Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 122.32 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 122.32 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 122.32

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS
Chapter 122
STATE AND COUNTY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 122.32
122.32 Repealer.It is the legislative intent that members of this system be provided with social security coverage only in pursuance of the method prescribed herein for becoming members of division B, anything in chapter 650 to the contrary notwithstanding, provided however that the officials and employees of any county or counties which have prior to June 19, 1957, elected to accept social security under the provisions of chapter 650 shall not be affected hereby; provided further, all present and future employees of such counties shall remain in or become members of division A as provided in s. 122.01 of the State and County Officers and Employees’ Retirement System; and chapter 29968, Acts of 1955, chapter 410, Florida Statutes, are hereby repealed; and provided, that nothing contained in the provisions of this law shall repeal or in any way affect chapter 23259, Laws of 1945, as amended.
History.s. 2, ch. 57-382.

F.S. 122.32 on Google Scholar

F.S. 122.32 on Casetext

Amendments to 122.32


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 122.32
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 122.32.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

n ORTIZ- OSORIO, v. MUNICIPALITY OF LO ZA,, 128 F. Supp. 3d 442 (D.P.R. 2015)

. . . . §§ 122.32, 122.33(a). . . .

ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER, INC. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, v. v., 319 F.3d 398 (9th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 122.32(a). .Support for this claim is also found in ACORN v. . . . See 40 C.F.R. § 122.32(a) (applying the Rule to federal, state, local, and tribal MS4 operators). . . .

D. SORENSON v. CONCANNON,, 161 F. Supp. 2d 1164 (D. Or. 2001)

. . . following rates for each of these years: 1991: $109.32 1992: $112.62 1993: $115.94 1994: $118.97 1995: $122.32 . . .

STATE v. EVANS,, 620 So. 2d 802 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . It contained 122.32 grams of marijuana, scales, and rolling papers. . . .

ARMSTRONG, v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT,, 810 F. Supp. 335 (D.D.C. 1993)

. . . . §§ 1220.54, 1222.10, 1222.20, 122.32, 122.50. . . .

PETERS, v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION,, 966 F.2d 1483 (D.C. Cir. 1992)

. . . We note that under section 122.32 of the U.S. . . . See United States Postal Service Domestic Mail Manual § 122.32, at 55 (Mar. 1992). . . .

J. E. Co. v., 62 Cust. Ct. 536 (Cust. Ct. 1969)

. . . in item 688.40) and that they thus can not be properly classified under schedule Y, subpart F, item 122.32 . . .

A. BOARDMAN E. J. E. v. UNITED STATES, 376 F.2d 895 (Ct. Cl. 1967)

. . . In June 1955 the plaintiffs, both of them experienced real estate developers and builders, bought 122.32 . . .

COE A. BOARDMAN AND MARTHA E. HIS WIFE, AND FRANK J. SMITH AND THERESE E. HIS WIFE v. THE UNITED STATES, 180 Ct. Cl. 264 (Ct. Cl. 1967)

. . . In June 1955 the plaintiffs, both of them experienced real estate developers and builders, bought 122.32 . . . 100.77 acres involved in this action are part of the plaintiffs’ original purchase on June 13, 1955, of 122.32 . . .

v., 142 Fla. 187 (Fla. 1940)

. . . Credit Corporation, for certain improvements on-the property described in the deed, in the sum of $122.32 . . .

GEORGE A. MOORE v. THE UNITED STATES, 58 Ct. Cl. 475 (Ct. Cl. 1923)

. . . Plaintiff was paid by the proper disbursing officer of the Government in December, 1921, the sum of $122.32 . . . Washington by the route actually traveled, 5,832 miles, at 4 cents per mile, amounting to $232.92, less $122.32 . . . $8.28, a total of $48.38, theretofore paid by plaintiff, and disallowed the balance of the payment of $122.32 . . . Washington at the rate of 4 cents per mile by the shortest usually traveled route, it would amount to $122.32 . . .

JOHN HOGAN v. THE UNITED STATES, 43 Ct. Cl. 158 (Ct. Cl. 1908)

. . . 3,058 miles, at 4 cents per mile; and, if the claimant is entitled to recover, the amount due him is $122.32 . . .