The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

Chapter 162
COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 162.02

162.02 Intent.—It is the intent of this part to promote, protect, and improve the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the counties and municipalities of this state by authorizing the creation of administrative boards with authority to impose administrative fines and other noncriminal penalties to provide an equitable, expeditious, effective, and inexpensive method of enforcing any codes and ordinances in force in counties and municipalities, where a pending or repeated violation continues to exist.

History.—s. 1, ch. 80-300; s. 2, ch. 82-37; s. 1, ch. 85-150; s. 1, ch. 86-201; s. 1, ch. 89-268.

Note.—Former s. 166.052.

F.S. 162.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 162.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 162.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 162.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 162.02.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

AURARIA STUDENT HOUSING AT THE REGENCY, LLC, a v. CAMPUS VILLAGE APARTMENTS, LLC, a, 843 F.3d 1225 (10th Cir. 2016)

. . . type of violation involved.” 8 Julian O. von Kalinowski et al., Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation, § 162.02 . . .

RITE AID CORP. v. AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES CO. INC., 708 F. Supp. 2d 257 (E.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . at 338-339, 91 S.Ct. 795; 8 Julian O. von Kalinowski et al., Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation § 162.02 . . . Three Phoenix Co., 813 F.2d 234, 237 (9th Cir.1987); see 8 Kalinowski § 162.02[2]. . . .

MONROE COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT, v. L. CARTER,, 14 So. 3d 1019 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . .” § 162.02. . . .

MATHIEU, v. CITY OF LAUDERDALE LAKES,, 961 So. 2d 363 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . .” § 162.02, Fla. Stat. (2003). . . .

BROWARD COUNTY, v. RECUPERO,, 949 So. 2d 274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . . § 162.02, Fla. Stat. (2001). . . .

In RELAFEN ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 286 F. Supp. 2d 56 (D. Mass. 2003)

. . . See Julian O. von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation § 162.02[2] (2d ed.2003). . . .

PLEASURES II ADULT VIDEO, INC. v. CITY OF SARASOTA, 833 So. 2d 185 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 162.02, Florida Statutes (1997), authorizes the creation of such boards “to impose administrative . . .

MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, v. BROWN,, 814 So. 2d 518 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . administrative boards to impose penalties where a violation of its code and ordinance exists, Florida Statutes § 162.02 . . .

ASTORIA ENTERTAINMENT, INC. v. W. EDWARDS, J. Jr. L. L. C. Dr., 159 F. Supp. 2d 303 (E.D. La. 2001)

. . . Julian O. van Kalinowski, Peter Sullivan & Maureen McGuirl, 8 ANTITRUST LAWS AND TRADE REGULATION, § 162.02 . . .

P. VERDI, Jr. v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, a, 684 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Part I of Chapter 162 (or the “Local Government Code Enforcement Boards Act”) as evinced in sections 162.02 . . . Section 162.02 reads: It is the intent of this part to promote, protect, and improve the health, safety . . .

C. MISKIN, v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, a, 661 So. 2d 415 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . .” § 162.02, Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

A. DEMURA L. v. COUNTY OF VOLUSIA, a, 618 So. 2d 754 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Section 162.02, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

CITY OF GAINESVILLE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD, v. J. LEWIS L., 536 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Section 162.02. . . .

W. c., 14 Fla. 565 (Fla. 1874)

. . . Interest on same five years,.................... 343.20 Due on fi. fa..........................'....... 162.02 . . . defendant’s counsel, only two of which, however, were sustained by the court, to wit: that the credit of $162.02 . . .