Cases from cite.case.law:

MOJICA, v. STATE, 192 So. 3d 1271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . The State also concedes that the trial court erred when it imposed a $125.72 fine and $6.28 surcharge . . .

HEADRICK, v. STATE, 72 So. 3d 233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . should be entered to reflect that the trial court struck the regional counsel fee of $200, the fine of $125.72 . . .

UNITED STATES v. GARCIA,, 954 F.2d 12 (1st Cir. 1992)

. . . Once there, Zuleta said that his “boss” had agreed to lower the price; in turn, Vega purchased 125.72 . . .

E. ELLIS, v. CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, a C. H. C. O, 257 F. Supp. 564 (W.D. Mich. 1966)

. . . . § 125.72; In re Edward J. . . .

GREENVILLE TEXTILE SUPPLY COMPANY, 1 B.T.A. 152 (B.T.A. 1924)

. . . $521.82; Blue Buckle Cotton Mills, $3,163.42; American Railway Express Co., $334.22; South Cotton Mills, $125.72 . . .