Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 101.24 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 101.24 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 101.24

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS
Chapter 101
VOTING METHODS AND PROCEDURE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 101.24
101.24 Ballot boxes and ballots.The supervisor of elections shall prepare for each polling place one ballot box of sufficient size to contain all the ballots of the particular precinct, and the ballot box shall be plainly marked with the name of the precinct for which it is intended. An additional ballot box, if necessary, may be supplied to any precinct. Before each election, the supervisor shall place in the ballot box or ballot transfer container as many ballots as are required in s. 101.21. After securely sealing the ballot box or ballot transfer container, the supervisor shall send the ballot box or ballot transfer container to the clerk or inspector of election of the precinct in which it is to be used. The clerk or inspector shall be placed under oath or affirmation to perform his or her duties faithfully and without favor or prejudice to any political party.
History.s. 26, ch. 3879, 1889; RS 180; s. 7, ch. 4328, 1895; s. 7, ch. 4537, 1897; GS 203; RGS 247; CGL 303; s. 1, ch. 17898, 1937; s. 1, ch. 24088, 1947; s. 11, ch. 25035, 1949; s. 1, ch. 25384, 1949; s. 5, ch. 26870, 1951; s. 12, ch. 65-380; s. 16, ch. 77-175; s. 2, ch. 86-200; s. 560, ch. 95-147; s. 9, ch. 2001-40.
Note.Former s. 99.02.

F.S. 101.24 on Google Scholar

F.S. 101.24 on Casetext

Amendments to 101.24


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 101.24
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 101.24.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

CENTRAL SIERRA ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE CENTER, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE,, 916 F. Supp. 2d 1078 (E.D. Cal. 2013)

. . . routes available for motorized use, closing only 10.66 miles of NFTS trails to public use, opening 101.24 . . .

YOUSUF, M. D. v. COHLMIA, M. D., 718 F. Supp. 2d 1279 (N.D. Okla. 2010)

. . . in forcing the willful wrongdoer to pay the consequences of the misconduct. 7 Couch on Insurance § 101.24 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ONE STAR CLASS SLOOP SAILBOAT BUILT IN WITH HULL NUMBER NAMED FLASH II, 546 F.3d 26 (1st Cir. 2008)

. . . ruling, the district court found that Crosby had a valid interest at least equal to the amount ($26,-101.24 . . .

GRIFE, v. ALLSTATE FLORIDIAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 493 F. Supp. 2d 1249 (S.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . That leaves $69,821 remaining, of which Plaintiffs share was $101.24 based on his percentage of ownership . . . of the remaining $69,821, the amount not reduced or eliminated by the Master Deductible, which was $101.24 . . . Because the Policy deductible is $250, an amount greater than $101.24, Plaintiff received no payment. . . .

In OVERSTREET,, 23 B.R. 712 (Bankr. W.D. La. 1982)

. . . repayment, rather than being forced into a Chapter 7 liquidation proceeding”. 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 101.24 . . .

In McGOWAN, s, 24 B.R. 73 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1982)

. . . a living upon the result of his or her own individual effort, see 2 Collier on Bankruptcy paragraph 101.24 . . .

In STEWART, PHILADELPHIA SAVING FUND SOCIETY, v. STEWART,, 7 B.R. 921 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1981)

. . . commissions and expenses and $168.76 will go to PSFS for the current mortgage payment, leaving only $101.24 . . .

In HOWELL,, 4 B.R. 102 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1980)

. . . See also, 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 101.24 (15th Ed.). . . .

In BUREN,, 4 B.R. 109 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1980)

. . . See also, 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 101.24 (15th Ed.). . . .

MANIACI v. W. WARREN, A., 314 F. Supp. 853 (W.D. Wis. 1970)

. . . .; that the Attorney General of Wisconsin is required by § 101.24(2), Wis.Stats. to prosecute such action . . .

UNITED STATES v. B. HOWE,, 349 F.2d 483 (9th Cir. 1965)

. . . Under the applicable regulation, section 101.24 of Treasury Regulation 43 (1941 Ed.), “Every club or . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. DELSEA IRON WORKS, INC., 334 F.2d 67 (3d Cir. 1964)

. . . On August 11, the Company, apparently pursuant to § 101.24(a) of the Board’s Rules, appealed the dismissal . . . This section provides: “§ 101.24 Final disposition of a charge which has been pending investigation of . . . (Supp.1964) § 101.24.) . . . .

SHAW, v. UNITED STATES, 253 F. Supp. 703 (E.D. Mich. 1963)

. . . Excise Tax (1954 Code), Section 49.4241(e) (1); Treasury Regulations 43 (1941 ed.) (1939 Code) Sec. 101.24 . . .

