The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS

Chapter 113
COMMISSIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 113.07

113.07 Bond by surety company; when required.—

(1) When public officials, not honorary, either state, county or district, are required to post fidelity or performance bonds, such bonds must be written by surety companies authorized by law to do business in the state.

(2) The provisions of this law do not apply to deputy sheriffs, notaries public, or special process servers appointed to serve process under the provisions of s. 48.021.

(3) The cost of the premium on such bond must be paid out of the General Revenue Fund of the state or out of the county or out of the various districts, depending upon the class in which such officer belongs. If any excess premium over the base premium rate is charged in the procurement of the bonds, such excess premium must be paid by the individual officer or official.

History.—ss. 1, 2, 3, 4, ch. 20523, 1941; s. 2, ch. 76-263; s. 18, ch. 98-34.

F.S. 113.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 113.07 on Casetext

Amendments to 113.07

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 113.07

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 113.07.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

GROUND AIR TRANSFER, INC. d b a v. WESTATES AIRLINES, INC., 899 F.2d 1269 (1st Cir. 1990)

. . . Dolan, supra p. 2, 113.07[4], at 3-26 to 3-28. . . .

TRI- STATE GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION ASSOCIATION, INC. v. SHOSHONE RIVER POWER, INC. a, 874 F.2d 1346 (10th Cir. 1989)

. . . Nickles, Common Law and Equity under the Uniform Commercial Code, 113.07[2][b][ii] (1985). . . .

In VALLEY PARK GROUP, INC., 96 B.R. 16 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 1989)

. . . Id. at 113.07. . . .

THOMSEN, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., 608 F. Supp. 1244 (S.D. Iowa 1985)

. . . Lucas, Moore’s Federal Practice, 113.07[4-3-2] (2d ed. 1985). . . .

VAN CLEEF H. O. v. AEROFLEX CORPORATION, a, 657 F.2d 1094 (9th Cir. 1981)

. . . See also 2 Moore’s Federal Practice 113.07[2], at 3-50. . . .

N. TAPPY, v. STATE W. S. BYINGTON,, 82 So. 2d 161 (Fla. 1955)

. . . such bonds “shall be conditioned upon the faithful discharge of the duties of his office”; and Section 113.07 . . . Section 113.07, supra. . . . jurisdiction that the sufficiency of a corporate surety now required on all official bonds under Section 113.07 . . .

In KING, 46 F.2d 115 (N.D.W. Va. 1930)

. . . Va., containing 113.07 acres, more or less. . . .