The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS

Chapter 115
LEAVES OF ABSENCE TO OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 115.01

115.01 Leave of absence for military service.—Any county or state official of the state, subject to the provisions and conditions hereinafter set forth, may be granted leave of absence from his or her office, to serve in the volunteer forces of the United States, or in the National Guard of any state, or in the regular Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force of the United States, when the same shall be called into active service of the United States during war between the United States and a foreign government.

History.—s. 1, ch. 7393, 1917; RGS 400; CGL 465; s. 732, ch. 95-147; s. 2, ch. 2016-216; s. 4, ch. 2022-183.

F.S. 115.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 115.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 115.01

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 115.01

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 115.01.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MARSHALL v. CITY OF FARMINGTON HILLS, a, 693 F. App'x 417 (6th Cir. 2017)

. . . Civil Jury Instruction 115.01; Mitchell v. . . .

C. S. McCROSSAN CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 946 F. Supp. 2d 851 (D. Minn. 2013)

. . . P. 115.01. . . . .

MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION OF OKLAHOMA, v. UNITED STATES,, 103 Fed. Cl. 210 (Fed. Cl. 2011)

. . . . §§ 115.01-115, 1001 and 25 U.S.C. § 177 to administer the trust assets with the greatest skill and . . .

ROSEBUD SIOUX TRIBE, v. UNITED STATES,, 102 Fed. Cl. 429 (Fed. Cl. 2011)

. . . . §§ 115.01-115.1001 and 25 U.S.C. § 177 to administer the trust assets with the greatest skill and care . . .

RACINE CHARTER ONE, INC. D B A v. RACINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 424 F.3d 677 (7th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 115.01(3). . . . own administration would suggest that the otherwise unmentioned entity falls squarely within Section 115.01 . . .

NIGHTCLUB MANAGEMENT, LTD. v. CITY OF CANNON FALLS,, 95 F. Supp. 2d 1027 (D. Minn. 2000)

. . . Rule 115.01 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure provides that ‘‘[t]he appeal period and . . .

WORKMAN, v. UNITED FIXTURES COMPANY,, 116 F. Supp. 2d 885 (W.D. Mich. 2000)

. . . Michigan SJI2d, § 115.01. . . .

In GRABILL CORP. A. STEINBERG, v. NCNB NATIONAL BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA,, 135 B.R. 101 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1991)

. . . C, p. 32, 115.01(a)-(c); see NCNB Exhibit No. . . .

In BROAD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,, 125 B.R. 707 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1991)

. . . Article IV, ¶ 4.03; Article V, 115.01 Class 4 consists of the debtor’s limited partners who will receive . . .

DRAKE v. LOCHINVAR WATER HEATER, INC. a a HONEYWELL, INC. v. WAGONER WATER HEATER CO. INC., 618 F. Supp. 549 (D. Minn. 1985)

. . . . §§ 115.01-.22 (1984). . . .

WHITE AND WHITE, INC. Co. v. AMERICAN HOSPITAL SUPPLY CORPORATION,, 540 F. Supp. 951 (W.D. Mich. 1982)

. . . sustained was “by reason of” the defendant’s violation of the antitrust laws. 15 Von Kalinowski, supra § 115.01 . . .

A. BONJORNO, M. Jr. K. Co. v. KAISER ALUMINUM CHEMICAL CORP., 518 F. Supp. 102 (E.D. Pa. 1981)

. . . acts alone may have contributed to the plaintiff’s injury. 15 Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation § 115.01 . . . of damages is not as great as in other kinds of lawsuits.” 15 Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation § 115.01 . . .

GRAVES v. BARNES REGESTER v. BULLOCK MARRIOTT v. SMITH, ARCHER v. SMITH A. ESCALANTE v. WHITE GASKIN v. WHITE L. CHAPMAN v. W. WHITE, Jr., 446 F. Supp. 560 (W.D. Tex. 1977)

. . . That part of Tarrant County included in census tracts 115.01, 115.02, 217.-01, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223 . . .

UNITED STATES v. R. ADCOCK,, 558 F.2d 397 (8th Cir. 1977)

. . . Moore’s Federal Practice 115.01[3] at 15-8 (1976). See also United States v. . . .

INDEX FUND, INC. v. R. HAGOPIAN FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK v. P. ADAMS, 417 F. Supp. 738 (S.D.N.Y. 1976)

. . . , Krekstein, Horwath & Horwath, 378 F.Supp. 112 (S.D.N.Y.1974); Jacobs, The Impact of Rule 10b-5, ¶ 115.01 . . .

RESERVE MINING COMPANY, a v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY D. RESERVE MINING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES UNITED STATES v. RESERVE MINING COMPANY RESERVE MINING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES STATE OF WISCONSIN, v. RESERVE MINING COMPANY MINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL LAW INSTITUTE, INC. v. UNITED STATES STATE OF MICHIGAN, v. RESERVE MINING COMPANY, 514 F.2d 492 (8th Cir. 1975)

. . . . § 115.01(5) as contamination which renders waters “impure so as to be actually or potentially harmful . . .

PANITCH, a a a v. STATE OF WISCONSIN, 390 F. Supp. 611 (E.D. Wis. 1974)

. . . Stats, § 115.01 et seq., was enacted. . . .

K. ATWOOD, B. P. H. v. KERLIN,, 169 F. Supp. 135 (S.D.N.Y. 1957)

. . . .: $115.01 under the Stanolind lease and $1,435.24 under the Magnolia —a total of $1,550.25 and not $15,854.55 . . .

C. v., 40 B.T.A. 32 (B.T.A. 1939)

. . . The book value of the corporation’s net assets on December 15, 1933, was $346,869.42 or $115.01 per share . . .