The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . The Bonds closed at $94.08 on January 30, 2017, $92.50 on January 31, 2017, and $89.50 on February 1, . . .
. . . following manner: (a) Under oath or affirmation taken or administered before an officer authorized under s. 92.50 . . .
. . . See §§ 92.50 and 92.525, Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . McCarthy § 19:92.50 (footnotes omitted); see, e.g., Am. . . . McCarthy § 19:92.50 (citing Institut Nat’l Des Appellations d’Origine v. . . .
. . . motion were each signed, sworn, and notarized, thereby fulfilling the affidavit requirements of section 92.50 . . .
. . . of his and his brother’s personal expenses: Ncaa ticket — $450 Room % 703 — $350 Car rental 185 — $92.50 . . .
. . . replied: Here is the break down in case you forgot: Ncaa ticket- $450 Room[é703- $350 Car rental 185- $92.50 . . . number of his and his brother’s personal expenses: Ncaa ticket- $450 RoomJ/¿703- $350 Car rental 185- $92.50 . . .
. . . Section 92.50(1), Florida Statutes (2014), recognizes that an affidavit must be sworn to before a person . . .
. . . . • Class 9- — COPs Claims accepted by 92.50% in number and 96.61% in amount. • Class 10 — PFRS Pension . . .
. . . 10.850.00 Thomas Murtagh 33.50 $120 4,020.00 Allen Engerman: 69.70 $538 37,498.60 Jeffrey Engerman: 92.50 . . .
. . . That same day, a trader used the Citigroup account to purchase 50 July $90 call options and 270 July $92.50 . . . call options in this purchase, too, was significantly higher than the average number of July $90 and $92.50 . . . The trades at issue were bets that Onyx’s stock would hit values ranging from $80 to $92.50 a share in . . . Exhibit 3 to Ganguly’s declaration includes the volume of July $80, $85, $90, and $92.50 call options . . . options purchased June 27,16% of the July $90 call options purchased June 28, and 57% of the July $92.50 . . .
. . . Statutory References § 92.50, Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . following manner: (a)Under oath or affirmation taken or administered before an officer authorized under s. 92.50 . . .
. . . With the exception of a cab fare costing $92.50 that Attorney Russell incurred traveling from the airport . . .
. . . Subsection (1)(a) allows for verification under oath or affirmation as set forth in section 92.50(1). . . . Section 92.50(1) provides that "[o]aths, affidavits, and acknowledgments required or authorized under . . .
. . . following manner: (a) Under oath or affirmation taken or administered before an officer authorized under s. 92.50 . . . See id. at 1185 (quoting § 92.50(1), Fla. Stat. (2007)). . . . following manner: (a) Under oath or affirmation taken or administered before an officer authorized under s. 92.50 . . . satisfied if the drafter swears under oath before a judge, or other officer authorized pursuant to section 92.50 . . . See § 92.50(1), Fla. . . .
. . . materials, so certification of the lumber could designate certification of the WPM, see 3 McCarthy § 19:92.50 . . . See id. §§ 19:91 & 19:92.50. 5. N.H. . . .
. . . The trial court acknowledged that section 92.50(3), Florida Statutes (2009), does not require that an . . . made under penalties of perjury, while “affidavits” are governed by a separate Florida law, section 92.50 . . . This Court’s decision in Defense Control complies with section 92.50(3), which provides as follows: ( . . .
. . . following manner: (a) Under oath or affirmation taken or administered before an officer authorized under s. 92.50 . . . of a court of record, the seal of such court may be affixed as the seal of such officer or person. § 92.50 . . . which expressly includes an affidavit, requiring verification may be so verified by oath, and section 92.50 . . .
. . . following manner: (a) Under oath or affirmation taken or administered before an officer authorized under s. 92.50 . . .
. . . the amount of $875, foreclosure costs in the amount of $930.41, property inspection fees totaling $92.50 . . .
. . . made under penalties of perjury, while “affidavits” are governed by a separate Florida law, section 92.50 . . .
. . . Section 92.50(1), Florida Statutes (1992), provides that the oath may be administered by a deputy clerk . . .
. . . This amount is comprised of $92.50 for the fifth entry on January 3, 2007 for clerical services; and . . .
. . . one-half hour charge for this service is disallowed, and thus the requested compensation is reduced by $92.50 . . . deems the travel time to be one hour, and thus compensation for services on November 18 is reduced by $92.50 . . .
