The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS

Chapter 110
STATE EMPLOYMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 110.405

110.405 Advisory committees.—The Secretary of Management Services may at any time appoint an ad hoc or continuing advisory committee consisting of members of the Senior Management Service or other persons knowledgeable in the field of personnel management. Any such committee shall consist of not more than nine members, who shall serve at the pleasure and meet at the call of the secretary, to advise and consult with the secretary on such matters affecting the Senior Management Service as the secretary requests. Members shall serve without compensation, but shall be entitled to receive reimbursement for travel expenses as provided in s. 112.061. The secretary may periodically hire a consultant with expertise in personnel management to advise him or her with respect to the administration of the Senior Management Service.

History.—s. 1, ch. 80-404; s. 3, ch. 81-213; ss. 5, 13, 14, ch. 85-318; ss. 1, 2, ch. 89-13; s. 36, ch. 92-279; s. 55, ch. 92-326; s. 18, ch. 94-113; s. 1, ch. 94-259; s. 669, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 110.405 on Google Scholar

F.S. 110.405 on Casetext

Amendments to 110.405

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 110.405

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 110.405.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 84 Fed. Cl. 408 (Fed. Cl. 2008)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice 110.405[1], pp. 621-624 (2d ed.1974) (hereinafter IB Moore); Restatement (Second . . .

L. CAMPBELL, v. UNITED STATES,, 38 Fed. Cl. 524 (Fed. Cl. 1997)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice 110.405[1], pp. 621-624 (2d ed.1974) (hereinafter IB Moore); Restatement (Second . . .

KRAFT, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 30 Fed. Cl. 739 (Fed. Cl. 1994)

. . . Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice, 110.405[8], at 239 (2d ed. 1991) [hereinafter IB Moore’s Federal . . . contradictory state [of facts] whenever self-interest may dictate a change.” 1B Moore’s Federal Practice, 110.405 . . .

In RIVERSIDE NURSING HOME, a REDNEL TOWER, LTD. v. RIVERSIDE NURSING HOME,, 144 B.R. 951 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice 110.405[7] (2d ed. 1983). . . .

In NEMOVITZ, W. FIELDS, v. NEMOVITZ, a k a, 142 B.R. 472 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1992)

. . . Moore, Fed.Prac. 110.405[1] (2nd Ed.1974). . . .

COMMODITIES EXPORT CO. a v. U. S. CUSTOMS SERVICE, U. S., 957 F.2d 223 (6th Cir. 1992)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice 110.405[4. . . . See also 18 Wright, supra, § 4428; IB Moore, supra, 110.405[4. . . .

PITTMAN, v. LaFONTAINE, Ed, 756 F. Supp. 834 (D.N.J. 1991)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice 110.405(1) at 622-624 (2d ed. 1974)). . . .

In COMSTOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., 111 B.R. 849 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1990)

. . . Moitie, 452 U.S. 394, 101 S.Ct. 2424, 69 L.Ed.2d 103 (1981); IB Moore’s Federal Practice 110.405[11] . . .

EASON, v. LINDEN AVIONICS, INC., 706 F. Supp. 311 (D.N.J. 1989)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice 110.405(1) at 622-624 (2d ed. 1974)). . . .

DAVID, v. SHOWTIME THE MOVIE CHANNEL, INC., 697 F. Supp. 752 (S.D.N.Y. 1988)

. . . Currier, Moore’s Federal Practice 110.405[8] at 243 (2d ed. 1988) [hereinafter “Moore’s”]. . . .

NAPIER, Sr. E. v. THIRTY OR MORE UNIDENTIFIED FEDERAL AGENTS, EMPLOYEES OR OFFICERS, s a A A a, 855 F.2d 1080 (3d Cir. 1988)

. . . Wicker, Moore’s Federal Practice 110.405[1] at 179 (2d ed. 1984) (citing numerous cases). . . .

UNITED STATES, v. LEVASSEUR, a k a UNITED STATES, v. LEVASSEUR,, 846 F.2d 786 (1st Cir. 1988)

. . . Lucas, Moore’s Federal Practice 110.405[8] (2d ed. 1984) (citing Scarano v. Central R. . . .

