Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 154.07 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 154.07 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 154.07

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 154
PUBLIC HEALTH FACILITIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 154.07
154.07 Public health trusts; creation.There may be created in and for each county of the state a public body corporate and politic, to be known as the “public health trust” of such county, for the purpose of exercising the powers described herein with respect to “designated facilities” as that term is hereinafter defined. No trust created hereunder shall transact any business or exercise any powers until the governing body of the county of such trust shall, by proper resolution, declare that there is a need for such trust to function and shall appoint the members thereof.
History.s. 1, ch. 73-102.

F.S. 154.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 154.07 on Casetext

Amendments to 154.07


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 154.07
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 154.07.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

DEOSEN BIOCHEMICAL LTD. USA, A. H. A. Co. v. UNITED STATES, CP US,, 301 F. Supp. 3d 1372 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2018)

. . . The two complaints assert that Commerce cannot lawfully apply to Plaintiffs the China-wide rate of 154.07% . . . , the court sustains Commerce's application of FA and AFA as well as the resultant separate rate of 154.07% . . . were otherwise entitled to a separate rate, see id. cmt. 3, Commerce imposed the China-wide rate of 154.07% . . . Here, Commerce permissibly imposed an AFA rate of 154.07% and, as such, the Department's Final Results . . . the best of their ability to produce the Export Service Agreements, Commerce imposed an AFA rate of 154.07% . . .

DEOSEN BIOCHEMICAL LTD. USA, A. H. A. Co. v. UNITED STATES, CP US,, 307 F. Supp. 3d 1364 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2018)

. . . The two complaints assert that Commerce cannot lawfully apply to Plaintiffs the China-wide rate of 154.07% . . . , the court sustains Commerce's application of FA and AFA as well as the resultant separate rate of 154.07% . . . were otherwise entitled to a separate rate, see id. cmt. 3, Commerce imposed the China-wide rate of 154.07% . . . Here, Commerce permissibly imposed an AFA rate of 154.07% and, as such, the Department's Final Results . . . the best of their ability to produce the Export Service Agreements, Commerce imposed an AFA rate of 154.07% . . .

INNER MONGOLIA JIANLONG BIOCHEMICAL CO. LTD. v. UNITED STATES, CP US,, 279 F. Supp. 3d 1332 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2017)

. . . On June 4, 2013, Commerce entered an antidumping duty order on xanthan gum from China at a rate of 154.07% . . .

TIDEWATER CONTRACTORS, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 131 Fed. Cl. 372 (Fed. Cl. 2017)

. . . Pursuant to section 154.07 of the SCRs, id. at A209, on August 19, 2011, the FHWA retained a portion . . .

WILSON, v. NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 625 F.3d 54 (2d Cir. 2010)

. . . Authorization was given, and on May 31, 2005, Northwestern sent two refund checks to Kenneth: (1) $154.07 . . . After Kenneth’s death, Wilson, Kenneth’s wife, received the first refund check for $154.07, dated May . . . onward, closed the ISA as of May 29, 2005, and refunded the balance for those months in the amount of $154.07 . . .

WILSON, v. NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 603 F. Supp. 2d 705 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . for May through November, 2005, closed the ISA as of May 29, 2005, and refunded the account balance ($154.07 . . . Wilson received the first refund check— for $154.07 — after Kenneth’s death, see Wilson Facts ¶ 10, and . . . Policy beyond backdating his ‘last payment’ of May 2005 as evidence by the premium refund check of $154.07 . . .

DADE COUNTY, a v. AMERICAN HOSPITAL OF MIAMI, INC. a, 463 So. 2d 232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . home county would be responsible for payment. 442 So.2d at 1046. .Chapter 73-102, Laws of Florida [154.07 . . .

COWELL, v. FULLER,, 362 So. 2d 124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . . §§ 154.07 et seq. Fla.Stat. (1977). On September 13,1976, Mr. . . .

STATE THE FLORIDA BAR, v. A. FORDHAM,, 143 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 1962)

. . . and continuously thereafter until he shall have paid the cost of this proceeding in the amount of $154.07 . . .

CHARLES E. SCHAFF, RECEIVER OF THE RAILROAD AND PROPERTY OF THE MISSOURI, KANSAS TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY OF TEXAS, v. THE UNITED STATES, 58 Ct. Cl. 87 (Ct. Cl. 1923)

. . . that time, from point of departure to destination, would have amounted to $566.16, a difference of $154.07 . . .

SALT LAKE CITY v. SMITH, 104 F. 457 (8th Cir. 1900)

. . . testimony, 308.7 cubic yards, and. according to the testimony of some of the witnesses for the plaintiffs, 154.07 . . . cubic yard; and that this contract authorized the engineer to require the contractors to construct 154.07 . . .