The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . ./94.82% 5,715/95.12% $35,069,584/5.18% 293/4.88% Class 4 $6,906,309/99.84% 38/97.44% $11,160/0.16% 1 . . .
. . . Andy Chang, opines that this difference causes African Americans to be underrepresented on jury panels 95.12% . . .
. . . . § 5:12-95.12 through 95.16. . . .
. . . disputed property since 1995, the Sniezeks’ counterclaim was foreclosed as a matter of law by section 95.12 . . . issue of material fact as to whether their counterclaim for ejectment was time-barred under section 95.12 . . . Skidmore, 842 So.2d 1003, 1005 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (referring to section 95.12 as an additional basis . . . Wheeler, 498 So.2d 1039, 1042 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (stating that the requirement of sei-sin under section 95.12 . . .
. . . . § 95.12 (recovery of real property). I agree with Realty. . . .
. . . See § 95.12, Fla. Stat. (1975). . . .
. . . . § 95.12 (real property actions). . . .
. . . Thus sections 95.12 and 95.14 are inapplicable because they govern actions to recover real property. . . . See Kempfer (section 95.12 does not apply to action for rescission of grant of easement). . . .
. . . , therefore, is governed by a seven year statute of limitations, as specified in Florida Statutes § 95.12 . . .
. . . . § 95.12 (real property actions). . . .
. . . Section 95.12, Florida Statutes (1985), provides: “No action to recover real property or its possession . . .
. . . Appellees assert that the seven year statute of limitation contained in § 95.12 bars the appellants’ . . . Section 95.12, Fla. . . . Cases falling within the ambit of § 95.12 deal generally with actions to recover possession of realty . . . recover real property or its possession” within the meaning of the seven year limitation period in § 95.12 . . .
. . . net income for the week after various withholdings mandated by state and federal law would have been $95.12 . . .
. . . Real property actions are governed by Section 95.12, providing that “[n]o action to recover real property . . .
. . . owners against unknown persons unknown by the plaintiff to be in adverse possession of real property (§§ 95.12 . . .
. . . trial court ruled that plaintiffs’ causes of action were barred by the statute of limitations, section 95.12 . . . Limitations In this case, the trial court found the plaintiffs’ cause of action was barred by section 95.12 . . . We disagree that section 95.12 bars the plaintiffs’ cause of action pertaining to the easements. . . . is an incoporeal interest in land, under no circumstances would the fee owner be affected by section 95.12 . . . Concealment of an alleged fraud, would prevent section 95.12 from running from the date of the deed and . . .
. . . prison regulations which govern inmate complaints brought against other prisoners. 37 Pa.Code §§ 95.1-95.12 . . .
. . . Ill, at 217, ¶ 55, 95.12% of the direct costs billed was allocated to EIS and EA preparation, Rec., vol . . .
. . . Gulf Power counters by citation to section 95.12, which provides that an “action to recover real property . . . Gulf Power’s citation to section 95.12 also misses the mark conceptually; as owner of an easement only . . . Power is not now and was never “seized or possessed” of the property in the sense prescribed by section 95.12 . . .
. . . Appellee also raised a statute of limitations defense (§ 95.12, Florida Statutes) and asserted that the . . .
. . . In our prior decision, we held that the statute of limitations, Section 95.12, Florida Statutes (1963 . . .
. . . The first of these is § 95.12, Florida Statutes, which provides as follows: “No action to recover real . . . We,. therefore, conclude that this action is not barred by § 95.12, Florida Statutes, as modified by . . .
. . . Section 95.12, Florida Statutes, provides that no action for the recovery of real property shall be maintained . . .
. . . . § 95.12 and § 95.14, F.S.A. provide that no action may be brought to recover real property unless the . . .
. . . . § 95.12 and § 95.14 provide that no action may be brought to recover real property unless the plaintiff . . .
. . . The court further found that the statute of limitations, specifically §§ 95.12 and 95.14, Fla.Stat., . . .
. . . Larson on Workmen’s Compensation Law, section 95.12, states as follows— The Massachusetts and Michigan . . .
. . . and on December 27, 1938, took the civil service examination of the city and made a passing grade of 95.12% . . .