Cases from cite.case.law:

RUIZ, v. G. FARIAS,, 43 So. 3d 124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . House of Representatives until the State Canvassing Commission certifies her election under section 102.111 . . .

B G BUILDING MAINTENANCE, INCORPORATED, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. B G, 123 F. App'x 551 (4th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 102.111(c). . . .

AWREY BAKERIES, INCORPORATED S UFCW, AFL- CIO- CLC v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, 59 F. App'x 690 (6th Cir. 2003)

. . . . §§ 102.111 and 102.112. The Union argues the exceptions were mailed the day before the deadline. . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. U. S. A. POLYMER CORP., 272 F.3d 289 (5th Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 102.111(c). . . . Board (in its order denying the motions for reconsideration) thereafter goes on to hold that section 102.111 . . . (c) governs acceptance of late filings, and that section 102.111(c) allows the Board to consider late . . . undue prejudice would result” and makes specific provision for acceptance of late filings. 29 C.F.R. § 102.111 . . . clear that the Board does possess at least some discretion under both section 102.48(d) and section 102.111 . . .

HOSPITAL DEL MAESTRO, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,, 263 F.3d 173 (1st Cir. 2001)

. . . Rule § 102.111(b). . . . Id. § 102.111(c). . . . That same day, the Board sent a letter advising the Hospital that, under the provisions of § 102.111 . . .

BUSH v. GORE, 531 U.S. 98 (U.S. 2000)

. . . . §102.111. Cf. Boardman v. . . . The Elections Canvassing Commission must then certify the results of the election. §102.111(1). . . . . §102.166 (Supp. 2001) (foreseeing manual recounts during the protest period) with § 102.111 (setting . . . to be conducted); compare § 102.112(1) (stating that the Secretary “may” ignore late returns) with § 102.111 . . . . §102.111 (Supp. 2001) or the word “may” in § 102.112 governs the scope of the Secretary of State’s . . .

PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, v. HARRIS, v. v., 772 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 2000)

. . . Second, the language in sections 102.111 and 102.112, authorizing the Secretary to ignore amended or . . . The recount provision thus conflicts with sections 102.111 and 102.112, which state that the Boards “ . . . In the present case, the provision in section 102.111 stating that the Department “shall” ignore late . . . See § 102.111, Fla. Stat. . . . See § 102.111, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . . .

GORE, Jr. I. v. HARRIS,, 772 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. 2000)

. . . See §§ 102.111, .121, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . . . recounts at all costs, the Court is asked to ... (5) substitute the certification process of Section 102.111 . . .

C. TOUCHSTON, v. McDERMOTT, a a, 234 F.3d 1133 (11th Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 102.111(1); Fla. Stat. § 102.112. . . . Stat. § 102.111(1). . . . Stat. § 102.111(1). . . .

L. SIEGEL, v. LEPORE, E., 234 F.3d 1163 (11th Cir. 2000)

. . . . §§ 102.111 and 102.112, until November 26, 2000, which is 19 days after the election. . . .

BUSH v. PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, 531 U.S. 70 (U.S. 2000)

. . . . §102.166 (2000) and the timeframe for submitting county returns under §§102.111 and 102.112, and (b . . . ) between § 102.111, which provides that the Secretary “shall. . . ignor[e]” late election returns, and . . . With regard to the second issue, the court held that the “shall. . . ignorfe]” provision of § 102.111 . . . The 7-day. deadline of § 102.111, assuming it would have applied, was effectively extended by 12 days . . .

PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, v. HARRIS, v. v., 772 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. 2000)

. . . Second, the mandatory language in section 102.111 conflicts with the permissive language in 102.112. . . . Whereas section 102.111 is mandatory, section 102.112 is permissive. . . . See § 102.111, Fla. Stat. . . . See § 102.111, Fla. Stat. . § 97.012, Fla. Stat. (2000). . § 98.015, Fla. . . . Stat. (2000). . §§ 102.1 ll-.l 12, Fla.Stat. (2000). . §§ 102.111, .121, Fla. . . .

