Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 101.34 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 101.34 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 101.34

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS
Chapter 101
VOTING METHODS AND PROCEDURE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 101.34
101.34 Custody of voting system.The supervisor of elections shall be the custodian of the voting system in the county, and he or she shall appoint deputies necessary to prepare and supervise the voting system prior to and during elections. The compensation for such deputies shall be paid by the supervisor of elections.
History.s. 3-A, ch. 22018, 1943; s. 4, ch. 24089, 1947; s. 5, ch. 26870, 1951; s. 16, ch. 65-380; s. 18, ch. 77-175; s. 3, ch. 80-20; s. 567, ch. 95-147; s. 11, ch. 2001-40.
Note.Former s. 100.42.

F.S. 101.34 on Google Scholar

F.S. 101.34 on Casetext

Amendments to 101.34


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 101.34
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 101.34.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

RECON REFRACTORY CONSTRUCTION INC. AFL- CIO, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,, 424 F.3d 980 (9th Cir. 2005)

. . . . §§ 101.34, 102.90. . . .

DERMINER, v. KRAMER,, 386 F. Supp. 2d 905 (E.D. Mich. 2005)

. . . Camps, Inc., 384 F.3d 1220, 1224 (10th Cir.2004); 15 Moore’s Federal Practice § 101.34 (3d. ed.). . . . evidentiary hearing to decide whether Plaintiff has demonstrated standing. 15 Moore’s Federal Practice § 101.34 . . .

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, v. NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY, v. H. HARCUM,, 8 F.3d 175 (4th Cir. 1993)

. . . Based on the improper classification, the Claimant had received $101.34 per week in excess benefits during . . . News was entitled to a credit against future benefit payments owed to the Claimant in the amount of $101.34 . . . The Board’s holding permits Newport News to credit its payments due to the Claimant by $101.34 per week . . .

N. RATLEY, Jr. v. BATCHELOR,, 599 So. 2d 1298 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . unless such violation was a proximate cause of the injury.” 4 Blashfield, Automobile Law and Practice § 101.34 . . .

In LEONARD JED COMPANY,, 118 B.R. 339 (Bankr. D. Md. 1990)

. . . Reduction in hours: 13.9 Reduction in fee: $1,780.87 SENIOR ASSOCIATE: PAULA KRAHN MERKLE (Average rate: $101.34 . . .

In LEONARD JED COMPANY,, 103 B.R. 706 (Bankr. D. Md. 1989)

. . . Merkle Associate 101.34 Josef E. Rosenblatt Associate 110.00 Kathleen G. . . . Lebowitz 47.8 X REASONABLE CUSTOMARY HOURS RATE $128.12 94.23 101.34 110.00 $1,127.46 4,391.12 1,449.16 . . .

In COORDINATED PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN PETROLEUM PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION, M. D. L. CITY OF LONG BEACH v. EXXON CORPORATION,, 830 F.2d 198 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Sec. 101.34(a)(2), did not exempt the sale of “net profits oil” by the appellees from the price control . . .

AFRAM EXPORT CORP. a v. METALLURGIKI HALYPS, S. A. a, 592 F. Supp. 446 (E.D. Wis. 1984)

. . . Such sale established a damage determining resale price of $103 per gross ton (or $101.34 per metric . . .

SUTTON v. R. BLOOM,, 710 F.2d 1188 (6th Cir. 1983)

. . . , appeals from a jury verdict and judgment against him in this housing discrimination case for $33,-101.34 . . .

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL NO. v. SULLIVAN TRANSFER, INC., 650 F.2d 669 (5th Cir. 1981)

. . . The hearing procedure is set out in section 101.34 of the N.L.R.B. . . . . § 101.34 (1980): If the parties have to adjusted the dispute or agreed upon methods of voluntary adjustment . . .

In S. J. LANFORD, S. J. LANFORD, v. NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY,, 10 B.R. 129 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1981)

. . . Harris for failure to pay telephone charges of approximately $101.34. 9. . . . Lanford, Northwestern Bell requested that she pay telephone charges of $101.34 owed by Reginald A. . . . Lanford paid Northwestern Bell $101.34. 12. . . . Lanford, the sum of $101.34, together with interest from the date of this order. . . .

INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE TELEGRAPH CORP. COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS DIVISION v. LOCAL INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL- CIO,, 419 U.S. 428 (U.S. 1975)

. . . issues and the evidence, but makes no recommendations in regard to resolution of the dispute.” 29 CFR § 101.34 . . . The Board’s regulations, 29 CFR §101.34, require the hearing officer to transmit the record to the Board . . .

I. STOCKTON R. v. LUCAS, 482 F.2d 979 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . . § 101.34(h), formerly § 101.32(h), 37 F.Reg. 21788 (Nov. 13, 1971) , amended by 37 F.Reg. 21952 (Nov . . .

SHELL CHEMICAL COMPANY, a DIVISION OF SHELL OIL COMPANY, a v. TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO., 353 F. Supp. 480 (D.N.J. 1973)

. . . This is promulgated in 29 C.F.R. 101.34 which states: See. 101.34 Hearing — If the parties have not adjusted . . .

MASS RETAILING INSTITUTE, INC. v. COST OF LIVING COUNCIL, 468 F.2d 948 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . . § 101.34(a), makes the task of judicial review more difficult, there is enough before us to demonstrate . . .

A. BADOWSKI v. UNITED STATES, 278 F.2d 934 (Ct. Cl. 1960)

. . . Under the commercial license, the average unit price per device was approximately $101.34 and the five . . .

WITOLD A. BADOWSKI v. THE UNITED STATES, 150 Ct. Cl. 482 (Ct. Cl. 1960)

. . . Under the commercial license, the average unit price per device was approximately $101.34 and the five . . . The average sale price for these 853 devices was approximately $101.34 per device, and the royalty paid . . .

C. v. v., 11 T.C. 341 (T.C. 1948)

. . . 877.86 Less: Surtax exemption_ 1,000. 00 Surtax net income_$2,877.86 Normal tax at 3% on $3,377.86_ $101.34 . . .

GUARANTY TRUST CO. OF NEW YORK v. GRAND RAPIDS, G. H. M. RY. CO. GRAND RAPIDS TRUST CO. v. UNITED LIGHT POWER CO., 7 F. Supp. 511 (W.D. Mich. 1931)

. . . 195,543.67 1,310,746.01 1907 1,506,289.68 236,862.04 1,269,427.64 1908 1,535,233.64 279,132.30 1,256*101.34 . . .

In BECK, 238 F. 653 (S.D.N.Y. 1915)

. . . cjty paymaster has retained the proper proportion of Beck’s wages, until he has in hand the sum of $101.34 . . .