Cases from cite.case.law:

FRIENDS OF ANIMALS, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, U. S., 383 F. Supp. 3d 1112 (D. Or. 2019)

. . . . § 154.10. . . . For example, § 154.10 states that "[t]he administrator may evaluate a pesticide under the criteria of . . . See, e.g. , 40 C.F.R. § 154.10 (1987) (petitioning to initiate Special Review). . . . unreasonable adverse effects on the environment,' see 7 U.S.C. § 136d ; see also 40 C.F.R. §§ 154.1(a), 154.10 . . .

ELLIS, v. HOUSENGER, LP,, 252 F. Supp. 3d 800 (N.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . . § 154.10; see also 40 C.F.R. § 154.7 (identifying "criteria for initiation of Special Review”). . . .

SHARP, v. PROFITT, 674 F. App'x 440 (6th Cir. 2016)

. . . Roger’s Thesaurus § 154.10, p. 89-90 (4th ed. 1977); Webster’s Sd New Nat’l Dictionary 886 (defining . . .

SOLOMON, v. J. VILSACK,, 763 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2014)

. . . Larson, Employment Discrimination § 154.10, at p. 154-105 & n. 25 (2d ed. 2014) (“In addition to the . . .

DIVERSEY, v. SCHMIDLY, 738 F.3d 1196 (10th Cir. 2013)

. . . .”); 2 Melville Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 8.11[B][4][d] at 8-154.10 (2013) (“No consummated . . .

SANOFI- AVENTIS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, S. A. Co. KG v. GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS INC. USA, 821 F. Supp. 2d 681 (D.N.J. 2011)

. . . parties agree that, based on the jury award of lost profits, the calculation of supplemental damages is $154.10 . . .

COALITION FOR A SUSTAINABLE DELTA v. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, 812 F. Supp. 2d 1089 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . . § 154.10). . . .

FLAGSHIP WEST, LLC, v. EXCEL REALTY PARTNERS, L. P., 758 F. Supp. 2d 1004 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . Flagship cites 6 Matthew Bender, California Real Estate Law & Practice, § 154.10[1], that a triple net . . .

WASHINGTON TOXICS COALITION s v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY USA s v. s v. s v. Of s, 413 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 154.10. . . . See 40 C.F.R. § 154.10. . . .

MANGINO, v. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY, 818 F. Supp. 1432 (D. Kan. 1993)

. . . grant plaintiff a personal interview as required under 32 CFR §§ 154.3(r), 154.8(h)(i)(l) and (2), 154.10 . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE v. ADMINISTRATOR, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY a DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE v. ADMINISTRATOR, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY a, 882 F.2d 1294 (8th Cir. 1989)

. . . . § 154.10 (1987) (petitioning to initiate Special Review). . . .

E. MERRELL, v. THOMAS,, 807 F.2d 776 (9th Cir. 1986)

. . . . § 154.10. . . .

DRAKE v. PERRIN, a a B. a, 593 F. Supp. 1176 (E.D. Pa. 1984)

. . . Counsel has here submitted an affidavit claiming a total of 154.10 hours. . . .

W. BANKSTON, v. STRATTON- BALDWIN COMPANY, INC., 441 F. Supp. 247 (S.D. Ala. 1977)

. . . earnings reveals: Protective Services, 1976, $110.00; Professional Security, 1976, $148.20; Otasco, 1976, $154.10 . . .

JAMES v. H. RAGIN,, 432 F. Supp. 887 (W.D.N.C. 1977)

. . . made the monthly payments to Wachovia Mortgage Company on the first deed of trust in the amount of $154.10 . . . has continued to make the monthly mortgage payments to Wachovia Mortgage Company in the amount of $154.10 . . . of $6,165.40 and 17 months’ payments (November 1975 to March 1977) to Wachovia Mortgage Company at $154.10 . . .

RATIGAN v. AMERICAN UNITED LIFE INS. CO., 37 F. Supp. 15 (E.D. Mich. 1941)

. . . to defendant’s rate book, the rate of premium on the desired policy during the first few years was $154.10 . . . Schulte agree that the annual premium was $154.10? Yes. Conclusions of Law 1. . . .

NEWELL, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 66 F.2d 102 (7th Cir. 1933)

. . . Indiana inheritance tax, the preferred stock was appraised at $75 per share and the common stock at $154.10 . . .

W. E. C. v., 25 B.T.A. 773 (B.T.A. 1932)

. . . respectively, of the total, were returned for estate-tax purposes at $75 per share for the preferred and $154.10 . . . preferred stock was returned for inheritance-tax purposes at a value of $75 per share and the common at $154.10 . . .