The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Fourteenth Amendments, (4) the Ordinance is void because it was enacted in violation of Florida Statutes § 125.66 . . . certified this question to the Florida Supreme Court: Whether, for purposes of Florida Statutes section 125.66 . . . constitutional attack on the pertinent Florida statute, and so the constitutionality of Florida Statutes § 125.66 . . .
. . . Because section 163.346 incorporates only the public notice requirements of sections 166.041(3)(a) and 125.66 . . . Finally, section 125.66(2), which applies to counties, provides in relevant part: (a) ... . . . This public notice is subject to the standards set forth in section 166.041(3)(a) or 125.66(2). . . . Although sections 166.041(3)(a) and 125.66(2) include additional procedures for enacting municipal and . . . the notice advise that interested parties may appear and be heard at the meeting. §§ 166.041(3)(a); 125.66 . . .
. . . VIII of the State Constitution, counties shall adhere to the procedures prescribed herein.” § 125.66( . . . Section 125.66(2): the Regular Enactment Procedure Section 125.66(2) governs the enactment process for . . . Section 125.66(4)(b) contains several important provisions. . . . They derive this standard from the language of section 125.66(4)(b). . . . They are required only for regular ordinances, which are governed by section 125.66(2). . . .
. . . Among their claims, Plaintiffs contend that Monroe violated Florida Statutes section 125.66 when it made . . . Florida Statutes section 125.66 sets out the procedures under which a county is empowered to enact an . . . because Monroe amended the Ordinance during the enactment process in a manner that violated section 125.66 . . . The district court concluded that Monroe did not violate section 125.66. . . . Section 125.66(4)(b) states, in part: In cases in which the proposed ordinance or resolution changes . . .
. . . Section 125.66, Fla. . . . Stat. § 125.66(4)(b). . . . that defendant did not comply with Section 125.66. . . . Fla Stat. § 125.66(4)(b)(2). . . . Rather, defendant complied with all notice and hearing requirements of § 125.66. . . . .
. . . Judgment as to whether Ordinance is void ab initio because enacted in violation of Florida Statutes § 125.66 . . . Florida Statutes § 125.66 governs the procedures by which a county is empowered to enact ordinances. . . . Prior to enacting the Ordinance, and pursuant to the requirements of § 125.66, Defendant advertised and . . . Plaintiffs argue that Defendant did not comply with § 125.66 because it failed to properly notice public . . . Stat. §§ 125.66 and 125.68). . . .
. . . the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community under proceedings as provided in s. 125.66 . . .
. . . Count VIII); and the ordinances were enacted improperly and in violation of Florida Statutes section 125.66 . . .
. . . 163.3184(15)(c) for such plan amendments if the local government complies with the provisions in s. 125.66 . . . notice by publication of a public hearing are required to all affected property owners under section 125.66 . . .
. . . interior structure of a btdlding an ordinance that “affects the use of land” within the meaning of Section 125.66 . . .
. . . In accordance with Section 125.66(2), Florida Statutes, a certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed . . .
. . . to procedures established in section 166.041, Florida Statutes (1991), and not pursuant to section 125.66 . . . Section 125.66(1) enumerates the procedures a county must follow when enacting an ordinance. . . . Section 125.66(1) specifically states that “in exei’cising the ordinance-making powers conferred by s . . . We find that the County properly enacted the ordinance pursuant to procedures established in section 125.66 . . .
. . . Section 125.66, Florida Statutes (1993), does not provide clear guidance for county governments in determining . . . INTERIOR STRUCTURE OF A BUILDING AN ORDINANCE THAT “AFFECTS THE USE OF LAND” WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 125.66 . . . argue that the ordinance was either a zoning law or a land-use ordinance within the meaning of section 125.66 . . . relatively minor changes in the interior of the building makes the ordinance a “land-use regulation.” § 125.66 . . . indicates that the conduct portions of the Broward County ordinance can stand even though the section 125.66 . . . governs the enactment of municipal zoning ordinances, not county ordinances which are governed by section 125.66 . . . Chapter 90-152 amends only section 125.66 which covers county ordinances. . In A.B.T. Corp. v. . . .
. . . . § 125.66 Fla.Stat.; § 125.68 Fla.Stat. . . . Section 125.66 Fla.Stat. provides in pertinent part: (1) In exercising the ordinance-making powers conferred . . .
. . . Sections 125.66(6) and 163.3194(2) specify procedures that a county board of commissioners must observe . . . First, section 125.66(6) does not require that an ordinance qualify as a zoning ordinance in order to . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 125.66(6) (“Ordinances ... initiated by the board of county commissioners ... which do . . . They thus appear to “affect the use of land” within the meaning of section 125.66(6). . . . Defendants rely on then-arguments made in connection with section 125.66(6). . . .
. . . erred in ruling that Ordinance 91-5 did not affect the use of land within the meaning of subsection 125.66 . . . Florida Statutes (1991), did not create a de facto change in zoning within the meaning of subsection 125.66 . . . (5) or (6), and was properly enacted as a general ordinance in accordance with subsections 125.66(1) . . . Recognizing there is no reported case law construing this operative language in subsection 125.66(6), . . . There is nothing so mysterious about the phrase “affects the use of land” as used in subsection 125.66 . . .
. . . remaining claims are that the zoning ordinances are void for failure to comply with Florida Statutes §§ 125.66 . . .
. . . this Court’s resolution is whether Ordinance 88-10 is a zoning ordinance within the meaning of section 125.66 . . . hearing held on February 16, 1988 did not conform to the form advertisement as required by section 125.66 . . . for the second public hearing again did not conform to the form advertisement as required by section 125.66 . . . (App 32) (emphasis supplied) In that under section 125.66 the only time two public hearings are mandated . . . Section 125.66(6), Fla. Stat. (1990). . . .
. . . . § 125.66(2). . . . Section 125.66(2) does not in any way require that the Board make a determination as to the legitimacy . . . Section 125.66(2), Florida Statutes, states: The regular enactment procedure shall be as follows: The . . .
. . . . — Contrary to the Board’s suggestion, §125.66, Fla. . . .
. . . project as defined in s. 125.011, either within or without the territorial boundaries of the county. 125.66 . . . enacted the ordinance on November 1,1977, pursuant to the emergency procedure contained in Section 125.66 . . .
. . . were as follows (1958 and 1959 figures): Sales — 51.8 and 60.4 mcf/customer; Revenues — $112.59 and $125.66 . . .
. . . to you, members of the jury, would the newspapers have reported $1,175 if the actual theft was $1,-125.66 . . .