Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 185.11 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 185.11 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 185.11

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XII
MUNICIPALITIES
Chapter 185
MUNICIPAL POLICE PENSIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 185.11
185.11 Funds received by municipalities, deposit in retirement trust fund.For any municipality, chapter plan, local law municipality, or local law plan under this chapter, all state and other funds received by any municipality under the provisions of this chapter shall be deposited by the municipality immediately, and under no circumstances more than 5 days after receipt, with the board of trustees. In lieu thereof, the municipality may provide authorization to the division for the direct payment of the premium tax to the board of trustees. The board shall deposit such moneys in the Municipal Police Officers’ Retirement Trust Fund immediately, and under no circumstances more than 5 days after receipt. Employee contributions, however, which are withheld by the employer on behalf of an employee member shall be deposited immediately after each pay period with the board of trustees of the municipal police officers’ retirement trust fund. Employer contributions shall be deposited at least quarterly.
History.s. 8, ch. 28230, 1953; s. 2, ch. 61-119; s. 9, ch. 86-42; s. 51, ch. 99-1.

F.S. 185.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 185.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 185.11


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 185.11
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 185.11.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

SCHMIDT, S. S. a v. HEATHER RAMSEY, APRN- CNM LLC, L. L. C. COPIC s S. S. a v. APRN- CNM LLC, L. L. C. COPIC s, 860 F.3d 1038 (8th Cir. 2017)

. . . . § 25-21, 185.11, applies in cases such as this one where the plaintiff was not negligent. . . . Stat. § 25-21, 185.11(1) (emphasis added). The reduction requires a fact finding. . . .

RIO MAR ASSOCIATES, LP, SE, v. UHS OF PUERTO RICO, INC. d b a S., 522 F.3d 159 (1st Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 25-21, 185.11 (1992) (codifying “proportionate share” rule); N.Y. Gen. . . . Ann. § 411.182 (West 2008) (similar); Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-21, 185.11 (similar). . . .

SMITH, a v. BEST WESTERN NEW TOWER INN, a, 238 F.3d 998 (8th Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 25-21, 185.11, the district court held that BWI must pay the portion of the judgment that exceeds . . . effective date, see § 25-21,185.07, the court declined to consider “the impact, if any, of § 25-21,-185.11 . . .

In RONEMUS, RONEMUS, v. FTB MORTGAGE SERVICES,, 201 B.R. 458 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1996)

. . . the Debtors received a late notice with respect to their January 1, 1996 payment and a demand for $185.11 . . .

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CITY OF CINCINNATI, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE,, 655 F. Supp. 1504 (S.D. Ohio 1986)

. . . . § 185.11. . . . Section 185.11 sets forth the criteria making a local educational agency (LEA) eligible for assistance . . . As we understand it, basic eligibility refers only to the requirement of 45 C.F.R. § 185.11 that some . . . Section 185.11(b)(1) provides for eligibility if a district "has adopted and is implementing ... a plan . . . Moreover, a school district could be eligible for ESAA assistance under 185.11(b)(2) as long as it would . . .

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CITY OF NEW YORK v. R. HARRIS, B. S., 622 F.2d 599 (2d Cir. 1979)

. . . nondiscriminatory assignments shall, in the case of a local educational agency implementing a plan described in § 185.11 . . .

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CITY OF NEW YORK v. CALIFANO, Jr., 464 F. Supp. 1114 (E.D.N.Y. 1979)

. . . nondiscriminatory assignments shall, in the case of a local educational agency implementing a plan described in § 185.11 . . . In the case of a local educational agency implementing a plan described in § 185.11(a), such evidence . . .

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CITY OF NEW YORK v. A. CALIFANO, Jr., 584 F.2d 576 (2d Cir. 1978)

. . . ) the year in which the applicant first implemented any portion of a plan or project described in § 185.11 . . .

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CITY OF CINCINNATI v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE, REGION, 396 F. Supp. 203 (S.D. Ohio 1975)

. . . 1609(a) and (b) as implemented by the “basic grant” administrative regulations set out at 45 CFR §§ 185.11 . . . Specifically, 45 CFR § 185.11(b)U&states: “(2) A local educational agency may apply for assistance under . . . See § 185.11(c)(2). (Set out in margin). . . . such time as your District has demonstrated that it has met the eligibility requirements of Section 185.11 . . . agency accomplished or to be accomplished by the implementation of a plan or project described in § 185.11 . . .

NORTHEAST COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION, INC. v. W. WEINBERGER, HEALTH AND WELFARE COUNCIL OF CENTRAL MARYLAND, INC. v. W. WEINBERGER,, 378 F. Supp. 1287 (D. Md. 1974)

. . . obtain funds even if the former is ineligible so long as the LEA has a qualified plan pursuant to CFR § 185.11 . . . states: A program . . . designed to support the implementation of a plan or project described in § 185.11 . . .

H. GATES v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, a, 278 So. 2d 645 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . are disbursed from the State Treasury to a lawfully established municipal pension fund (F.S., Section 185.11 . . .

C. BAILEY, K. V. E. N. v. CITY OF TAMPA, a B. D., 175 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 1965)

. . . . §§ 185.11 and 185.30, F.S.A.), and used exclusively for the benefit of policemen and their dependents . . .

BOYD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 168 Ct. Cl. 579 (Ct. Cl. 1964)

. . . 195Í 1955 1956 Depreciation expense___ _$640.63 $640.63 $939.09 Insurance expense_ __ 181.44 181.44 185.11 . . . Allowable by IRS Agent. 293.76 346.87 300.00 181.43 1,122.06 S}8t}56 (55 Cadillac).. 1,099.79 . 300.00 185.11 . . . 1,584.90 (51 Chrysler & 55 Lincoln). . 780.19 300.00 185.11 1,265.30 Sub-Total__ 1,099.79 780.19 600.00 . . . 370.22 2,850.20 Disallowed (50% Personal). (549.89) (390.10) (300.00) (185.11) (1,425.10) Allowable . . . by IRS Agent. 549.90 390.09 300.00 185.11 1,425.10 7. . . .

WHITESTONE v. AMERICAN INS. UNION, 143 F. 862 (3d Cir. 1906)

. . . At the trial, the indebtedness, on account of the overdraft of $185.11, was not contested, and the court . . .