Cases from cite.case.law:

CITY OF VENICE, v. L. GWYNN,, 76 So. 3d 401 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Section 162.11, Florida Statutes (2009), authorizes an aggrieved party to appeal a final administrative . . .

G. HARDIN, v. MONROE COUNTY,, 64 So. 3d 707 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 162.11, Fla. . . .

MONROE COUNTY, v. M. CISNEROS,, 49 So. 3d 801 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . that court while the court had pending before it the Cisneros’ statutorily authorized appeal, see § 162.11 . . .

MANSEAU, M. v. CITY OF MIRAMAR a, 395 F. App'x 642 (11th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 162.11. . . .

CITY OF MIAMI, a v. CORTES, 995 So. 2d 604 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 162.11, Fla. . . .

SCHWARZ, a I, V, v. CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND,, 544 F.3d 1201 (11th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 162.11; Code § 2-169, on September 9, 2005, Schwarz, along with Gulf Coast Recovery and several Jane . . .

CITY OF OCALA, v. V. GARD, 988 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . § 162.11, Fla. . . .

ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., 598 F. Supp. 2d 199 (D.P.R. 2008)

. . . Courtney, 186 U.S. 342, 22 S.Ct. 833, 46 L.Ed. 1193 (1902); 11 Couch on Insurance 3D (1998), §§ 162.11 . . .

CITY OF PALM BAY v. PALM BAY GREENS, LLC,, 969 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Section 162.11, Florida Statutes, specifically authorizes appeals of final administrative orders of enforcement . . .

SARASOTA COUNTY, v. BOW POINT ON GULF CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPERS, LLC, a, 974 So. 2d 431 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . . §§ 26.012(1), 162.11, Fla. Stat. (2005); Fla. R.App. P. 9.030(c)(1)(C). . . . Under section 162.11, an appeal of the code enforcement board’s order to the circuit court "shall not . . .

SCHWARZ, v. CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND,, 521 F. Supp. 2d 1307 (M.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . Finally, Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint seeks to appeal the August 25, 2005 hearing pursuant to Section 162.11 . . . procedural due process rights pursuant to the United States and Florida Constitutions and Sections 162.11 . . .

ROSEBUD SIOUX TRIBE, a v. UNITED STATES,, 75 Fed. Cl. 15 (Fed. Cl. 2007)

. . . . § 162.11 (1998); (9) with certain exceptions, any sublease, assignment, amendment or encumbrance must . . .

UNITED STATES v. MASTERCASES OF CIGARETTES, MORE OR LESS, v. v., 448 F.3d 1168 (9th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 162.11 allows Customs officers “lawfully on any premises and [] able to identify merchandise which . . .

KONIKOV, v. ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, D., 410 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . Stat. ch. 162.11. . . .

WILSON, Sr. v. COUNTY OF ORANGE,, 881 So. 2d 625 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Second, failure to file an appeal to the circuit court pursuant to section 162.11, Florida Statutes, . . . Section 162.11, Florida Statutes, provides for an appeal of CEB final orders, which has been held to . . . Monroe County, 582 So.2d 721, 721 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (holding that appeal under section 162.11 was proper . . .

I. MASSEY W. v. CHARLOTTE COUNTY,, 842 So. 2d 142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . . § 162.11, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

HOYT, v. STATE, 810 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See § 162.11, Fla. Stat. (2001). An appeal now is untimely. . . .

L. KIRBY, v. CITY OF ARCHER,, 790 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . The City’s lien arose from fines imposed pursuant to sections 162.06-162.11, Florida Statutes (1997), . . . final order of the Board, his remedy was to file an appeal in the circuit court pursuant to section 162.11 . . . an appeal to the circuit court from a final order of an enforcement board taken pursuant to section 162.11 . . .

RICHBON, INC. v. MIAMI- DADE COUNTY,, 791 So. 2d 505 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Review of a code enforcement board’s decision by the circuit court is by appeal pursuant to section 162.11 . . .

ROSS, v. CITY OF ORLANDO,, 141 F. Supp. 2d 1360 (M.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . . § 162.11) requires dismissal of his claim. Neither argument is well-founded. . . .