SCAC TRANSPORT USA INC. v. S. S. DANAOS, USA, N. A. d b a DANAIS SHIPPING COMPANY, v. UNIVERSAL MARITIME SERVICE CORP., 845 F.2d 1157 (2d Cir. 1988)

. . . Currier, Moore’s Federal Practice 110.405[9], at 247-48 (2d ed. 1984); 18 C. Wright, A. Miller & E. . . .

UNITED STATES v. LEVASSEUR, J., 699 F. Supp. 965 (D. Mass. 1988)

. . . Lucas, Moore’s Federal Practice 110.405[8] (2d ed. 1984) (citing Scarano v. Central R. . . .

UNITED STATES v. HILL, Jr. M. E. a k a Sr. I E, 676 F. Supp. 1158 (N.D. Fla. 1987)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, 110.405(1), at 622-24 (2d ed. 1974)). . . .

MAGNUS ELECTRONICS, INC. v. LA REPUBLICA ARGENTINA,, 830 F.2d 1396 (7th Cir. 1987)

. . . Currier, Moore’s Federal Practice 110.405[5], at 223 (2d ed. 1984) (footnote omitted); see also Oglala . . . preclude a party from litigating the same cause of action in a court of competent jurisdiction, 1B Moore’s 110.405 . . .

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION,, 665 F. Supp. 402 (E.D. Pa. 1987)

. . . collateral estoppel, have as their basis the protection of final judgments, IB Moore’s Federal Practice .110.405 . . .

TOTAL PETROLEUM, INC. v. J. DAVIS, d b a J., 822 F.2d 734 (8th Cir. 1987)

. . . Currier, Moore’s Federal Practice, 110.405[8], at 238-39 (2d ed. 1984) [hereinafter cited as Moore’s . . .

UNITED STATES v. WIGHT, a k a, 819 F.2d 485 (4th Cir. 1987)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice 110.405(1), at 622-24 (2d ed. 1974)). . . .

In INDEPENDENT REFINING CORPORATION,, 65 B.R. 622 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 1986)

. . . IB Moore’s Federal Practice 110.405[1] at 178 (1984). . . .

PHILIP MORRIS, INC. v. BROWN WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORP., 641 F. Supp. 1438 (M.D. Ga. 1986)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice 110.405[8] at 239 (1984). . . .

PARK v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, 21 Fla. Supp. 2d 219 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1985)

. . . Statutes (Supp. 1984), which provides in pertinent part: In order to implement the purposes of ss. 110.401-110.405 . . .

In TELTRONICS SERVICES, INC. ANACONDA- ERICSSON INC. LM v. J. HESSEN, M. T. TELTRONICS SERVICES, INC. M. v. ANACONDA- ERICSSON INC. LM, 762 F.2d 185 (2d Cir. 1985)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice 110.405[1], at 186 n. 27 (1984). . . .

In TELTRONICS SERVICES, INC. ANACONDA- ERICSSON INC. LM v. J. HESSEN, M. T. TELTRONICS SERVICES, INC. M. v. ANACONDA- ERICSSON INC. LM, 762 F.2d 185 (2d Cir. 1985)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice 110.405 (1964). . . .

NESTLE COMPANY, INC. v. CHESTER S MARKET, INC. s, 596 F. Supp. 1445 (D. Conn. 1984)

. . . issues that were a part of the cause of action previously dealt with. 1B Moore’s Federal Practice, 110.405 . . .

SOUTHMARK PROPERTIES St. v. CHARLES HOUSE CORPORATION,, 742 F.2d 862 (5th Cir. 1984)

. . . letter law that a valid final judgment, even if erroneous, is not open to collateral attack, IB Moore’s 110.405 . . .

NESS INVESTMENT CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES, 595 F.2d 585 (Ct. Cl. 1979)

. . . dismissal of the previous action has been for lack of jurisdiction, see IB Moore’s Federal Practice, 110.405 . . .