. . . Section 92.50, Florida Statutes, entitled: “Oaths, affidavits and acknowledgements, who may take or administer . . . following manner: (a) Under oatb or affirmation taken or administered before an officer authorized under s. 92.50 . . . definition of a verification and because a notarized oath must satisfy the requirements of section 92.50 . . . Section 92.50, Florida Statutes, also indicates that an affidavit must be sworn to before a person authorized . . . § 92.50(1), Fla. Stat. (2003). . . . following manner: (a) Under oath or affirmation taken or administered before ah officer authorized under s. 92.50 . . .
. . . following manner: (a) Under oath or affirmation taken or administered before an officer authorized under s. 92.50 . . .
. . . 225.00 1,800.00 11/20/04 10 12.0 225.00 2,700.00 11/22/04 10 .7 225.00 157.50 11/22/04 17 .5 185.00 92.50 . . .
. . . defective because it was not sworn to before a person authorized to administer oaths under section 92.50 . . .
. . . following manner: (a) Under oath or affirmation taken or administered before an officer authorized under s. 92.50 . . .
. . . This fact is implicitly recognized in section 92.50, Florida Statute (2002), which sets forth the persons . . .
. . . Statutory References § 92.50, Fla. Stat. . . .
. . . the HUD-1, CST collected $37.50 for recording a mortgage and $55 for recording releases, which total $92.50 . . . loan documents were provided to her for the 1999 mortgage, she cannot determine whether CST collected $92.50 . . .
. . . based on Ortiz’s testimony since she was not properly sworn as a witness in accordance with section 92.50 . . . an attorney challenged the admissibility of testimony that was not taken in accordance with section 92.50 . . . specifically agreed to continue with her testimony in the absence of the formalities required by section 92.50 . . .
. . . Section 92.50(1), Florida Statutes (1997), provides the general authority for a notary public to administer . . . Section 92.50(1), Florida Statutes (1997), provides: IN THIS STATE. — Oaths, affidavits, and acknowledgments . . .
. . . Circuit Court in Miami-Dade County was not valid because it did not satisfy the requirements of section 92.50 . . . THE OATH Defendant argues that pursuant to the terms of section 92.50(2), the oath administered to Ms . . . .2d 1364 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 236, 142 L.Ed.2d 194 (1998), as concerns section 92.50 . . .
. . . P. 4.075(f)(3); see also § 92.50(a), Fla. . . .
. . . not challenge defense counsels’ hourly rates, which we conclude are reasonable in any event — either $92.50 . . .
. . . We first note that the affidavit is deficient, for failure to comply with section 92.50(3), Florida Statutes . . . The affidavit was not properly authenticated under section 92.50(3), because it does not contain the . . .
. . . and file brief. 2.5 512.20 212 Assc. 0.5 185 Review final draft of reply to motion to dismiss. 0.5 92.50 . . .
. . . pricing decisions, the Plaintiffs have directed our attention to NMP’s announced January price of $92.50 . . .
. . . This statute together with section 92.50(2), Florida Statutes (1993), furnish the authority for the admission . . . Section 92.50(2) provides that acknowledgments required or authorized under the laws of this state may . . . Barker does not contend that section 92.50(2) does not authorize the taking of an acknowledgment by an . . .
. . . Costa Rica, should have been excluded because the oath was not administered in accordance with section 92.50 . . . An affidavit that is not executed in accordance with the requirements of section 92.50(3) is not competent . . . Vannier, 498 So.2d 896 (Fla.1986), it would be a better practice to comply with section 92.50(3). . . . Section 92.50(3), Florida Statutes (1993), provides: Oaths, affidavits, and acknowledgments, required . . .
. . . Section 92.50(2), Florida Statutes (1993), provides that oaths, affidavits and acknowledgements taken . . .
. . . following manner: (a) Under oath or affirmation taken or administered before an officer authorized under s. 92.50 . . .
. . . following manner: (a) Under oath or affirmation taken or administered before an officer authorized under s. 92.50 . . .
. . . this case under the EAJA is 24.65 hours at $100 per hour ($2,465), plus 1.85 hours at $50 per hour ($92.50 . . .
. . . Statutory References § 92.50, Fla.Stat. . . .
. . . Section 92.50(1), Florida Statutes (1991), provides in pertinent part: 92.50 Oaths, affidavits, and acknowledgments . . .
. . . Turning to the expense schedule, we find a charge of $92.50 for secretarial overtime. . . .
. . . This affidavit was not executed in accordance with the requirements of section 92.50(3), Florida Statutes . . .