A. ROBINSON W. v. CITY OF TAMPA, a P. a k a L. a k a, 982 F. Supp. 1465 (M.D. Fla. 1997)

. . . As a result'of the Board’s decision, and pursuant to Section 162.11, Florida Statute, Plaintiffs appealed . . . an appeal to the circuit court from a final order of an enforcement board taken pursuant to Section 162.11 . . .

J. BAGGS S. v. CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA,, 958 F. Supp. 586 (M.D. Fla. 1997)

. . . The complaint contained counts ■ for injunction and declaratory relief pursuant to Florida Statute § 162.11 . . .

MICHAEL D. JONES, P. A. v. SEMINOLE COUNTY,, 670 So. 2d 95 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . .§§ 162.06; 162.07; 162.11, Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

MASTRANGELO, v. CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG,, 890 F. Supp. 1025 (M.D. Fla. 1995)

. . . The pertinent language of Ordinance 19-68 is identical to the language of Florida Statute § 162.11. . . . Section 162.11 addresses an aggrieved party’s right to appeal a local government’s enforcement board’ . . . Court of Appeal of Florida has addressed the scope of an appeal brought pursuant to Florida Statute § 162.11 . . . an appeal to the circuit court from a final order of an enforcement board taken pursuant to Section 162.11 . . .

P. McMURTRY, v. CITY OF LARGO,, 837 F. Supp. 1155 (M.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . Chapter 162.11, Florida Statutes, allows a party to an enforcement board action to appeal the final administrative . . . from reading section 525 of the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act in conjunction with section 162.11 . . .

CITY OF PLANTATION, a v. M. VERMUT H., 583 So. 2d 393 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . See section 162.11, Fla.Stat. . . .

HOLIDAY ISLE RESORT MARINA ASSOCIATES v. MONROE COUNTY,, 582 So. 2d 721 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . of certiorari which seeks review of two circuit court orders dismissing appeals taken under Section 162.11 . . . an appeal to the circuit court from a final order of an enforcement board taken pursuant to Section 162.11 . . .

KENT D. KEHR, P. C. v. ARONOWITZ,, 750 F. Supp. 400 (E.D. Mo. 1990)

. . . The $360.25 in expenses remaining will be divided among the defendants, $97.27 to Jack Aronowitz, $162.11 . . .

DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE v. ADMINISTRATOR, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY a DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE v. ADMINISTRATOR, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY a, 882 F.2d 1294 (8th Cir. 1989)

. . . . § 162.11 (1976). . . .

BENLINE, v. CITY OF DELAND,, 731 F. Supp. 464 (M.D. Fla. 1989)

. . . . § 162.11 (1988). See also Casines v. Murchek, 766 F.2d 1494, 1498-99 (11th Cir.1985). . . .

CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD, v. A. CHEFAN,, 504 So. 2d 815 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Foremost Dairies, Inc., 128 So.2d 586, 592-93 (Fla.1961); and Section 162.11, Florida Statutes (1985) . . .

CITY OF DELAND, v. BENLINE PROCESS COLOR COMPANY, INC., 493 So. 2d 26 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . The circuit court was acting in its capacity as an appellate court pursuant to section 162.11, Florida . . .

BADGER, v. TOWN OF DAVIE,, 449 So. 2d 963 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . prejudice upon the following grounds: That the present proceeding is governed by the provisions of § 162.11 . . .

ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, INC. v. M. COSTLE, FLORIDA CITRUS MUTUAL, v. M. COSTLE,, 631 F.2d 922 (D.C. Cir. 1980)

. . . . § 162.11 (1978). . 43 Fed.Reg. 29,824 (1978). . 7 U.S.C. § 136(b) (1976). .7 U.S.C. § 136d(d) (1976 . . .

MOBAY CHEMICAL CORPORATION, v. M. COSTLE,, 447 F. Supp. 811 (W.D. Mo. 1978)

. . . before October 21, 1976, and the pesticide does not meet or exceed the criteria for risk set forth in § 162.11 . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. MOLT, Jr., 444 F. Supp. 491 (E.D. Pa. 1978)

. . . . § 162.11. . . .

RECHSTEINER, III, v. MADISON FUND, INC. a, 75 F.R.D. 499 (D. Del. 1977)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 38.17 at 162.11 (1976). . . . .