The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

Chapter 162
COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 162.13

162.13 Provisions of act supplemental.—It is the legislative intent of ss. 162.01-162.12 to provide an additional or supplemental means of obtaining compliance with local codes. Except as provided in s. 162.06(1)(b), nothing contained in ss. 162.01-162.12 shall prohibit a local governing body from enforcing its codes by any other means.

History.—s. 11, ch. 82-37; s. 3, ch. 2021-167.

F.S. 162.13 on Google Scholar

F.S. 162.13 on Casetext

Amendments to 162.13

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 162.13

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 162.13.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

BEY, v. CITY OF TAMPA CODE ENFORCEMENT,, 607 F. App'x 892 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . §§ 162.01-162.13 (authorizing municipalities to adopt a code enforcement system that gives special . . .

In DIAMOND BEACH VP, LP, s s v. J. s, 506 B.R. 701 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . cost of the common amenities ($8,657,342.00) and the marketable portion of the common areas ($7,816,-162.13 . . .

MONROE COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT, v. L. CARTER,, 14 So. 3d 1019 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Part I, sections 162.01-162.13, establishes the pleading and proof requirements for an administrative . . . findings by imposing Part II, sections 162.21-162.30, pleading requirements to a Part I, sections 162.01-162.13 . . .

BROWARD COUNTY, v. RECUPERO,, 949 So. 2d 274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . property were imposed pursuant to the Local Government Code Enforcement Boards Act, sections 162.01-162.13 . . .

ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. X. ST. MARTIN, St., 128 F. Supp. 2d 368 (E.D. La. 2000)

. . . point; THENCE, N5312'25"E, a distance of 190.44 feet to a point; THENCE, N5156'43"E, a distance of 162.13 . . .

M. WARR, v. UNITED STATES,, 46 Fed. Cl. 343 (Fed. Cl. 2000)

. . . . § 162.13; 25 C.F.R. § 171.17(b). . . .

GOODMAN, v. COUNTY COURT IN BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, 711 So. 2d 587 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . , in its appellate capacity, found that the county court had jurisdiction under sections 162.09 and 162.13 . . . The third district determined that under section 162.13, Florida Statutes (1983), a municipality could . . .

METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, a v. A. HERNANDEZ,, 708 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . See sections 162.13, 162.21(8), Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . Next, section 162.13 establishes the supplemental nature of the “Part I” procedures— they “shall [not . . .

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE TROOPERS, INC. v. D. PREATE, Jr., 832 F. Supp. 894 (M.D. Pa. 1993)

. . . . § 162.13(b) apply. . . .

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE TROOPERS, INC. v. D. PREATE, Jr., 825 F. Supp. 1228 (M.D. Pa. 1993)

. . . . § 162.13(b) (Purdon’s 1992 Supp.) applies to charitable organizations which do their own solicitation . . . Also, the only difference between § 162.9(h) and § 162.13(b) is, obviously, that of the professional . . . In fact, § 162.13(b) requires the further disclosure, if requested, of the name and address of a representative . . . whom inquiries may be .addressed, and a source from which a financial statement may be obtained. § 162.13 . . .

L. THOMAS, v. STATE, 614 So. 2d 468 (Fla. 1993)

. . . See §§ 162.13, 162.21(8), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

M. DEEHL, v. WEISS,, 505 So. 2d 529 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Section 162.13, which was then added, provides: Provisions of act supplemental. — It is the legislative . . . Significantly, the Legislature added section 162.13 to the statute, which otherwise remained essentially . . .

Co. v., 4 Cust. Ct. 652 (Cust. Ct. 1940)

. . . Dortmunder. 2/10/37 603.82 3/18/37 0.26850 162.13 B-9-2a. . . .

Co. v., 4 Cust. Ct. 542 (Cust. Ct. 1939)

. . . . 888.93-_ 12/10/36 $0.257611 $237.79 B — 9—8a_ Dortmunder. 2/10/37 Rms. 603.82.. 3/18/37 $0.26850 $162.13 . . .

SCOFIELD v. UNITED STATES BOND, 174 F. 1 (6th Cir. 1909)

. . . The result was a verdict for the plaintiff for the $-162.13, with interest from the date of Ivelleher . . .