PORTER, Jr. v. UNITED STATES, 197 F. Supp. 171 (S.D. Tex. 1961)

. . . A Treasury ruling on Section 101.24 of Treasury Regulations 43 defined “any period of more than six days . . .

VECELLIO, v. UNITED STATES TAMPLIN, v. UNITED STATES TAMPLIN, v. UNITED STATES IRLE, v. UNITED STATES TABOR, v. UNITED STATES McKINNEY, v. UNITED STATES A. THORNHILL, III, v. UNITED STATES, 196 F. Supp. 1 (D.W. Va. 1961)

. . . Supp. 388; 26 C.F.R. 101.24. . Downtown Club of Dallas v. . . .

DOWN TOWN ASSOCIATION OF CITY OF NEW YORK, v. UNITED STATES, 278 F.2d 313 (2d Cir. 1960)

. . . Treasury Regulation 43, § 101.24-.25, 26 C.F.R. §§ 101.24-.25: “101.24. . . .

ENGINEERS CLUB OF LOS ANGELES, a v. UNITED STATES, 173 F. Supp. 934 (S.D. Cal. 1959)

. . . Under Tr.Reg. 43, 101.24 and all cited cases, determination of the social or nonsocial status of a club . . .

W. LAVIDGE v. UNITED STATES, 159 F. Supp. 376 (Ct. Cl. 1958)

. . . The Act does not define a social, athletic, or sporting club, but section 101.24 of Treasury Regulations . . .

ARTHUR W. LAVIDGE v. THE UNITED STATES, 141 Ct. Cl. 634 (Ct. Cl. 1958)

. . . The Act does not define a social, athletic, or sporting club,, but section 101.24 of Treasury Eegulations . . .

J. McINTYRE v. UNITED STATES, 151 F. Supp. 388 (D. Md. 1957)

. . . Sec. 101.24 provides in substance that organizations having social, athletic or sporting features are . . .

INSURANCE CLUB OF DALLAS, v. UNITED STATES, 241 F.2d 830 (5th Cir. 1957)

. . . . § 1710, and the applicable Treasury Regulation 43 (1941 edition, Sections 101.24 and 101.25) is -a . . .

DOWNTOWN CLUB OF DALLAS, v. UNITED STATES, 240 F.2d 159 (5th Cir. 1957)

. . . The regulations implementing the statute provide that: “Sec. 101.24 Determination of Character of Club . . . Reg. 43 (1941 Ed.) §§ 101.24, 101.25. . . .

ROCKEFELLER CENTER LUNCHEON CLUB, v. W. JOHNSON, ROCKEFELLER CENTER LUNCHEON CLUB, v. T. HIGGINS,, 131 F. Supp. 703 (S.D.N.Y. 1955)

. . . however, two relevant Regulations of the Treasury Department which treat with the-subject. 26 C.F.R. 101.24 . . . and 101.25, so far as material provide: 101.24 “Determination of character of club. — The purposes and . . . As 26 C.F.R. 101.24, supra, provides, the purpose and activities of a club, and not its name, determine . . .

UPTOWN CLUB OF MANHATTAN, v. UNITED STATES, 83 F. Supp. 823 (Ct. Cl. 1949)

. . . The regulations of the Treasury Department, Treasury Regulations 43, secs. 101.24 and 101.25, are to . . .

THE UPTOWN CLUB OF MANHATTAN, INCORPORATED v. THE UNITED STATES, 113 Ct. Cl. 422 (Ct. Cl. 1949)

. . . The regulations of the Treasury Department (Treasury Regulations 43, secs. 101.24 and 101.25) are to . . .

TURKS HEAD CLUB v. BRODERICK, 166 F.2d 877 (1st Cir. 1948)

. . . Regulations 43 (1941 ed.), the following elaboration of the phrase appears (26 Code Fed.Reg., Supp.1941, §§ 101.24 . . . , 101.25): “§ 101.24 Determination of character of club. . . .

TURKS HEAD CLUB v. BRODERICK, 71 F. Supp. 272 (D.R.I. 1947)

. . . .) : “Sec. 101.24 Determination of Character of Club. . . .

In DENVER R. G. W. R. CO., 38 F. Supp. 120 (D. Colo. 1941)

. . . The Rio Grande Junction bonds receive 101.24 per cent, of their principal and 79.14 per cent, of their . . .

THOMPSON, v. BOISSELIER SAME v. SAME McNAB HARLAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. THOMPSON, EATON v. SAME, 114 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1885)

. . . was made in one suit, for $1,200 damages and $118.74 costs, and in the other for $415 damages ánd $101.24 . . .

, 17 Fla. 289 (Fla. 1879)

. . . The latter date is the date of completion of the lien, and only $101.24 of the account was made after . . .