. . . 22,000.00 Grossmann 298.00 80.00 77,480.00 20,800.00 Litowitz 130.25 36.00 35,818.75 9,900.00 Browne 92.50 . . . 92.50 16,187.50 16,187.50 Kainen 101.00 98.25 11,615.00 11,298.75 Mellieker 39.25 39.25 5,298.75 5,298.75 . . .
. . . Utilities 217.00 Food 200.00 Clothing 100.00 Laundry & Cleaning 25.00 Medical & Drug 100.00 Insurance 92.50 . . . 364.00 Utilities 125.00 Food 200.00 Clothing 0.00 Laundry & Cleaning 0.00 Medical & Drug 0.00 Insurance 92.50 . . .
. . . From 1982 until July of 1987, Salsbury sold MG-BAC at $92.50 per bottle. . . . If these bottles of MG vaccine had been sold by Salsbury at its original price of $92.50 per bottle, . . . Erosion When Merieux entered the MG vaccine market in April of 1987, Salsbury was selling MG-BAC at $92.50 . . . figure by 5, which represents the five-month period during which Salsbury would have sold MG-BAC at $92.50 . . .
. . . Umana and Ferguson 511.45 Special Postage 87.34 Photocopying 564.28 Filing Fee and Service of Summons 92.50 . . .
. . . See § 92.50(1), Fla.Stat. .See generally State v. Miller, 313 So.2d 656 (Fla.1975); Gerstein v. . . .
. . . F.S. 92.50 Oaths, affidavits, and acknowledgments; who may take or administer; requirements. 22 U.S.C . . .
. . . F.S. 92.50 Oaths, affidavits, and ac-knowledgements; who may take or administer; requirements. 22 U.S.C . . .
. . . The cost of the towels was $92.50. . . . TENANT’S CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO PERSONAL PROPERTY The court rules the tenant is entitled to $92.50 for . . . Total damages to personal property for the tenant $92.50 5. . . . Towels (cleaning and replacement) $ 92.50 Total damages for tenant subject to set off $342.50 Security . . .
. . . . § 92.50(l) II. Each claimant was employed by an affected employer. . . . claimants reversed without considering whether they were covered employees on the basis that section 92.50 . . . apply to determinations of entitlement under the California Unemployment Insurance Code. 29 C.F.R. § 92.50 . . .
. . . Elevator Patronage Dividend 72.00 Farming Rent 17,181.50 Gasoline Tax Credit 61.00 Gasoline Tax Refund 92.50 . . .
. . . Elevator Patronage Dividend 72.00 Farming Rent 17,181.50 Gasoline Tax Credit 61.00 Gasoline Tax Refund 92.50 . . .
. . . Florida Statute § 92.50, which governs oaths, affidavits, and acknowledgments, requires that an acknowledgment . . . Thus, Fla.Stat. §§ 695.03, 92.50, and 117.07, when read in para materia, provide that if an instrument . . . Gi-bralter urges that the document substantially complies with the requirements of Fla.Stat. §§ 695.03, 92.50 . . .
. . . . § 92.50(c) (reconsideration of a Redwood benefit application is subject to time limits applicable to . . .
. . . Elevator Patronage Dividend 72.00 Farming Rent 17,181.50 Gasoline Tax Credit 61.00 Gasoline Tax Refund 92.50 . . .
. . . . § 92.50(c) (1984); Cal.Unemp.Ins.Code § 1382 (West 1972 & Supp.1985). . . . receive benefits in November 1979, and was not advised of his ineligibility until April 1980. 29 C.F.R. § 92.50 . . .
. . . The third exception, where the rate was $92.50, was a case that had been taken over from another firm . . .
. . . F.S. 92.50 Oaths, affidavits, and acknowledgments; who may take or administer; requirements. 22 U.S.C . . .
. . . . § 92.50(c) (reconsideration of Redwood Act determinations to be made according to California unemployment . . .
. . . that Demarinis was not “laid off” and therefore not eligible for REPP benefits, and that 29 C.F.R. 92.50 . . . Twenty-nine C.F.R. 92.50(c) and Cal.Un-emp.Ins.Code § 1332 provide that the EDD may, for good cause, . . . . § 92.50(c) provides that the EDD may reconsider determinations of eligibility on the same terms and . . .
. . . . § 92.50(c), bar the Secretary from reconsidering Jackson’s eligibility for Redwood Act benefits. . . .
. . . . §§ 92.50(g), 92.-50(m), and direct the Assistant Secretary, when hearing an appeal, to “ascertain whether . . . party has occurred, regardless of whether such error is alleged by an appealing party.” 29 C.F.R. § 92.50 . . .
