Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 162.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 162.10 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 162.10

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 162
COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 162.10
162.10 Duration of lien.No lien provided under the Local Government Code Enforcement Boards Act shall continue for a period longer than 20 years after the certified copy of an order imposing a fine has been recorded, unless within that time an action is commenced pursuant to s. 162.09(3) in a court of competent jurisdiction. In an action to foreclose on a lien or for a money judgment, the prevailing party is entitled to recover all costs, including a reasonable attorney’s fee, that it incurs in the action. The local governing body shall be entitled to collect all costs incurred in recording and satisfying a valid lien. The continuation of the lien effected by the commencement of the action shall not be good against creditors or subsequent purchasers for valuable consideration without notice, unless a notice of lis pendens is recorded.
History.s. 9, ch. 82-37; s. 9, ch. 86-201; s. 9, ch. 89-268; s. 5, ch. 94-291; s. 2, ch. 2000-125.

F.S. 162.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 162.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 162.10


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 162.10
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 162.10.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, a v. J B MOTEL CORP. N. A. N. A. F. S. B. f k a, 213 So. 3d 1102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Section 162.10, titled “Duration of Lien,” provides, in pertinent part, that: No lien provided under . . . within that time an action is commenced pursuant to s. 162.09(3) in a court of competent jurisdiction. § 162.10 . . . Thus, when read in conjunction with section 162.09(3), the plain language of section 162.10 establishes . . . Although the plain language implications of the statute of limitations as outlined in section 162.10 . . . Employing this same logic to a reading of section 162.10, it is plain that the applicable statute of . . .

LOWE, v. SPORICIDIN INTERNATIONAL,, 47 F.3d 124 (4th Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 162.10(a)(5)(ix).” . . .

COUNTY COLLECTION SERVICES, INC. a v. ALLEN,, 650 So. 2d 650 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . . § 162.10, Fla.Stat. (1993). REVERSED AND REMANDED. HERSEY, GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur. . . .

BROWN, v. UNITED STATES,, 32 Fed. Cl. 509 (Fed. Cl. 1994)

. . . . § 162.10. . . .

KENNAN, v. DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY,, 717 F. Supp. 799 (M.D. Fla. 1989)

. . . . § 162.10(a) Pursuant to the regulations promulgated under FI-FRA, the EPA not only specifies the particular . . . warning language required, see 40 C.F.R. § 162.10(a)(1), but also the type size, see 40 C.F.R. § 162.10 . . . (a)(2)(ii)(A), color, see 40 C.F.R. § 162.10(a)(2)(ii)(B), and placement, see 40 C.F.R. § 162.10(a)(4 . . .

EARL BRACE SONS, v. CIBA- GEIGY CORPORATION,, 708 F. Supp. 708 (W.D. Pa. 1989)

. . . conspicuous because it was inside the sealed carton attached to the plastic containers, in violation of § 162.10 . . .

N. COX, Sr. Co- v. VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, 704 F. Supp. 85 (E.D. Pa. 1989)

. . . . § 162.10(h) (1987). . . .

I. OLIVER, S. J. F. v. FORT WAYNE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, INC. G. J. H. P. T. K. A., 651 F. Supp. 778 (N.D. Ind. 1986)

. . . ALDRICH $ 0 $162.10 $162.10 2. GERALD L. ANDERSON 193.50 211.50 405.00 3. RALPH J. . . . ANDERSON 0 162.10 162.10 4. CAROL F. AYRES 0 211.50 211.50 5. MARITA A. . . . DENNY 0 162.10 162.10 60. DAN A. DICKEY 193.50 211.50 405.00 61. SHARON L. . . . TOM 0 162.10 162.10 270. ROBERT W. TRAMMEL 0 211.50 211.50 271. RITA A. . . .

In BEVERLY HILLS FIRE LITIGATION., 639 F. Supp. 915 (E.D. Ky. 1986)

. . . 2/19/85 Palm Court lounge -22.67 #10 2/20/85 Palm Court lounge 8.33 #16 2/21/85 Orchids Restaurant 162.10 . . .

PANHANDLE COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION, BRIDGEPORT, NEBRASKA, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 771 F.2d 1149 (8th Cir. 1985)

. . . . § 162.10(e) (1981). . . .

AERO- MASTER, INC. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,, 765 F.2d 746 (8th Cir. 1985)

. . . . § 162.10(a)(4). . . .

MONSANTO COMPANY, v. RUCKELSHAUS,, 753 F.2d 649 (8th Cir. 1985)

. . . . §§ 162.6— 162.10 (1984). . . .

In GAS METERS ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 500 F. Supp. 956 (E.D. Pa. 1980)

. . . Reiser $ 95.00 COSTS INCURRED Telephone $ 22.40 Photocopies $ 24.20 Travel & Meals $115.50 TOTAL $162.10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. DOBIE,, 444 F.2d 417 (4th Cir. 1971)

. . . Section 162.10 of 32 C.F.R. provides that: ‘In Class I-A shall be placed every registrant who has failed . . .

R. BLACK, C. C. a v. DENVER UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK,, 362 F.2d 38 (8th Cir. 1966)

. . . second installment was applied toward payment of the balance of the principal of the Black note ($1,-162.10 . . .

v., 42 B.T.A. 1200 (B.T.A. 1940)

. . . Leeoh: Respondent has determined deficiencies in income tax of $410.02 and $162.10 for the fiscal years . . .