Cases from cite.case.law:

P. JANSEN v. AARON PROCESS EQUIPMENT CO. INC. v. LUXEMBOURG CHEESE FACTORY, INC., 149 F.3d 603 (7th Cir. 1998)

. . . .; and the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act, Ill.Rev.Stat.1991, ch. 48, §§ 138.5(a), 138.11, amended . . .

POMMIER, v. JAMES L. EDELSTEIN ENTERPRISES, a k a JLE d b a, 816 F. Supp. 476 (N.D. Ill. 1993)

. . . Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 48, ¶ 138.11 (1987). . . .

THOMPSON, v. PIZZA HUT OF AMERICA, INC., 767 F. Supp. 916 (N.D. Ill. 1991)

. . . Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 48, ¶ 138.11. . . .

MUNIE, v. STAG BREWERY, DIVISION OF G. HEILEMAN BREWING CO. INC. J., 751 F. Supp. 142 (S.D. Ill. 1990)

. . . exclusivity provision of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 48, para. 138.11 . . .

ANDERSON v. MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY, f k a, 801 F.2d 936 (7th Cir. 1986)

. . . .-1(a)(3), 138.3(1), 138.11. . . .

WAYCASTER, v. AT T TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 636 F. Supp. 1052 (N.D. Ill. 1986)

. . . See Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 48, ¶ 138.11 (1983); Rubenstein Lumber Co., 122 Ill.App.3d at 719, 78 Ill.Dec. . . .

R. BRUDNICKI, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, a, 535 F. Supp. 84 (N.D. Ill. 1982)

. . . enforcement provision of Workmen’s Compensation Act involved in Kelsay, Ill.Rev.Stat.1973, ch. 48, § 138.11 . . .

LOUCKS, v. STAR CITY GLASS COMPANY,, 551 F.2d 745 (7th Cir. 1977)

. . . the measure of the responsibility of any employer [covered by the Act], Ill.Rev.Stat.1975, ch. 48, § 138.11 . . .

GOVEDARICA, v. YELLOW CAB COMPANY, a, 216 F.2d 499 (7th Cir. 1954)

. . . Secs. 138.7 to 138.11, chap. 48, Ill.R.S. 1951. . . .

CHARLES L. CHARLEBOIS v. THE UNITED STATES, 54 Ct. Cl. 183 (Ct. Cl. 1919)

. . . We think this reasoning conclusive, and that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the sum of $138.11. . . .