The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 163.355. In March, 2005, the U.S. . . . Stat. § 163.355 fits the definition of an aggravated felony "sexual abuse of a minor" within the meaning . . . Stat. § 163.355 provided as follows: "A person commits the crime of rape in the third degree if the person . . .
. . . . § 163.355(1). . . .
. . . . § 163.355 and O.R.S. § 163.385 — criminalize sexual conduct based entirely on the age of the victim . . .
. . . “I follow the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Ba-nos-Mejia and hold that defendant’s conviction under § 163.355 . . .
. . . . § 163.355, was a categorical match for the generic federal definition of statutory rape and, therefore . . .
. . . . § 163.355, was a categorical match for the generic federal definition of statutory rape and, therefore . . .
. . . . § 163.355, criminalizes sexual conduct based entirely on age. . . .
. . . . § 163.355 (1999). . . . .
. . . Ortiz-Ibanez’s conviction for third-degree rape under Oregon Revised Statute § 163.355 is not categorically . . .
. . . Act reads: Before the governing body adopts any resolution or enacts any ordinance required under s. 163.355 . . .
. . . Segoviano Mendoza pled guilty, in February 1996, to third degree rape under Oregon Revised Statute section 163.355 . . . Segoviano Mendoza has not argued that his conviction under Oregon Revised Statute section 163.355 does . . .
. . . review attempts to raise the question of whether a conviction under Oregon Revised Statutes (“ORS”) § 163.355 . . . In 2001, Rivas pleaded guilty to felony rape in the third degree pursuant to ORS § 163.355. . . .
. . . 394 F.3d 712, 718 (9th Cir.2005) (concluding that a conviction under Oregon Revised Statute section 163.355 . . .
. . . . § 163.355. . . .
. . . ORS § 163.355. . . . Thus, the court reasons, ORS § 163.355 “contains an inherent ‘without consent’ element.” . . . But ORS § 163.355 — the crime to which Rivas pled guilty — “is a Class C felony.” . . . ORS § 163.355 is not of “similar severity and import” to murder. . . . Code Wash. § 9A.44.060 — is not analogous to ORS § 163.355. . . . petition for review raises the question of whether a conviction under Oregon Revised Statutes (“ORS”) § 163.355 . . . In 2001, Rivas pleaded guilty to felony rape in the third degree pursuant to ORS § 163.355. . . . contemporary, and common meaning” of the word “rape” to determine whether the conduct prohibited by ORS § 163.355 . . . ORS § 163.355. . . . Because ORS section 163.355 prohibits sexual activity that is both (1) unlawful and (2) without consent . . .
. . . Asberry was arrested on July 1, 1993 and charged with violating Oregon Revised Statute section 163.355 . . . Stat. § 163.355 (2003). Asberry pled guilty. . . . consider whether the district court erred in holding that a violation of Oregon Revised Statute section 163.355 . . . Because we conclude that Rape in the Third Degree, as defined by Oregon Revised Statute section 163.355 . . . Also, the conduct prohibited by section 163.355 may create a greater risk of physical injury than the . . . . §§ 163.345, 163.355 (2003). . . .
. . . part: (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in a prosecution for a crime described in ORS 163.355 . . . admissible. (2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in a prosecution for a crime described in ORS 163.355 . . .
. . . part: (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in a prosecution for a crime described in ORS 163.355 . . . admissible. (2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in a prosecution for a crime described in ORS 163.355 . . .
. . . . § 163.355 (governing body must determine that: (1) slum or blighted areas or areas with shortage of . . .
. . . . §§ 163.335, 163.355. . . . . §§ 163.335, 163.355. . . . . § 163.355. Thereafter, it may create a community redevelopment agency. § 163.356. . . .
. . . Pursuant to section 163.355, Florida Statutes (1979), a finding that a blighted area exists in a municipality . . . Under Section 163.355, prior to any municipality exercising its power of eminent domain, the governing . . . the evidence produced at trial, the prerequisites for [a] finding of necessity pursuant to Section 163.355 . . .
. . . Under Section 163.355, prior to any municipality exercising its power of eminent domain, the governing . . . upon the evidence produced at trial, the prerequisites for finding of necessity pursuant to Section 163.355 . . .
. . . Stat. 163.355 (1987), Fla. . . .
. . . Section 163.355 requires that, in order for a county or municipality to exercise the authority conferred . . .
. . . Community Development Act, §§ 163.330, et seq., Fla.Stat. (1977), no finding of necessity required by § 163.355 . . .