SIEGEL, S. D. W. v. LEPORE, E. Jr., 120 F. Supp. 2d 1041 (S.D. Fla. 2000)

. . . . § 102.111(1); Fla. Stat. § 102.112. . . . Stat. § 102.111(1). . . . Board has adopted a motion stating that it will comply with the requirements of Florida Statutes, § 102.111 . . . state or federal judicial relief from the time limit for certification provided in Florida Statutes, § 102.111 . . .

E. W. GROBBEL SONS, INC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,, 176 F.3d 875 (6th Cir. 1999)

. . . a)(2) of EAJA and its thirty-day period for pursuing an application for fees and expenses, and on § 102.111 . . . The Board’s Rule 102.111(b) is not applicable to filings in this court. . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. CONTINENTAL HAGEN CORPORATION,, 932 F.2d 828 (9th Cir. 1991)

. . . Pursuant to NLRB Rules and Regulations, § 102.111, the five day period provided for in the Order began . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. CONTINENTAL HAGEN CORPORATION,, 932 F.2d 828 (9th Cir. 1991)

. . . Pursuant to NLRB Rules and Regulations, § 102.111, the five day period provided for in the Order began . . .

FATHER SONS LUMBER AND BUILDING SUPPLIES, INC. T. T. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,, 931 F.2d 1093 (6th Cir. 1991)

. . . . § 102.111(b). . . .

ALLGOOD, v. ELYRIA UNITED METHODIST HOME, 904 F.2d 373 (6th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 102.111(a). We must give deference to an agency’s interpretation of its own enabling statute. . . .

STATE CHAPPELL, Jr. v. MARTINEZ,, 536 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 1988)

. . . We find that the Flagler County Canvassing Board substantially complied with section 102.111, Florida . . . Section 102.111, Florida Statutes (1987), provides that county canvassing boards shall forward election . . . Chappell, therefore, argues that section 102.111 mandátes that the Flagler County votes not be counted . . . Contrary to Chappell’s claim, we do not find that section 102.111’s “all missing counties” language turns . . . There has been substantial, and perhaps complete, compliance with section 102.111. . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. CINCINNATI BRONZE, INC., 829 F.2d 585 (6th Cir. 1987)

. . . . § 102.111(b), the Board did not serve a copy of the subpoena on CBI’s attorney. . . .

VOKAS PROVISION CO. d b a v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,, 796 F.2d 864 (6th Cir. 1986)

. . . . § 102.111(a) (1985); see also 29 U.S.C. § 161(4). . . .

REPUBLICAN STATE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, a v. GRAHAM,, 388 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 1980)

. . . . § 102.111(1), Fla.Stat. (1979). . Ch. 6469, § 27, Laws of Fla. (1913). . . . . declares the winner of contested positions only, and no mention of unopposed candidates is made in section 102.111 . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. PRESTON H. HASKELL COMPANY,, 616 F.2d 136 (5th Cir. 1980)

. . . . §§ 102.111(a) and 102.113(a), provide that “[cjharges . may be served . by registered mail” and that . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. ZENO TABLE COMPANY, INC., 610 F.2d 567 (9th Cir. 1979)

. . . . § 102.111(b) (1978). . . . determine which office should be considered Long’s “principal office” for service of process (29 C.F.R. § 102.111 . . .

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND MACHINE WORKERS, AFL- CIO- CLC, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND MACHINE WORKERS, AFL- CIO- CLC, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. EAST DAYTON TOOL AND DIE CO. AFL- CIO- CLC, I. U. E. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, AFL- CIO- CLC,, 610 F.2d 956 (D.C. Cir. 1979)

. . . . § 102.111(a) & (c) (1978). . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. AUTOTRONICS, INC., 596 F.2d 322 (8th Cir. 1979)

. . . . §§ 102.111(b), 102.126, 102.-128(e), 102.129(a). . . . the Respondent, settlement discussions commenced and culminated into this Agreement. . 29 C.F.R. § 102.111 . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. C. E. STRICKLAND, 220 F. Supp. 661 (W.D. Tenn. 1962)

. . . . § 102.111(a), have adopted this interpretation of the Act. . . .