Cases from cite.case.law:

E. BROCK, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, a k a a l q F. S. a T., 21 So. 3d 844 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Section 219.08 provides that “[e]ach of the duties required to be performed or done under the provisions . . .

SHRINK MISSOURI GOVERNMENT PAC, v. ADAMS,, 5 F. Supp. 2d 734 (E.D. Mo. 1998)

. . . 1992 race for lieutenant governor, the six candidates spent $1,974,066.33, as compared to the $1,001,-219.08 . . .

H. SAFER, v. A. WOOD,, 249 F.2d 401 (9th Cir. 1957)

. . . County Clerk, as garnishee upon the second execution, to the effect: “That we have the sum of $82,-219.08 . . .

INDIANA ROLLING MILL BALING CORPORATION, v. NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 240 F.2d 74 (7th Cir. 1957)

. . . The premium on the policy in suit in the Cincinnati area would have been $284.31 as compared with $219.08 . . .

INDIANA ROLLING MILL BALING CORPORATION v. NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 141 F. Supp. 831 (N.D. Ind. 1956)

. . . Wayne, Indiana, and where the premium on the policy in suit would have been $284.31 as compared with $219.08 . . .

CAMPBELL v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 87 F.2d 128 (7th Cir. 1936)

. . . Policemen’s Fund in Milwaukee the sum of $2,804; the Employees’ Fund of Cook County, Ill., the sum of $21, 219.08 . . .