Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 161.29 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 161.29 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 161.29

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 161
BEACH AND SHORE PRESERVATION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 161.29
161.29 Benefit categories or zones.Upon adoption of a reasonably final plan of improvement for the beach and shore preservation program for the entire county, the board of county commissioners shall conduct, through the use of personnel competent and qualified in this field, an economic analysis of the proposed program, determining the nature and extent of benefits expected to accrue from the program and allocating these benefits to their proper recipients by categories or zones of comparable benefits, and place in the same zone areas of equal benefit, or follow such other method as may be deemed suitable for the purposes of this section. From time to time, the board of county commissioners shall conduct in the same or similar manner a new analysis to better determine and allocate actual or expected benefits.
History.s. 1, ch. 65-408.

F.S. 161.29 on Google Scholar

F.S. 161.29 on Casetext

Amendments to 161.29


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 161.29
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 161.29.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

ADJUSTACAM, LLC, v. NEWEGG, INC., 861 F.3d 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

. . . argument that Ad-justaCam’s per-unit settlement amounts were so varied (between $0.10 per unit and $161.29 . . .

TILMAN v. UNITED STATES,, 644 F. Supp. 2d 391 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . Plaintiffs claim a “home-office” deduction for their purchase of a(l) rug ($161.29), (2) cabinet for . . .

DIAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. a v. F. HURST v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE TELEGRAPH CO. a, 536 So. 2d 258 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . east-west measurement of Lot 65 was 645.15 feet, and that the quarter portions of the lot each measured 161.29 . . . lot therefore would measure 645.15 feet, and the east half of the east half of the lot would measure 161.29 . . .

H. c., 23 How. Pr. 373 (U.S.D.C. 1862)

. . . It is agreed between the parties that this order will embrace the sum of $161.29, and it is therefore . . .