The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . The two complaints assert that Commerce cannot lawfully apply to Plaintiffs the China-wide rate of 154.07% . . . , the court sustains Commerce's application of FA and AFA as well as the resultant separate rate of 154.07% . . . were otherwise entitled to a separate rate, see id. cmt. 3, Commerce imposed the China-wide rate of 154.07% . . . Here, Commerce permissibly imposed an AFA rate of 154.07% and, as such, the Department's Final Results . . . the best of their ability to produce the Export Service Agreements, Commerce imposed an AFA rate of 154.07% . . .
. . . The two complaints assert that Commerce cannot lawfully apply to Plaintiffs the China-wide rate of 154.07% . . . , the court sustains Commerce's application of FA and AFA as well as the resultant separate rate of 154.07% . . . were otherwise entitled to a separate rate, see id. cmt. 3, Commerce imposed the China-wide rate of 154.07% . . . Here, Commerce permissibly imposed an AFA rate of 154.07% and, as such, the Department's Final Results . . . the best of their ability to produce the Export Service Agreements, Commerce imposed an AFA rate of 154.07% . . .
. . . On June 4, 2013, Commerce entered an antidumping duty order on xanthan gum from China at a rate of 154.07% . . .
. . . Pursuant to section 154.07 of the SCRs, id. at A209, on August 19, 2011, the FHWA retained a portion . . .
. . . Authorization was given, and on May 31, 2005, Northwestern sent two refund checks to Kenneth: (1) $154.07 . . . After Kenneth’s death, Wilson, Kenneth’s wife, received the first refund check for $154.07, dated May . . . onward, closed the ISA as of May 29, 2005, and refunded the balance for those months in the amount of $154.07 . . .
. . . for May through November, 2005, closed the ISA as of May 29, 2005, and refunded the account balance ($154.07 . . . Wilson received the first refund check— for $154.07 — after Kenneth’s death, see Wilson Facts ¶ 10, and . . . Policy beyond backdating his ‘last payment’ of May 2005 as evidence by the premium refund check of $154.07 . . .
. . . home county would be responsible for payment. 442 So.2d at 1046. .Chapter 73-102, Laws of Florida [154.07 . . .
. . . . §§ 154.07 et seq. Fla.Stat. (1977). On September 13,1976, Mr. . . .
. . . and continuously thereafter until he shall have paid the cost of this proceeding in the amount of $154.07 . . .
. . . that time, from point of departure to destination, would have amounted to $566.16, a difference of $154.07 . . .
. . . testimony, 308.7 cubic yards, and. according to the testimony of some of the witnesses for the plaintiffs, 154.07 . . . cubic yard; and that this contract authorized the engineer to require the contractors to construct 154.07 . . .