Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 112.25 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 112.25 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 112.25

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS
Chapter 112
PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 112.25
112.25 Declaration of policy.The state recognizes that intergovernmental cooperation is an essential factor in resolving problems affecting this state and that the interchange of personnel between and among governmental agencies at the same or different levels of government is a significant factor in achieving such cooperation.
History.s. 1, ch. 65-524.

F.S. 112.25 on Google Scholar

F.S. 112.25 on Casetext

Amendments to 112.25


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 112.25
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 112.25.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In M. CONNER, M. v. U. S., 526 B.R. 218 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2015)

. . . pocket medical expenses, Plaintiff has $192.00 available from her health care spending account and $112.25 . . .

F. M. v., 135 T.C. 365 (T.C. 2010)

. . . Moss spent 112.25 hours traveling to and from the rental properties and 342.75 hours working on the rental . . .

YURMAN DESIGNS, INC. v. PAJ, INC. d b a, 125 F. Supp. 2d 54 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . PAJ calculated the challenged entries to constitute 5 hours of partner time, 112.25 hours of associates . . .

STUDENT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP OF NEW JERSEY, v. MONSANTO COMPANY, 721 F. Supp. 604 (D.N.J. 1989)

. . . ’s time slips, which are often illegible and/or missing their “classification codes”, approximately 112.25 . . . On that basis, I find a reduction of the Terris firm’s claim of 112.25 hours of travel time by one-third . . .

PROBE v. STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM, 780 F.2d 776 (9th Cir. 1986)

. . . ) Senior Associates’ hours 16,156.25 (129.25 hours at $125/hour) Junior Associates’ hours 6,735.00 (112.25 . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. SAGE REALTY CORPORATION,, 521 F. Supp. 263 (S.D.N.Y. 1981)

. . . which the Court has reduced to one-quarter hour, all of the time sought for discovery, or a total of 112.25 . . . Discovery 112.75 112.25 7,245.00 3. Conferences 30.00 30.00 1,942.50 4. . . .

MID- HUDSON LEGAL SERVICES, v. G U, INC., 465 F. Supp. 261 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)

. . . The attorneys’ hours claimed are: Reilly: 97.25 Szczygiel: _15_ Total: 112.25 hours Consideration of . . .

v., 46 Cust. Ct. 797 (Cust. Ct. 1961)

. . . GIS (AJ/BB) Selected G2S (AJ/AJ) 1/8" 51. 00 66.00 71. 00 81.00 106.00 5/32" 55.75 72.25 77.25 87.25 112.25 . . .

HOPE BASKET CO. v. PRODUCT ADVANCEMENT CORP., 104 F. Supp. 444 (W.D. Mich. 1952)

. . . said: “Plaintiff objects to the taxation of the cost of the reporter’s transcript in the amount of $112.25 . . .

KENYON v. AUTOMATIC INSTRUMENT CO., 10 F.R.D. 248 (W.D. Mich. 1950)

. . . Transcript of testimony for'use of court.............................. 112.25 Total............ $1,015.99 . . . Plaintiff objects to the taxation of the cost of the reporter’s transcript in the amount of $112.25. . . . However, it appears that plaintiff has already paid the court reporter $112.25, -or half of the -cost . . . Apparently the clerk was under the mistaken impression that the cost of the original transcript was $112.25 . . .

CRABB v. WELDEN BROS. WELDEN BROS. v. DEDRICK DEDRICK v. WELDEN BROS. C. F. LYTLE CO. v. PETERSON SAME v. VOLLUM, 164 F.2d 797 (8th Cir. 1947)

. . . $232.29 for overtime during the first six days work week, a similar sum as liquidated damages, and $112.25 . . .

In DONAHOE S, In GEO. K. STEVENSON CO., 29 F. Supp. 677 (D. Del. 1939)

. . . Zacharias will also be allowed One Hundred Twelve Dollars and twenty-five cents ($112.25) for his expenses . . . ........... 25,000.00 - Howard Zacharias .......................................................... 112.25 . . .

JOHNSON v. RUDOLPH, 16 F.2d 525 (D.C. Cir. 1926)

. . . The assessment against plaintiff’s property amounted to $3.17 per front foot, or a total of $6,-112.25 . . .