Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 173.13 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 173.13 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 173.13

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XII
MUNICIPALITIES
Chapter 173
FORECLOSURE OF MUNICIPAL TAX AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LIENS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 173.13
173.13 Procedure under this chapter optional.The exercise of the power and provisions conferred in this chapter shall be optional with the municipalities and shall not be mandatory upon any municipality of the state. Any municipality desiring to proceed hereunder may elect to proceed hereunder by formal action of its governing authority and by proceeding as described herein.
History.s. 8, ch. 15038, 1931; CGL 1936 Supp. 3004(9).

F.S. 173.13 on Google Scholar

F.S. 173.13 on Casetext

Amendments to 173.13


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 173.13
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 173.13.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

G. M. M. a v. KIMPSON,, 92 F. Supp. 3d 53 (E.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . condition, location, or accessibility to children, in violation of the New York City Health Code Section 173.13 . . .

WALL, v. CITY OF BROOKFIELD,, 406 F.3d 458 (7th Cir. 2005)

. . . . §§ 173.13(l)(a)l, 173.22(1), she cannot proceed under section 173.22, the petition-for-return section . . .

VALENCIA, FRANCO, v. M. LEE, 123 F. Supp. 2d 666 (E.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . (Tr. 243-46); see also New York, NY, Health Code, Title IV, § 173.13(d)(2). . . . New York, NY, Health Code, Title IV, § 173.13(d)(2) (as written prior to 1997). . . . Owens, 259 A.D.2d 272, 686 N.Y.S.2d 31 (1st Dept.1999) (holding that § 173.13 benefits general public . . . Feb. 24, 1999) (“[§ 173.13] was created for the benefit of all residents of New York City who live in . . . New York, NY, Health Code, Title IV, § 173.13(d)(2) (as amended, effective January 1,1997). . . .

R. VALENCIA, FRANCO, v. M. LEE, 55 F. Supp. 2d 122 (E.D.N.Y. 1999)

. . . . § 173.13. . . . Section 173.13(d)(2) does not apply to the “special benefit” of a “particular class” of persons, such . . . Owens, 259 A.D.2d 272, 686 N.Y.S.2d 31 (1st Dept. 1999) (holding that § 173.13 benefits general public . . . Feb. 24, 1999) (interpreting New York law and concluding that “[§ 173.13] was created for the benefit . . . Those cases firmly address plaintiffs’ first contention — that failure to enforce § 173.13 gives rise . . .

SANTIAGO, By MUNIZ, v. HERNANDEZ, 53 F. Supp. 2d 264 (E.D.N.Y. 1999)

. . . paint at the Apartment contained sufficiently high levels of lead to violate the New York Health Code § 173.13 . . .

GERMAN v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP., 943 F. Supp. 370 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)

. . . Health Code § 173.13(e), (d)(1). . . . Section 173.13 of the Health Code makes provision for this control. . . . On January 15, 1970, section 173.13 of the New York City Health Code was enacted. . . . only conduct of the City relevant to this action is its conduct after January 15, 1970, when section 173.13 . . .

MOUNT VERNON FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. EAST SIDE RENAISSANCE ASSOCIATES, J. a k a K. N. P. H., 893 F. Supp. 242 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . the non-volatile content of the paint resulting in violation of the New York City Health Code Section 173.13 . . .

GERMAN v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP. CAISI L. P., 885 F. Supp. 537 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . . § 173.13 and § 173.14 and 24 C.F.R. . . . Part 35 and Part 570 (claim against NYCHA and NYC does not include § 173.13 and is Part 882, not § 171.13 . . . 882.116, 882.404(c); New York City Administrative Code §§ 27-2013(h) and 27-2126(b); and 24 R.C.N.Y. §§ 173.13 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WHITMORE,, 536 F. Supp. 1284 (D. Me. 1982)

. . . . § 173.13 (1980) for certain exempt vessels, including vessels used exclusively for racing. . . .

M. MYERS, III, v. UNITED STATES, 345 F. Supp. 197 (N.D. Miss. 1972)

. . . The profit of $9,328.87 ($173.13 expenses deducted) was divided between Jefcoat and Myers, each taking . . .

SMITH v. COURY, 247 F. 168 (D. Me. 1918)

. . . $109, and an account of Hannaford Bros, of Portland for $64.13; for these two bills, amounting to $173.13 . . .