II to five years in prison, and on counts III, IV and V to 92.25 . . .
. . . 87.75 0.00 1/12/99 CO 379.44 $185,119.42 0.05% 92.56 10,000.00 1/13/99 C/3 626.76 $184,492.66 0.05% 92.25 . . .
. . . Bederman requests legal fees for 92.25 hours at $250.00 per hour for a total of $23,062.50. Mr. . . . Thus, the number of allowed billable hours are reduced from 92.25 hours to 63.13 hours, which at $250 . . .
. . . . § 2412(d)(2)(B). 9) The increase in the cost of living justifies a minimum rate of $92.25 per hour . . . litigation required uncommon levels of expertise in both tax and bankruptcy law not available at the $92.25 . . . Thus, fees of attorneys Sterling, Hahn, Temple and attorney TMH are reduced to the statutory rate of $92.25 . . . The court awards compensation at the statutory rate of $92.25 to attorneys with no expertise in tax law . . . The court finds 143.6 hours are compensa-ble and at the statutory rate of $92.25/hour for a total of . . .
. . . analysis 37.50 hrs $37.50/hr 1.312.50 hrs 0 -Input 105.25 hrs $22.50/hr 2,368.13 hrs 0 -Processing 92.25 . . .
. . . $ 264.24 Costs and Expenses from 2/24/83 through 12/31/84: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 92.25 . . .
. . . LG) in December, 1981 $ 626.00 Travel to D.C. to review Justice Department files (LG) in June, 1982 92.25 . . . The $92.25 expense in connection with travel to Washington, D.C. to review Justice Department files in . . . Orleans — December, 1981 $ 514.29 Travel to Washington to review Justice Department files — June, 1982 92.25 . . .
. . . [Available on WESTLAW, 1987 WL 43607] (awarding counsel $92.25 per hour on basis that congressional intent . . .
. . . namely $3,566.62, although the district court later found that Morrison’s actual damages were only $92.25 . . . district court awarded plaintiff $3,566.62, pursuant to the stipulation on the promotion claim, plus $92.25 . . .
. . . Attorney time (at $75 per hour) thus aggregates 92.25 hours. . . .
. . . Attorney time (at $75 per hour) thus aggregates 92.25 hours. . . .
. . . Wolff, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 92.25 (Supp.1986). . . .
. . . 264.24 Costs and Expenses from 2/24/83 through 12/31/84: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ...... 92.25 . . .
. . . to 1 MCU 2.17 to 1 Routine 4.83 to 1 The costs per patient day were: ICU $271.67 MCU 153.09 Routine 92.25 . . .
. . . The 92.25 hours billed by summer associates Jonathan K. Baum and Elizabeth V. . . .
. . . The majority’s reliance on Devitt & Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 92.25 (Supp.1982 . . . See Devitt & Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 92.25 (Supp.1982) (proposing model instructions . . .
. . . Parker (geologist) 92.25 65.00 5,996.25 C — Craig W. . . .
. . . . 110 28.820.00 Harwood .5 110 55.00 Sucharow 61.5 100 6.150.00 Rosengarten 4.75 100 ■ 475.00 Avery 92.25 . . .
. . . The trial court found appellant liable because it violated Coast Guard Regulation 92.25-5 (a) which states . . . that “All vessels shall have sufficient guard rails . . . . ” C.F.R. 92.25-5(a). . . .
. . . Thurmond claims compensation for 92.25 hours of time spent in preparation out of Court, at $10.00 per . . .
. . . with the defendant, plaintiff was entitled to a total overtime payment of $3,493.20, LESS the sum of $92.25 . . .
. . . In addition, the Executor paid to Cedar Hill Cemetery the sum of $92.25 for a grave marker placed on . . . So the District argues that, as no such direction was contained in the will, the sum of $92.25 should . . .
. . . New York Stock Exchange, ranging in price from a low in 1942 of $21.50' a share to a high in 1953 of $92.25 . . .
. . . New York Stock Exchange, ranging in price from a low in 1942 of $21.50 a share to a high in 1953 of $92.25 . . . 39.875 32 1948_ 43 31.75 1949_ 42.375 34 1950_ 50. 5 41.125 1951_ 63.875 49.5 1952_ 72.75 54.375 1953___ 92.25 . . .
. . . plaintiff for the profit that it would have made on the sale of the 369 cases at 25$i per case, or $92.25 . . . to recover on its counterclaim of $165.64, less the damage suffered by the plaintiff in the sum of $92.25 . . .
. . . that other property throughout Michigan was assessed on a basis varying from 86.53 percent in 1937 to 92.25 . . .
. . . of January, 1918, leased to Ethel Rosensteel six items of household furniture at a listed value of $92.25 . . .
. . . , at $4.581 55.00 Stone & Stansell: 284]^ team days, at $4____ 1,187.20 61A days’ labor, at $1.50.. 92.25 . . .