. . . . §§ 92.1-92.50 (1983). . . . .
. . . The close resulted in a profit of $92.50. . . . The third trade again of November 1980 lumber resulted in a profit of $92.50. . . .
. . . See 29 C.F.R. 92.50(r). . . .
. . . Notwithstanding § 92.50 of this part, after the effective date of this section, an affected employee . . .
. . . Plaintiff asks to be compensated at the rates of $97.90 for work by its senior attorneys, $92.50 for . . .
. . . However, in McManus, the statute on oaths, affidavits and acknowledgments Section 92.50, Florida Statutes . . .
. . . See sections 92.50, 92.51 and 695.25, Florida Statutes (1979). . . . See again sections 92.50 and 92.51 as well as 5 Bigham, Tennessee Practice § 1115. . . .
. . . Therefore, it benefited to the extent of $92.50 and suffered no actual damages. . . . Summary Procedure 7.100(a) bars his recovery of any differential remaining in the respondent’s hands ($92.50 . . .
. . . a circuit judge, in the usual course of his duties, would administer a lawful oath pursuant to F.S. 92.50 . . .
. . . In fact, two invoices from our court reporter, dated June 10, 1976 and June 21, 1976, totalling $92.50 . . . This $92.50 charge was based on an expedited delivery rate. . . .
. . . Clothing. 150.00 Incidentals.42.00 Medical and dental.10.00 Transportation. 135.00 Recreation and club.92.50 . . .
. . . 591.00 36.642.00 1974 75.00 335.50 25,162.50 1975 81.25 261.50 21,246.87 1976 88.75 77.50 6,878.12 1977 92.50 . . .
. . . 591.00 36.642.00 1974 75.00 335.50 25,162.50 1975 81.25 261.50 21,246.87 1976 88.75 77.50 6,878.12 1977 92.50 . . .
. . . Karnowski 93.50 Caucasian Male Franeoise Euliss 92.50 Caucasian Female George Ramirez 92.50 Mexican-American . . . Karnowski 93.50 Caucasian Male Francoise Euliss 92.50 Caucasian Female George Ramirez 92.50 Mexican- . . .
. . . control of Kirby’s stock to 95%; the purchase prices during the period 1968-1973 ranged from $65 to $92.50 . . .
. . . Attorneys' Fees Question Total 1.50 (1) Trial Work — Hearing 0 1.50 (2) Pre-Trial Work on the Merits 92.50 . . . Hourly Rate Hours Logged Total (1) Trial Work-Hearing $65.00 0 (2) Pre-Trial Work on the Merits 50.00 92.50 . . .
. . . .$ 108.75 $ 92.50 2nd Quarter............................... 121.50 97.13 3rd Quarter................ . . .
. . . period from 1968 through 1973, Santa Fe affiliates purchased shares at prices ranging from $65.00 to $92.50 . . .
. . . Also located was some old office furniture, subsequently appraised at $92.50, being held by Charisma’ . . .
. . . months at 261.06= 3,132.72 12 months at 183.34= 2,200.08 12 months at 129.85= 1,538.20 . 5 month at 92.50 . . .
. . . Roush 145.21 Edythe Fulkerson 82.00 Virginia Johnston 92.50 Ida Paine 365.97 Helen Perry 232.97 Gladys . . .
. . . Virginia 18.1-96, that is, attempting to employ as true an American Express Money Order in the amount of $92.50 . . .
. . . have had a primary insurance amount of $115.60 and would have been entitled to monthly payments of $92.50 . . .
. . . In addition to the items mentioned, a claim for the sum of $92.50, for exemplification of copies of documents . . .
. . . June 8th of that year he received his final paycheck in the amount of $74.39, based on gross wages of $92.50 . . . a “corrected” withholding tax statement in place of the one prepared by his employer, omitting the $92.50 . . . Having realized on the check in 1962, he reported the $92.50 on his return for that year, which, as he . . . He was then advised by the District Director’s office that the $92.50 in wages should have been reported . . .
. . . aggregating $745.61, an amount of $2,350, which was retained by the Realty Co., and plus an amount of $92.50 . . .
. . . ready for shipment to tbe United States was the invoice unit values plus export shipping charge of $92.50 . . . involved, and I hold that such statutory value is the invoice unit values, plus export shipping charge of $92.50 . . .
. . . case is close, I do not believe that plaintiff would have been paid in any one week such sums as $90, $92.50 . . .