The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . (Ex. 13 at 21-22 113.02(b).) . . .
. . . Bankr.D.Conn.1990); In re Earl’s Tire Service, Inc., 6 B.R. 1019 (D.C.Del.1990); 1 Collier on Bankruptcy, 113.02 . . . be waived, and is waived by him unless timely objections are interposed.” 1 Collier on Bankruptcy, 113.02 . . .
. . . corporation’s domicile is generally held to be its state of incorporation.” 1 King COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY 113.02 . . .
. . . 935, 938 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1985); In re Butcher, 46 B.R. 109, 112 (Bankr.N.D.Ga.1985); 1 Collier, supra, 113.02 . . . In re Lionel Corp., 24 B.R. 141, 143 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1982); 1 Collier, supra, at 113.02[4][a], at 3-153 . . .
. . . The authorities are split on this issue. 1 Collier on Bankruptcy 113.02[4][d][ii] (15th ed. 1988). . . .
. . . Id. 113.02, at 29. . . .
. . . predecessor in the context of the Bankruptcy Act, former Bankruptcy Rule 116(a). 1 COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY, 113.02 . . .
. . . cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1092, 94 S.Ct. 722, 38 L.Ed.2d 549 (1973); Bittker & Eustice, supra n. 40, at 113.02 . . .
. . . The trial court went on to say that “[t]here is no evidence of an intent that 113.02 would relieve Singer . . .
. . . Turner, Antitrust Law ¶ 316, 57-58 (1978); J. von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws & Trade Regulation ¶ 113.02 . . .
. . . (See 113.02). . . .
. . . Antitrust Law ¶ 316 at 57-58 (1978); see also J. von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws & Trade Regulation § 113.02 . . .
. . . See, In re Powell, 29 B.R. 346 (Bankr.Colo.1983); 1 Collier on Bankruptcy, 113.02(e), at p. 3-171 (15th . . . limitation is In re Powell, supra, which relies upon the House Report and 1 Collier on Bankruptcy, 113.02 . . .
. . . Casad, Jurisdiction in Civil Cases 113.02[2][b][ix] at 3-83 to 3-88 (1983); 2 J. Moore, J. . . .
. . . See generally 3 Moore’s Federal Practice 113.02 at p. 13-17 (1983). . . .
. . . See also 1 Collier, supra, 113.02[6][e]. . . .
. . . without interference with substantial justice.” 8 Moore’s Federal Practice 113.03, at 13-6; see also id. 113.02 . . .
. . . was correctly subjected to a per se rule. 15 Von Kali-nowski, Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation § 113.02 . . .
. . . See generally, 6 Cavitch, Business Organizations, § 113.02[2] at 19-20 (1977). . . . .
. . . 78.02, 103, 104, 105.01, 105.02, 106.01, 106.02, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112.01, 112.02, 113.01 and 113.02 . . .
. . . Assessments were made against Cape Ann Machinery Co. in the amounts of $2,714.97 for income tax for 1947, $3,-113.02 . . .
. . . The libelant acknowledges to have received on account of his wages the sum of $113.02, and there remains . . .